Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 1

The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 1
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 17 Jul 2024
Result
456 for · 166 against · 26 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 July 2024, 13:45
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 28 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: ECR
Official label
B10-0007/2024 – § 4/1
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0007
Dossier
2024/2721(RSP)
Vote id
169345
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 456 for, 166 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘reiterates its support for the peace formula presented by Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy’ and ‘urges Hungary to lift its blockade of the European Peace Facility funding for Ukraine, including the agreed reimbursement for Member States for military assistance already delivered;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 1Abst. 5No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 47Against 2Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 121Against 1Abst. 1No vote 13 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 162Against 8Abst. 5No vote 13 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 17Against 53Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
PatriotsFor 0Against 59Abst. 10No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 0No vote 2 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 1Against 20Abst. 5No vote 6 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Anna BRYŁKA changed group, Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Tomasz BUCZEK changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Germany800
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1300
Ireland400
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands700
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden300
Slovenia100
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote453 for, 178 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.90 582 voters
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 17 — part 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilSplit vote445 for, 178 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 570 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 19 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote445 for, 188 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 570 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedFinal415 for, 193 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.88 563 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeFinal386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.88 515 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote440 for, 175 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 564 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.88 574 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 88 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote447 for, 199 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 584 voters
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseFinal347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.88 475 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeFinal452 for, 176 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.87 592 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169345
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 4 — part 1 — The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine”. Vote, 17 July 2024. votingId 169345, reference 2024/2721(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169345 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-07-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-07-17-169345,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 1 — The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-07-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169345}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169345},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169345, reference 2024/2721(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}