Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from resolution motion joint to adopted text

RC-10-2025-0358 → TA-10-2025-0190

From
RC-10-2025-0358 resolution motion joint of 5 Sept 2025
To
TA-10-2025-0190 Adopted text of 10 Sept 2025
Changes
None of substance
Paragraphs
+4 added · −2 removed · 0 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on governance of the internet – renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum
Title (to)
Governance of the internet – renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum

The two versions differ only in presentation: cover page, numbering, or the parts a report carries that the adopted text does not.

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 1 of 1: Paragraphs 1–29

RemovedEuropean Parliament resolution on governance of the internet – renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum

AddedP10_TA(2025)0190

Removed(2025/2801(RSP))

AddedGovernance of the internet – renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum

AddedPE776.183

AddedEuropean Parliament resolution of 10 September 2025 on governance of the internet – renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum (2025/2801(RSP))

23 unchanged paragraphs

The European Parliament,

– having regard to its resolution of 11 February 2015 on the renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum,

– having regard to the joint declaration by the EU delegation to the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) held from 23 to 27 June in Lillestrøm, Norway,

– having regard to the joint communication from the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 5 June 2025 entitled ‘An International Digital Strategy for the European Union’ (JOIN(2025)0140),

– having regard to Rule 136(2) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,

A. whereas the main role and function of the IGF is to discuss a wide range of issues related to internet governance and, where appropriate, to make recommendations to the international community;

B. whereas the purpose of the IGF is to carry out its mandate, issued by the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), of convening forums for democratic, transparent and multistakeholder policy dialogue;

C. whereas it considers that, while the IGF does not adopt formal conclusions, the insights and exchanges that take place there are meaningful in the development of digital legislation across the globe;

D. whereas the European Parliament sent an ad hoc delegation to the 2005 WSIS and has done so for every annual meeting of the IGF since, thus playing a pivotal role in promoting European values and fostering interaction with stakeholders;

E. whereas, on 26 June 2025, Commission Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen and Members of the European Parliament signed a joint declaration at the 20th IGF meeting in Lillestrøm, Norway;

F. whereas the 80th UN General Assembly, scheduled for autumn 2025, will review the IGF’s mandate, which is due to expire on 31 December 2025;

G. whereas the EU and its Member States, as well as the United States and other countries, signed the Declaration for the Future of the Internet on 28 April 2022;

H. whereas the joint communication from the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy entitled ‘An International Digital Strategy for the European Union’ underlines that the EU will continue to proactively defend the general availability and integrity of the internet as a global, interoperable network of networks, reflecting the importance of the multistakeholder model of internet governance;

1. States that the internet must be and must remain open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, secure and governed for all by all;

2. Calls on the UN General Assembly to permanently renew the mandate of the IGF, and to strengthen its resources and the multistakeholder model of internet governance;

3. Calls on the Member States and the EU institutions concerned to continue to support the IGF and its secretariat, and to contribute to its development as an efficient and independent organisation capable of exercising its mandate and contributing to the evolving model of internet governance;

4. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to increase their efforts to secure a positive outcome for the future of the IGF through a UN General Assembly resolution by the end of this year;

5. Considers that, although the IGF does not adopt formal conclusions, the EU’s responsibility is to support this process and to raise the issue of the impact of these exchanges in policy discussions, as the IGF offers a positive and specific context for shaping the internet’s future on the basis of a multistakeholder approach;

6. Stresses that Parliament intends to continue to participate in future IGF meetings with a substantial delegation in order to contribute effectively to formulating an EU approach to the governance of the internet together with the Member States and the Commission;

7. Stresses that fundamental freedoms and human rights are non-negotiable and must be protected both online and offline; strongly rejects the idea of a state- or corporate-controlled internet and mass surveillance on the internet;

8. Stresses the importance of addressing the digital divide and structural inequalities in accessing the internet; considers affordable high-speed connectivity to be essential for an inclusive digital environment that leaves no one behind;

9. Underlines the importance of preserving a single, open and interoperable internet as a global public resource and warns against and condemns any effort to fragment the internet or to replace multistakeholder governance with intergovernmental control;

10. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between RC-10-2025-0358 and TA-10-2025-0190”. Text, 10 September 2025. from RC-10-2025-0358, to TA-10-2025-0190. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-10-2025-0358/compare/TA-10-2025-0190?all=1 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-09-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between RC-10-2025-0358 and TA-10-2025-0190}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-10-2025-0358/compare/TA-10-2025-0190?all=1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/RC-10-2025-0358/compare/TA-10-2025-0190?all=1},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from RC-10-2025-0358, to TA-10-2025-0190. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}