Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
ENVI-PR-742410 → A-9-2023-0233
- From
- ENVI-PR-742410 report parliamentary committee draft of 23 Feb 2023
- To
- A-9-2023-0233 Plenary report of 5 Jul 2023
- Changes
- 68 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +280 added · −176 removed · 38 changed
More facts (2)
- Title (from)
- on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Ambient Air quality and cleaner air for Europe (recast)
- Title (to)
- on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (recast)
Changes that matter, 68
Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.
Change 1
Changed– having regard to the opinionafter ofconsulting the Committee of the Regions of…,Regions,
Change 2
AddedA. whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the Commission proposal does not include any substantive amendments other than those identified as such in the proposal and whereas, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts together with those amendments, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance;
Change 3
RemovedRecital 4: (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged and ambitious approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing air quality standards for the year 2030 and at regular intervals beyond, and developing a perspective for continuous full alignment with the most up-to-date WHO Air Quality Guidelines in order to achieve the zero pollution objective by the year 2050 at the latest based on a regular review mechanism to take into account the latest scientific understanding. Given the links between pollution reduction and decarbonisation, the long-term objective to achieve the zero pollution ambition should be pursued hand in hand with reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as set by Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council42 .
AddedRecital 2: (2) In December 2019, the European Commission set out in its Communication ‘The European Green Deal’40an ambitious roadmap to transform the Union into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy, aiming to protect, conserve and enhance the Union’s natural capital, and to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. Specifically on clean air, the Commission committed itself to further improving air quality and to aligning EU air quality standards more closely with the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO). It also announced a strengthening of provisions on air quality monitoring, modelling and planning.
RemovedRecital 4 a (new): (4a) In September 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) released new Air Quality Guidelines, based on a comprehensive synthesis of the scientific evidence on health effects of air pollution. This Directive takes into account the latest scientific understanding on the need to fully align the Union air quality standards with the most recent WHO guidelines in order to fulfil the overall objectives of the Zero Pollution Action Plan.
AddedRecital 4: (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, an ambitious approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing air quality standards for the year 2030 and at regular intervals beyond, and developing a perspective for continuous full alignment with the most up-to-date WHO Air Quality Guidelines in order to achieve the zero pollution objective by the year 2050 at the latest based on a regular review mechanism to take into account the latest scientific evidence. Given the links between pollution reduction and decarbonisation, the long-term objective to achieve the zero pollution ambition should be pursued hand in hand with reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as set by Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council42.
RemovedRecital 5: (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal and the respect of the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment, the well-being of citizens, the fight against inequalities, the sustainability of solidarity-based social protection systems, the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart mobility and transport solutions; the impact of behavioural changes; fairness and solidarity across and within Member States, in light of their economic capability, national circumstances, such as the specificities of islands, and the need for convergence over time; the need to make the transition just and socially fair through appropriate education and training programmes; best available and most recent scientific evidence, in particular the findings r…
AddedRecital 4 a (new): (4a) In September 2021, the WHO released new Air Quality Guidelines, based on a comprehensive synthesis of the scientific evidence on health effects of air pollution. The conclusions of these Air Quality Guidelines specifically stress the importance of lowering the pollution concentrations at every level and show clear benefits for public health and the environment of such actions. This Directive takes into account the latest scientific understanding and the need to fully align the Union air quality standards with the most recent WHO Air Quality Guidelines in order to fulfil the overall objectives of the Zero Pollution Action Plan.
Show 56 more lines
RemovedRecital 8: (8) A common approach to the assessment of ambient air quality should be followed by applying common assessment criteria. When assessing ambient air quality, account should be taken of the size of populations and ecosystems exposed to air pollution. It is therefore appropriate to classify the territory of each Member State into zones reflecting the population density, while taking socio-economic and health inequalities into account.
AddedRecital 4 b (new): (4b) The societal benefits from the continued and improved reduction of air pollution far outweigh the costs involved. According to Commission estimates, the annual direct costs of complying with various policy scenarios analysed under the impact assessment accompanying this Directive are between EUR 3,3 billion and EUR 7 billion, and the monetised health and environmental benefits are between EUR 36 billion and EUR 130 billion in 2030, thereby demonstrating that benefits of the air quality policy greatly exceeded implementation cost. Since the year 2000, air-polluting emissions in the Union have steadily decreased as a result of Union and national legislation.
RemovedAmended for consistency with Recital 5, that introduces “the fight against social inequalities” in the text. According to the World Health Organization, socio-economic factors are a major health determinant. Therefore, they should be taken into account when assessing ambient air quality. https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1
AddedRecital 5: (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’, the ‘polluter pays principle’ and the ‘prevention and rectifying pollution at source principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal and the respect of the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment and ecosystem resilience, the well-being of citizens, equality and the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, healthcare costs, the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the role of civil society, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart mobility and transport solutions and their infrastructure; the impact of behavioural changes; the impact of fiscal policies; fairness and solidarity across and within Member States, in light of their economic capability, national circumstances, such as the specificities of islands, and the need for convergence over time; the need to make the …
RemovedRecital 11: (11) It is important that pollutants of emerging concern, such as ultrafine particles, black carbon and elemental carbon, as well as ammonia and the oxidative potential of particulate matter, be monitored in order to support scientific understanding of their effects on health and the environment, as recommended by the WHO, and with a view to establishing limit values for them.
AddedRecital 5 a (new): (5a) This Directive contributes to the attainment of the SDGs, in particular SDGs 3, 7, 10, 11 and 13.
RemovedRecital 12: (12) Detailed measurements of fine particulate matter at rural background locations should be made in order to understand better the transboundary contribution and the impacts of this pollutant, and to develop appropriate policies. Such measurements should be made in a manner consistent with those of the cooperative programme for monitoring and evaluation of the long range transmission of air pollutants in Europe (EMEP) set up under the 1979 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution approved by Council Decision 81/462/EEC of 11 June 198144 and its Protocols, including the Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone of 1999, which was revised in 2012 .
AddedRecital 6: (6) The ‘Eighth General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030’ adopted by Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council on 6 April 202243 establishes as one of its priority objectives to achieve a non-toxic environment protecting the health and well-being of people, animals and ecosystems from environment-related risks and negative impacts, and, for that purpose, stipulates, inter alia, that further improvement of monitoring methods, better transboundary coordination, better information to the public and access to justice are needed. This guides the objectives set in this Directive.
RemovedParticulate matter is a type of air pollution that can travel long distances in the atmosphere. Long-range transport of particulate matter contributes significantly to exposure and to health effects. This aspect should be highlighted in the text. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/78657/E88189.pdf
AddedRecital 7: (7) The Commission should regularly review the scientific evidence related to pollutants, their effects on human health and the environment, health inequalities, direct and indirect healthcare costs associated with air pollution, environmental costs, and behavioural, fiscal and technological developments. Based on the review, the Commission should assess whether applicable air quality standards are still appropriate to achieve the objectives of this Directive. The first review should be carried out by 31/12/2028 to assess whether air quality standards need to be updated based on the latest scientific information. The Commission should regularly assess the contribution of Union legislation laying down emissions standards for sources of air pollution to the achievement of the air quality standards established by this Directive and, where necessary, propose additional Union measures.
RemovedRecital 15: (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective emission reduction measures at local, national and Union level, in particular when it comes to emissions from agriculture, industries, transport, heating and energy generation. Therefore, emissions of harmful air pollutants should be avoided, prevented or reduced and appropriate standards set for ambient air quality on the basis of the latest scientific evidence as published in the most up-to-date WHO Air Quality Guidelines.
AddedRecital 10: (10) Where relevant, modelling applications should be applied to enable point data to be interpreted in terms of geographical distribution of concentration of pollutants, to help to detect breaches of air quality standards, and to inform air quality plans and air quality roadmaps and the placement of sampling points. In addition to the requirements for air quality monitoring defined in this Directive, for monitoring purposes, Member States are encouraged to exploit information products and supplementary tools (e.g. regular evaluation and quality assessment reports, policy online applications), provided by the Earth Observation component of the EU Space Programme, in particular the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS).
RemovedNew drafting for consistency with the changes made to ANNEX I and the wording used when mentioning the WHO Air Quality Guidelines and the latest scientific evidence.
AddedRecital 11: (11) It is important that pollutants of emerging concern, such as ultrafine particles, black carbon and elemental carbon, as well as ammonia and the oxidative potential of particulate matter, be monitored in order to support scientific understanding of their effects on health and the environment, as recommended by the WHO, and with a view to establishing limit values for them in the framework of the first review of this Directive in 2028. The Commission should continue to monitor scientific developments regarding any other pollutants not covered by this Directive and assess the need to extend its provisions to these pollutants.
RemovedRecital 16: (16) Scientific evidence shows that sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ozone are responsible for significant negative impacts on human health that can result in premature death, and that there is no identifiable threshold below which those substances do not pose a risk to human health. Those substances damage most organ systems and are linked to many debilitating diseases, such as childhood and adult-onset asthma, cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, stroke, diabetes, lung cancer, impaired cognitive development and dementia. Although everyone is affected by those substances, certain groups are especially sensitive and vulnerable and more likely to experience adverse health effects, such as for example those with specific pre-existing health conditions (e.g. respiratory or cardiovascular diseases), pregnant women, newborns, children, the elderly, people living in poverty, people living with disabilities or people with inadequate access to medical care. Impact on human health and the environment occurs via concentrations in ambient air and via deposition.
AddedRecital 12: (12) Detailed measurements of fine particulate matter, black carbon, mercury and ammonia at rural background locations should be made in order to understand better the transboundary contribution and the impacts of those pollutants, and to develop appropriate policies, including the possible introduction of limit values, target values or critical levels. Such measurements should be made in a manner consistent with those of the cooperative programme for monitoring and evaluation of the long range transmission of air pollutants in Europe (EMEP) set up under the 1979 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution approved by Council Decision 81/462/EEC of 11 June 198144 and its Protocols, including the Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone of 1999, which was revised in 2012 .
RemovedRecital 16 a (new): (16a) Air pollution affects the human body in the short and long term, in ways that are detrimental to health. Even though air pollution is a universal health problem that affects everyone on this planet, the risks are not evenly distributed amongst the population, with some groups of people at greater risk of harm. Vulnerable people appear to be most at risk, as highlighted by studies linking air pollution to decreased cognitive performance among the elderly as well as suggesting that poor air quality is especially dangerous to children. This Directive recognises the increased risks and specific needs of sensitive population and vulnerable groups as regards air pollution and aims at addressing and ending health inequalities caused by polluted air.
AddedAmendment in order to safeguard the internal logic of the text.
RemovedRecital 18: (18) The average exposure of the population to the pollutants with the highest documented impact on human health, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), should be reduced based on the most up-to-date WHO recommendations. To this end, an average exposure reduction obligation should be introduced for these pollutants, in addition to limit values, and should by no means serve as a substitute for those limit values, which have been demonstrated to be the most effectively enforceable standards to date.
AddedRecital 15: (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective emission reduction measures at local, national and Union level, in particular when it comes to emissions from agriculture, industries, transport, heating and cooling systems and energy generation. Relevant Union legislation such as on European vehicle emission standards or on industrial emissions are instrumental in further reducing ambient air pollution. Therefore, emissions of harmful air pollutants should be avoided, prevented or reduced and appropriate standards set for ambient air quality on the basis of the latest scientific evidence as published in the most up-to-date WHO Air Quality Guidelines and in line with the Zero Pollution Action Plan for 2050.
RemovedRecital 19: (19) The Fitness Check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC)45 has shown that limit values are more effective in bringing down pollutant concentrations than other types of air quality standards, such as target values. With the aim of minimising harmful effects on human health, paying particular attention to vulnerable groups and sensitive populations, and the environment limit values should be set for the concentration of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, ozone, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air. To ensure effective protection against harmful effects on ecosystems, those limit values should be regularly updated in light of the most recent recommendations by the WHO. Benzo(a)pyrene should be used as a marker for the carcinogenic risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air.
AddedNew drafting for consistency with the changes made to the wording used when mentioning the WHO Air Quality Guidelines and the latest scientific evidence, as well as with Annexes I and VII.
RemovedRecital 21: (21) Ozone is a transboundary pollutant formed in the atmosphere from the emission of primary pollutants, some of which are addressed by Directive 2016/2284/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council46. Ground-level ozone adversely affects not only human health but also vegetation and ecosystems, leading to decreased crop yields and forest growth, and loss of biodiversity. Progress towards the air quality limit value and long-term objectives for ozone set in this Directive should be determined by the targets and emission reduction commitments provided for in Directive 2016/2284/EU and, by implementing cost-effective measures and air quality plans .
AddedRecital 15 a (new): (15a) Agriculture is a significant source of air pollution: it accounts for around 93 % of total ammonia emissions in the Union, while the agricultural emissions of methane, the precursor of ozone ground level formation, and of particulate matter such as PM10, account for about 54 % of total emissions of this gas in the Union. Member States should take the necessary measures to reduce emissions in agriculture, alongside those in the other sectors, which could include, inter alia, measures to reduce emissions linked to livestock management, such as nitrogen management systems and low-emission animal housing systems, sustainable management of agricultural waste, sustainable crop management, precision farming, efficient use of resources and alternative energy sources.
RemovedOzone is an important air pollutant, with well-established health effects of short-term and long-term exposure and therefore commonly used in air pollution burden assessments. For that reason, the ozone target value for the protection of human health has been transformed into a limit value in the Rapporteur proposal (Annex I). Amendment to clarify the impacts of ozone pollution, in relation to the changes on the proposal.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
RemovedRecital 22: (22) The existing ozone target values of ensuring effective protection against harmful effects on human health should be updated and transformed, in light of the most recent recommendations of the World Health Organization, into a legally binding limit value in order to ensure that adequate measures to decrease ozone concentrations across the Union are taken and that the health of Union citizens is better protected.
AddedRecital 15 b (new): (15b) The Commission should assess the consistency of any relevant draft measure or legislative proposal, including budgetary proposals, with the air quality standards set out in this Directive, before adoption, and include that assessment in any impact assessment accompanying those measures or proposals, and make the result of that assessment publicly available at the time of adoption. The Commission should endeavour to align its draft measures and legislative proposals with the objectives of this Directive. In any case of non-alignment, the Commission should provide its reasons as part of the consistency assessment.
RemovedAmendment to reflect the change in the proposal of the ozone target value for protection of human into a limit value.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
RemovedRecital 23: (23) An alert threshold and an information threshold for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, should be set for the protection of the general population, and especially vulnerable groups and sensitive sections, from brief exposures to elevated concentrations of pollutants. Those thresholds should trigger the dissemination of information to the public on the associated health risks of exposure and the implementation, of short-term measures to reduce pollution levels where the alert threshold is exceeded.
AddedRecital 15 c (new): (15c) Air pollutants emitted from the transport sector pose a particular risk to the health of people living in urban areas and near transport hubs. Member States and the relevant regional and local authorities should therefore consider implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans and invest in zero-emission technologies and measures enabling a modal shift towards active, collective and sustainable transport systems, as well as the creation of green spaces and pedestrian areas in the cities with the aim to reduce air pollution and road congestion, especially in urban areas in line with the communication of the Commission of 9 December 2020 entitled ‘Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy - putting European transport on track for the future’. Member States should also take all necessary measures to accelerate the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, in particular electric recharging infrastructure for light- and heavy-duty vehicles, as well as carry out regular transport infrastructure quality checks to identify the areas in need of decongestion and infrastructure optimisation, and take appropriate measures, with the support of Union funding, where applicable.
RemovedInformation thresholds are designed to protect the vulnerable population from air pollution. Given that sensitive groups bear a disproportionate burden, it is unfounded that information thresholds are only applicable for ozone only. Amendment consistent with recommended changes to Article 15 and Annex I.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
RemovedRecital 25: (25) Air quality status should be maintained where it is already good, or improved. Where the standards for ambient air quality laid down in this Directive are at risk of not being met, or have not been met, Member States should take immediate action in order to comply with the limit values, average exposure reduction obligations, critical levels and the ozone long-term objectives.
AddedRecital 15 d (new): (15d) Air pollution from maritime transport alone leads to over 50 000 premature deaths annually in the Union1a. While the most detrimental part of maritime transport exhausts is sulphur dioxide pollution, NOx should not be forgotten. The impact of maritime transport on the environment and on coastal communities, both in terms of ecosystem damage and public health, could be alleviated with a comprehensive electrification of short-distance and urban maritime transport, in addition to zero-emission requirements and infrastructure at berth. Moreover, comprehensive coverage of the Union maritime space under sulphur emission control area (SECA) and nitrogen emission control area (NECA) zones would significantly contribute to the reduction of air pollution in ports and port cities, as well as in Union waters. / 1a Brandt, J., Silver, J. D., and Frohn, L. M., Assessment of Health-Cost Externalities of Air Pollution at the National Level using the EVA Model System, CEEH Scientific Report No 3, 2011.
