Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 1

The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 1
Result
483 for · 153 against · 32 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 July 2024, 13:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 28 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: The Left, S&D, Patriots
Official label
B10-0007/2024 – § 5/1
Vote id
169350
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 483 for, 153 against, 32 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Recalls that Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine is part of a broader set of objectives against the West, against our democracy and our values; welcomes the outcome of the NATO Summit and reiterates its belief that Ukraine is on an irreversible path to NATO membership; calls for the EU and its Member States to increase their military support to Ukraine for as long as necessary and in whatever form necessary; reiterates its previous position that all EU Member States and NATO allies should collectively and individually commit to supporting Ukraine militarily with no less than 0.25 % of their GDP annually;’ without the words ‘and reiterates its belief that Ukraine is on an irreversible path to NATO membership;’ ‘increase their military’ and ‘reiterates its previous position that all EU Member States and NATO allies should collectively and individually commit to supporting Ukraine militarily with no less than 0.25 % of their GDP annually’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 7Against 36Abst. 1No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
GreensFor 42Against 7Abst. 2No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
S&DFor 122Against 6Abst. 2No vote 6 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 67Against 4Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 165Against 0Abst. 13No vote 10 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 63Against 8Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 14Against 47Abst. 8No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 2 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 22Abst. 6No vote 1 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Anna BRYŁKA changed group, Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Tomasz BUCZEK changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Germany1300
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1900
Finland200
France1200
Greece300
Croatia300
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy2000
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta021
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal710
Romania1001
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 668 members

No vote recorded, 51

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 51 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 2 — part 3 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesSplit vote447 for, 135 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 576 voters
19 Sept 2024Final vote — text as a whole Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesFinal425 for, 131 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by EPP, S&D, Renewr · shared0.86 579 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 12 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesSeparate vote432 for, 108 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 576 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Nov 2024Final vote — text as a whole Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaFinal390 for, 135 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.86 536 voters
9 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineFinal418 for, 135 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.84 549 voters
9 Oct 2024Paragraph 22 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaSplit vote487 for, 113 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by EPP, ESNr · shared0.83 611 voters
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 14 2025 Commission report on UkraineSeparate vote435 for, 162 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESN, The Leftr · shared0.83 590 voters
17 Dec 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Military MobilityFinal493 for, 127 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.83 605 voters
11 Feb 2026Final vote Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the Ukraine Support Loan for 2026 and 2027Final458 for, 140 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.82 590 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 13 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote455 for, 68 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 540 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 5 — part 1 — The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine”. Vote, 17 July 2024. votingId 169350, reference 2024/2721(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169350 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-07-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-07-17-169350,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 1 — The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-07-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169350}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169350},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169350, reference 2024/2721(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}