Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from resolution motion joint to adopted text

RC-10-2026-0294 → TA-10-2026-0224

From
RC-10-2026-0294 resolution motion joint of 17 Jun 2026
To
TA-10-2026-0224 Adopted text of 18 Jun 2026
Changes
2 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+7 added · −2 removed · 0 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on the deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich
Title (to)
Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The new version adds recitals and a paragraph on the misuse of Article 411 of the Criminal Code of Belarus, including specific prisoner cases and a call for repeal.12

The notes class 2 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 0 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Changes that matter, 2

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

AddedD. whereas the cases of Dzianis Ivashyn, Pavel Belavus, Ihar Alinevich, Volha Mayorava, Alena Lazarchyk, Aliaksandr Frantskevich, Viktar Snehur, Eduard Babaryka, Mikalai Autukhovich, Uladzimir Hundar, Iryna Melkher, members of the Rezanovich and Karsakou families, Stsiapan Latypau, Viachaslau Areshka and many others illustrate the severe deterioration of health and the devastating consequences of inhuman detention conditions, prolonged isolation and the denial of adequate medical care;

AddedE. whereas Article 411 of the Criminal Code of Belarus has been systematically used against political prisoners to arbitrarily extend their imprisonment on the basis of fabricated disciplinary violations, creating a mechanism of indefinite detention and coercion; whereas more than 80 political prisoners have been convicted under this provision since 2020, some of them repeatedly; whereas Article 411 is used to subject detainees to blackmail, force them to seek pardons from the regime, participate in propaganda activities or cooperate with the authorities, and has become an instrument of psychological torture and political repression;

AI: Note on change 1 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds two recitals detailing cases of political prisoners with deteriorating health and condemning the systematic use of Article 411 of the Criminal Code of Belarus to extend imprisonment arbitrarily.

Report a problem

Change 2

Added4. Condemns the systematic misuse of Article 411 of the Criminal Code of Belarus as a tool for political persecution and arbitrary sentence extension; calls for its immediate repeal; demands the release and full legal rehabilitation of all persons convicted under this provision; expresses deep concern for the approximately 50 political prisoners who remain imprisoned under Article 411 and whose lives and health are at serious risk as a result of prolonged detention, solitary confinement and other forms of inhuman and degrading treatment;

AI: Note on change 2 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds a paragraph condemning the misuse of Article 411, calling for its repeal, demanding release and rehabilitation of all convicted, and expressing concern for about 50 prisoners under this article.

Report a problem

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between RC-10-2026-0294 and TA-10-2026-0224”. Text, 18 June 2026. from RC-10-2026-0294, to TA-10-2026-0224. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-10-2026-0294/compare/TA-10-2026-0224 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-06-18,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between RC-10-2026-0294 and TA-10-2026-0224}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-10-2026-0294/compare/TA-10-2026-0224}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-10-2026-0294/compare/TA-10-2026-0224},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from RC-10-2026-0294, to TA-10-2026-0224. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}