RemovedAmendment to reflect the change in the proposal of the ozone target value for protection of human health into a limit value.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
RemovedRecital 29: (29) Contributions from natural sources can be assessed but can in some instances be difficult to control. However, the overall health impact of such contributions can be reduced. Therefore, where natural contributions to pollutants in ambient air can be determined with sufficient certainty, and where exceedances are due in whole or in part to these natural contributions, which are beyond the Member States’ control and could not have been anticipated or prevented, these may, under the conditions laid down in this Directive, be subtracted when assessing compliance with air quality limit values. The subtraction should be allowed provided that reasonable measures have been taken to reduce local emissions from anthropogenic sources during the episodes and to inform the population about individual actions to reduce the exposure. Moreover, Member States should be able to demonstrate the unpreventable nature of the episode. Contributions to exceedances of particulate matter limit values attributable to winter-sanding or winter-salting of roads may also be subtracted when assessing compliance with air quality limit values for particulate matter provided that all reasonable measures have been taken to lower concentrations and that the source contribution from winter-sanding and winter-salting in relation to other sources has been assessed by analyses of chemical constituents of particulate matter and the population has been informed about potential individual actions to reduce the exp…
AddedRecital 16: (16) Scientific evidence shows that sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ozone are responsible for an array of significant adverse effects on human health that can result in premature death, and that there is no identifiable threshold below which those substances do not pose a risk to human health. Those substances damage most organ systems and are linked to many debilitating diseases, such as childhood and adult-onset asthma, cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, strokes, diabetes, lung cancer, impaired cognitive development and dementia. Impact on human health and the environment occurs via concentrations in ambient air and via deposition.
RemovedScientific evidence demonstrates that air pollution from “natural” sources is also harmful to human health, for that reason it is necessary to reinforce this flexibility. Changes in the recital are necessary to ensure the consistency with changes to paragraph 2 of Article 16.
AddedRecital 16 a (new): (16a) Air pollution affects the human body, in both the short and long term, in ways that are detrimental to health. Even though air pollution is a universal health problem that affects everyone, the risks are not evenly distributed amongst the population, with some groups of people at greater risk of harm than others. Sensitive population and vulnerable groups, such as those with specific pre-existing health conditions (e.g. respiratory or cardiovascular diseases), pregnant women, newborns, children, the elderly, people living with disabilities or having inadequate access to medical care, and workers who are exposed to particularly high levels of air pollution in their profession, appear to be most at risk, as highlighted by studies linking air pollution to decreased cognitive performance among the elderly as well as suggesting that poor air quality is especially dangerous to children. Those groups should be informed and protected. This Directive recognises the increased risks and specific needs of sensitive population and vulnerable groups as regards air pollution and aims to address health inequalities caused by polluted air.
AddedRecital 16 b (new): (16b) While ambient air pollution is a major environmental health risk affecting everyone and all Member States, there is ample evidence emerging on the associations between socio-economic status and air pollution, demonstrating in particular that the health of people of lower socio-economic status tends to be more affected by air pollution than the health of the general population as a result of their both greater exposure and higher vulnerability1a. Member States should take into account such factors when drafting, implementing or updating their air quality plans or air quality roadmaps to address effectively the social aspects of air pollution and to minimise the socio-economic impacts of measures taken. / 1a Unequal exposure and unequal impacts: social vulnerability to air pollution, noise and extreme temperatures in Europe, European Environment Agency, 2018.
AddedRecital 18: (18) The average exposure of the population to the pollutants with the highest documented impact on human health, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), should be reduced based on the most up-to-date WHO recommendations. To this end, an average exposure reduction obligation should be introduced for these pollutants, in addition to limit values. The average exposure reduction obligation should complement and not substitute those limit values which have demonstrated to be the most effectively enforceable standards to date.
AddedRecital 19: (19) The Fitness Check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC)45 has shown that limit values are more effective in bringing down pollutant concentrations than other types of air quality standards, such as target values. With the aim of minimising harmful effects on human health, paying particular attention to vulnerable groups and sensitive populations, and the environment limit values should be set for the concentration of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air. To ensure effective protection against harmful effects on ecosystems, those limit values should be regularly updated in light of the most recent recommendations by the WHO. Benzo(a)pyrene should be used as a marker for the carcinogenic risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air.
AddedRecital 21: (21) Ozone is a transboundary pollutant formed in the atmosphere from the emission of primary pollutants, some of which are addressed by Directive 2016/2284/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council46. Ground-level ozone adversely affects not only human health but also vegetation and ecosystems, leading to decreased crop yields and forest growth, and loss of biodiversity. Progress towards the air quality targets and long-term objectives for ozone set in this Directive should be determined by the targets and emission reduction commitments provided for in Directive 2016/2284/EU and, by implementing cost-effective measures, air quality roadmaps and air quality plans .
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
AddedRecital 22: (22) The ozone target values and long-term objectives of ensuring effective protection against harmful effects on human health and vegetation and ecosystems from exposure to ozone should be regularly updated in light of the most recent recommendations of the World Health Organization .
AddedRecital 23: (23) An alert threshold and an information threshold for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, should be set for the protection of the general population, and especially sensitive population and vulnerable groups, from brief exposures to elevated concentrations of pollutants. Those thresholds should trigger the dissemination of information to the public on the associated health risks of exposure and the implementation, of short-term measures to reduce pollution levels where the alert threshold is exceeded. Alert and information thresholds are not set for the other regulated pollutants, as evidence on the health effects of those pollutants often considers long-term exposure effects only. In the event that scientific evidence emerges on their short-term exposure effects, the Commission should evaluate the need to introduce alert and information thresholds for those pollutants.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
AddedRecital 25: (25) Air quality status should be maintained where it is already good, or improved. Where the standards for ambient air quality laid down in this Directive are at risk of not being met, or have not been met, Member States should take immediate and continuous action in order to comply with the limit values , average exposure reduction obligations and critical levels, and to attain the ozone target values and long-term objectives
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
AddedRecital 29: (29) Contributions from natural sources can be assessed but can in some instances be difficult to control. Therefore, where natural contributions to pollutants in ambient air can be determined with sufficient certainty, and where exceedances are due in whole or in part to these natural contributions, which are beyond the Member States’ control and could not have been anticipated, mitigated or prevented, these may, under the conditions laid down in this Directive, be subtracted when assessing compliance with air quality limit values and average exposure reduction obligations. Contributions to exceedances of particulate matter limit values attributable to winter-sanding or winter-salting of roads may also be subtracted when assessing compliance with air quality limit values only when evidence is provided that all reasonable measures have been taken to lower concentrations. Subtractions of those contributions when assessing compliance with air quality limit values and average exposure reduction obligations should not prevent Member States from taking action to reduce their health impact.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
AddedRecital 29 a (new): (29a) It is crucial to systematically monitor air quality in the vicinity of air pollution hotspots where pollution level is strongly influenced by the emissions from heavy pollution sources that could expose individuals and population groups to elevated risks of adverse health effects. To that end, Member States should install sampling points in the air pollution hotspots, such as ports or airports, with the aim to improve the understanding of the impact of those sources on air pollution, and to take appropriate measures to minimise their impact on human health.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
Change 4
RemovedThe term "agglomeration" deleted for consistency, since it has been deleted at the beginning of the Recital and in the text of the COM proposal as well.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
Change 5
ChangedRecital 31: (31) Air quality plans should be developed and updated for zones within which concentrations of pollutants in ambient air exceed the relevant air quality limit values, ozone target values or average exposure reduction obligations .obligations. Air pollutants are emitted from many different sources and activities. To ensure coherence between different policies, such air quality plans should where feasible be consistent with plans and programmes prepared pursuant to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council48 ,Council48, Directive (EU) 2016/2284, and Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council49 .Council49.
Change 6
RemovedRecital 32: (32) Preparatory air quality plans should be prepared ahead of 2030 setting out measures and policies to comply with this Directive and for the Member States to attain the new limit values set out in this Directive by that date in order to ensure that levels of pollutants are reduced accordingly.
AddedRecital 31 a (new): (31a) As clarified by the case-law of the Court of Justice1a, the provisions on air quality plans do not allow the deadline for complying with air quality standards to be extended. The fact that an air quality plan has been drawn up does not, in itself, mean that a Member State has nevertheless fulfilled its obligations to ensure that levels of air pollutants do not exceed the air quality standards established by this Directive. / 1a Judgment of the Court of Justice of 10 November 2020, European Commission v Italian Republic, C-644/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:895, paragraph 154, and judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 November 2014, ClientEarth v The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, C-404/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2382, paragraph 49.
RemovedRecital 33: (33) Action plans should be drawn up indicating the measures to be taken in the short term where there is a risk of an exceedance of one or more alert thresholds in order to reduce that risk and to limit its duration. When the risk applies to one or more limit values Member States may, where appropriate, draw up such short-term action plans.
AddedRecital 32: (32) In order to align Union legislation with the latest scientific evidence and the most recent WHO Air Quality Guidelines, this Directive sets new air quality standards to be met by 2030. Member States and competent authorities should in anticipation of the 2030 deadline for new limit values laid down in Section 1, Table 1, of Annex I, develop a distinct type of an air quality plan, a so-called air quality roadmap, for zones within which concentrations of pollutants in ambient air exceed the relevant air quality limit values set for 2030. The air quality roadmap should set out short- and long-term policies and measures in order to comply with those limit values by 2030 at the latest. For the sake of legal clarity, and notwithstanding the specific terminology used, an air quality roadmap should be considered to be an air quality plan as defined in Article 4, point (36).
RemovedAmendment to reflect the change in the proposal of the ozone target value for protection of humans into a limit value.
AddedRecital 34: (34) Member States should cooperate with one another if, following significant pollution originating in another Member State, , the level of a pollutant exceeds, or is likely to exceed, any limit value, ozone target value, average exposure reduction obligation or alert threshold. The transboundary nature of specific pollutants, such as ozone and particulate matter, should require rapid coordination between neighbouring Member States in drawing up and implementing air quality plans and short-term action plans and in informing the public as soon as possible. Where appropriate, Member States should pursue cooperation with third countries, with particular emphasis on the early involvement of candidate countries. The Commission should be timely informed of and invited to assist in any such cooperation.
Show 16 more lines
RemovedRecital 34: (34) Member States should cooperate with one another if, following significant pollution originating in another Member State, the level of a pollutant exceeds, or is likely to exceed, any limit value, average exposure reduction obligation or alert threshold. The transboundary nature of specific pollutants, such as ozone and particulate matter, may require coordination between neighbouring Member States in drawing up and implementing air quality plans and short-term action plans and in informing the public. Where appropriate, Member States should pursue cooperation with third countries, with particular emphasis on the early involvement of candidate countries. The Commission should be timely informed of and invited to assist in any such cooperation.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. The amendment is linked to the changes made to Article 1.
RemovedRecital 40: (40) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Where damage to human health and well-being has occurred as a result of a violation of Articles 13, 19, 20, 21 of this Directive, Member States should ensure that the individuals affected by such violations are able to claim and obtain compensation for that damage from the relevant competent authority. This Directive has the objective to avoid, prevent and reduce harmful effects on human health and the environment from air pollution, in line with Article 191(1) TFEU. It thus seeks to integrate into the policies of the Union a high level of environmental protection and the improvement of the quality of the environment in accordance with the principle of sustainable development as laid down in Article 37 of the Charter, and puts into concrete terms the obligation to protect the right to life and to the integrity of the person, the right to private life and the right to healthcare laid down in Articles 2, 3, 7 and 35 of the Charter. It also contributes to the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal as laid down in Article 47 of the Charter, in relation to the protection of human health. In addition, it recognises and protects the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment recognised by the United Nations General Assembly in resolution A/76/L.75 dated 26 July 2022.
AddedRecital 35: (35) It is necessary for the Member States and the Commission to collect, exchange and disseminate air quality information in order to understand better the impacts of air pollution and develop appropriate policies. Up-to-date information on concentrations of all regulated pollutants in ambient air as well as air quality plans, air quality roadmaps and short-term action plans should also be readily available to the public in a coherent and easily understandable manner.
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1: 1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is progressively improved to levels no longer considered harmful to human health and natural ecosystems, as defined by the most up-to-date scientific evidence, thus contributing to a toxic-free environment at the latest by 2050.
AddedAmended to be coherent with changes in the text such as Article 19(4) and Article 15(3).
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 2: 2. This Directive sets limit values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives (‘air quality standards’) to be met by the year 2030 at the latest, and regularly reviewed thereafter in accordance with Article 3.
AddedRecital 35 a (new): (35a) The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) shows that over 40 % of adults in the Union lack basic digital skills1a. Member States should therefore ensure that information to be made public in accordance with this Directive is communicated, where relevant, also via non-digital communication channels. / 1a Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022 (https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi).
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 3 a (new): 3a. In addition, this Directive protects the individual right to breathe clean and healthy air, which follows from Articles 2, 3, 7, 35 and 37 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
AddedRecital 40: (40) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Where damage to human health and well-being has occurred as a result of a violation of Articles 13, 19, 20, 21 of this Directive, Member States should ensure that the individuals affected by such violations are able to claim and obtain compensation for that damage from the relevant competent authority. This Directive has the objective to avoid, prevent and reduce harmful effects on human health and the environment from air pollution, in line with Article 191(1) TFEU. It thus seeks to integrate into the policies of the Union a high level of environmental protection and the improvement of the quality of the environment in accordance with the principle of sustainable development as laid down in Article 37 of the Charter, and puts into concrete terms the obligation to protect the right to life and to the integrity of the person, the respect for private life and the right to healthcare laid down in Articles 2, 3, 7 and 35 of the Charter. It also contributes to the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal as laid down in Article 47 of the Charter, in relation to the protection of human health. In addition, it recognises and protects the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment as recognised by the United Nations General Assembly in resolution 76/300 of 28 July 2022.
AddedRecital 40 a (new): (40a) Rebuttable presumptions are a common mechanism for alleviating a claimant’s evidential difficulties, while preserving the rights of the defendant. Rebuttable presumptions are only applicable provided that certain conditions are fulfilled. In order to maintain a fair apportionment of risk, and to avoid a reversal of the burden of proof, a claimant should be required to demonstrate sufficiently relevant evidence, including scientific data, that give rise to a presumption that the violation has caused or contributed to the occurrence of damage. In light of the evidentiary challenges faced by injured persons, especially in complex cases, such a rebuttable presumption will achieve a fair balance between the rights of the individuals suffering from human health damage and the relevant authorities. It should also be possible to use relevant scientific data as evidence in accordance with national law. Where such relevant scientific data is not available, it should be possible to use other evidence to support the claim in accordance with national law. Considering that air quality standards are set on the basis of scientific knowledge on the harmful effects of air pollution on human health, where limit values are exceeded, air pollution becomes potentially harmful to the health and well-being of those exposed to it1a. / 1a European Court of Human Rights judgment in Fadeyeva v. Russia, 55723/00, (ECtHR, 9 June 2005), §87.
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1: 1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is progressively improved to levels no longer considered harmful to human health, natural ecosystems and biodiversity, as defined by the best available and most up-to-date scientific evidence, thus contributing to a toxic-free environment at the latest by 2050.
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 2: 2. This Directive sets limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives and critical levels, to be met as soon as possible and by the year 2030 at the latest, and regularly reviewed thereafter in accordance with Article 3. It also sets long-term objectives, information thresholds and alert thresholds as part of air quality standards.
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 3: 3. Furthermore, this Directive contributes to achieving the Union’s pollution-reduction, biodiversity and ecosystem objectives in accordance with the 8th Environment Action Programme, as set out in Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council55, as well as to enhanced synergies between the Union’s air quality policy and other relevant Union policies, in particular climate, transport and energy policies.
AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3: 3. measures for monitoring ambient air quality long-term trends and impacts of Union and national measures, as well as measures established in cooperation with third countries, on ambient air quality;
Change 7
RemovedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2: In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to ensuring continuous alignment with the most-up-to date WHO Air Quality Guidelines and the latest scientific information.
AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6: 6. measures promoting increased cooperation between Member States, regional and local authorities, within and between Member States, as well as with third countries that have a common border with the Union, in reducing air pollution.
RemovedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point a: (a) latest scientific information from WHO and other relevant scientific organisations,
AddedAmendment needed to ensure consistency in the text. In most cases, air pollution and harmful effects on human health and the environment do not stop at the border of the Member State, particularly where a production facility is located not far from the border, which means that reliable and effective ways of cooperation at cross-border level, including with candidate or non-EU countries, must be established, to enable interventions in the shortest possible time and in the most efficient manner, as also advocated in Article 4, paragraph 1, point 37
RemovedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b: (b) behavioural, fiscal and technological developments impacting air quality and its assessment,
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 1: 1. By 31 December 2028, and every 5 years thereafter, and more often if substantial new scientific findings point to the need for it, the Commission shall review the scientific evidence related to air pollutants and their effects on human health and the environment relevant to achieving the objective set in Article 1 and present a report with the main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council. The review shall be carried out without undue delay following the publication of the latest WHO Air Quality Guidelines.
Show 16 more lines
RemovedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point c: (c) air pollution levels and associated impacts on human health and the environment in Member States,
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2: In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to ensuring full and continuous alignment with the most up-to-date World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines, the most recent review by the WHO Regional Office for Europe and the latest scientific information.
RemovedArticle 3 – paragraph 4: 4. Where the Commission considers it appropriate, as a result of the review, it shall present a proposal to revise air quality standards or cover other air pollutants. Such a proposal shall be developed in line with the non-regression principle.
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point a: (a) latest scientific information from relevant Union bodies, WHO and other relevant scientific organisations,
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new): (1a) ‘air quality standards’ means limit values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds and alert thresholds;
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b: (b) behavioural changes, fiscal policies and technological developments impacting air quality and its assessment,
RemovedDefinition provided in Article 1(2). Included also here, so that all definitions are in the same article for greater clarity.
