Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

ITRE-PR-785328 → A-10-2026-0130

From: ITRE-PR-785328 report parliamentary committee draft of 16 Mar 2026
To: A-10-2026-0130 Plenary report of 7 May 2026
Changes: 3 changes to the text
Paragraphs: +0 added · −0 removed · 7 changed

More facts (3)

Dossier: 2025/0398(NLE)
Title (from): on the draft Council decision on the adoption of the Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, on the multiannual technical guidelines for this programme, on the multiannual financial guidelines for managing the assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, and repealing Decisions 2003/77/EC and 2008/376/EC
Title (to): on the draft Council decision on the adoption of the Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, on the multiannual technical guidelines for this programme, on the multiannual financial guidelines for managing the assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, and repealing Decisions 2003/77/EC and 2008/376/EC

Dossier: 2025/0398(NLE)
Title (from): on the draft Council decision on the adoption of the Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, on the multiannual technical guidelines for this programme, on the multiannual financial guidelines for managing the assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, and repealing Decisions 2003/77/EC and 2008/376/EC
Title (to): on the draft Council decision on the adoption of the Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, on the multiannual technical guidelines for this programme, on the multiannual financial guidelines for managing the assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, and repealing Decisions 2003/77/EC and 2008/376/EC

What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds conditions to Parliament's support for the RFCS final phase, requiring optimized capital disbursement and targeted funding for breakthrough technologies in vulnerable regions.2 Adds a rejection of concentrating research resources in established hubs, emphasizing geographical inclusivity for competitiveness and cohesion.3 The other change is wording: removes "European" before "Commission".1

The notes class 2 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 1 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Changes that matter, 3

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1 under “EXPLANATORY STATEMENT”

ChangedProtocol No. 37 of the EU Treaty lays down requirements for the liquidation of the ECSC assets and management of the RFCS research programme by the ~~European~~ Commission. In 2021, the RFCS legal basis was amended in line with the Treaty to allow the sale of assets to supplement the revenue earned which had become too low to support a viable research programme. The resulting annual budget of €111 million is split between coal-related research (27.2%) and steel-related research (72.8%).

Note on change 1 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes the word "European" before "Commission" in the first sentence.

Report a problem

Change 2 under “EXPLANATORY STATEMENT”

ChangedIn respect of the latest amendments to the RFCS legal basis, as proposed by the ~~European~~ Commission in December 2025, the Council of the European Union has agreed a General Approach. It is recommended that the European Parliament supports this General Approach which defines a final phase of the RFCS during which the annual budget will be increased to €120 million to support RFCS research calls from 2027 until 2034. The RFCS research programme would then come to an end around 2038, having disbursed all the remaining assets. The amendments are in line with the European Steel and Metals Action Plan of March 2025. While acknowledging the proposed operational timeline, the European Parliament conditions its support on the optimization of capital disbursement during the final phase. It is imperative that the 2027–2034 funding cycle is directly calibrated toward the deployment of breakthrough technologies in regions facing the most acute structural dependencies and transformation pressures.

Note on change 2 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds a condition that Parliament's support for the General Approach depends on optimizing capital disbursement and calibrating the 2027–2034 funding cycle toward breakthrough technologies in regions with acute structural dependencies.

Report a problem

Change 3 under “EXPLANATORY STATEMENT”

ChangedSeveral other changes are proposed that will more closely align the management of the RFCS research programme with the Horizon Europe research programme, including on financial guarantees and increased funding rates to match Horizon Europe. In accordance with the provisions of this Protocol No.37, the assets of the RFCS shall be used exclusively for research, outside the research framework programme, in the sectors related to the coal and steel industry. Therefore, in the opinion of the European Parliament, the RFCS research programme should remain industry-led, and the ~~European~~ Commission should ensure that this is the case when evaluating proposals in response to future calls following this reform. The Parliament rejects the perceived trade-off between scientific excellence and the industrial revitalization of vulnerable regions. Sustaining European competitiveness requires geographical inclusivity; a strategy that concentrates resources within established technology hubs while neglecting the primary industrial base is both structurally inefficient and detrimental to the cohesion of the internal market.

Note on change 3 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds a rejection of the trade-off between scientific excellence and industrial revitalization, stating that concentrating resources in established hubs is inefficient and detrimental to internal market cohesion.

Report a problem

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ITRE-PR-785328/compare/A-10-2026-0130
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between ITRE-PR-785328 and A-10-2026-0130”. Text, 7 May 2026. from ITRE-PR-785328, to A-10-2026-0130, reference 2025/0398(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ITRE-PR-785328/compare/A-10-2026-0130 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-text-2026-05-07,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between ITRE-PR-785328 and A-10-2026-0130}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ITRE-PR-785328/compare/A-10-2026-0130}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ITRE-PR-785328/compare/A-10-2026-0130},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from ITRE-PR-785328, to A-10-2026-0130, reference 2025/0398(NLE). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}