Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
EMPL-PR-774423 → A-10-2025-0251
- From
- EMPL-PR-774423 report parliamentary committee draft of 30 Jun 2025
- To
- A-10-2025-0251 Plenary report of 8 Dec 2025
- Changes
- 21 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +80 added · −20 removed · 7 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2025/0073(COD)
- Title (from)
- on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/691 as regards support to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring
- Title (to)
- on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/691 as regards support to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Extends EGF support to workers in enterprises undergoing restructuring, including suppliers and downstream producers, with a focus on SMEs and disadvantaged groups.1245 Adds flexibility for applications in small labour markets and exceptional cases, with a 15% cap and a 40% budget reservation for displaced workers.91020 Strengthens social partner involvement and consultation, and extends the deadline for enterprise requests to four weeks.12131517 Adds reporting and assessment requirements, including a 20-working-day extension for Commission assessments and new reporting on beneficiary outcomes.14181920 The other changes are formal: a budgetary assessment is added as an annex.21
The notes class 20 changes as substance, 1 as formal, 0 as wording only.
Changes that matter, 21
Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.
Change 1
RemovedRecital 6: (6) The EGF’s role continues to be important as a flexible instrument to support workers who lose their jobs in large-scale restructuring events and to help them to find other jobs as quickly as possible. The Union should continue to provide specific, one-off support to facilitate the reintegration into decent and sustainable employment of displaced workers in areas, sectors, territories or labour markets suffering from a shock caused by serious economic disruption. The EU has to ensure its sustainable prosperity, strategic autonomy and competitiveness while preserving its unique social market economy, succeeding in the twin transition, and safeguarding its democracy, economic security and geopolitical standing. The change in production models related to the twin digital and green transitions will go hand in hand with restructuring processes, which can be essential to ensure a company’s economic sustainability and long-term employment stability, thus strengthening the Union’s competitiveness and saving jobs at the same time. To safeguard the EU’s future as an economic powerhouse, and progress on its twin digital and green transition, it is vital to support workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring so that they can acquire the skills that would help them transfer into a different role, or to change job. If this restructuring process affects activities in the enterprises’ direct suppliers or downstream users, workers employed by those…
AddedRecital 5 a (new): (5a) The Union faces increasingly unequal competition from third countries due to the fact that they do not comply with the same level of labour rights or safety and environmental regulations. Union enterprises must be supported in their fight against unfair competition and workers must be protected from its negative consequences.
AI: Note on change 1 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a recital stating that the Union faces unequal competition from third countries and that enterprises and workers must be supported against unfair competition.
Change 2
ChangedRecital 7:6: (7)(6) ThereforeThe itEGF’s isrole necessarycontinues to amend Regulation (EU) 2021/691be soimportant thatas thea EGFflexible caninstrument alsoto offersupport assistanceworkers towho workerslose affectedtheir byjobs imminentin joblarge-scale displacementrestructuring inevents enterprisesand undergoingto restructuring,help includingthem theirto suppliersfind orother downstreamsuitable users.jobs Toas ensurequickly efficientas EGFpossible. spending,The supportUnion should only gocontinue to companies undergoingprovide restructuringspecific, ifone-off thissupport processto supportsfacilitate the twinreintegration greeninto decent and digitalsustainable transitions.employment Asof thesedisplaced workers are still in activeareas, employment,sectors, theirterritories employeror maylabour requestmarkets assistancesuffering throughfrom thea relevantshock Membercaused States’by authorities.serious Whereeconomic multipledisruption. companiesThe areUnion affectedhas byto theensure restructuringits process,sustainable theprosperity, Memberstrategic Stateautonomy should,and oncompetitiveness anwhile exceptionalpreserving basis,its allowunique forsocial collectivemarket applicationseconomy, tosupporting beworkers submitted.and Asenterprises theto EGFensure isa underjust sharedtwin management,transition, itpreserving isjobs in the MemberUnion States’and authoritiessafeguarding thatits candemocracy, requesteconomic EGFsecurity co-fundingand upongeopolitical receiptstanding. ofTo asafeguard requestthe byUnions future as an enterprise,economic providedpowerhouse, thatand theprogress enterpriseon agreesits totwin providedigital theand nationalgreen co-funding.transition, Shouldit theis financialvital contributionto fromsupport theworkers EGFaffected beby granted,imminent thejob Memberdisplacement Statein concernedenterprises shouldundergoing makerestructuring theso fundsthat requestedthey availablecan toacquire the enterpriseskills asthat soonwould ashelp possiblethem andtransfer ininto anya eventdifferent withinrole twoin weeksthe ofsame theirenterprise, receipt.or Into particular,change thejob. enterpriseIf shoulda makerestructuring availableprocess toaffects the Memberdirect Statesuppliers alland informationdownstream neededproducers toof preparean theenterprise, finalworkers reportemployed onby thethem implementationshould ofalso thebe relevanteligible financialfor contribution,EGF notsupport, laterprovided thanthat sixtheir monthsemployer afteragrees to cover the endrelated ofcosts. theSuppliers implementationand ofdownstream theproducers assistance.should Thedemonstrate Commissionthat willthere prepareis a beneficiarycausal surveylink andbetween thesuch enterpriseeffects shouldand sharethe the…initial res…
AI: Note on change 2 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Replaces recital 7 with recital 6, which now includes a preventive approach, financing up-front training, and extending support to direct suppliers and downstream producers, with focus on SMEs and disadvantaged groups.