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point c: (c) air quality and associated impacts on human health and the environment in Member States,
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point c a (new): (ca) direct and indirect healthcare and environmental costs associated with air pollution as well as cost-benefit analysis,
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d a (new): (da) progress made in implementing other relevant Union legislation, in particular in the field of climate, transport and energy,
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d b (new): (db) introduction by individual Member States of more stringent air quality standards in accordance with Article 193 TFEU.
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new): The Commission shall support and work closely with the WHO Regional Office for Europe to monitor and review the scientific evidence on health effects of air pollution.
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 2 a (new): 2a. In the first regular review, by 31 December 2028, the Commission shall propose, if appropriate, limit values, target values or critical levels for the air pollutants measured by the monitoring supersites referred to in Article 10 but currently not included in Annex I. Those values or levels shall be in line with the latest scientific evidence as to what is necessary to protect human health and the environment. In the framework of the first regular review, the Commission shall publish an assessment on the possibility to convert the target value for ozone into a limit value, accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal.
AddedArticle 3 – paragraph 4: 4. Where the Commission considers it appropriate, as a result of the review, it shall present a proposal to revise air quality standards or to cover other air pollutants. Such a proposal shall be developed in line with the non-regression principle.
AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new): (1a) ‘air quality standards’ means limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds and alert thresholds;
AddedTerm used in Article 1(2). Included also here, so that all definitions are in the same article for greater clarity and consistency of the text.
Change 8
ChangedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 23: (23) ‘urban background locations’ means places in urban areas where levels are representative of the exposure of the general urban population, takingincluding socio-economicurban healthsensitive inequalitiespopulation intoand account;vulnerable groups;
Show 60 more changes
Change 9
RemovedAmended for consistency with Recital 5, Recital 16a and Article 12(4), that introduce “the fight against social inequalities” in the text.
AddedThe amendment creates coherence with the concept of "sensitive population and vulnerable groups" defined in Article 4(39).
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24 a (new): (24a) ‘traffic location’ means a place whose pollution level is determined predominantly by the emissions from nearby traffic on roads, motorways or other highways;
AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24: (24) ‘rural background locations’ means places in rural areas with low population density where levels are representative of the exposure of the general rural population, including rural sensitive population and vulnerable groups;
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made to the assessment of “Average Exposure Indicator” (AEI) in Definition 28 of Article 4, Point A in Section 5 of Annex I, and the deletion of Point B in Annex III.
AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24 a (new): (24a) ‘air pollution hotspot’ means a place where the pollution level is strongly influenced by the emissions from heavy pollution sources such as, but not limited to, nearby congested and heavily trafficked roads, motorways or other highways, a single industrial source or an industrial area with many sources, ports, airports, intensive residential heating, or a combination thereof;
Show 4 more lines
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24 b (new): (24b) ‘industrial location’ means a place whose pollution level is influenced predominantly by emissions from a nearby single industrial source or an industrial area with many sources, such as, but not limited to, sources of power generation, incinerators, waste treatment plants and ports;
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made to the assessment of “Average Exposure Indicator” (AEI) in Definition 28 of Article 4, Point A in Section 5 of Annex I, and the deletion of Point B in Annex III.
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24 c (new): (24c) ‘residential location’ means a place whose predominant use is residential, and whose concentration levels are higher than urban background locations as a result of the high use of residential heating sources in the area;
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made to the assessment of “Average Exposure Indicator” (AEI) in Definition 28 of Article 4, Point A in Section 5 of Annex I, and the deletion of Point B in Annex III.
Change 10
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 27: deleted
AddedClarification amendment. The words "not to be exceeded" are moved to the end.
RemovedAmendment to reflect the change in the proposal of the ozone target value for the protection of human health into a limit value, and for the protection of the environment into a critical level. This change is in accordance with the changes made to Table 1, Section 1 of Annex I and Section 2 of Annex I.
AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 28: (28) ‘average exposure indicator’ means an average level determined on the basis of measurements at urban background locations throughout the territorial unit at NUTS 2 level as described in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003, or, if there is no urban area located in that territorial unit, at rural background locations, and which reflects population exposure, used to check whether the average exposure reduction obligation and the average exposure concentration objective for that territorial unit have been met;
Change 11
ChangedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 28:29: (28)(29) ‘average exposure indicator’reduction meansobligation’ anmeans averagea levelpercentage determinedreduction onof the basisaverage ofexposure measurementsof atthe urbanpopulation background,, traffic,expressed industrialas andaverage residentialexposure locationsindicator, throughoutof thea territorial unit at NUTS 2 level as described in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003,1059/2003 or,of ifthe thereEuropean isParliament noand urbanof areathe locatedCouncil57 inset thatfor territorialthe unit,reference atyear ruralwith backgroundthe locations,aim andof whichreducing reflectsharmful populationeffects exposure,on usedhuman tohealth, checkto whetherbe theattained averageover exposurea reductiongiven obligationperiod and the average exposure concentration objective for that territorialnot unitto havebe beenexceeded metonce ;attained;
Change 12
ChangedAmendment for consistency with the addition of definitions 24a, 24bwording andon 24c,the anddefinition changesset madeout in Point A,Article Section4, Aparagraph of1, Annexpoint I.26.
Change 13
ChangedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 29: (29)30: ‘(30) average‘average exposure reductionconcentration obligationobjective ’ means a percentage reduction of the average exposurelevel of the population , expressed as average exposure indicator, of a territorial unit at NUTS 2 level as described in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council57indicator set for the reference year with the aim of reducing harmful effects on human health, to be attained overwithin a given period and not to be exceeded once attained;
Change 14
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the wording on definition (26).
AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 35: (35) ‘contributions from natural sources’ means emissions of pollutants not caused directly or indirectly by human activities, including natural events such as volcanic eruptions, seismic activities, geothermal activities, wild-land fires, high-wind events, sea sprays or the atmospheric re-suspension or transport of natural particles from dry regions, which the Member State concerned could not have prevented or mitigated by policy actions;
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 30: (30) ‘ average exposure concentration objective ’ means a level of the average exposure indicator to be attained within a given period, with the aim of reducing harmful effects on human health;
AddedAmendment for consistency with change in Annex I.
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made in Annex I.
AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 35 a (new): (35a) ‘air quality roadmap’ means an air quality plan, adopted ahead of the attainment deadline of new limit values laid down in Section 1, Table 1, of Annex I, that sets out short- and long-term policies and measures in order to comply with those limit values;
Show 18 more lines
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 33: (33) ‘alert threshold’ means a level beyond which there is a severe threat to human health from brief exposure for the population as a whole and at which immediate steps are to be taken by Member States;
AddedAmendment for consistency with the changes made to Article 19, in order to differentiate the air quality plans that have to be adopted to guarantee the attainment of new limit values, from the ones to be adopted when there is an exceedance of the limit values.
RemovedAmendment to further differentiate between information and alert thresholds and their impacts on human health. This amendment is linked to the changes made to Section 4 of Annex I.
AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 36: (36) ‘air quality plans’ means plans that set out measures in order to comply with limit values, ozone target values or average exposure reduction obligations once these have been exceeded;
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 35 a (new): (35a) ‘preparatory air quality plans’ means plans, adopted ahead of the attainment deadline of new limit values laid down in Section 1, Table 1, of Annex I, that set out short and long-term policies and measures in order to comply with those limit values or average exposure reduction obligations;
AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 38: (38) ‘the public concerned’ means the public affected or likely to be affected by exceedances of air quality standards, or having an interest in, the decision-making procedures related to the implementation of the obligations under this Directive, including non-governmental organisations promoting the protection of human health or the environment;
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made to Article 19, in order to differentiate the air quality plans that have to be adopted to guarantee the attainment of new limit values (new Paragraph 1, Article 19), from the ones to be adopted when there’s an exceedance of the limit values (new Paragraph 2 Article 19).
AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39: (39) ‘sensitive population and vulnerable groups’ means those population groups that are permanently or temporarily more sensitive or more vulnerable to the effects of air pollution than the average population, because of specific characteristics that make the health consequences of exposure more significant or because they have a higher sensitivity or a lower threshold for health effects or have a reduced ability to protect themselves.
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 36: (36) ‘air quality plans’ means plans that set out measures in order to comply with limit values once these have been exceeded, or average exposure reduction obligations ;
AddedArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point b: (b) approval of measurement systems (locations, methods, equipment, networks and laboratories) and ensuring an adequate functioning and maintenance of the monitoring network;
RemovedAmendment to reflect the change in the proposal of the ozone target value into a limit value. Amendment for consistency with the vocabulary on the air quality plans on paragraph 2 of Art. 19 as proposed by the Rapporteur. The changes to ozone target values are linked to the amendments to Table 1, Section 1 of Annex I and Section 2 of Annex I.
AddedAmendment for consistency with the changes made in Annex IV, Part D, point 10 a (new).
RemovedArticle 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39: (39) ‘sensitive population and vulnerable groups’ means those population groups that are permanently or temporarily more sensitive or more vulnerable to the effects of air pollution than the average population, because of specific characteristics that make the health consequences of exposure more significant or because they have a higher sensitivity or a lower threshold for health effects or have a reduced ability to protect themselves, such as those with specific pre-existing health conditions, pregnant women, newborns, children, the elderly, people living in poverty or people living with disabilities.
AddedArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point c: (c) ensuring the accuracy of measurements and the transfer and sharing of measurement data, including their compliance with the data quality objectives laid down in Annex V;
RemovedArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point b: (b) approval of measurement systems (methods, equipment, networks and laboratories) and ensuring an adequate maintenance of the monitoring network;
AddedAmendment consistent with the obligations set out in Articles 22 and 23 on the provision of information to the public and reporting of information to the Commission.
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made in Point 11, Point D, Annex IV.
AddedArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point d: (d) ensuring the accuracy of air quality modelling applications;
Change 15
ChangedArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point ig: a(g) (new):cooperation (ia)with provisionthe ofother publicMember information.States, third countries and the Commission;
Change 16
RemovedArticle 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1: In all zones where the level of pollutants exceeds a limit value established for those pollutants in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, modelling applications shall be used in addition to fixed measurements to assess the ambient air quality.
AddedAmendment for consistency of the text (e.g. recital 34 and Article 2, paragraph 1, points 3 and 6).
RemovedArticle 8 – paragraph 4: 4. In all zones where the level of pollutants is below the assessment threshold established for those pollutants, a combination of modelling applications and indicative measurements, shall be sufficient for the assessment of the ambient air quality.
AddedArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point h: (h) establishment of air quality plans and air quality roadmaps;
RemovedObjective estimation has been eliminated from the Rapporteur proposal.Amendment for consistency with changes on paragraph 5. The Rapporteur suggests to always have a combination of model and indicative data, to increase data quality.
AddedArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new): (ia) provision and maintenance of an hourly updated air quality index and other relevant public information.
Show 10 more lines
RemovedArticle 8 – paragraph 5: 5. Without prejudice to Article 9(6) and Article 19, if modelling or indicative measurements show an exceedance of any limit value in an area of the zone not covered by fixed measurements, additional fixed measurements shall be installed within 1 calendar year after the exceedance was recorded.
AddedArticle 8 – paragraph 4: 4. In all zones where the level of pollutants is below the assessment threshold established for those pollutants, a combination of modelling applications and indicative measurements shall be sufficient for the assessment of the ambient air quality.
RemovedArticle 8 – paragraph 7: 7. In addition to monitoring required under Article 10, Member States shall monitor ultrafine particles levels in accordance with Point D of Annex III and Section 3 of Annex VII.
AddedAmendment for consistency with changes to paragraph 5.
RemovedArticle 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1: The location of sampling points for the measurement of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), ozone, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide , arsenic, cadmium, nickel, benzo(a)pyrene in ambient air shall be determined in accordance with Annex IV.
AddedArticle 8 – paragraph 5: 5. If modelling or indicative measurements show an exceedance of any limit value or ozone target value in an area of the zone not covered by fixed measurements, additional fixed measurements shall be installed within 6 months after the exceedance was recorded and shall be used during at least 1 calendar year to assess the concentration level of the relevant pollutant.
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made in Annex I. Ozone has been set as a limit value.
AddedArticle 8 – paragraph 7: 7. In addition to monitoring required under Article 10, Member States shall monitor ultrafine particles levels, black carbon, ammonia and mercury in accordance with Point D of Annex III and Sections 3, 3a, 3b and 3c of Annex VII.
AddedArticle 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new): The location of sampling points shall be representative of the exposure of at risk communities and of the exposure of one or more sensitive population and vulnerable groups.
AddedAmendment consistent with the changes made to Annex VIII.
Change 17
ChangedAmendment to fix a typo error in the Commission’sCommission proposal. Tables 3 and 4 apply to instances when numbers of monitoring sites can be reduced by 50%, dealt with in the following paragraph.
Change 18
RemovedArticle 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part: 3. For zones where the level of pollutants exceeds the relevant assessment threshold specified in Annex II, but not the respective limit values specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I or critical levels specified in Section 3 of Annex I and where information from fixed measurement sampling points is supplemented by information from modelling or indicative measurement, the minimum number of sampling points may be reduced by up to 50 %, in accordance with Points A and C of Annex III provided that the following conditions are met:
AddedArticle 9 – paragraph 3 – point c: (c) the number of indicative measurements is the same as the number of fixed measurements that are being replaced and the indicative measurements have a minimum duration of 2 months per calendar year equally distributed over the calendar year;
RemovedArticle 9 – paragraph 3 – point a: (a) indicative measurements and modelling provide sufficient information for the assessment of air quality with regard to limit values, critical levels, information thresholds and alert thresholds, as well as adequate information for the public , in addition to the one provided by the fixed sampling points ;
AddedArticle 9 – paragraph 5: 5. Each Member State shall, in accordance with Annex IV, ensure that the distribution used for the calculation of the average exposure indicators for PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), reflect the general population exposure adequately. The number of sampling points shall be no less than that determined by application of Point B, of Annex III.
RemovedArticle 9 – paragraph 3 – point c: (c) the number of indicative measurements is the same as the number of fixed measurements that are being replaced and the indicative measurements cover the full calendar year;
AddedArticle 9 – paragraph 7: 7. Sampling points at which exceedances of any limit value specified in Section 1 of Annex I were recorded within the previous 3 years shall not be relocated, unless a relocation is absolutely necessary. Relocation of sampling points shall be done within their area of spatial representativeness, ensure continuity of measurement and be based on modelling results.
Show 4 more lines
RemovedArticle 9 – paragraph 6: 6. The results of modelling applications and indicative measurements shall be taken into account for the assessment of air quality with respect to the limit values.
AddedArticle 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1: Each Member State shall establish at least one monitoring supersite per 2 million inhabitants at an urban background location. Member States that have fewer than 2 million inhabitants shall establish at least one monitoring supersite at an urban background location.
RemovedArticle 9 – paragraph 7: 7. Sampling points at which exceedances of any limit value specified in Section 1 of Annex I were recorded within the previous 3 years shall not be relocated, unless a relocation is necessary due to special circumstances, including spatial development. Relocation of sampling points shall be done within their area of spatial representativeness, ensure continuity of measurement and be based on modelling results.
RemovedArticle 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1: Each Member State shall establish at least one monitoring supersite per territorial unit at NUTS 2 level as described in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 at an urban background location.
Change 19
ChangedArticle 10 – paragraph 6 – point c: (c) fixed measurements of arsenic, cadmium, nickel, total gaseous mercury, benzo(a)pyrene and the other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons referred to in Article 8(6), and of the total deposition of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel, lead, benzene, benzo(a)pyrene and the other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons referred to in Article 8(6), irrespective of concentration levels.
Change 20
RemovedArticle 12 – title: Requirements where levels are lower than the limit values and average exposure concentration objectives
AddedArticle 10 – paragraph 7: 7. Measurements of particulate and gaseous divalent mercury shall also be undertaken at monitoring supersites at urban background locations and rural background locations.
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made on ozone as proposed by the Rapporteur proposal. Deletion of the reference to assessment thresholds because it was incoherent with paragraph 4 of this article. If Member States shall endeavour to achieve the best ambient air quality, there is no reason to limit the obligation only to the areas where concentrations are above the assessment thresholds.
AddedArticle 12 – title: Requirements where levels are lower than the limit values, ozone target value and average exposure concentration objectives
RemovedArticle 12 – paragraph 1: 1. In zones where the levels of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter ( PM10 and PM2.5), ozone, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide , arsenic, cadmium, nickel and benzo(a)pyrene in ambient air are below the respective limit values specified in Section 1 of Annex I , Member States shall maintain the levels of those pollutants below the limit values .
AddedDeletion of the reference to assessment thresholds because it is incoherent with paragraph 4 of this article. If Member States shall endeavour to achieve the best ambient air quality, there is no reason to limit the obligation only to the areas where concentrations are above the assessment thresholds.
Show 2 more lines
RemovedAmendment for consistency with ozone changes as proposed by the Rapporteur. Ozone should be treated as the other pollutants, for which limit values are being proposed.
AddedArticle 12 – paragraph 2: 2. In zones in which ozone levels are below the ozone target value Member States shall take necessary measures to maintain those levels below the ozone target value and attain the long-term objectives specified in Section 2 of Annex I, in so far as factors including the transboundary nature of ozone pollution and meteorological conditions so permit. Once the long-term objectives are attained, Member States shall maintain the ozone levels below the long-term objectives.
