Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from adopted text to adopted text
TA-9-2023-0425 → TA-9-2024-0318
- From
- TA-9-2023-0425 Adopted text of 22 Nov 2023
- To
- TA-9-2024-0318 Adopted text of 24 Apr 2024
- Changes
- Not comparable
- Paragraphs
- +17 added · −368 removed · 1 changed
More facts (2)
- Title (from)
- Packaging and packaging waste
- Title (to)
- Packaging and packaging waste
These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 1 of 7: Paragraphs 1–60
RemovedP9_TA(2023)0425
AddedP9_TA(2024)0318
Packaging and packaging waste
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
PE742.297
ChangedAmendments adopted by the European Parliament onlegislative 22resolution Novemberof 202324 April 2024 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and Directive (EU) 2019/904, and repealing Directive 94/62/EC (COM(2022)0677 – C9-0400/2022 – 2022/0396(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
RemovedRecital 1: (1) Products need appropriate packaging to be protected and easy to transport from where they are produced to where they are used or consumed. Prevention of barriers to the internal market for packaging is key for the functioning of the internal market for products. Fragmented rules and vague requirements cause uncertainty and additional cost to the economic operators.
Change 1
AddedThe European Parliament,
RemovedRecital 2: (2) In addition, packaging uses high amounts of virgin materials (40 % of plastics and 50 % of paper use in the Union is for packaging) and represents 36 % of municipal solid waste30. High and constantly growing levels of packaging generated as well as low levels of re-use and collection and poor recycling, present significant barriers to achieving a low-carbon circular economy. For these reasons, this Regulation should establish rules over the entire life-cycle of packaging contributing to the efficient functioning of the internal market by harmonising national measures, while preventing and reducing the adverse impacts of packaging and packaging waste on the environment and human health. By laying measures in line with the hierarchy of waste, it should contribute to the transition to a circular economy.
Added– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2022)0677),
RemovedRecital 5: (5) In line with the Green Deal33, the new Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP)34 commits to reinforcing the essential requirements for packaging in view of making all packaging reusable or recyclable by 2030, and to consider other measures to reduce (over)packaging and packaging waste, drive design for re-use and recyclability of packaging, reduce the complexity of packaging materials, introduce requirements for recycled content in plastic packaging, and assess the need for recycled content requirements for packaging made of materials other than plastic. It highlights the necessity to reduce food waste and encourages circular approaches to the use of water and commits the Commission to assess the feasibility of Union-wide labelling that facilitates the correct separation of packaging waste at source.
Added– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C90400/2022),
RemovedRecital 9 a (new): (9a) This Regulation is in line with the objectives set out in ...[the forthcoming directive on environmental claims (2023/0085(COD))], and ...[the forthcoming directive on empowering consumers in the green transition (2022/0092(COD))]. It aims to promote and support substantiated alternatives for more sustainable packaging solutions.
Added– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
RemovedRecital 11: (11) An item, which is an integral part of a product and is necessary to contain, support or preserve that product throughout its lifetime and where all elements are intended to be used, consumed or disposed of together, should not be considered as being packaging given that its functionality is intrinsically linked to it being part of the product. However, in light of the disposal behaviour of consumers regarding tea and coffee bags or soft after-use system which in practice are disposed of together with the product residue leading to the contamination of compostable and recycling streams, those specific items should be treated as packaging. This is in line with the objective to increase the separate collection of bio-waste, as required by Article 22 of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council41. Furthermore, to ensure coherence regarding end-of-life financial and operational obligations, also all coffee or tea system single-serve units necessary to contain coffee or tea should be treated as packaging.
Added– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 27 April 2023,
RemovedRecital 12: (12) In line with the waste hierarchy set out in Article 4(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC, and in line with life-cycle thinking to deliver the best overall environmental outcome, the measures provided for under this Regulation aim at reducing the amount of packaging placed on the market in terms of its volume and weight, and preventing the generation of packaging waste, especially through packaging minimisation, avoiding packaging where it is not needed, and increased re-use of packaging. In addition, the measures aim at increasing the use of recycled content in packaging, in particular in plastic packaging where the uptake of recycled content is very low, by strengthening high-quality recycling systems, thereby increasing recycling rates for all packaging and improving the quality of the resulting secondary raw materials, while reducing other forms of recovery and final disposal.