Change 3
RemovedRecital 7 a (new): (7a) Since workers affected by imminent job displacement are still in active employment, workers need to be informed during the restructuring process. Therefore, companies need to comply with existing national law on social dialogue, collective bargaining and trade union involvement during the restructuring process in general and during the implementation of the targeted packages funded with EGF support.
AddedRecital 7: (7) The EGF should be extended to comprise a more preventive approach by financing up-front training and reskilling that enables cross-sectoral labour mobility. It should support workers by developing transferable skills to avoid redundancies and to allow a smooth transition into new employment, preferably in the same region, thereby reducing the social cost of restructuring. Therefore it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU) 2021/691 so that the EGF can also offer assistance to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring, as well as their direct suppliers and downstream producers, with particular focus on workers employed by SMEs and disadvantaged groups of workers, such as older workers, persons with disabilities and low-skilled workers. To ensure efficient EGF spending, support should benefit enterprises undergoing restructuring processes that contribute to the twin green and digital transition. As these workers are still in active employment, their employer may request assistance through the relevant Member States’ authorities. Where several enterprises are affected by the same restructuring process, Member States should be able to provide the submission of collective applications. As the EGF is under shared management, it is the Member States’ authorities that can request EGF co-funding upon receipt of a request by one or more enterprises, provided that the enterprises agree to provide the national co-funding. Should the financia…
RemovedRecital 9: (9) The support provided to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring should supplement existing forms of support available under national measures and support the twin digital and green transition by reskilling and upskilling workers and by doing so ensuring quality jobs creation and decent working conditions. Short-time work schemes should not be eligible for EGF support as they do not relate to the displacement of jobs, but to their temporary suspension. If the national measures allow it, the requesting enterprise may subcontract the delivery of the coordinated package of personalised measures, or parts thereof.
AddedRecital 8 a (new): (8a) Restructuring processes should support an enterprise’s economic sustainability and long-term employment stability, thus strengthening the Unions competitiveness. Therefore, restructuring plans should anticipate and manage change as early as possible to prevent insolvency and job losses, while involving workers’ representatives and trade unions at an early stage. Both the decision by the enterprise to submit an application for EGF support and the design of the coordinated package of personalised measures should be done in consultation with the targeted beneficiaries, their representatives and the social partners as applicable in order to ensure workers’ rights to information and consultation are respected in line with Union and national legislation and to ensure the quality and relevance of the measures.
RemovedRecital 10: (10) The co-financing rate for such measures targeted to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring should be equal to the co-financing rate for EGF assistance to displaced workers. If applicable, suppliers or downstream users included in collective applications should provide the co-financing covering the support for their own workers. Enterprises that request EGF support should provide the national co-financing.
AddedRecital 8 b (new): (8b) Applications for financial support involving enterprises undergoing restructuring located in small labour markets, regions with high structural unemployment or involving only SMEs should be able to be considered to be admissible even if not all eligibility criteria are met. In such cases, the reasons for not meeting all criteria should be duly substantiated in the application. In the case of applications involving micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, limited administrative capacity should be taken into account.
Show 9 more lines
RemovedRecital 14 a (new): (14a) The current EGF is used regularly in some Member States, while in other Member States uptake has previously been low. Therefore, information campaigns to raise awareness of EGF availability should be organised in those Member States. The Commission should assist Member States through technical guidance and by sharing best practices.