Change 21
ChangedArticle 12 – paragraph 2:3: 2.3. In zones in which ozone levels are belowterritorial theunits ozoneat limitNUTS value2 Memberlevel Statesas shalldescribed takein necessaryRegulation measures(EC) toNo maintain1059/2003 thosewhere levelsthe belowaverage theexposure ozoneindicators limitfor valuePM2.5 and endeavourNO2 toare attainbelow the long-term objectivesrespective specifiedvalue inof Sectionthe 2average ofexposure Annexconcentration I,objectives infor sothose farpollutants as factorslaid includingdown thein transboundarySection nature5 of ozoneAnnex pollutionI, andMember meteorologicalStates conditionsshall somaintain permit,the andlevels maintainof those levelspollutants below the long-termaverage objectives.exposure concentration objectives
Change 22
ChangedArticle 12 – paragraph 3:4: 3.4. InMember territorialStates unitsshall atendeavour NUTSto 2achieve leveland aspreserve describedthe inbest Regulationambient (EC)air Noquality 1059/2003and wherea thehigh averagelevel exposureof indicatorsenvironmental forand PM2.5human andhealth NO2protection are, belowin line with the respectivemost valuerecent ofWHO theAir averageQuality exposureGuidelines concentrationand objectivesreviews forpublished thoseby pollutantsthe asWHO laidRegional downOffice infor SectionEurope 5and ofbelow Annexthe I,assessment Memberthresholds Stateslaid shalldown maintainin theAnnex levelsII, ofpaying thoseparticular pollutantsattention belowto the averageprotection exposureof concentrationsensitive objectives.population and vulnerable groups.
Change 23
RemovedArticle 12 – paragraph 4: 4. Member States shall achieve and preserve the best ambient air quality and a high level of environmental and human health protection, in line with the most recent air quality guidelines published by the WHO and below the assessment thresholds laid down in Annex II, paying particular attention to the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, as well as socio-economic and health inequalities.
RemovedArticle 13 – title: Limit values and average exposure reduction obligation for the protection of human health
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made in Annex I. Ozone has been set as a limit value.
RemovedArticle 13 – paragraph 1: 1. Member States shall ensure that, throughout their zones , levels of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter ( PM10 and PM2.5), ozone, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide , arsenic, cadmium, nickel and benzo(a)pyrene in ambient air, do not exceed the limit values laid down in Section 1 of Annex I.
RemovedArticle 13 – paragraph 2: 2. For ozone, Member States shall ensure, by taking all necessary measures not entailing disproportionate costs, that throughout the zone long-term objectives are attained, as laid down in Section 2, Point C, of Annex I.
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made in Annex I. Ozone has been set as a limit value.
Change 24
AddedArticle 13 – paragraph 6: 6. The deadline for attaining the limit values laid down in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I for the pollutants referred to in Article 18(1) may be postponed in accordance with Article 18.
Change 25
ChangedArticle 15 – paragraph 3: 3. Where2 anya alert(new): threshold2a. orWhere any informationalert threshold laid down in Section 44, Point A, of Annex I is exceeded, Member States shall take the necessary steps to inform the public within a few hours at the latest, providing detailed information about the severity ofimplement thewithout exceedanceundue anddelay the associated health impacts, and on sensitive population andemergency vulnerablemeasures groupsindicated in particular, and making use of different mediathe andshort-term communicationaction channelsplans anddrawn ensuringup broadunder publicArticle access.20.
Change 26
ChangedArticle 15 – paragraph 3 a (new):3: 3a.3. Where any alert threshold laid down in Section 4, Point A,4 of Annex I is exceeded, Member States shall implementtake the emergencynecessary measuressteps outlinedto inform the public within a few hours at the latest, in short-terma actioncoherent plansand drawneasily upunderstandable undermanner, Articleproviding 20.detailed information about the severity of the exceedance and the associated health impacts, as well as suggestions for the protection of the population, with a special focus on sensitive population and vulnerable groups. Member States shall make use of different media and communication channels and ensure broad public access.
Change 27
AddedArticle 15 – paragraph 3 a (new): 3a. Where any information threshold laid down in Section 4 of Annex I is exceeded, Member States shall take the necessary steps to inform the public, and sensitive population and vulnerable groups in particular, within a few hours at the latest, in an accessible, coherent and easily understandable manner.
AddedArticle 15 – paragraph 4: 4. Member States shall ensure that information about actual or predicted exceedances of any alert threshold or information threshold is provided to the public in a coherent and easily understandable manner as soon as possible in accordance with, points 2 and 3 of Annex IX.
Change 28
ChangedArticle 16 – paragraph 2: 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with lists of any such zones and NUTS 2 territorial units, as referred to in paragraph 1, together with: / (a) ainformation progresson reportconcentrations onand thesources; implementation/ of(b) the nationalevidence strategydemonstrating forthat adaptationthe exceedances are attributable to climatenatural changesources adoptedand pursuantcould tonot Articlehave 5(4)been ofanticipated, Regulationprevented (EU)or 2021/1119;mitigated /by (b)the Member State concerned, including, where appropriate, the evidence demonstrating the impact of ecosystem perturbations driven by climate change resulting in excess emissions insuch aexceedances; way/ which(c) isinformation beyondon the Member States’ control and could not have been anticipated or prevented, in particular by implementingimplementation sufficientof adaptationrelevant measures to ensureunder the resilience ofnational thestrategy affectedfor areaadaptation to climate change; / (c) information on concentrations and sources; and / (d) the evidencechange demonstratingadopted thatpursuant theto exceedancesArticle are5(4) attributableof toRegulation natural(EU) sources.2021/1119.
Change 29
AddedAmendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.
Change 30
ChangedToAmendment necessary to ensure the integrityconsistency of the Article and given the amount of new evidence that a Member State needs to provide in order to discount the exceedance for the compliance purposes, it should be made clear that the Commission will review the evidence and inform the Member State accordingly.
Change 31
RemovedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part: 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) or nitrogen dioxide cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, because of exceptional site-specific dispersion characteristics, orographic boundary conditions, adverse climatic conditions or transboundary contributions, a Member State may postpone - that deadline once by a maximum of 3 years for that particular zone , if the following conditions are met:
AddedArticle 17 – paragraph 1: 1. Member States may, for a given month, identify zones within which limit values for PM10 are exceeded in ambient air due to the re-suspension of particulates following winter-sanding or winter -salting of roads.
Removed"Exceptional" added to circumscribe the scope of the Regulation. The shortening of the time extension from 5 to 3 years aims to align the timing with the 3 years cycle of the Air Quality Plans in Article 19.
AddedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part: 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) or nitrogen dioxide cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, because of exceptional and unpreventable site-specific dispersion characteristics, orographic boundary conditions or transboundary contributions, a Member State may postpone - that deadline once by a maximum of 5 years for that particular zone , if the following conditions are met:
Change 32
ChangedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – point a: (a)-a an(new): air(-a) qualitythe planlevels isof establishedpollutants in accordance with Article 19(1)ambient andair meetingin the requirementsrelevant listedzone inare Articlebelow 19(5)the tolimit (7)values forspecified thein zoneSection to1, whichTable the2, postponementof wouldAnnex apply;I;
Change 33
RemovedParagraph 4 of Article 19 has been moved to Paragraph 1.
AddedAmendment for consistency with the amendment to Annex I, Section 5, Point B.
Change 34
ChangedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – point b:a: (b)(a) thean air quality plan referred in point (a)roadmap is supplemented by the information listedestablished in Point B of Annex VIII related toaccordance thewith pollutantsArticle concerned19(-1) and demonstrates how exceedance periods abovemeeting the limit values will berequirements keptlisted asin shortArticle as19(5) possibleto and(7) howfor the limit values will be attained by thezone endto ofwhich the new postponed deadlinepostponement forwould compliance;apply;
Change 35
RemovedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – point c: (c) the air quality plan referred to in point (a) outlines how the public and, in particular, sensitive population and vulnerable groups will be informed about the consequences of the postponement for human health and the environment and includes specific measures designed for the protection of the sensitive population and vulnerable groups;
AddedAmendment for consistency with a change of order made by another amendment to Article 19, whereby paragraph 4 is moved to the beginning of the Article, and with the introduction of the term “air quality roadmap”.
RemovedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new): (da) the levels of pollutants in ambient air in the relevant zone are below the limit values specified in Section 1, Table 2, of Annex I;
AddedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – point b: (b) the air quality roadmap referred in point (a) is supplemented by the information listed in Point B of Annex VIII related to the pollutants concerned as well as annual projections on the evolution of emissions and concentrations in the zone concerned until the attainment date and demonstrates how the limit values will be attained by the end of the postponed deadline for compliance and how exceedance periods above the limit values will be kept as short as possible;
RemovedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new): (db) in addition to the information and reporting under Articles 22 and 23, annual projections are published on the evolution of emissions and concentrations in the zone concerned, taking into consideration the measures included in the air quality plan, covering all years until the attainment date; where any such projection reveals that the measures included in the air quality plan are insufficient to achieve likely compliance with the related limit value by the postponed attainment deadline, Member States shall update the air quality plan and the measures therein, and take additional and more effective measures, in the subsequent calendar year to keep the exceedance period as short as possible and in any case attain compliance by the postponed deadline.
AddedAmendment for consistency, linked to the introduction of the term “air quality roadmap”.
Show 21 more lines
RemovedArticle 19 – paragraph -1 (new): -1. Where on ... [ three months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], in a zone or NUTS 2 territorial unit, the levels of pollutants recorded for the preceding calendar year, are above any limit value to be attained by 1 January 2030 as laid down in Section 1, Table 1, of Annex I, Member States shall establish a preparatory air quality plan for the concerned pollutant as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the date where the exceedance of the limit value was reported in line with Article 23(2) in order to attain the respective limit values by the expiration of the attainment deadline. / Where, for the same pollutant, Member States are required to establish a preparatory air quality plan in accordance with this paragraph as well as an air quality plan in accordance with Article 19(2), they may establish a combined air quality plan in accordance with Article 19(5), (6) and (7) and provide information on the expected impact of measures to reach compliance for each limit value it addresses, as required by Annex VIII, Point A, points 5 and 6. Any such combined air quality plan shall set out appropriate measures to achieve all related limit values and to keep all exceedance periods as short as possible.
AddedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – point c: (c) the air quality roadmap referred to in point (a) outlines how the public and, in particular, sensitive population and vulnerable groups will be informed in a coherent and easily understandable manner about the consequences of the postponement for human health and the environment;
RemovedArticle 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1: Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value, laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, Member States shall establish air quality plans for those zones as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which that exceedance of any limit value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out all appropriate measures to achieve the limit value concerned, to address the dangers to human health caused by the exceedance of the concerned limit value and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible, and in any case no longer than 3 years from the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded.
AddedArticle 18 – paragraph 1 – point d: (d) the air quality roadmap referred to in point (a) outlines how additional funding, including via relevant national and Union funding programmes, where such funding is foreseen, will be mobilised to accelerate the improvement of air quality in the zone to which the postponement would apply;
RemovedArticle 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2: Where exceedances of any limit values persist during the third calendar year after the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded, Member States shall update the air quality plan and the measures therein, provide detailed information concerning the status of implementation of the Directives referred to in Point B, point 1, of Annex VIII and take additional and more effective measures, in the subsequent calendar year to keep the exceedance period as short as possible and in any case no longer than 1 year after the update of the air quality plan.
AddedArticle 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1: Member States shall notify the Commission where, in their view, paragraph 1 is applicable, and shall communicate the air quality roadmap referred to in paragraph 1 and all relevant information necessary for the Commission to assess whether the invoked reason for postponement and the conditions set out in that paragraph are satisfied. In its assessment, the Commission shall take into account estimated effects on ambient air quality in Member States, at present and in the future, of measures that have been taken by Member States as well as estimated effects on ambient air quality of Union measures . Where annual projections provided in accordance with paragraph 1, point (b), demonstrate that the measures set out in the air quality roadmap are insufficient to achieve likely compliance with the limit value of the pollutant concerned by the postponed attainment deadline, Member States shall update the air quality roadmap and revise the measures therein in order to ensure compliance by that deadline.
RemovedArticle 19 – paragraph 2: deleted / (deleted) / (deleted)
AddedAmendment for consistency, linked to the introduction of the term “air quality roadmap”.
RemovedArticle 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1: Where in a given NUTS 2 territorial unit, the average exposure reduction obligation laid down in Section 5 of Annex I is exceeded, Member States shall establish air quality plans for those NUTS 2 territorial units as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which the exceedance of the average exposure reduction obligation was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out appropriate measures to achieve the average exposure reduction obligation and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible and in any case no longer than 3 years from the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded.
AddedArticle 19 – title: Air quality plans and air quality roadmaps
RemovedArticle 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2: Where exceedances of the average exposure reduction obligation persist during the third calendar year after the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded, Member States shall update the air quality plan and the measures therein, provide detailed information concerning the status of implementation of the Directives referred to in Point B, point 1, of Annex VIII, and take additional and more effective measures, in the subsequent calendar year to keep the exceedance period as short as possible.
AddedAmended to be coherent with changes in Article 19, paragraph 4.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph -1 (new): -1. Where from ... [three months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], in a zone or NUTS 2 territorial unit, the levels of any pollutant recorded for the preceding calendar year are above any limit or target value to be attained by 1 January 2030 as laid down in Section 1, Table 1, of Annex I and Section 2, Point B, of Annex I, the Member State concerned shall establish an air quality roadmap for that pollutant as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which the exceedance of the pollutant was recorded in order to attain the respective limit values or ozone target value by the expiration of the attainment deadline. / Where, for the same pollutant as referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph, a Member State is required to establish an air quality roadmap in accordance with that subparagraph as well as an air quality plan in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, it may establish a combined air quality roadmap in accordance with paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of this Article and provide information on the expected impact of measures to reach compliance for each limit value it addresses, as required by Point A, points 5 and 6, of Annex VIII. Any such combined air quality roadmap shall set out appropriate measures to achieve all related limit values and to keep all exceedance periods as short as possible.
AddedAmendment for internal logic of the text. Paragraph 4 has been moved here because it comes first time-wise.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1: Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value, laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, Member States shall establish air quality plans for those zones as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which that exceedance of any limit value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out all appropriate and sufficient measures to achieve the concerned limit value and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible, and in any case no longer than 3 years from the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2: Where exceedances of any limit values persist during the third calendar year after the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded, Member States shall update the air quality plan and the measures therein, including updated detailed information concerning the status of implementation of the Directives referred to in Point B, point 1, of Annex VIII and take additional and more effective measures, in the subsequent calendar year to keep the exceedance period as short as possible and in any case no longer than 1 calendar year after the update of the air quality plan.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1: Where in a given NUTS 2 territorial unit, the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed the ozone target value, laid down in Section 2 of Annex I, Member States shall establish air quality plans for those NUTS 2 territorial units as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which the exceedance of the ozone target value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out appropriate and sufficient measures in order to achieve the ozone target value and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible, and in any case no longer than 3 years from the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2: Where exceedances of the ozone target value persist during the third calendar year after the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded in the relevant NUTS 2 territorial unit, Member States shall update the air quality plan and the measures therein, and take additional and more effective measures, in the subsequent calendar year to keep the exceedance period as short as possible, and in any case no longer than 2 calendar years after the update of the air quality plan.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3: For NUTS 2 territorial units where the ozone target value is exceeded, Member States shall ensure that the relevant national air pollution control programme prepared pursuant to Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2016/2284 includes measures addressing those exceedances.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1: Where in a given NUTS 2 territorial unit, the average exposure reduction obligation laid down in Section 5 of Annex I is exceeded, Member States shall establish air quality plans for those NUTS 2 territorial units as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which the exceedance of the average exposure reduction obligation was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out appropriate and sufficient measures to achieve the average exposure reduction obligation and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible and in any case no longer than 3 years from the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2: Where exceedances of the average exposure reduction obligation persist during the third calendar year after the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded, Member States shall update the air quality plan and the measures therein, including updated detailed information concerning the status of implementation of the Directives referred to in Point B, point 1, of Annex VIII and take additional and more effective measures, in the subsequent calendar year to keep the exceedance period as short as possible, and in any case no longer than 1 calendar year after the update of the air quality plan.
Change 36
ChangedArticle 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – pointintroductory c:part: (c)Air informationquality onplans abatementand measuresair listedquality inroadmaps Pointshall B,contain Pointat 2least ofthe Annexfollowing VIII;information:
Change 37
ChangedArticle 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point cb a (new): (ca) where applicable,(ba) the information referred to in Point B, point 1, of Annex VIII.VIII, and in particular measures included in the National Air Pollution Control Programme (NAPCP);
Change 38
RemovedArticle 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new): Member States shall ensure that before the time period for receiving comments from the public starts, the following is made available to the public on the internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users: / (a) the draft air quality plan containing the minimum information required under Points A and B of Annex VIII; / (b) information on the estimated impact of the air quality plan assessed pursuant to Point C of Annex VIII, and the background documents and information used for the development of the draft; / (c) a non-technical summary of the information referred to under points (a) and (b).
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c: (c) information on abatement measures listed in Point B, Point 2 of Annex VIII.