Added– having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the French Senate, the Italian Chamber of Deputies and the Italian Senate, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
RemovedRecital 12 a (new): (12a) In line with the waste hierarchy which places waste disposal through landfills as the least preferred option, the measures provided for under this Regulation should be complemented by a review of Council Directive 1999/31/EC1a with the aim to accelerate the phasing-out of landfill of packaging waste. / 1a Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (OJ L 182, 16.7.1999, p. 1).
Added– having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the committee responsible under Rule 74(4) of its Rules of Procedure and the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 15 March 2024 to approve Parliament’s position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
RemovedRecital 13: (13) Packaging should be designed, manufactured and commercialised in such a way as to allow for its re-use as many times as possible or high-quality recycling, and to minimise its impact on the environment during its entire life-cycle and the life cycle of products, for which it was designed. The Commission should be empowered the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in order to supplement this Regulation by establishing a minimum number of rotations for reusable packaging in specific packaging categories.
Added– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
RemovedRecital 15 a (new): (15a) Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) are a large family of more than 4 700 man-made chemicals in accordance with 2018 OECD definitions1a. Since their emergence in the late 1940s, PFASs have been used in an increasingly wide range of consumer products and industrial applications, from food packaging and clothing to electronics, aviation and firefighting foams. They are used for their ability to repel grease and water, as well as for their high stability and resistance to high temperatures, due to their carbon-fluorine bond. That bond is also responsible for their extreme persistence in the environment. Exposure to the most studied PFASs has been associated with a range of adverse health effects1b, including thyroid disease, liver damage, reduced birth weight, obesity, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia and reduced response to routine vaccinations, as well as increased risk of breast, kidney and testicular cancer.
Added– having regard to the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Agriculture,
RemovedRecital 15 b (new): (15b) On 27 May 2020, Denmark published Order No. 681 of May 25, 2020 ‘Executive Order on Food Contact Materials and Penal Code for Violation of Related EU Acts’ in its Official Gazette (Lovtidende A) to prohibit PFASs chemicals in food contact paper and board materials and articles. Following that example, in light of the health and environmental emergency represented by PFASs and awaiting ECHA's opinion on a wider ban on PFASs for all packaging and for other sectors all paper, cardboard food packaging containing intentionally added PFASs should not be placed on the Union market.
Added– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A9-0319/2023),
RemovedRecital 15 c (new): (15c) Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical compound used in the manufacture of materials that come into contact with food, such as reusable plastic tableware or linings for cans, mainly as a protective layer. BPA residues can migrate into food and drink and be ingested by consumers. BPA from sources other than food, including thermal paper, cosmetics and dust, can be absorbed through the skin and by inhalation.
Added1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
RemovedRecital 15 d (new): (15d) In a scientific opinion1a published in January 2015, and in light of the availability of new data EFSA's expert groups indicated that exposure to Bisphenol A was likely to have adverse effects on the kidneys and liver. The findings led EFSA experts to significantly reduce the safe level of BPA - from 50 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per day (µg/kg bw/day) to 4 µg/kg bw/day. / 1a https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3978
Added2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
RemovedRecital 15 e (new): (15e) Considering the danger posed by the presence of Bisphenol A and the risk of migration into food, the presence of intentionally added BPA should be prohibited in packaging that comes into contact with food.
Added3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
RemovedRecital 19: (19) Without prejudice to the restriction of PFAS and Bisphenol A, this Regulation should not enable the restriction of substances based on reasons of chemical safety, or for reasons related to food safety, unless there is an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment, including but not limited to the restrictions on lead, cadmium, mercury and hexavalent chromium that were already established on the basis of Directive 94/62/EC and should continue to be addressed under this Regulation, given that such restrictions are addressed under other Union legislation. It should also allow for the restriction of substances present in packaging and packaging components or used in their manufacturing processes, which negatively affect the sustainability of packaging, in particular as regards its circularity, especially re-use or recycling processes.