AddedRecital 9: (9) The support provided to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring should supplement existing forms of support available under national measures or collective agreements and support the twin digital and green transition by reskilling and upskilling workers and by doing so ensuring quality jobs creation and decent working conditions. Short-time work schemes should not be eligible for EGF support as they do not relate to the displacement of jobs, but to their temporary suspension. If the national measures allow it, the requesting enterprise may subcontract the delivery of the coordinated package of personalised measures, or parts thereof.
AddedRecital 10: (10) The co-financing rate for such measures targeted to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring should be equal to the co-financing rate for EGF assistance to displaced workers. Enterprises that request EGF support should provide the national co-financing. Suppliers and downstream producers involved in an EGF application should provide the co-financing for their own workers.
AddedRecital 13: (13) Workers affected by imminent job displacement receiving EGF assistance should remain eligible for continued EGF support even if their work relationship ends. They should also remain eligible for possible follow-up applications by the respective Member States in support of displaced workers from the same enterprise.
AddedRecital 14 a (new): (14a) Given the uneven uptake of EGF support by Member States, the Commission should raise awareness of the funding opportunities available and promote its usage. Moreover, the Commission should assist Member States through technical guidance and dissemination of good practices.
AddedRecital 15: deleted
AddedRecital 16: deleted
AddedRecital 16 a (new): (16a) Given the scale and frequency of restructuring in recent years, there are concerns that the existing EGF budget will be insufficient to meet increasing needs. Therefore, a minimum of 40% of the annual maximum amount of the EGF should be reserved for applications concerning the cessation of activity of displaced workers or self-employed persons. In addition, any financial contribution to workers affected by imminent job displacement should be capped per application. The discontinuation of the EGF budget under the proposed next multiannual financial framework is regrettable and there is a need to ensure continued support for displaced workers in the next MFF.
AddedRecital 17 a (new): (17a) This Regulation has implications for the Union budget. Accordingly, the European Parliament’s Committee on Budgets adopted a budgetary assessment, which forms an integral part of Parliament’s mandate for negotiations.
AI: Note on change 3 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds recitals on restructuring plans, admissibility for small labour markets, co-financing by suppliers, continued eligibility, awareness raising, budget reservations, and a budgetary assessment.
Change 4
ChangedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1, Article 1 – paragraph 2: 2. In accordance with Article 4, the EGF shall offer support to displaced workers and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased in the course of major restructuring events and to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring, including their direct suppliers orand downstream users,producers, provided that theall national obligations under Directive 98/59/EC98/59/EC, including for information, consultation and standstill, have been fulfilled prior to the submission of the EGF application and the restructuring process addscontributes to the twin digital and green transitions;transition.
AI: Note on change 4 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Changes 'direct suppliers or downstream users' to 'direct suppliers and downstream producers' and requires all national obligations under Directive 98/59/EC, including information, consultation, and standstill, to be fulfilled.
Change 5
ChangedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2, Article 2 – paragraph 1: 1. The EGF shall support socioeconomic transformations that are the result of globalisation and of technological and environmental changes by helping displaced workers and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased to adapt to structural change. The EGF shall also support workers orand self-employed persons at risk of imminent job displacement. The EGF shall constitute an emergency fund. As such, the EGF shall contribute to the implementation of the principles set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights, promote sustainable employment and enhance social and economic cohesion among regions and Member States.
AI: Note on change 5 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Changes 'workers or self-employed persons at risk' to 'workers and self-employed persons at risk', broadening the scope to include both groups.
Change 6
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b, Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d: (d) at least 200 workers affected by imminent job displacement resulting from an enterprise undergoing restructuring in a Member State, including workers affected in the enterprises suppliers or downstream users;
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2, Article 2 – paragraph 2: 2. The objectives of the EGF are to demonstrate solidarity and promote decent and sustainable employment in the Union by offering assistance in the case of major restructuring events, in particular those caused by challenges related to globalisation, such as changes in world trade patterns, trade disputes, significant changes in the trade relations of the Union or the composition of the internal market and financial or economic crises, as well as the transition to a low-carbon economy as part of the green and just transition, or as a consequence of digitisation or automation. The EGF shall support beneficiaries in returning to decent and sustainable employment as soon as possible. Particular emphasis shall be placed on measures that help the most disadvantaged groups. The EGF shall also support workers affected by imminent job displacement in acquiring the skills needed to help them transfer into a different role,
AI: Note on change 6 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a new paragraph on EGF objectives, emphasizing support for workers affected by imminent job displacement in acquiring skills for transition.