RemovedArticle 19 – paragraph 7 a (new): 7a. The Commission shall facilitate the elaboration and implementation of the air quality plans, where appropriate, through an exchange of good practices. The Commission may establish guidance on the elaboration, implementation and revision of air quality plans.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2: Member States shall include measures referred to in Article 20(2) and specific measures aiming at the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, including children in their air quality plans and air quality roadmaps.
RemovedArticle 19 – paragraph 7 b (new): 7b. The Commission shall specify by means of implementing acts, the format and structure of the air quality plans. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
AddedAmendment for consistency, linked to the introduction of the term “air quality roadmap”.
Change 39
ChangedArticle 2019 – paragraph 15 – subparagraph 2: However, where3: thereRegarding isthe apollutants riskconcerned, thatwhen thepreparing alertair thresholdquality forplans ozoneor willair bequality exceededroadmaps, Member States may refrain from drawing up such short-term action plans when there is no significantshall potential,assess takingthe intorisk accountof nationalexceeding geographical,the meteorologicalrespective andalert economicthresholds. conditions,That toanalysis reduceshall thebe risk,used durationfor orestablishing severityshort-term ofaction suchplans anwhere exceedance.applicable.
Change 40
RemovedTechnical correction, words missing in the COM proposal.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 4: Where air quality plans or air quality roadmaps shall be established in respect of several pollutants or air quality standards, Member States shall, where appropriate, establish integrated air quality plans or air quality roadmaps covering all pollutants and air quality standards concerned.
RemovedArticle 20 – paragraph 2: 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may, depending on the individual case, provide for effective measures to control and, where necessary, temporarily suspend activities which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or alert threshold being exceeded. Member States shall also take into consideration the list of measures outlined in Annex VIIIa for their short-term action plans, and depending on the share of the main pollution sources to the exceedances to be addressed, shall consider including measures in relation to transport, construction works, industrial installations and the use of products and domestic heating. Specific actions aiming at the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, including children, shall also be considered in the framework of those plans.
AddedAmendment for consistency, linked to the introduction of the term “air quality roadmap”.
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made in Annex I. Ozone has been set as a limit value.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 5: Member States shall, to the extent feasible, ensure consistency of their air quality plans and air quality roadmaps with other plans that have a significant impact on air quality, including those required under Directive 2010/75/ EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58, Directives (EU) 2016/2284 and 2002/49/EC and under climate, biodiversity protection, energy, transport and agriculture legislation.
Show 31 more lines
RemovedArticle 20 – paragraph 5 a (new): 5a. The Commission shall publish, at regular intervals, examples of best practices for drawing up short-term action plans, including examples of best practices for the protection of sensitive population groups, including children.
AddedAmendment for consistency, linked to the introduction of the term “air quality roadmap”.
RemovedArticle 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1: Where transboundary transport of air pollution from one or more Member State contributes significantly to the exceedance of any limit value, average exposure reduction obligation or alert threshold in another Member State, the latter shall notify the Member States from which the air pollution originated and the Commission thereof.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 5 a (new): 5a. The Commission may, at the request of a Member State, provide assistance and technical expertise in the framework of the Technical Support Instrument (TSI) in order to support air quality policies and measures in the Member State concerned.
RemovedAmendment for consistency with the changes made in Annex I. Ozone has been set as a limit value.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph -1 (new): Member States shall ensure that before the time period for receiving comments from the public starts, the draft air quality plan or draft air quality roadmap containing the minimum information required under Points A and B of Annex VIII is made available to the public on the internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users, and, where appropriate, through other non-digital communication channels. Member States may also make available to the public on the internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users, and, where appropriate, through other non-digital communication channels the following: / (a) information on the methods used to assess the estimated impact of the air quality plan or air quality roadmap pursuant to Point Ba of Annex VIII, and the background documents and information used for the development of the draft air quality plan or draft air quality roadmap; / (b) a non-technical summary of the information referred to in this subparagraph.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1: Member States shall consult the public, in accordance with Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council59, and the competent authorities, which, by reason of their responsibilities in the field of air pollution and air quality, are likely to be concerned by the implementation of the air quality plans and air quality roadmaps, on draft air quality plans and draft air quality roadmaps and any significant updates of air quality plans and air quality roadmaps prior to their finalisation.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2: Member States shall encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of this Directive, in particular in the preparation, review and update of air quality plans and air quality roadmaps. When preparing air quality plans and air quality roadmaps, Member States shall ensure that stakeholders whose activities contribute to the exceedance situation are encouraged to propose measures they are able to take to help end the exceedances and that non-governmental organisations, such as environmental and health organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, other relevant health-care bodies, including healthcare professionals and the relevant industrial federations are encouraged to take part in those consultations. Member States shall make sure that relevant stakeholders and citizens are duly informed about the specific sources and air pollutants affecting air quality and the relevant air pollution mitigation measures that exist and are available on the market.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 7: 7. Air quality plans and air quality roadmaps shall be communicated to the Commission within 2 months after their adoption .
AddedAmendment for consistency, linked to the introduction of the term “air quality roadmap”.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 7 a (new): 7a. The Commission shall establish, by means of implementing acts, a template with the format and structure of the air quality plans and air quality roadmaps. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 7 b (new): 7b. The Commission may establish guidance on the elaboration, implementation and revision of air quality plans and, where appropriate, air quality roadmaps.
AddedArticle 19 – paragraph 7 c (new): 7c. The Commission shall facilitate the elaboration and implementation of the air quality plans and air quality roadmaps, where appropriate, through an exchange of good practices.
AddedArticle 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2: However, where there is a risk that the alert threshold for ozone will be exceeded, Member States may refrain from drawing up such short-term action plans when there is no significant potential, taking into account national geographical, meteorological and economic conditions, to reduce the risk, duration or severity of such an exceedance.
AddedAmendment consistent with changes to Annex IX.
AddedArticle 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new): In order to inform citizens about poor air quality and its effects, competent authorities shall require the permanent display of easily understandable information on symptoms associated with air pollution peaks and on behaviour to reduce exposure to air pollution in the vicinity of communities of sensitive population and vulnerable groups.
AddedArticle 20 – paragraph 2: 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may, depending on the individual case, provide for effective measures to control and, where necessary, temporarily suspend activities which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or target values or alert threshold being exceeded. Member States shall also take into consideration the list of measures set out in Annex VIIIa for their short-term action plans, and depending on the share of the main pollution sources to the exceedances to be addressed, shall at least consider including measures in relation to transport, construction works, industrial installations and the use of products and domestic heating. Specific actions aiming at the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, including children shall also be considered in the framework of those plans.
AddedArticle 20 – paragraph 3 a (new): 3a. Member States may request the Commission to provide technical assistance and support in drawing up the short-term action plans.
AddedArticle 20 – paragraph 4: 4. When Member States have drawn up a short-term action plan, they shall make available to the public and to appropriate organisations such as environmental and health organisations consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, healthcare professionals, other relevant health-care bodies and the relevant industrial federations both the results of their investigations on the feasibility and the content of specific short-term action plans as well as information on the implementation of these plans.
AddedThese changes are linked to Article 27, which provides for access to justice for the members of the public, including non-governmental organisations. The proposed changes ensure consistency with recitals 39 and 40, and are inherently linked to Article 27.
AddedArticle 20 – paragraph 4 a (new): 4a. Member States shall use modelling and forecasting to identify the risk that the levels of pollutants will exceed one or more of the alert thresholds and shall ensure that emergency measures enter into force soon after a risk of exceedance is forecasted in order to prevent such exceedance.
AddedAmendment needed for the internal logic of the text.
AddedArticle 20 – paragraph 5 a (new): 5a. The Commission may establish guidelines setting out best practices for drawing up short-term action plans, including examples of best practices for the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, including children. Those examples shall be updated regularly. The Commission shall promote the exchange of best practices among Member States through the EU Clean Air Forum.
AddedArticle 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2: The Member States concerned shall cooperate at national, regional and local level, including by establishing joint teams of experts, to identify the sources of air pollution and the shares of pollution originating from each country and the measures to be taken individually and jointly to address those sources, and draw up joint activities, such as the preparation of joint or coordinated air quality plans pursuant to Article 19, in order to remove such exceedances.
AddedArticle 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new): The Member States concerned shall inform the Commission without undue delay of the situation and measures taken.
AddedArticle 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3: Member States shall respond to each other in a timely manner, and no later than 2 months after being notified by another Member State in accordance with the first subparagraph.
AddedArticle 21 – paragraph 2: 2. The Commission shall be informed of, and invited to be present, assist and oversee any cooperation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. The Commission may also, in cooperation with the Member States concerned, draw up working plans for the implementation of proposed measures. Where appropriate, the Commission shall, taking into account the reports established pursuant to Article 11 of Directive (EU) 2016/2284, consider whether further action shall be taken at Union level in order to reduce precursor emissions responsible for transboundary pollution.
AddedAmendment needed for the internal logic of the text.
AddedArticle 21 – paragraph 3 a (new): 3a. Where a Member State takes legal action for a violation of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, as referred to in Article 29, that have caused air pollution in another Member State, Member States shall cooperate in an efficient manner.
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part: 1. Member States shall ensure that the public as well as appropriate organisations such as environmental and health organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive populations and vulnerable groups, healthcare professionals and other relevant health-care bodies and the relevant industrial federations are informed, adequately and in good time, of the following:
AddedThese changes are linked to Article 27, which provides for access to justice for the members of the public, including non-governmental organisations. The proposed changes ensure consistency with recitals 39 and 40, and are inherently linked to Article 27.
Change 41
RemovedTechnical correction, air quality information should be in accordance to the whole Annex IX.
AddedTechnical correction, needed to ensure the internal coherence of the text.
RemovedArticle 22 – paragraph 1 – point e: (e) the effects of exceedances of limit values, average exposure reduction obligations, information thresholds and alert thresholds in a summary assessment ; the summary assessment shall include, where appropriate, further information and assessments on forest protection as well as information on pollutants covered by Article 10 and Annex VII.
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new): (aa) any observed lack of data from sampling points, in particular in relation to the data referred to in point 1, points (a) and (b), of Annex IX;
RemovedArticle 22 – paragraph 2: 2. Member States shall establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, and make it available through a public source providing an hourly update, ensuring that sufficient real-time data is available in all stations. The air quality index shall be comparable across all Member States, follow the most up-to-date recommendations by the WHO, be based on the air quality indices at European scale provided by the European Environmental Agency and shall be accompanied by detailed information about the associated health risks for each pollutant, including information tailored to sensitive population and vulnerable groups.
AddedAmendment needed for the internal logic of the text (Annex IX).
Show 15 more lines
RemovedArticle 22 – paragraph 2 a (new): 2a. The Commission shall adopt guidelines specifying the format and structure of the information provided to the public via an air quality index.
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 1 – point c: (c) air quality plans and air quality roadmaps as provided for in Article 19;
AddedAmendment for consistency, linked to the introduction of the term “air quality roadmap”.
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 1 – point d: (d) short-term action plans drawn up in accordance with Article 20;
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new): (da) overview of air pollution sources and air pollutants affecting air quality in a Member State concerned;
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new): (db) documentation submitted to the Commission in relation to exceedances caused by natural sources referred to in Article 16(2);
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new): (dc) documentation on site selection referred to in point D of Annex IV;
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 1 – point e: (e) the effects of exceedances of limit values, ozone target values, average exposure reduction obligations and average exposure concentration objectives, information thresholds and alert thresholds in a summary assessment ; the summary assessment shall include, where appropriate, further information and assessments on forest protection as well as information on pollutants covered by Article 10 and Annex VII.
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 2: 2. Member States shall establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, and make it available in a coherent and easily understandable manner through a public source providing an hourly update, ensuring that sufficient real-time data is available in all stations. The air quality index shall be comparable across all Member States and follow the most up-to-date recommendations by the WHO and be based on the air quality indices at European scale provided by the European Environmental Agency. The air quality index shall be accompanied by information about the associated health risks for each pollutant, including information tailored to sensitive population and vulnerable groups.
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 2 a (new): 2a. By ... [12 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 25 to supplement this Directive by specifying how the air quality index shall be calculated and presented, and the format and structure of the information provided to the public.
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 2 b (new): 2b. Member States shall promote the display of information on symptoms associated with air pollution peaks and on air pollution exposure reduction and protection behaviours, in buildings frequented by sensitive population and vulnerable groups, such as healthcare facilities.
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 3: 3. Member States shall inform the public of the competent authority or body designated in relation to the tasks referred to in Article 5 and of the competent authority or body operating the sampling points established pursuant to Article 9 and Annex IV.
AddedAmendment for consistency, linked to the provision on access to justice (Article 27) and compensation for damage to human health (Article 28).
AddedArticle 22 – paragraph 4: 4. The information referred to in this Article shall be made available to the public free of charge by means of easily accessible media and communication channels in a coherent and easily understandable manner in accordance with Directive 2007/2/EC60and Directive (EU)2019/102461of the European Parliament and of the Council while ensuring broad public access.
AddedArticle 23 – paragraph 2 – introductory part: 2. For the specific purpose of assessing compliance with the limit values, ozone target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, and critical levels , the information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made available to the Commission no later than 4 months after the end of each calendar year and shall include:
Change 42
ChangedArticle 23 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part: (b) the list of zones and NUTS 2 territorial units and the levels of pollutants assessed. For zones in which the levels of one or more pollutants are higher than the limit values or critical levels ,levels, as well as for NUTS 2 territorial units where the levels of one or more pollutants are higher than the target valuesvalues, average exposure reduction obligations or average exposure reductionconcentration obligations:objectives:
Change 43
RemovedArticle 24 – paragraph 2 – point a: (a) the limit values and long-term objectives, critical levels, alert and information thresholds , average exposure reduction obligations and average exposure concentration objectives specified in Annex I;
AddedArticle 25 – paragraph 2: 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 22(2a), Article 24 and Article 29(3a) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from ... [date of entry into force of this Directive]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
RemovedArticle 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part: 1. Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with their national legal system, members of the public have access to a review procedure before a court of law, or another independent and impartial body established by law, to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of all decisions or acts taken by, or omissions of, the Member State to achieve compliance with this Directive, including, but not limited to, those concerning the classification of zones under Article 7, the network design, location and relocation of sampling points under Article 9, air quality plans referred to in Article 19 and short term action plans referred to in Article 20, provided that any of the following conditions is met:
AddedArticle 25 – paragraph 3: 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 22(2a), Article 24 and Article 29(3a) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
RemovedArticle 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2: Member States shall determine what constitutes a sufficient interest and impairment of a right consistently with the objective of giving the public wide access to justice.
AddedArticle 25 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2: A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 22(2a), Article 24 and Article 29(3a) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of 2 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and to the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by 2 months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Show 3 more lines
RemovedArticle 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3: The interest of any natural person affected or likely to be affected by exceedances of air quality standards, or having an interest in, the decision-making procedures related to the implementation of the obligations under this Directive, and any non-governmental organisation which is a member of the public shall be deemed sufficient for the purposes of the first paragraph, point (a). Such natural persons and organisations shall also be deemed to have rights capable of being impaired for the purposes of the first paragraph, point (b).
AddedArticle 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part: Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with their national legal system, members of the public concerned have access to a review procedure before a court of law, or another independent and impartial body established by law, to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of all decisions, acts or omissions by Member States including, but not limited to, those concerning the classification of zones under Article 7, the network design, location and relocation of sampling points under Article 9, air quality plans and air quality roadmaps referred to in Article 19 and short term action plans referred to in Article 20, provided that any of the following conditions is met:
AddedArticle 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3: The interest of any natural person affected or likely to be affected by exceedances of air quality standards, or having an interest in the decision-making procedures related to the implementation of the obligations under this Directive, and of any non-governmental organisation, which are both members of the public concerned shall be deemed sufficient for the purposes of the first paragraph, point (a). Such natural persons and organisations shall also be deemed to have rights capable of being impaired for the purposes of the first paragraph, point (b).
Change 44
RemovedArticle 27 – paragraph 3: 3. The review procedure shall be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive, and shall provide adequate and effective redress mechanisms, including injunctive relief as appropriate. Member States shall ensure that the courts or other independent and impartial review bodies are able to apply effective coercive measures.
AddedArticle 28 – paragraph 1: 1. Member States shall ensure that natural persons who suffer damage to human health caused by a violation of this Directive, including, but not limited to, Article 13, Articles 19(1) to 19(4), 20(1) and 20(2), Article 21(1) second subparagraph, and Article 21(3) of this Directive by an omission, decision, act or delay of a decision or act of the competent authorities are entitled to compensation in accordance with this article.
Change 45
ChangedArticle 28 – paragraph 1:2: 1.2. Member States shall ensure that naturalnon-governmental personsorganisations whopromoting sufferthe damageprotection toof human health and well-beingor causedthe byenvironment aare violationallowed ofto therepresent provisionsnatural ofpersons thisreferred Directive,to including,in butparagraph not1 limitedand to,bring Articlescollective 13,actions 19(1)for tocompensation. 19(4),The 20(1)requirements andset 20(2),out 21(1)in secondArticle sub-paragraph10 and 21(3)Article of12(1) thisof Directive by(EU) the2020/1828 competentshall authoritiesmutatis aremutandis entitledapply to compensation in accordance withsuch thiscollective article.actions.