AddedP9_TC1-COD(2022)0396
RemovedRecital 23: (23) In order to stimulate innovation in packaging, it is appropriate to allow that packaging, which presents innovative features resulting in significant improvement in the core function of packaging and has demonstrable environmental benefits, is given limited additional time of five years to comply with the recyclability requirements. The innovative features should be justified, especially concerning the use of new or innovative materials and explained in the technical documentation accompanying the packaging.
AddedPosition of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 April 2024 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/… of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and Directive (EU) 2019/904, and repealing Directive 94/62/EC
RemovedRecital 24: (24) In order to protect human and animal health and safety, due to the nature of the packaged products and the related requirements, it is appropriate that the recyclability requirements should not apply to immediate packaging as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council50 and in Article 4(25) of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council51 , which are in direct contact with the medicinal product, of contact sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council52 of in vitro diagnostics medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council53, of contact sensitive plastic packaging for foods intended for infants and young children and food for special medical purposes covered by Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council53a as well as packaging of supplies, components, and immediate packaging components for the manufacturing of medicinal products under Directive 2001/83/EC and for veterinary medicinal products under Regulation (EU) 2019/6 where such packaging needs to comply with the quality standards of the medicinal product. These exemptions should apply until 1 January 2035. / 53a Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on food intended for infants and young children, food for special medical purposes, …
Added(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) 2025/40.)
RemovedRecital 25: (25) Some Member States are taking action to encourage recyclability of packaging through modulation of extended producer responsibility fees; such initiatives taken at the national level may create regulatory uncertainty for the economic operators, in particular where they supply packaging in several Member States. At the same time, modulation of extended producer responsibility fees is an effective economic instrument to incentivise more sustainable packaging design leading to better recyclable packaging while improving the functioning of the internal market. It is therefore necessary to harmonise criteria for the modulation of extended producer responsibility fees based on the recyclability performance grade obtained through recyclability assessment, while not setting the actual amounts of such fees and to ensure that such fees are earmarked to finance the net cost of collection, sorting and recycling of packaging. As the criteria should be related to the criteria on packaging recyclability, it is appropriate to empower the Commission to adopt such harmonised criteria at the same time as establishing the detailed design for recycling criteria per packaging categories.
RemovedRecital 28: (28) In order to ensure a high level of human and animal health protection in accordance with requirements in Union legislation and to avoid any risk to the security of supply and to the safety of medicines and medical devices safety, it is appropriate to provide for the exclusion from the obligation of a minimum recycled content in plastic packaging for immediate packaging as defined in Article 1, point 23, of Directive 2001/83/EC and in Article 4, point 25, of Regulation (EU) 2019/6, as well as for contact sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/745, for contact sensitive packaging of in vitro diagnostics medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/746 and for contact-sensitive plastic packaging of foods intended for infants and young children and food for special medical purposes covered by Regulation (EU) No 609/2013. This exclusion should also apply to outer packaging of human and veterinary medicinal products as defined in Article 1, point 24, of Directive 2001/83/EC and in Article 4, point 26, of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 in cases where it has to comply with specific requirements to preserve the quality of the medicinal product. Finally, that exclusion should apply to inks, adhesives, paints, varnishes and lacquers used on packaging and for any plastic part representing less than 5% of the total weight of the whole packaging unit.
RemovedRecital 28 a (new): (28a) In order to achieve the targets for the integration of recycled content referred to in this Regulation, the Commission should publish, no later than 31 December 2025, a report assessing the possibility of setting targets for the use of bio-based plastic raw materials in packaging in order to achieve the target up to a maximum of 50%, based on sustainability requirements.
RemovedRecital 29: (29) In order to prevent barriers to the internal market and ensure the efficient implementation of the obligations, economic operators should ensure that plastic packaging, on average per format, per manufacturing plant, and per year contains a certain minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste.
RemovedRecital 31: (31) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the rules on calculating and verifying, per post-consumer plastic waste in the packaging format, per manufacturing plant, and per year, the share of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste present, considering the environmental impact of the recycling process and establishing the format for technical documentation, the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing provisions, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council55.