Change 7
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6, Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c: (c) workers affected by imminent job displacement in an enterprise undergoing restructuring, including their direct suppliers or downstream users. The workers shall remain eligible even in case of an actual termination of the work relationship. Workers who have received EGF support during employment shall not be excluded from receiving further support after the termination of the work relationship. Only those restructuring events shall be eligible that qualify as collective redundancies under Directive 98/59/EC;
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b, Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6: (6) ‘enterprise undergoing restructuring’ means an enterprise undergoing a process that involves projected collective redundancies and which has notified the competent public authority in writing as referred to in Directive 98/59/EC;
AI: Note on change 7 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a definition of 'enterprise undergoing restructuring' requiring projected collective redundancies and written notification to the competent authority.
Change 8
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a, Article 7 – paragraph 1: 1. A financial contribution from the EGF may be made for active labour market policy measures that form part of a coordinated package, designed to facilitate the reintegration of the targeted beneficiaries, in particular the most disadvantaged among them, into employment or self-employment, or to help workers referred to in Article 6, first paragraph, point(c) acquire the skills they need to transfer either into a different role with their current employer or to a different employer, preferably within their home region;
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b, Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d: (d) at least 200 workers affected by imminent job displacement in an enterprise undergoing restructuring in a Member State, including affected workers employed by direct suppliers or by downstream producers;
AI: Note on change 8 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Replaces the threshold for workers affected by imminent job displacement, now requiring at least 200 workers in an enterprise, including those employed by direct suppliers or downstream producers.
Show 13 more changes
Change 9
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b, Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c: (c) ‘For the beneficiaries referred to in Article 6, first paragraph, point (c), the coordinated package may include training and retraining supplementing existing forms of support available under national measures, tailored to the individual worker’s needs, including on information and communication technology and other skills required in the digital age, certification of acquired knowledge and skills, individual job-search assistance services and targeted group activities, occupational guidance, advisory services, mentoring, outplacement assistance, entrepreneurship promotion and cooperation activities. It may not include short-time work schemes;
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new), Article 4 – paragraph 3: (ba) paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: / ‘3. In small labour markets, in particular with regard to applications involving SMEs, where duly substantiated by the applicant Member State, an application for a financial contribution under this Article shall be considered to be admissible even if the criteria laid down in paragraph 2 are not entirely met, provided that the redundancies or projected collective redundancies have a serious impact on employment and the local, regional or national economy. In such cases, the applicant Member State shall specify which of the intervention criteria set out in paragraph 2 are not entirely met.’
AI: Note on change 9 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a new paragraph allowing applications in small labour markets, especially involving SMEs, to be admissible even if not all criteria are met, with substantiation.
Change 10
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b a (new), Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5 a (new): (ba) In paragraph 2, the following subparagraph is added: / ‘When setting up coordinated packages pursuant to this paragraph, employers shall ensure that the social partners participate in the process, in accordance with the applicable national law, especially by defining skills needs, co-designing training curricula, validating quality, and by monitoring implementation.
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b b (new), Article 4 – paragraph 4: (bb) paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: / ‘4. In exceptional circumstances, in particular with regard to applications involving SMEs, paragraph 3 shall also apply to labour markets other than small labour markets. The aggregated amount of financial contributions in such cases shall not exceed 15 % of the annual ceiling of the EGF.’
AI: Note on change 10 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a new paragraph allowing exceptional application of admissibility rules to other labour markets, with a cap of 15% of the annual ceiling for such cases.
Change 11
ChangedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9,6, Article 8a6 – paragraph 1: 1.1 Enterprises– undergoingpoint restructuringc: may(c) requestworkers theaffected Memberby Stateimminent concernedjob todisplacement submitin an application for a financial contribution from theenterprise EGF,undergoing ifrestructuring, theincluding interventiontheir criteriadirect setsuppliers outand indownstream Articleproducers. 4(2),The pointworkers (d)shall areremain met,eligible ifeven thein enterprisecase wishesof toan offeractual EGF-co-financedtermination assistanceof tothe thosework partsrelationship. ofWorkers itswho workforcehave affectedreceived byEGF imminentsupport jobwhile displacement,still in lineemployment withshall Articlenot 6,be firstexcluded paragraph,from pointreceiving (c)further andsupport after consulting workers' representatives. Such a request shall be submitted by the enterprise within two weekstermination of the datework onrelationship. whichOnly itthose hadrestructuring notifiedevents theshall publicbe authoritieseligible inthat writingqualify ofand theare projectednotified as collective redundancies in accordance with Article 3(1) ofunder Directive 98/59/EC.98/59/EC;
AI: Note on change 11 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Moves and rewrites Article 6(1)(c) to clarify that workers remain eligible even after termination, and only restructuring events qualifying as collective redundancies under Directive 98/59/EC are eligible.
