Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from resolution motion joint to adopted text

RC-9-2024-0106 → TA-9-2024-0075

From
RC-9-2024-0106 resolution motion joint of 7 Feb 2024
To
TA-9-2024-0075 Adopted text of 8 Feb 2024
Changes
3 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+4 added · −2 removed · 3 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on the situation in Serbia following the elections
Title (to)
Situation in Serbia following elections
Cite Link to this page

Changes that matter, 3

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

ChangedK. whereas voter turnout was 58.5858,58 %, slightly higher than for the previous elections, held in 2022;

Change 2

ChangedN. whereas according to the Serbian Republic Election Commission (REC) the SNS won 46.7546,75 % of the votes, while the largest opposition coalition, ‘Serbia against Violence’ won 23.6623,66 %, the Socialist Party of Serbia won 6.556,55 %, the NADA coalition won 5.025,02 %, ‘We – the Voice of the People’ won 4.694,69 % and five minority lists won a combined total of 3.683,68 %;

Change 3

ChangedQ. whereas Serbian civil society organisation CRTA carried out an in-depth analysis, based on limited data and resources, and made the very conservative estimate is that inaccuracies in the voter register account for at least 30 000 voters; whereas they have firm evidence that this inaccuracy was part of a strategy of illegal and illegitimate electoral engineering to influence the election results and distort the will of the voters; whereas people were being transported from all over Serbia and abroad (Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro) to vote in municipal elections in Belgrade; whereas even government officials and politicians from BiH openly voted in the Belgrade municipal elections; whereas the Serbian Government has defended this practice as legitimate;

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-9-2024-0106/compare/TA-9-2024-0075
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Changes between RC-9-2024-0106 and TA-9-2024-0075”. Text, 8 February 2024. from RC-9-2024-0106, to TA-9-2024-0075. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-9-2024-0106/compare/TA-9-2024-0075 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-text-2024-02-08,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between RC-9-2024-0106 and TA-9-2024-0075}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-02-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-9-2024-0106/compare/TA-9-2024-0075}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-9-2024-0106/compare/TA-9-2024-0075},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from RC-9-2024-0106, to TA-9-2024-0075. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}