Change 46
ChangedArticle 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1: Where a claim for compensation is supported by evidenceevidence, including relevant scientific data, from which it may be presumed that the violation referred to in paragraph 1 has caused or contributed to the occurrence of the damage of that person, it shall be for the respondent public authority tocausal provelink thatbetween the violation did not cause or contribute toand the occurrence of the damage.damage shall be presumed.
Change 47
ChangedArticle 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2:2 Thea respondent(new): publicMember authorityStates shall beensure ablethat where the claimant has provided reasonably available evidence to rebutsupport thisa presumption.claim Infor particular,compensation thein respondentaccordance shallwith beparagraph required1, toand provehas reasonably substantiated that additional evidence lies in the violationcontrol didof notthe causerespondent public authority or contributea tothird theparty, occurrenceif ofrequested by the damageclaimant, the court or administrative authority is able to order that such evidence be disclosed by the violationrespondent didpublic notauthority reasonablyor leadthird party in accordance with national procedural law and subject to the associatedapplicable damageUnion sufferedand bynational therules claimant.on confidentiality and proportionality.
Change 48
RemovedArticle 28 – paragraph 4 a (new): 4a. For the purpose of this Article, it shall be presumed that where limit values specified in Article 13 and Table 1 of Annex I are exceeded, air pollution becomes harmful to human health and well-being of those exposed to it, in particular sensitive population groups, and it causes or contributes to the associated health effects. / The association between the exceedance of the limit values and health effects shall be based on reliable relevant data, including, but not limited to, epidemiological studies. / Member States shall create the opportunity to systematise and publish available information on epidemiological studies and other scientific data on health effects of air pollution and causality associations, taking into account both domestic and international research, impact factor considerations, peer-reviewed publications, university and research institutions rankings, degree of acceptance by the scientific community and its admissibility in legal procedures under this Directive.
AddedArticle 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 b (new): The violation of this Directive by the respondent public authority shall be presumed where the respondent public authority has failed to comply with an obligation to disclose relevant requested evidence at its disposal pursuant to this paragraph.
RemovedArticle 28 – paragraph 6: 6. Member States shall ensure that the limitation periods for bringing actions for compensation as referred to in paragraph 1 are not less than 10 years. Such periods shall not begin to run before the violation has ceased and the person claiming the compensation knows, or can reasonably be expected to know, that he or she suffered damage from a violation as referred to in paragraph 1. / Where new relevant data, for example scientific studies, epidemiological studies, or other such studies, demonstrates for the first time a causality link between a violation as referred to in paragraph 1 and adverse health effects, the limitation period shall begin to run from the date of release of those relevant data. Where the limitation period has already begun to run, that period shall be reset as from the date of release of the relevant data.
AddedArticle 28 – paragraph 4 a (new): 4a. For the purpose of this Article, ‘relevant scientific data’ means statistical, epidemiological and other data demonstrating a statistically robust causal relationship between certain types of pollution and certain health conditions.
RemovedArticle 29 – paragraph 3 a (new): 3a. The types of infringements subject to penalties shall be at least the following: / (a) exceeding any limit value laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, in breach of Article 13(1); / (b) exceeding the average exposure reduction obligation laid down in Section 5 of Annex I, in breach of Article 13(3); / (c) failing to promptly adopt or implement adequate air quality plans pursuant to Article 19; / (d) failing to promptly adopt or implement adequate short-term action plans pursuant to Article 20; / (e) non-compliance with measures to reduce air pollution set out in air quality plans pursuant to Article 19 and short-term action plans pursuant to Article 20; / (f) failing to take the necessary steps to inform the public in the event of information or alert thresholds being exceeded pursuant to Article 15(3); / (g) failing to design the monitoring network and locate sampling points in accordance with the requirements in Article 9 and Annexes III, IV and V.
AddedArticle 28 – paragraph 6: 6. Member States shall ensure that the limitation periods for bringing actions for compensation as referred to in paragraph 1 are not less than 10 years. Such periods shall not begin to run before the violation has ceased and the person claiming the compensation knows, or can reasonably be expected to know, that he or she suffered damage from a violation as referred to in paragraph 1.
Show 5 more lines
AddedArticle 29 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new): (aa) the real or estimated economic benefits derived from the violation;
AddedArticle 29 – paragraph 3 – point c: (c) the population, including sensitive population and vulnerable groups, or the environment affected by the violation, and the harm caused, taking into account the objective of achieving a high level of protection of human health and the environment;
AddedArticle 29 – paragraph 3 – point d: (d) the repetitive or singular character of the violation, including any previous receipt of an admonition penalty, or administrative or criminal sanction.
AddedArticle 29 – paragraph 3 a (new): 3a. By ... [6 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 25 to supplement this Directive by laying down common criteria for determining the amount of penalties referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
AddedArticle 29 – paragraph 3 b (new): 3b. Member States shall ensure that revenues from penalties referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article are used, as a matter of priority, to finance measures related to the improvement of air quality. Member States shall make publicly available information on the use of these revenues. Without prejudice to Article 28, revenues raised from penalties shall not be used for the purpose of that Article.
Change 49
AddedAmendment needed for the internal logic of the text.
Change 50
RemovedTo be in line with the objectives of the Zero Pollution ambition, the EU air quality standards need to be fully aligned with the most up to date WHO Air Quality Guidelines. Given that the suggested limit values for some pollutants have not been updated in the 2021 WHO guidelines, these have been aligned with earlier WHO guidelines or other national limit values. The hourly limit value for SO2 has been aligned with the values agreed under the Gothenburg Protocol and in line with the US NAAQS.
AddedB Ozone target values
RemovedAnnex I – Section 2 – title: 2 Ozone long-term objectives
AddedB Ozone target values
RemovedAnnex I – Section 2 – point B: deleted / (deleted)
AddedC Long-term objectives for ozone (O3)
Show 4 more lines
Removeddeleted
RemovedGiven the extensive impacts of ozone on human health and the need to reduce the level of this pollutant in the ambient air, it is necessary to transform the currently applicable target value for this pollutant into a legally binding limit value. At the same time, for the sake of consistency, the ozone target value for the protection of the environment should be transformed into an ozone critical level.
RemovedOzone concentrations peak in certain parts of the year, especially in regions with high emissions from traffic and industry. In regions away from the equator, in the northern hemisphere, this period will typically be in the warm season (summer) within a single calendar year. Consequently, possible exceedances are likely to be recorded during that period. The long-term objective for this pollutant should therefore be also linked to the peak season exposure in line with the 2021 WHO Guidelines.
RemovedFor the sake of consistency with the other pollutants having adverse effect on the ecosystem, the ozone target value for the protection of the environment should be transformed into an ozone critical level. Moreover, critical level for ammonia should be also introduced, in line with the provisions of the Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) and the values recommended by the group of experts under the Convention.
Change 51
ChangedAnnex I – Section 4 – point A – paragraph 1: The alert thresholds are triggered when the values in the following table are exceeded for 3 consecutive hours in the case of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and ozone, and over 23 consecutive days for PM10 and PM2.5.PM2.5, at locations representative of air quality over at least 100 km2 or an entire zone, whichever is the smaller.
Change 52
RemovedFor the sake of overall consistency of the Directive, alert threshold for ozone should be included together with the alert thresholds for other pollutants. Moreover, alert thresholds for SO2 and NO2 should be lowered following the alignment of the limit values listed in Table 1 Section 1 of Annex I (the new values proposed have as a basis the Canadian air quality legislation).
Change 53
RemovedThere are certain risks to human health from brief exposure for particularly sensitive population and vulnerable groups to pollutants other than ozone, such as SO2, NO2, PM2.5 and PM10. It is therefore prudent to include in the Directive information thresholds also for those pollutants. The numerical values for newly introduced information thresholds are based on those of the Canadian air quality legislation.
AddedAnnex I – Section 5 – point A – paragraph 1: The Average Exposure Indicator expressed in μg/m3 (AEI) shall be based upon measurements at all sampling points in urban background locations in territorial units at NUTS 2 level throughout the territory of a Member State. It shall be assessed as a 3-calendar-year running annual mean concentration averaged over all sampling points of the relevant pollutant in each NUTS 2 territorial unit. The AEI for a particular year shall be the mean concentration of that same year and the preceding 2 years.
RemovedAnnex I – Section 5 – point A – paragraph 1: The Average Exposure Indicator expressed in μg/m3 (AEI) shall be based upon measurements at all sampling points in urban background, traffic, industrial and residentiallocations in territorial units at NUTS 2 level throughout the territory of a Member State. It shall be assessed as a 3-calendar-year running annual mean concentration averaged over all sampling points of the relevant pollutant in each NUTS 2 territorial unit. The AEI for a particular year shall be the mean concentration of that same year and the preceding 2 years.
AddedAnnex I – Section 5 – point A – paragraph 2: Where Member States identify exceedances attributable to natural sources, which the Member State or Member States could not have mitigated, contributions from natural sources shall be deducted before calculating the AEI.
Change 54
ChangedAnnex I – Section 5 –point– point B – paragraph 1 – indent 1: – for PM2.5, 25% lower than the AEI was 57 years before, unless it is already no higher than the average exposure concentration objective for PM2.5 defined in Section C.
Change 55
ChangedAnnex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – indent 2: – for NO2, 25% lower than the AEI was 57 years before, unless it is already no higher than the average exposure concentration objective for NO2 defined in Section C.
Change 56
ChangedThe assessment thresholds forAnnex healthIII protection– haveSection beenA adjusted– inpoint light1 of– theparagraph full1: alignmentTable with1 the- WHOMinimum guidelinesnumber of the limit values listedsampling inpoints Tablefor 1fixed ofmeasurement Sectionto 1assess ofcompliance Annexwith Ilimit byvalues usingfor the percentageprotection of the upperhuman assessmenthealth thresholdand forinformation eachand pollutantalert listedthresholds in thezones currentwhere Directive.fixed Formeasurement ozoneis the assessment threshold has been derived from EEAsole Assessmentsource of ground-levelinformation ozone(for inall EEApollutants memberexcept countries.ozone)
Change 57
RemovedFollowing the addition of ozone and ammonia to the list of critical levels for the protection of vegetation and natural ecosystems, it is necessary to establish assessment thresholds for both pollutants. Assessment threshold for ammonia stems from the work of the expert group under the Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). For ozone the assessment threshold has been derived from EEA Assessment of ground-level ozone in EEA member countries,
AddedAnnex III – Section A – point 1 – paragraph 3: Table 3 - Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurement to assess compliance with limit values for the protection of human health and information and alert thresholds in zones where a 50% reduction of such measurements applies (for all pollutants except ozone)
RemovedAnnex III – Part A – title: A Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurement to assess compliance with limit values for the protection of human health, ozone long-term objectives, information thresholds and alert thresholds
AddedAnnex III – Section A – point 1 – paragraph 5: For each zone, the minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurements set out in the tables in this point shall include at least 1 background location sampling point and 1 sampling point in air pollution hotspots according to Point B, of Annex IV. For nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, benzene, sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide, this shall include at least 1 sampling point focused on measuring contribution from transport emissions. However, in the cases where there is only 1 sampling point required, this shall be in the area with the highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed.
RemovedAnnex III – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 1: Table 1 - Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurement to assess compliance with limit values for the protection of human health and information and alert thresholds in zones where fixed measurement is the sole source of information (for all pollutants except ozone)
AddedAnnex III – Section A – point 1 – paragraph 6: For each zone, for nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, benzene and carbon monoxide, the total number of urban background location sampling points and the total number of sampling points in air pollution hotspots required shall not differ by more than a factor of 2. The number of PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide sampling points at urban background locations and air pollution hotspots shall meet the requirements set out in Point B.
Show 2 more lines
RemovedTechnical AM following the introduction of information thresholds for a number of other pollutants and deletion of Point B of Annex III
AddedAnnex III – Section B: deleted / (deleted)
Change 58
ChangedAnnex III – Part A – pointSection 1D – paragraph 2: Table 2title: -D Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurement to assess compliance with the ozone limit value,measurements criticalof level,ultrafine long-termparticles, objectivesblack andcarbon, informationmercury and alert thresholdsammonia where suchhigh measurementsconcentrations are the sole source of information (forlikely ozoneto only)occur
Change 59
RemovedTechnical AM following the transformation of ozone target value for the protection of human health into a limit value and the ozone target value for the protection of environment into ozone critical level. Additionally an editing mistake in the table has been corrected.
AddedAnnex III – Section D – paragraph 1: Ultrafine particle number concentrations and BC shall be monitored at selected locations in addition to other air pollutants at those same locations as sampling points for particulate matter or nitrogen dioxide referred to in Point A of this Annex, and be sited in accordance with Section 3 of Annex VII. Sampling points to monitor ammonia shall coincide, where appropriate, with sampling points for particulate matter referred to in Point A of this Annex, and be sited in accordance with Section 3 of Annex VII. Sampling points to monitor mercury shall be sited in accordance with Section 3 of Annex VII. For this purpose, at least one sampling point per 1 million inhabitants shall be established at a location where high UFP concentrations are likely to occur, at least one sampling point per 1 million inhabitants shall be established at a location where high BC concentrations are likely to occur, at least one sampling point per 1 million inhabitants shall be established at a location where high mercury concentrations are likely to occur, and at least one sampling point per 1 million inhabitants shall be established at a location where high NH3 concentrations are likely to occur. Member States that have fewer than 1 million inhabitants shall establish at least one fixed sampling point at a location where high UFP concentrations are likely to occur, one sampling point at a location where high BC concentrations are likely to occur, one sampling point at a location where high NH3 concen…
RemovedAnnex III – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 3: Table 3 - Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurement to assess compliance with limit values for the protection of human health and information and alert thresholds in zones where a 50% reduction of such measurements applies (for all pollutants except ozone)
AddedAnnex III – Section D – paragraph 2: Monitoring supersites at urban background or rural background locations established in accordance with Article 10 shall not be included for the purpose of meeting the requirements on the minimum number of sampling points for UFP, BC and NH3 set here.
RemovedTechnical AM following the introduction of information thresholds for a number of other pollutants and deletion of point B of Annex III.
AddedAnnex IV – Section A – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c: (c) on the carriageway of roads; and on the central reservations of roads except where there is normally pedestrian access to the central reservation or where cycling lanes are present.
Show 12 more lines
RemovedAnnex III – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 4: Table 4 - Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurements to assess compliance with the ozone limit value, critical level, long-term objectives and information and alert thresholds in zones where a 50% reduction of such measurements applies (for ozone only)
AddedAnnex IV – Section B – point 2 – point a – introductory part: (a) Sampling points directed at the protection of human health shall be sited in such a way as to provide reliable data on all of the following:
RemovedTechnical AM following the transformation of ozone target value for the protection of human health into a limit value and the ozone target value for the protection of environment into ozone critical level.
AddedAnnex IV – Section B – point 2 – point a – point i: (i) concentration levels in the areas within zones with the highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed for a period which is significant in relation to the averaging period of the limit value(s), including in the vicinity of all air pollution hotspots,
RemovedAnnex III – Part B: deleted / (deleted)
AddedAnnex IV – Section B – point 2 – point a – point ii: (ii) concentration levels in other areas within the zones which are representative of the exposure of the general population, both in urban and rural background locations, and
RemovedAnnex III – Part D – title: D Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurements of ultrafine particles where high concentrations are likely to occur
AddedAnnex IV – Section B – point 2 – point b a (new): (ba) locations intended to be representative of urban traffic shall be located in such a way as to provide data on the streets where the highest concentrations occur, taking into consideration traffic volume (at least 10 000 vehicles per day or representing the largest traffic density in the zone), local dispersion conditions and spatial land use (for example in street canyons);
RemovedAnnex III – Part D – paragraph 1: Ultrafine particle number concentrations shall be monitored at selected locations in addition to other air pollutants at the same locations as sampling points for particulate matter or nitrogen dioxide referred to in Point A, and be sited in accordance with Section 3 of Annex VII. For this purpose, at least 1 sampling point per 1 million inhabitants shall be established at a location where high UFP concentrations are likely to occur. Member States that have fewer than 1 million inhabitants shall establish at least 1 fixed sampling point at a location where high UFP concentrations are likely to occur.