Change 12
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 2: 2. All Member States shall designate a Single Entry Point to which enterprises can direct requests referred to in paragraph 1. If applicable, this Single Entry Point may be established in such a way as to take into account the national division of competence. The Commission shall publish relevant guidelines and common templates in coordination with the Member States. To ensure financial support reaches the workers concerned, those guidelines shall, inter alia, contain guidance regarding the applicable State aid rules. The information collected from these templates shall cover all the information necessary for a financial contribution application from the EGF as set out in paragraph 10.
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a, Article 7 – paragraph 1: 1. A financial contribution from the EGF may be made for active labour market policy measures that form part of a coordinated package, designed to facilitate the reintegration of the targeted beneficiaries, in particular the most disadvantaged among them, into employment or self-employment, or to help workers referred to in Article 6, first paragraph, point(c) update or acquire the skills they need to transfer either into a different role with their current employer or to a different employer;
AI: Note on change 12 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a new paragraph requiring employers to ensure social partners participate in setting up coordinated packages, in line with national law.
Change 13
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 5: 5. If requested by the enterprise or the workers' representative, the Member State concerned shall provide guidance to the enterprise throughout the application procedure.
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b, Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c: (c) ‘For the beneficiaries referred to in Article 6, first paragraph, point (c), the coordinated package may include training and retraining, supplementing existing forms of support available under national measures or requirements under collective agreements, tailored to the individual worker’s needs, including on skills required for a resource-efficient and sustainable economy, information and communication technology and other skills required in the digital age, certification of acquired knowledge and skills, individual job-search assistance services and targeted group activities, occupational guidance, advisory services, mentoring, outplacement assistance, entrepreneurship promotion and cooperation activities. It may not include short-time work schemes;
AI: Note on change 13 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Expands the coordinated package to include training supplementing collective agreements and skills for a resource-efficient and sustainable economy.
Change 14
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 6: 6. If requested by the applicant Member State, the Commission shall provide guidance to the Member State throughout the application procedure, including by providing centralised templates and guidance on State aid rules.
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b, Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2: Where the Commission is unable to meet that deadline, it shall inform the Member State before that deadline explaining the reasons for the delay and setting a new date to complete its assessment. That new date shall be no later than 20 working days after the deadline under the first subparagraph;
AI: Note on change 14 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a provision that if the Commission cannot meet the assessment deadline, it must inform the Member State and set a new date no later than 20 working days after the original deadline.
Change 15
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1: Based on the information provided by the applicant Member State, the Commission shall complete its assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution within 30 working days of the receipt of the complete application or, where applicable, of the translation of the application. That assessment shall include a summary of the adequacy of the consultation process and the proposed training measures.
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 1: 1. Enterprises undergoing restructuring may request the Member State concerned to submit an application for a financial contribution from the EGF, if the intervention criteria set out in Article 4(2), point (d) are met, and if the enterprise wishes to offer EGF-co-financed assistance to those parts of its workforce affected by imminent job displacement, in line with Article 6, first paragraph, point (c). Such a request shall be submitted by the enterprise within four weeks of the date on which it had notified the public authorities in writing of the projected collective redundancies in accordance with Article 3(1) of Directive 98/59/EC.
AI: Note on change 15 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Changes the deadline for enterprises to request EGF support from two weeks to four weeks after notifying public authorities of projected collective redundancies.
Change 16
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – introductory part: 10. An application shall be based on centralised templates and shall contain the following information:
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 2: 2. All Member States shall designate a Single Entry Point to which enterprises can direct requests referred to in paragraph 1. If applicable, this Single Entry Point may be established in such a way as to take national divisions of competence into account. The Commission shall publish relevant guidelines and standardised templates in coordination with the Member States. The information collected from these templates shall cover all the information necessary for a financial contribution application from the EGF as set out in paragraph 10.
