Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9 to paragraph 5

The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine

Vote
Amendment 9 to paragraph 5
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 17 Jul 2024
Result
35 for · 583 against · 45 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 July 2024, 13:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 28 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0007/2024 – § 5 – Am 9
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0007
Dossier
2024/2721(RSP)
Vote id
169348
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 35 for, 583 against, 45 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 5 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 21Abst. 14No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
GreensFor 14Against 37Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
S&DFor 4Against 100Abst. 16No vote 16 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
RenewFor 2Against 71Abst. 0No vote 4 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 3Against 176Abst. 1No vote 8 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 1Against 63Abst. 6No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 3 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 3Against 20Abst. 7No vote 2 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Anna BRYŁKA changed group, Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Tomasz BUCZEK changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia001
Germany0130
France010
Hungary010
Poland030
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 56

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 56 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169348
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 — The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine”. Vote, 17 July 2024. votingId 169348, reference 2024/2721(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169348 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-07-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-07-17-169348,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 — The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-07-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169348}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169348},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169348, reference 2024/2721(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}