AddedAnnex IV – Section B – point 2 – point c: (c) urban background locations shall be located so that their pollution level is influenced by the integrated contribution from all sources upwind of the sampling point, following the main wind direction. The pollution level shall not be dominated by a single source unless such a situation is typical for a larger urban area. Those sampling points shall, as a general rule, be representative for several square kilometres;
RemovedAnnex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point ii: (ii) concentration levels in other areas within the zones which are representative of the exposure of the general population,
AddedAnnex IV – Section B – point 2 – point c a (new): (ca) air pollution hotspots shall be covered by a sufficient number of sampling points installed within the main wind direction of the source where there is a near residential area or an area where the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed for a period which is significant in relation to the averaging period of the limit or target value or values, including but not limited to schools, hospitals, assisted living facilities and office areas;
Change 60
ChangedAnnex IV – PartSection B – point 2 – point ac –b point(new): ii(cb) awhere (new):the (iia)objective is to measure concentration levels in other areas withinreferred theto zonesin whichpoints are(a)(i) and (a)(ii), sampling points shall be sited close to locations frequented by sensitive population and vulnerable groups,groups and at-risk communities, such as schools, playgrounds, hospitals and homes for the elderly,elderly;
Change 61
RemovedAnnex IV – Part B – point 2 – point b a (new): (ba) Urban traffic locations shall be located in such a way as to provide data on the streets where the highest concentrations occur, taking into consideration traffic volume (at least 10 000 vehicles per day or representing the largest traffic density in the zone), local dispersion conditions and spatial land use (e.g. in street canyons);
AddedAnnex IV – Section B – point 2 – point d: (d) where the objective is to measure the contribution of heating, at least one sampling point shall be installed within the main wind direction of these sources; sampling points shall be sited in such a way that the air sampled is representative of air quality for an area of at least 250 m × 250 m;
Change 62
ChangedAnnex IV – PartSection B – point 2 – point d: (d) where the objective is to measure the contribution ofe: residential(e) heating,sampling atpoints leastin onerural samplingbackground pointlocations shall be installed within the main wind direction oflocated theseso sources;that samplingthey pointsare shallnot beinfluenced sitedby inurban suchareas aand wayso that thetheir airpollution sampledlevel is representative of air quality for a residential areainfluenced ofby atthe leastintegrated 250contribution mfrom ×all 250relevant m;sources;
Change 63
ChangedAnnex IV – PartSection B – point 2 – point f: (f) where contributions from industrial sources, ports orand airports are to be assessed, at least 1one sampling point shall be installed downwind (fromfollowing the main wind direction)direction of the source in the nearest residential area. Where the background concentration is not known, an additional sampling point shall be situated within the main wind direction. The sampling points shall be sited such that the application of BAT can be monitored;
Change 64
RemovedGiven that sensitive population and vulnerable groups are particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of elevated ozone concentrations even after brief exposures, the sampling points for ozone shall be positioned in locations frequented by sensitive population and vulnerable groups, such as schools, playgrounds, hospitals and homes for elderly.
AddedAnnex IV – Section B – point 2 – point i: (i) sampling points measuring arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons shall be co-located with sampling points for PM10.
RemovedAnnex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point b: (b) in general, the sampling point inlet shall be between 0,5 m (the breathing zone) and 2 m above the ground. Higher siting (up to 4 m) may be appropriate if the sampling point is representative of a large area (a background location) or in other specific circumstances and any derogations shall be fully documented;
AddedAnnex IV – Section C – paragraph 1 – introductory part: The following shall apply:
RemovedAnnex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point e: (e) for all pollutants, sampling probes shall be no more than 10 m from the kerbside; consideration shall be given to whether locating the sampling point at less than 25 m from the edge of major junctions would result in over- or under-estimating concentrations and lead to measuring a very small micro-environment that is not representative of levels along that road segment; for the purposes of this point, a ‘kerbside’ means the line that separates motorised traffic from other areas; a ‘major junction’ means a junction which interrupts the traffic flow and causes different emissions (stop&go) from the rest of the road;
AddedAnnex IV – Section C – paragraph 1 – point b: (b) in general, the sampling point inlet shall be between 0,5 m (the breathing zone) and 3 m above the ground. Higher siting (up to 6 m) may be appropriate if the sampling point is representative of a large area (a background location). The decision to apply such higher siting shall be fully documented;
Show 16 more lines
RemovedAnnex IV – Part D – point 3: 3. The documentations shall include evidence explaining the reasons for the network design, in particular: / (a) the reasons for the selection of locations representative of the highest levels of pollution in the zone or agglomeration for each pollutant; / (b) the reasons for the selection of locations representative of the general exposure of population; and / (c) any deviation from the micro-scale siting criteria, their underlying reasons and the likely impact on measured levels.
AddedAnnex IV – Section C – paragraph 1 – point e: (e) for all pollutants, sampling probes shall be positioned no more than 5 m from the kerbside; consideration shall be given to whether locating the sampling point at less than 25 m from the edge of major junctions would result in over- or under-estimating concentrations and lead to measuring a very small micro-environment that is not representative of levels along that road segment; for the purposes of this point, a ‘kerbside’ means the line that separates motorised traffic from other areas; a ‘major junction’ means a junction which interrupts the traffic flow and causes different emissions (stop&go) from the rest of the road;
RemovedAnnex IV – Part D – point 4: 4. Where indicative measurements or modelling, or a combination thereof are used within a zone, the documentation shall include details of these methods and information on how the criteria listed in Article 9(3) are met.
AddedAnnex IV – Section C – paragraph 1 – point f: (f) for the deposition measurements in rural background locations, the guidelines and criteria of EMEP shall apply;
RemovedAnnex IV – Part D – point 5: 5. Where indicative measurements or modelling are used, competent authorities shall use gridded data reported under Directive (EU) 2016/2284 and emission information reported under Directive 2010/75/EU.
AddedAnnex IV – Section D – point 1: 1. The competent authorities responsible for air quality assessment shall provide a data-based assessment for all zones, fully document the site-selection procedures, record information to support the network design and choice of location for all monitoring sites and provide justifications. The design of the monitoring network shall be supported at least by either modelling with a sufficiently low level of uncertainty or indicative measurements.
RemovedAnnex IV – Part D – point 9: 9. At least every 5 years the selection criteria, network design and monitoring site locations, defined by the competent authorities in view of the requirements of this Annex, shall be reviewed to ensure they remain valid and optimal overtime. The review shall be supported at least by either modelling or indicative measurements. Where such a review reveals that the network design and monitoring site locations are not valid anymore (for instance, there is no fixed monitoring station in the area of modelled maximum levels), then the competent authority shall correct and update the network design within no more than one year.
AddedAnnex IV – Section D – point 2: 2. The documentation shall include the location of the sampling points through spatial coordinates, detailed maps and photos, and shall include information on the spatial representativeness of all sampling points.
RemovedAnnex IV – Part D – point 10 a (new): 10a. The competent authorities responsible for air quality assessment shall perform regular checks and maintenance of the ambient air quality monitoring stations to ensure that they continue to operate and to ensure the accuracy of measurements and reliability of instrumentation.
AddedAnnex IV – Section D – point 3: 3. The documentations shall include evidence explaining the reasons for the network design and proof of compliance with the requirements referred to in Points B and C, in particular: / (a) the reasons for the selection of locations representative of the highest levels of pollution in the zone or agglomeration for each pollutant; / (b) the reasons for the selection of locations representative of the general exposure of population; and / (c) any deviation from the micro-scale siting criteria, their underlying reasons and the likely impact on measured levels.
RemovedWhile technologies for air quality monitoring are improving, the Commission proposal introduced wider margin of uncertainties compared to the current AAQD. The introduced changes are to bring the numbers in line with the current AAQD and with the amended limit values in Table 1 Section 1 of Annex I.
AddedAnnex IV – Section D – point 4: 4. Where indicative measurements or modelling, or a combination thereof are used within a zone, the documentation shall include details of these methods and information on how the criteria listed in Article 9(3) are met.
RemovedThe introduced changes are to bring the numbers in line with the amended limit values in Table 1 Section 1 of Annex I.
AddedAnnex IV – Section D – point 5: 5. Where indicative measurements or modelling are used, competent authorities shall use gridded data reported under Directive (EU) 2016/2284 and emission information reported under Directive 2010/75/EU.
RemovedAnnex V – Part A – point 2 – paragraph 3: The percentages for uncertainty in the tables in this Section apply for all limit values (and the ozone target value) that are calculated by simple averaging of individual measurements such as hourly mean, daily mean or yearly mean values without considering the additional uncertainty for the calculation of the number of exceedances. Levels below 5 for PM2.5 and 10 for NO2, respectively, shall be allowed to have percentages for uncertainty of 30 %. The uncertainty shall be interpreted as being applicable in the region of the appropriate limit values (or ozone target value). The uncertainty calculation does not apply to AOT40 and values that include more than 1 year, more than 1 station (e.g. AEI) or more than 1 component. They are also not applicable for information thresholds, alert thresholds and critical levels for the protection of vegetation and natural ecosystems.
AddedAnnex IV – Section D – point 9: 9. At least every 5 years the selection criteria, network design and monitoring site locations, defined by the competent authorities in view of the requirements of this Annex, shall be reviewed to ensure they remain valid and optimal overtime. The review shall be supported at least by either modelling or indicative measurements and shall identify measures to be taken within a timeframe in accordance with the guidelines to ensure that the network design remains valid and optimal. Where such a review reveals that the network design and monitoring site locations are no longer valid (for example, there is no fixed monitoring station in the area of modelled maximum levels), the competent authority shall correct and update the network design within one year.
Change 65
ChangedAnnex VIV – PartSection AD – point 210 –a paragraph(new): 9:10a. WhereThe ancompetent authorities responsible for air quality modelassessment isshall usedperform forand assessment,document referencesregular tochecks descriptionsand maintenance of the model, includingambient theair spatialquality resolutionmonitoring ofstations theto modelensure itselfthat andthey source-specificcontinue inputto dataoperate and informationto onensure the calculationaccuracy of the modelling qualitymeasurements objectiveand shallreliability beof compiled.instrumentation.
Change 66
RemovedAnnex V – Part A – point 2 – paragraph 10: deleted
AddedAnnex V – Section A – point 2 – paragraph 3: The percentages for uncertainty in the tables in this Section apply for all limit values (and the ozone target value) that are calculated by simple averaging of individual measurements such as hourly mean, daily mean or yearly mean values without considering the additional uncertainty for the calculation of the number of exceedances. Levels below 5 for PM2.5 and 10 for NO2 shall be allowed to have percentages for uncertainty of 30 %. The uncertainty shall be interpreted as being applicable in the region of the appropriate limit values (or ozone target value). The uncertainty calculation does not apply to AOT40 and values that include more than 1 year, more than 1 station (e.g. AEI) or more than 1 component. They are also not applicable for information thresholds, alert thresholds and critical levels for the protection of vegetation and natural ecosystems.
RemovedAnnex V – Part C – paragraph 1: An assessment of compliance with the relevant limit value shall be carried out regardless of whether the data quality objectives are achieved, provided the available data allows for a conclusive assessment. In cases relating to the short-term limit values, measurements that only cover a fraction of the calendar year, and that have not delivered sufficient valid data as required by Point B, may still constitute non-compliance. Where this is the case, and there are no clear grounds to doubt the quality of the valid data acquired, this shall be considered an exceedance of the limit and be reported as such.
AddedAnnex V – Section A – point 2 – paragraph 9: Where an air quality model is used for assessment, references to descriptions of the model, including the spatial resolution of the model itself and source-specific input data and information on the calculation of the modelling quality objective shall be compiled.
RemovedAnnex V – Part D – paragraph 1 – introductory part: The following information shall be compiled for zones where air quality modelling is used:
AddedAnnex V – Section A – point 2 – paragraph 10: deleted
Show 2 more lines
RemovedAnnex V – Part D – paragraph 1 – point d: (d) a description of results, including uncertainties and, in particular, the extent of any area or, if relevant, the length of road within the zone over which concentrations exceed any limit value or long-term objective, and of any area within which concentrations exceed the assessment threshold,
AddedAnnex V – Section B – paragraph 3: For the other cases, measurements are to be evenly distributed over the calendar year (or over the April-September period for indicative measurements of O3). In order to comply with these requirements and to ensure that any potential losses of data do not skew results, the minimum data coverage and distribution requirements shall be met for specific periods (quarter, month, weekday) of the whole year depending on the pollutant and measurement method/frequency.
Change 67
ChangedAnnex V – PartSection FD – pointparagraph 1 a– (new):introductory 1a.part: The Commission shall providefollowing clearinformation guidanceshall andbe requirementscompiled for the usezones ofwhere air quality models, workingmodelling towardsis harmonisation.used:
Change 68
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part A – point 3 a (new): 3a. Nature and assessment of pollution and health effects / (a) the concentrations observed or recorded in previous years, before implementation of the air quality plan to be adopted or updated started; / (b) in the event of an updated air quality plan, concentrations measured since the beginning of the implementation of the measures set out in the air quality plan being updated; / (c) assessment of health effects related to the exposure of the population to measured concentrations, including assessment of mortality and morbidity from both acute and chronic health effects on both the general population and sensitive population and vulnerable groups; / (d) techniques used for the assessment of air pollution, exposure and health effects.
AddedAnnex V – Section D – paragraph 1 – point c a (new): (ca) observed lack of data or information from specific sampling points,
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part A – point 4 a (new): 4a. Identification of effective pollution abatement measures / (a) information on all possible air pollution abatement measures that could be adopted at appropriate local, regional or national level to contribute to the attainment of air quality objectives, including at least the pollution abatement measures listed under Point B; / (b) assessment of the emission reduction potential and projected impact on reducing concentrations resulting from the implementation of each of the possible pollution abatement measures identified, bothindividual and combined impacts, including the method of analysis and the associated uncertainties in line with the methodology described under Point C.
AddedAnnex V – Section D – paragraph 1 – point e a (new): (ea) in respect of measurements from transboundary stations, an estimation of transboundary pollution related to another Member State or a third country;
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part A – point 4 b (new): 4b. Baseline scenario / (a) a description of existing air pollution abatement measures at local, regional, national and international level, including up-to-date information on the status and timetable of implementation; / (b) information concerning the status of implementation of the Directives referred to in Point B, point 1; / (c) observed effects of these measures in addressing the factors responsible for the exceedance (emission reductions achieved and related concentration reductions); / (d) a projected further evolution of air quality, both emissions and concentrations, assuming no change to already adopted measures (baseline scenario), covering all years until the attainment date; / (e) an estimate of health effects related to the exposure of the population to air pollution in the baseline scenario; / (f) a description of the method of analysis for the projections and the associated uncertainties in line with the methodology described under Point C.
AddedAnnex V – Section F – point 1 a (new): 1a. The Commission shall provide clear guidance and requirements for the use of air quality models, with a view to working towards harmonisation.
Show 64 more lines
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part A – point 5 – introductory part: 5. Expected impact of measures to reach compliance in the shortest time possible and, at the latest, within 3 years after the end of the year in which the first exceedance was recorded.
AddedAnnex VI – Section B – point 2: 2. The Commission shall require Member States to prepare and submit a report on the demonstration of equivalence in accordance with point 1.
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part A – point 5 – point b a (new): (ba) for air quality plans under Article 19(2), detailed reasons to explain how the plan sets out all appropriate measures, so that the exceedance period can be kept as short as possible, including the following: / (i) where the start date for implementation of a measure is later than 6 months from the date of adoption of the air quality plan, an explanation of the reasons why an earlier start date is not possible; / (ii) where the analysis pursuant to point 4a has identified measures that would have greater impacts in improving air quality, but they have not been selected for adoption, an explanation of the reasons why adoption of such measures is impossible and evidence that the selected measures will achieve at least an equivalent reduction in emissions and concentrations.
AddedAnnex VII – Section 1 – point A – paragraph 1: The main objectives of such measurements are to ensure that adequate information is made available on levels in urban background and rural background locations. This information is essential to judge the enhanced levels in more polluted areas (such as urban background locations, air pollution hotspots, industry related locations, traffic related locations), assess the possible contribution from long-range transport of pollutants, support source apportionment analysis and for the understanding of specific pollutants such as particulate matter. It is also essential for the increased use of modelling also in urban areas.
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part A – point 7 a (new): 7a. Annex 2a: A summary of the public information and consultation measures undertaken pursuant to Article 19(6), their results and an explanation of how these results were taken into account in the final plan.
AddedAnnex VII – Section 1 – point C – paragraph 1: Measurements shall be taken in urban background locations, air pollution hotspots and rural background locations in accordance with Annex IV.
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B – point 2 – introductory part: 2. When preparing air quality plans, Member States shall consider at least the following air pollution abatement measures at local, regional or national level for implementation in connection with the attainment of air quality objectives:
AddedAnnex VII – Section 2 – point B – paragraph 1: Measurement of ozone precursor substances shall include at least nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2), methane (CH4) and other appropriate volatile organic compounds (VOC). The selection of the specific compounds to be measured completed by other compounds of interest will depend on the objective sought.
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point a: (a) reduction of emissions from stationary sources by ensuring that polluting small and medium-sized stationary combustion sources (including coal, biomass and gas stoves and boilers) are fitted with emission control equipment, and progressively phased-out and replaced by zero-emission alternatives, and that the energy efficiency of buildings is improved;
AddedAnnex VII – Section 3 a (new): SECTION 3A - MEASUREMENT OF BLACK CARBON (BC) / A. Objectives / The objective of such measurements is to ensure that adequate information is available at locations where high concentrations of BC occur that are mainly influenced by sources from air, water, or road transport (such as airports, ports or roads), industrial sites or domestic heating. The information shall be appropriate to judge on enhanced levels of BC concentrations from those sources. / B. Substances / BC / C. Siting / Sampling points shall be established in accordance with Annexes IV and V at a location where high BC concentrations are likely to occur and within the main wind direction.
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point c: (c) procurement by public authorities, in line with the handbook on environmental public procurement, of zero-emission vehicles;
AddedAnnex VII – Section 3 b (new): SECTION 3B - MEASUREMENT OF AMMONIA (NH3) / A. Objectives / The objective of such measurements is to ensure that adequate information is available at locations where high concentrations of NH3 occur that are mainly influenced by sources from agricultural and animal farming (fields and grassland subject to the application of fertiliser, stables and storages of manure). The information shall be appropriate to judge on enhanced levels of NH3 concentrations from those sources. / B. Substances / NH3 / C. Siting / Sampling points shall be established in accordance with Annexes IV and V at a location where high NH3 concentrations are likely to occur and within the main wind direction.