AI: Note on change 16 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Updates the Single Entry Point provision to include standardised templates and take into account national divisions of competence.
Change 17
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – point a: (a) the identification of the enterprise concerned, and, if applicable, the identification of any suppliers or downstream users concerned;
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 5: 5. If requested by the enterprise or the workers' representatives, the Member State concerned shall provide guidance and support to the enterprise throughout the application procedure taking the size and the administrative capacity of the enterprise into account. In the case of microenterprises and SMEs, their limited administrative capacity shall be taken into account and Member States should provide enhanced technical support for preparation of the application.
AI: Note on change 17 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds that Member States must provide guidance and support to enterprises, taking into account the size and administrative capacity, with enhanced support for microenterprises and SMEs.
Change 18
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – point ca (new): (ca) if applicable, a reasoned analysis provided by suppliers or downstream users detailing the direct and causal link between the companies included in the collective application, including the connection between the main jobs affected by displacement and those affected in their suppliers or downstream users;
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 6: 6. If requested by the applicant Member State, the Commission shall provide guidance to the Member State throughout the application procedure, including by providing standardised templates and guidance on State aid rules applicable to the specific restructuring case.
AI: Note on change 18 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Updates the Commission's guidance to include standardised templates and State aid rules applicable to the specific restructuring case.
Change 19
RemovedArticla 8a – paragraph 10 – point d
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1: Based on the information provided by the applicant Member State, the Commission shall complete its assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution within 30 working days of the receipt of the complete application or, where applicable, of the translation of the application. That assessment shall evaluate the adequacy of the consultation process referred to in Article 7(4) of this Regulation and of the coordinated package.
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9: (d) a confirmation that the enterprise has complied and continues to comply with its legal obligations or collective agreements governing those projected redundancies and is providing for its workers accordingly, and a description of the procedures followed by the enterprise for consulting the targeted beneficiaries or their representatives during the entire process, including during the establishment of the coordinated package;
AI: Note on change 19 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Changes the assessment to evaluate the adequacy of the consultation process and the coordinated package, and adds a confirmation of compliance with Directive 98/59/EC.
Change 20
RemovedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17, Article 22 – paragraph 4: 4. A beneficiary survey shall be launched during the sixth month after the end of each implementation period. The beneficiary survey shall be open to participation for at least four weeks. Member States shall distribute the beneficiary survey to the beneficiaries, send out at least one reminder and inform the Commission of the distribution and reminder sent. In cases involving assistance implemented by an enterprise to beneficiaries under Article 6, first paragraph, point (c), that enterprise is responsible for distributing the survey prepared by the Commission among the workers and workers' representatives that have participated in the measures. The responses to the beneficiary surveys shall be collated and analysed by the Commission for the use in future evaluations.
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2: Where the Commission is unable to meet that deadline, it shall inform the applicant Member State before that deadline, explaining the reasons for the delay and setting a new date for the completion of its assessment. That new date shall be no later than 20 working days after the deadline under the first subparagraph.
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – introductory part: 10. An application shall contain the following information on the basis of a standardised template:
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – point a: (a) the identification of the enterprises concerned, including affected direct suppliers and downstream producers, where applicable;
Show 26 more lines
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – point b: (b) an assessment of the number of workers affected by imminent job displacement including the direct suppliers or downstream producers, in accordance with Article 6, first paragraph, point (c);
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – point c a (new): (ca) if applicable, a reasoned analysis provided by direct suppliers or downstream producers detailing the direct and causal link to the restructuring process, including the extent to which they are impacted;
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – point d: (d) a confirmation that the enterprise has complied and continues to comply with its legal obligations in particular as regards Article 2 of Directive 98/59/EC and any collective agreements governing those projected redundancies and is providing for its workers accordingly;
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – point d a (new): (da) a description of the procedures followed by the enterprise for consulting the targeted beneficiaries and their representatives regarding the design of the coordinated package as well as local and regional authorities or other relevant stakeholders as applicable;
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9, Article 8a – paragraph 10 – point d b (new): (db) an explanation of the extent to which the recommendations set out in the EU Quality Framework for anticipation of change and restructuring have been taken into account and where applicable how the coordinated package complements actions funded by other Union or national funds;
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new), Article 11 – paragraph 4: (10a) in Article 11, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: / ‘4. The Commission’s technical assistance shall include the provision of information and guidance to the Member States on using, monitoring and evaluating the EGF as well as dedicated outreach to Member States who historically have no or low uptake of the EGF. The Commission shall also provide information along with clear guidance to the social partners at Union and national level on the use of the EGF. Guidance measures may also include the creation of taskforces in cases of severe economic disruptions in a Member State.’