RemovedRecital 33: (33) The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending the targets for mandatory recycled content in plastic packaging. In evaluating the justification of such a delegated act, the Commission should assess well-reasoned requests from natural and legal persons.
RemovedRecital 33 a (new): (33a) The Union packaging recycling market should be strengthened in order to improve the recycling rate, avoid landfill and minimise the export of waste to third countries. The development of Union recycling capacities should occur in cooperation with the sector's actors and industries, and be based on a regulated value chain allowing for quality checks, quality assurance, certification, logistics and pricing.
RemovedRecital 35: (35) The bio-waste waste stream is often contaminated with conventional plastics and the material recycling streams are often contaminated with compostable plastics. This cross-contamination leads to waste of resources, lower quality secondary raw materials and should be prevented at source. As the proper disposal route for compostable plastic packaging is becoming increasingly confusing for consumers, it is justified and necessary to lay down clear and common rules on the use of compostable plastic packaging, mandating it only when its use brings a clear benefit for the environment or for human health. This is particularly the case when the use of compostable packaging helps collect or dispose of bio-waste, for example for products where the separation between the content and packaging is particularly complex, such as tea bags or coffee pods.
RemovedRecital 36: (36) For limited packaging applications made of biodegradable plastic polymers, there is a demonstrable environmental benefit of using compostable packaging, which enters composting plants, including anaerobic digestion facilities under controlled conditions. In addition, the biodegradable waste should not lead to the presence of contaminants in the compost. To facilitate the use of compostable packaging that helps collect or dispose of bio-waste, the requirements of EN 13432 "Packaging - Requirements for packaging recoverable by composting and biodegradation - Test scheme and evaluation criteria for final acceptance of packaging" should be revised with regard to composting times, permissible levels of contamination and restrictions on the release of microplastic to allow these materials to be processed in bio-waste treatment facilities in an appropriate manner. In addition, a similar standard for home-composting should be established in the Union.
RemovedRecital 40: (40) Packaging should be designed so as to minimise its volume and weight while maintaining its ability to perform the packaging functions. The manufacturer of packaging should assess the packaging against the performance criteria, as listed in Annex IV of this Regulation. In view of the objective of this Regulation to reduce packaging and packaging waste generation and to improve circularity of packaging across the internal market, it is appropriate to further specify the existing criteria and to make them more stringent. The list of the packaging performance criteria, as listed in the existing harmonised standard EN 13428:200057, should therefore be modified. While marketing and consumer acceptance remain relevant for packaging design, they should not be part of performance criteria justifying on their own additional packaging weight and volume. However, this should not compromise product specifications for craft and industrial products and food and agricultural products that are registered and protected under the EU geographical indication protection scheme, as part of the Union’s objective to protect cultural heritage and traditional know-how, or packaging design that is subject to legal protection under Council Regulation (EC) No 6/200257a. On the other hand, recyclability, the use of recycled content, and re-use may justify additional packaging weight or volume, and should be added to the performance criteria. Packaging with double walls, false bottoms and other charact…
RemovedRecital 44: (44) It is necessary to inform consumers and to enable them to appropriately dispose of any packaging waste. The most appropriate manner to do this is to establish a harmonised labelling system based on the material composition of packaging for sorting of waste, and to pair it with corresponding labels on waste receptacles. The need for such a harmonised labelling system to be recognised by all citizens irrespective of their circumstances, such as age and language knowledge, should be a guiding factor in their design. This can be achieved through the use of pictograms with minimal language used. This would also serve to minimise the costs for translation of language used, which would otherwise be required.
RemovedRecital 44 a (new): (44a) Sorting is an essential step to ensure greater circularity of packaging. The improvement of sorting capacities, notably through technological innovations, should be encouraged in order to allow a better quality of sorting, and thus a better quality of feedstock for recycling.
RemovedRecital 49: (49) To support the implementation of the objectives of this Regulation, consumers should be protected from misleading and confusing information about packaging characteristics and its appropriate end-of-life treatment, for which harmonised labels have been established under this Regulation / (deleted)
RemovedRecital 50 a (new): (50a) An expert group should be set up with a balanced participation of representatives of Member States and all parties concerned with packaging. The group should be referred to as the "Packaging Forum" and should contribute in particular to preparing, developing and clarifying sustainability requirements, reviewing the effectiveness of established market surveillance mechanisms and assessing any self-regulatory measures.