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d: (d) measures to limit transport emissions through traffic planning and management, including at least: / (i) congestion pricing; / (ii) parking fees on all public land or other economic incentives to reduce unnecessary mobility by car and with differentiated fees for polluting and zero-emission vehicles; / (iii) establishing urban vehicles access restrictions schemes, including low emission zones in line with the most recent Euro standard, and zero-emission zones; / (iv) establishing low-traffic neighbourhoods; / (v) introducing speed limits of 30 km per hour; / (vi) ‘last mile’ zero (exhaust) emission delivery arrangements; / (vii) promoting car sharing and carpooling.
AddedAnnex VII – Section 3 c (new): SECTION 3C – MEASUREMENT OF MERCURY / A. Objectives / The objective of such measurements is to ensure that adequate information is available at locations where high concentrations of mercury occur that are mainly influenced by sources from energy production and industry. The information shall be appropriate to judge on enhanced levels of mercury concentrations from those sources. / B. SUBSTANCES / Mercury / C. Siting / Sampling points shall be established in accordance with Annexes IV and V at a location where high mercury concentrations are likely to occur and within the main wind direction.
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e: (e) measures to encourage a modal shift from private vehicles towards active mobility and less polluting forms of transport (e.g. walking, cycling, public transport), including at least: / (i) strengthening the public transport network; / (ii) reducing the cost of public transport or eliminating it altogether for certain sectors of the population; / (iii) improving the infrastructure to create more space for people to walk and cycle safely; / (iv) economic incentives for the purchase of active and shared mobility solutions (e.g. bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters); / (v) scrappage schemes for the most polluting vehicles;
AddedAnnex VIII – title: Information to be included in air quality plans and air quality roadmaps for improvement in ambient air quality
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point g: (g) requiring the use of best available technologies to eliminate or, where it is not possible to eliminate, to reduce as much as possible emissions from small-, medium- and large-scale stationary sources and in mobile sources;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 2 – point a: (a) type of zone (urban, industrial, air pollution hotspot or rural area) or characteristics of NUTS 2 territorial unit (including urban, industrial, air pollution hotspot or rural areas);
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h a (new): (ha) measures to reduce air pollution in hotspots, including in ports, establishing specific requirements for moored ships, boats and port traffic, while speeding-up on-shore power and electrification of ships and port working machinery;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 2 – point c: (c) concentrations or average exposure indicator of the relevant pollutant observed at least 5 years prior to the exceedance and comparison with limit values or average exposure reduction obligation and average exposure concentration objective;
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h b (new): (hb) measures to reduce emissions from agriculture, including nitrogen management systems, taking into account the whole nitrogen cycle, livestock feeding strategies, low-emission manure spreading techniques, low-emission manure storage systems, low-emission animal housing systems, the reduction of animal number; while taking into account the upcoming revised UNECE Framework Code for Good Agricultural Practice for Reducing Ammonia Emissions;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 3 – paragraph 1: Names and addresses of the competent authorities responsible for the development and implementation of air quality plans or air quality roadmaps.
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point i: (i) measures to protect the health of children, such as school streets with limited or no access for cars, and measures to protect the health of other sensitive population and vulnerable groups, including pregnant women and people living with asthma or other respiratory or cardio-vascular conditions.
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 3 a (new): 3a. Assessment of environmental impacts and health effects / (a) concentrations and exceedances recorded in previous years, before the start of implementation of the air quality plan, the updated air quality plan or the air quality roadmap; / (b) in the event of an updated air quality plan, concentrations and exceedances recorded since the beginning of the implementation of the measures set out in the updated air quality plan; / (c) assessment of environmental impacts and health effects related to the exposure of the population to measured concentrations, including assessment of mortality and morbidity from both acute and chronic health effects on both the general population and sensitive population and vulnerable groups; / (d) methods used for the assessment of environmental impacts, exposure and health effects. / Member States shall be guided in their assesment by the concentration-response (C-R) functions defined by the WHO linking concentrations of pollutants in ambient air to mortality risks or other adverse health effects (Health risks of air pollution in Europe – HRAPIE project), as well as the counterfactual concentrations above which health impacts are estimated (‘cut-off points’).
RemovedAnnex VIII – Part B a (new): Ba Guidance and minimum requirements for analysing the projected impact of air quality plans and pollution abatement measures / 1. Member States shall rely on objective and rigorous methods to assess the projected impact of air quality plans and pollution abatement measures. When relying on projected impacts of pollution abatement measures for the delivery of compliance with air quality objectives, those projected impacts must not be only possible, but likely with a high degree of certainty. / 2. Air quality plans shall contain enough information in sufficient detail in order to justify the impact assessment, including: / (a) a description of the method used for forecasting the evolution of air quality; / (b) an explanation of whether the projections are based on objective data or on assumptions; when relying on assumptions, a sensitivity analysis to explain best case, most likely and worst case scenarios; / (c) background documents and information used for the assessment; / (d) a detailed assessment of the individual impact of each air pollution abatement measure on emission reductions and related concentration reductions and the relevant assumptions; / (e) a detailed assessment of the combined impact of the air pollution abatement measures included in the plan on emission reductions and related concentration reductions and the relevant assumptions. / 3. The impact assessment shall only include pollution abatement measures that are certain to be adopted and implemented. Meas…
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 4 – point a: (a) list of the main emission sources and, where possible, of the specific entities responsible for pollution;
RemovedAnnex VIII a (new): ANNEX VIIIa / EMERGENCY MEASURES TO BE CONSIDERED FOR INCLUSION IN THE SHORT-TERM ACTION PLANS REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 20 / 1. Measures aimed at addressing the sources which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or target values or alert threshold being exceeded: / (a) restricting the circulation of private vehicles; / (b) temporary free public transportation; / (c) implementing stricter emission limits or suspending the operation of industrial facilities, or both; / (d) suspending operations at construction works; / (e) restricting the use of solid fuels for domestic heating. / 2. Measures aimed at protecting sensitive population and vulnerable groups, including children: / (a) permitting or mandating remote working; / (b) closing nurseries and elementary schools; / (c) introducing driving restrictions around nurseries and elementary schools. / 3. Proactive steps to provide specific air pollution, health and health protection information both to the general public and to sensitive population and vulnerable groups, as soon as exceedances of information and alert thresholds and of limit values and target values are projected: / (a) including air quality forecasts in weather forecasts on television and radio; / (b) informing environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups and other relevant health-care bodies; / (c) disseminating information on impacts of air pollution lev…
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 4 – point b: (b) total quantity of emissions from these sources and, where possible, of the specific entities (in tonnes/year);
RemovedAnnex IX – point 1 – point e: (e) information on preventive actions to reduce pollution and exposure to it: indication of main source sectors; recommendations for actions to reduce emissions both for individuals and organisations;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 4 – point d: (d) source apportionment according to relevant sectors and, where possible, apportionment to specific entities, that contribute to the exceedance in the national air pollution control programme.
RemovedAnnex IX – point 3: 3. When an exceedance occur or when there is a risk of exceedance of any limit value, average exposure reduction obligation, alert thresholds or information thresholds, Member States shall ensure that the information referred to in this Annex is additionally promoted to the public.
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 4 a (new): 4a. Identification of effective pollution abatement measures / (a) information on all possible air pollution abatement measures that could be adopted at appropriate local, regional or national level to contribute to the attainment of air quality objectives and their estimated effect in air pollution reduction of each air pollutant, including at least the pollution abatement measures listed under point B; / (b) assessment of the emission reduction potential and projected impact on reducing concentrations resulting from the implementation of each of the possible pollution abatement measures identified, both individual and combined impacts, including the method of analysis and the associated uncertainties in line with the methodology referred to in Point Ba.
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 4 b (new): 4b. Baseline scenario / (a) a description of existing air pollution abatement measures at local, regional, national and international level, including up-to-date information on the status and timetable of implementation; / (b) information concerning the status of implementation of the Directives referred to in point B, point 1, and in particular measures included in the National Air Pollution Control Programme (NAPCP); / (c) observed effects of the measures referred to in points (a) and (b) in addressing the factors responsible for the exceedance (emission reductions achieved and related concentration reductions); / (d) a projected further evolution of air quality, both emissions and concentrations, assuming no change to already adopted measures (‘baseline scenario’), covering all years until the attainment date; / (e) an estimate of health effects related to the exposure of the population to air pollution in the baseline scenario; / (f) a description of the method of analysis for the projections and the associated uncertainties in line with the methodology referred to in Point Ba.
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 5 – introductory part: 5. Expected impact of measures to reach compliance as soon as possible and, at the latest, within 3 years after the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 5 – point b: (b) indicative trajectory towards compliance and estimated year of compliance per air pollutant covered by the air quality roadmap or air quality plan taking into account measures referred to in point 6.
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 5 – point b a (new): (ba) for air quality roadmaps under Article 19(-1) and air quality plans under Article 19(1), with a view to ensuring that the exceedance period is kept as short as possible, detailed reasons to explain how the plan sets out measures referred to in point 4a of this Point, including the following: / (i) where the start date for implementation of a measure is later than 6 months from the date of adoption of the air quality plan or air quality roadmap, an explanation of the reasons why an earlier start date is not possible; / (ii) where the analysis pursuant to point 4a has identified measures that would have greater impacts in improving air quality, but they have not been selected for adoption, an explanation of the reasons why adoption of such measures is not considered feasible.
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 6 – point -a (new): (-a). review of pollution reduction measures as referred to in point 4a of this Point and their estimated effect on air pollution reduction of each air pollutant, including at least the measures listed under Point B;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 6 – point a: (a) listing and description of all the measures set out in the air quality plan or air quality roadmap and justification for those measures in terms of the source of exceedance, their effectiveness, their efficiency and their availability in time, including the identification of the competent authority in charge of their implementation;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 6 – point b: (b) quantification of emission reduction (in tonnes/year), by source and, where possible, by specific entities, of each measure, both individual and combined, under point (a);
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 6 – point c: (c) timetable for implementation of each measure and identification, where possible, of the specific entities which have obligations arising from the measures set out in the air quality plan or air quality roadmap, and a description of those obligations and their economic and social impacts;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 6 – point d: (d) estimate of the concentration reduction in relation to the exceedance concerned, as a consequence of each air quality measure, both individual and combined, under point (a);
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 7 – point d: (d) listing, description, justification and socio-economic impact of all additional measures, that unfold their full impact on ambient air pollutant concentrations in 3 years or more.
AddedAnnex VIII – Section A – point 7 a (new): 7a. Annex 2a: A summary of the public information and consultation measures undertaken pursuant to Article 19(6), their results and an explanation of how these results were taken into account in the final air quality plan or air quality roadmap.
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – introductory part: 2. When preparing air quality plans or air quality roadmaps, Member States shall consider at least the following air pollution abatement measures at local, regional or national level for implementation in connection with the attainment of air quality objectives, including:
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point c: (c) procurement by public authorities, in line with the handbook on green public procurement, of fuels, combustion equipment to reduce emissions and zero-emission vehicles as defined in Article 3(1), point (m), of Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a; / 1a Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 443/2009 and (EU) No 510/2011 (OJ L 111, 25.4.2019, p. 13).
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point c a (new): (ca) reduction of emissions through the uptake of zero- and low-emission collective and public transport vehicles and/or vehicles equipped with modern digital solutions affecting emissions reduction;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point c b (new): (cb) measures to improve the quality, efficiency, affordability and connectivity of collective and public transport;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point c c (new): (cc) measures related to the uptake and implementation of alternative fuel infrastructure;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point d: (d) measures to limit transport emissions through urban planning and traffic management, including at least: / (i) congestion pricing, such as road pricing and mileage-based user fees; / (ii) choice of road materials; / (iii) parking fees on public land or other economic incentives and with differentiated fees for polluting and zero-emission vehicles; / (iv) establishing urban vehicles access restrictions schemes, including low emission zones in line with the most recent Euro standard, and zero-emission zones; / (v) establishing low-traffic neighbourhoods, super blocks and car-free neighbourhoods; / (vi) establishing car-free streets; / (vii) introducing low speed limits; / (viii) ‘last mile’ zero (exhaust) emission delivery arrangements; / (ix) promoting car sharing and carpooling; (x) implementation of intelligent transport systems and digital solutions related to emissions reduction; / (xi) creation of multimodal hubs connecting various sustainable transport solutions and parking facilities;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point e: (e) measures to encourage a modal shift towards active mobility and less polluting forms of transport (e.g walking, cycling, public transport or rail), including at least: / (i) electrifying public transport, strengthening the public transport network, reducing public transport cost for citizens, and simplifying access and use, for example through digital and interconnected booking and real-time transit information; / (ii) ensuring smooth inter-modality for rural-urban commuting, for example between rail and cycling, and between cars and public transport (park and ride schemes); / (iii) incentivising cycling and walking, for example by expanding space for cyclists and pedestrians, prioritising cycling and walking in infrastructure planning, expanding the network of cycling routes, and redirecting fiscal and economic incentives towards active and shared mobility, including incentives for cycling and walking commute to work; / (iv) planning for compact cities; / (v) scrappage schemes for the most polluting vehicles;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point g: (g) requiring the use of best available technologies to eliminate or, where it is not possible to eliminate, to reduce as much as possible emissions from small-, medium- and large-scale stationary sources and in mobile sources;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point h a (new): (ha) measures to reduce air pollution in air pollution hotspots, including in ports and port cities, and establishing specific requirements for ships and boats at berth and port traffic, while speeding-up on-shore power supply and electrification of ships and port working machinery;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point h b (new): (hb) reduction of emissions from road, maritime and air transport through the use of alternative fuels and deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, as well as the use of economic incentives to accelerate their take-up;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point h c (new): (hc) measures to reduce emissions from agriculture and forestry;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point i: (i) measures to protect the health of children or other sensitive population and vulnerable groups;
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B – point 2 – point i a (new): (ia) measures by health authorities to encourage behavioural changes.
AddedAnnex VIII – Section B a (new): Ba. Guidance and minimum requirements for analysing the projected impact of air quality plans or air quality roadmaps and pollution abatement measures / 1. Member States shall rely on objective and scientific methods to assess the projected impact of air quality plans, air quality roadmaps and pollution abatement measures. Where relying on projected impacts of pollution abatement measures for the delivery of compliance with air quality objectives, those projections shall include a low level of uncertainty. / 2. Air quality plans or air quality roadmaps shall contain enough information in sufficient detail in order to justify the impact assessment, including: / (a) a description of the method used for forecasting the evolution of air quality; / (b) an explanation of whether the projections are based on objective data or on assumptions; when relying on assumptions, a sensitivity analysis to explain best-case, most likely and worst-case scenarios; / (c) background documents and information used for the assessment; / (d) an assessment of the individual impact of each air pollution abatement measure on emission reductions and related concentration reductions and the relevant assumptions; / (e) an assessment of the combined impact of the air pollution abatement measures included in the air quality plan or air quality roadmap on emission reductions and related concentration reductions and the relevant assumptions. / 3. The impact assessment shall include the margin of uncertainty of…
AddedAnnex VIII a (new): ANNEX VIIIa / EMERGENCY MEASURES TO BE CONSIDERED FOR INCLUSION IN THE SHORT-TERM ACTION PLANS REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 20 / 1. Measures to be taken in the short term aimed at addressing the sources which contribute to the risk of the relevant limit values, target values or alert threshold being exceeded: / (a) restricting the circulation of vehicles; / (b) low-fare or fare-free public transportation; / (c) implementing stricter emission limits; / (d) suspending operations at construction works; (e) street cleaning; (f) flexible work arrangements; / (g) introducing driving restrictions around locations frequented by sensitive population and vulnerable groups. / 3. Proactive steps to be taken in order to provide specific air pollution, health and health protection information, both to the general public and to sensitive population and vulnerable groups, by means of easily accessible, online or offline communication channels, as soon as exceedances of information and alert thresholds and of limit values and target values are projected.
AddedAnnex IX – point 1 – point b: (b) measured concentrations of all pollutants and how they compare with the most recent maximum concentrations recommended by the WHO, presented according to the appropriate periods as laid down in Annex I;
AddedAnnex IX – point 1 – point c – introductory part: (c) information on observed exceedance(s) of any limit value, ozone target value, information threshold, alert threshold, and average exposure reduction obligation, including at least:
AddedAnnex IX – point 1 – point d – point i: (i) the health impacts of air pollution, and specifically of each pollutant measured under this Directive, on general population,
AddedAnnex IX – point 1 – point d – point ii: (ii) the health impacts of air pollution, and specifically of each pollutant measured under this Directive, on vulnerable groups,
AddedAnnex IX – point 1 – point d – point iv: (iv) recommended precautions to be taken, broken down into precautions to be taken by the general population and by sensitive population and vulnerable groups, and actions to relieve the symptoms once exposure has occurred,
AddedAnnex IX – point 2 – point d: (d) information on short-term measures and preventive actions to reduce pollution and/or exposure to it: indication of main source sectors; recommendations for action to reduce emissions and limitations on exposure;
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2023). “Changes between ENVI-PR-742410 and A-9-2023-0233”. Text, 5 July 2023. from ENVI-PR-742410, to A-9-2023-0233. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-PR-742410/compare/A-9-2023-0233 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2023-07-05,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between ENVI-PR-742410 and A-9-2023-0233}},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-07-05},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-PR-742410/compare/A-9-2023-0233}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-PR-742410/compare/A-9-2023-0233},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from ENVI-PR-742410, to A-9-2023-0233. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}