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b, Article 13 – paragraph 2a: 2a. The co-financing rate for expenditure incurred by the Member State for beneficiaries referred to in Article 6, first paragraph, point (c) and relating to measures set out in Article 7, shall be 100%.
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c, Article 13 – paragraph 3: 3. Where, on the basis of the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 8 or Article 8a, the Commission concludes that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met, it shall immediately initiate the procedure as set out in Article 15.
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c a (new), Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new): (ca) the following paragraph is inserted: / ‘4a. A minimum of 40% of the annual maximum amount of the EGF shall be reserved for applications concerning the cessation of activity of displaced workers or self-employed persons as set out in Article 4(2), points (a), (b) and (c). Any portion of this amount not used or reserved by 1 October of each year can also be used for applications concerning workers affected by imminent job displacement as set out in Article 4(2) point (d). Any financial contribution to workers affected by imminent job displacement as set out in Article 4(2) point (d) shall not exceed EUR 4 000 000 per application for any financing year.’
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13, Article 15: (13) in Article 15, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: / ‘3. The Commission proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF shall include the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 8(6) or Article 8(a) (9), together with a summary of the information on which that assessment is based and the reasons justifying the amounts proposed in accordance with Article 13(1).’ / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted)
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14, Article 16: deleted / (deleted) / (deleted) / (deleted)
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16, Article 20 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new): The enterprise, with the assistance of the Member State where necessary, shall also provide the following information: / (a) the percentage of EGF beneficiaries who remain employed within the enterprise and an outline of the changes to their role six months after the end of the implementation period; / (b) the percentage of EGF beneficiaries who are no longer employed by the enterprise and percentage of those who have taken up new employment or self-employment six months after the end of the implementation period’; / (c) the percentage of EGF beneficiaries who gained a qualification by six months after the end of the implementation period.
AddedRegulation (EU) 2021/691
AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17, Article 22 – paragraph 4: 4. A beneficiary survey shall be launched during the sixth month after the end of each implementation period. The beneficiary survey shall be open to participation for at least four weeks. Member States shall distribute the beneficiary survey to the beneficiaries, send out at least one reminder and inform the Commission of the distribution and reminder sent. In cases involving assistance implemented by an enterprise to beneficiaries under Article 6, first paragraph, point (c), that enterprise is responsible for distributing the survey prepared by the Commission among the workers and workers' representatives that have participated in the measures, sending out at least one reminder and informing the Member State of the distribution and reminder sent. The responses to the beneficiary surveys shall be collated and analysed by the Commission for the use in future evaluations. The resulting analysis shall be submitted to the European Parliament and the Member States and may be used to improve re-skilling and reintegration programmes at Union and national level.
AI: Note on change 20 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds numerous new provisions including a 40% reservation for displaced workers, a cap of EUR 4 million per application, technical assistance outreach, and reporting requirements.