RemovedRecital 60: (60) The problem of excessive packaging waste generation cannot be fully addressed by setting obligations on packaging design. For certain packaging types, obligations to reduce the empty space should be set on economic operators in terms of reducing the empty space when using such packaging. In case of grouped, transport and e-commerce packaging used for supply of products to final distributors or end user, the empty space ration should not exceed 40 %. In line with the waste hierarchy, it should be possible for economic operators using sales packaging as e-commerce packaging to be exempted from this obligation. That obligation shall not apply to reusable packaging.
RemovedRecital 65: (65) To incentivise waste prevention, a new concept of ‘refill’ should be introduced. Refill should be considered as a specific waste prevention measure that counts towards and is necessary for meeting the prevention targets as set out in this Regulation.
RemovedRecital 66: (66) Where economic operators offer the possibility to purchase products through refill, they should ensure that their refill stations meet certain requirements in order to ensure the health and safety of consumers. In this context, where the consumers use their own containers, the economic operators should therefore inform about the conditions for safe refill and use of those containers. In order to encourage refill, economic operators should not provide packaging free of charge or not being a part of deposit and return system at the refill stations. Economic actors should be exempted from liability for food safety problems that could arise from the use of containers provided by consumers.
RemovedRecital 67: (67) In order to reduce the increasing proportion of packaging that is single use and the growing amounts of packaging waste generated, it is necessary to establish quantitative re-use targets on packaging in sectors, which have been assessed as having the greatest potential for packaging waste reduction, namely food and beverages for take-away, large-white goods and transport packaging. This was appraised based on factors such as existing systems for re-use, necessity of using packaging and the possibility of fulfilling the functional requirements in terms of containment, tidiness, health, hygiene and safety. Differences of the products and their production and distribution systems were also taken into account. The setting of the targets is expected to support the innovation and increase the proportion of re-use and refill solutions. Single use packaging for food and beverages filled and consumed, within the premises in the HORECA sector should not be allowed. Consumers should always have the option to purchase food and beverages for take-away in reusable or their own containers at conditions not less favourable than food and beverages offered in single-use packaging. Economic operators selling food or beverages for take-away should offer consumers the option to purchase the food or beverages in their own containers and the option to purchase beverages in reusable packaging.
RemovedRecital 68: (68) To increase their effectiveness and ensure the equal treatment of economic operators, re-use targets should be placed on the final distributors. The targets should be calculated as a percentage of sales in reusable packaging within a system for re-use or, in case of transport packaging, as a percentage of uses. The targets should be material neutral. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of targets for re-use and refill, the power to adopt an implementing act in accordance with Article 291 of the Treaty on the methodology for their calculation, should be conferred to the Commission.
RemovedRecital 71: (71) To enable the verification of compliance with the re-use targets, it is necessary that the respective economic operators report to the competent authorities. Economic operators should report the relevant data for each calendar year, starting from 1 January 2030. Member States should make this data publicly available.
RemovedRecital 73 a (new): (73a) As very lightweight plastic carrier bags, below 15 microns, have a high potential to become waste and contribute to marine pollution, measures should be taken to restrict their placing on the market except for strictly necessary uses. Those plastic bags should not be placed on the market as packaging for bulk foodstuffs, except for hygienic reasons or for packaging wet bulk foodstuffs such as raw meat, fish or dairy products.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “Changes between TA-9-2023-0425 and TA-9-2024-0318”. Text, 24 April 2024. from TA-9-2023-0425, to TA-9-2024-0318. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2023-0425/compare/TA-9-2024-0318?all=1 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-04-24,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between TA-9-2023-0425 and TA-9-2024-0318}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-04-24},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2023-0425/compare/TA-9-2024-0318?all=1}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2023-0425/compare/TA-9-2024-0318?all=1},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from TA-9-2023-0425, to TA-9-2024-0318. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}