Change 21 under “EXPLANATORY STATEMENT”
AddedBUDGETARY ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS
Addedfor the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
Addedon the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/691 as regards support to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring
AddedRapporteur for budgetary assessment: Johan Van Overtveldt
AddedThe Committee on Budgets has carried out a budgetary assessment of the proposal under Rule 58 of the Rules of Procedure and has reached the following conclusions:
AddedThe Committee on Budgets,
Show 15 more lines
AddedA. whereas the proposal aims to broaden the scope of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers (EGF) to also allow for support to workers affected by imminent job displacement;
AddedB. whereas the proposal does not modify existing budgetary commitments and remains within the limits of the overall allocations for the period 2021-2027 and is therefore budget-neutral; whereas the Commission has not proposed a dedicated successor fund for the period 2028-2034;
AddedC. whereas the proposal includes changes to the EGF mobilisation procedure that put an end to the regular involvement of the budgetary authority and therefore severely undermine its oversight role;
AddedConclusions of the budgetary assessment
Added1. Determines that the proposal is compatible with the MFF Regulation; notes that the proposed enlargement of the scope of support will be covered within the maximum amount set for this special instrument;
Added2. Recalls, however, that in the recent mid-term review of the MFF, the maximum amount available annually for the EGF had been substantially reduced from EUR 186 million to EUR 30 million; considers that the proposed broadening of the intervention criteria now carries a significant risk of exhausting this amount in a given year, potentially leading to a backlog of financing decisions; notes that the average take-up rate was only 63 % between 2021 and 2024; recalls that the total annual amount had not been used so far and therefore it was substantially reduced in the recent mid-term review of the MFF;
Added3. Notes that the proposed tripling of the maximum amount for technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission implies a further limitation of funds available for active labour market measures, while acknowledging that the amounts available for technical assistance were drastically reduced as a result of the reduction of the overall envelope in the mid-term review of the MFF; stresses that, rather than expanding administrative resources, focus should be put on simplifying and shortening the internal processes so as to reduce the burden on final beneficiaries and accelerate the delivery of support;
Added4. Notes that the proposal requires additional human resources of EUR 1 431 000 per year in 2025, 2026 and 2027, for six establishment plan posts and three external staff; notes that the additional needs will be covered by redeployment within the DG or other Commission services;
Added5. Notes additionally that, while the change to the mobilisation procedure could reduce the time between the application for assistance from the EGF and the financing decision by the Commission, the eligibility period for co-financed measures would at the same time become shorter in absolute terms; considers that the current six-week deadline for a decision by the budgetary authority is not detrimental to the swift provision of support; notes that, under Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2021/691, the Commission has 50 working days from receipt of the complete application from the Member State to complete its analysis; highlights the fact that, in practice, the Commission frequently requires more than the 50 working days and that it should give priority to simplifying and shortening its internal processes when assessing and deciding on applications under this regulation; opposes any simplification that comes at the expense of institutional balance, in particular of the rights of Parliament as budgetary authority;
Added6. Determines that the proposal is compatible with the letter of the IIA; notes, however, that the aims of the IIA include the improvement of interinstitutional cooperation on budgetary matters; considers that the proposed drastic simplification of the mobilisation procedure runs counter to that goal and would change the nature of the EGF as a stand-alone thematic special instrument that is implemented with the close involvement of the budgetary authority;
Added7. Considers that the proposal is compatible with the budgetary principles laid down in the Financial Regulation; notes, nevertheless, a degree of contradiction, in terms of sound financial management, between the recent decrease of the maximum annual amount available for the EGF and the proposed broadening of the EGF’s scope;
AddedRecommendations
Added8. Rejects the proposed change to the mobilisation procedure, and in particular the introduction of a single request for mobilisation of the maximum annual amount based on estimates by Member States for the support needed until the end of the year; proposes maintaining the practice of case-by-case mobilisation of the EGF on the basis of an assessment of the material conditions for support; stresses that Parliament’s role as budgetary authority must be fully preserved; stresses, furthermore, that any changes to the mobilisation procedure must ensure that Parliament retains its oversight and decision-making powers;
Added9. Considers that the additional reporting requirements related to the estimate of assistance needed in the following year constitute an unnecessary additional administrative burden for the Member States, with limited usefulness in terms of reliable evidence-based decision-making;
Added10. Requests that the Commission take the appropriate coordination measures to ensure that assistance to workers threatened by restructuring events is provided from the most appropriate support instrument, depending on the specific circumstances and the national or regional programme architecture, and to avoid any risk of duplication and overlap, in particular between the EGF and the European Social Fund Plus, and to ensure that the additional nature of the support from the EGF is not undermined in these cases either; regrets that the EGF remains administratively burdensome, which has discouraged some Member States from using it altogether; underlines, in this regard, the Commission’s own mid-term evaluation, which found that 16 Member States consider the EU-level procedure lengthy and complex, and stresses the importance of addressing this, given that in some cases this constitutes the only barrier to applying for EGF support.
AI: Note on change 21 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a budgetary assessment from the Committee on Budgets, including conclusions and recommendations, as an annex to the report.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Changes between EMPL-PR-774423 and A-10-2025-0251”. Text, 8 December 2025. from EMPL-PR-774423, to A-10-2025-0251, reference 2025/0073(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/EMPL-PR-774423/compare/A-10-2025-0251 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-12-08,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between EMPL-PR-774423 and A-10-2025-0251}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-12-08},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/EMPL-PR-774423/compare/A-10-2025-0251}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/EMPL-PR-774423/compare/A-10-2025-0251},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from EMPL-PR-774423, to A-10-2025-0251, reference 2025/0073(COD). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}