Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

ECON-PR-731818 → A-9-2023-0030

From
ECON-PR-731818 report parliamentary committee draft of 30 May 2022
To
A-9-2023-0030 Plenary report of 10 Feb 2023
Changes
Not comparable
Paragraphs
+2 827 added · −636 removed · 3 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor
Title (to)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor

These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 41 of 58: Paragraphs 2401–2460

Added(c) the date on which the operational risk event concerned would be excluded, considering the minimum retention period set out paragraph 1, point (c);

Added(d) the reason why the operational risk event is no longer deemed relevant to the institution’s risk profile;

Added(e) the demonstration that there are no similar or residual legal exposures and that the operational risk event to be excluded has no relevance to other activities or products;

Added(f) reports of the institution’s independent review or validation, confirming that the operational risk event is no longer relevant and that there are no similar or residual legal exposures;

Added(g) proof that competent bodies of the institution, through the institution’s approval processes, have approved the request for exclusion of the operational risk event and the date of such approval;

Added(h) the impact of the exclusion of the operational risk event on the annual operational risk loss.

Added3. EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the conditions that the competent authority has to assess pursuant to paragraph 1, including how the average annual operational risk loss should be computed and the specifications on the information to be collected pursuant to paragraph 2 or any further information deemed necessary to perform the assessment.

AddedEBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by [OP please insert the date = 18 months after entry into force of this Regulation].

AddedPower is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.

Added1. Losses stemming from merged or acquired entities or activities shall be included in the loss data set as soon as the business indicator items related to those entities or activities are included in the institution’s business indicator calculation in accordance with Article 315(1). To that end, institutions shall include losses observed during a ten-year period prior to the acquisition or merger.

Added2. EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify how institutions shall determine the adjustments to their loss data set following the inclusion of losses from merged or acquired entities or activities as referred to in paragraph 1.

AddedEBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by [OP please insert the date = 18 months after entry into force of this Regulation].

AddedPower is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.

Added1. Institutions shall have in place the organisation and processes to ensure the comprehensiveness, accuracy and quality of the loss data and to review it independently.

Added2. Competent authorities shall ▌review the quality of the loss data of an institution that calculates annual operational risk losses in accordance with Article 316(1).▌

Added1. Institutions shall have in place:

Added(a) a well-documented assessment and management system for operational risk which is closely integrated into the day-to-day risk management processes, forms an integral part of the process of monitoring and controlling the institution’s operational risk profile, and for which clear responsibilities have been assigned. The assessment and management system for operational risk shall identify the institution’s exposures to operational risk and track relevant operational risk data, including material loss data;

Added(b) an operational risk management function that is independent from the institution’s business and operational units;

Added(c) a system of reporting to senior management that provides operational risk reports to relevant functions within the institution;

Added(d) a system of regular monitoring and reporting of operational risk exposures and loss experience, and procedures for taking appropriate corrective actions;

Added(e) routines for ensuring compliance, and policies for the treatment of non-compliance;

Added(f) regular reviews of the institution’s operational risk assessment and management processes and systems, performed by internal or external auditors that possess the knowledge necessary to carry out such reviews;

Added(g) internal validation processes that operate in a sound and effective manner;

Added(h) transparent and accessible data flows and processes associated with the operational risk assessment system.

Added2. EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the obligations under paragraph 1, points (a) to (h), taking into consideration institutions’ size and complexity.

AddedEBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by [OP please insert the date = 18 months after entry into force of this Regulation].

AddedPower is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.

Added_________________________________________________

Added*5 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/451 of 17 December 2020 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (OJ L 97, 19.3.2021, p. 1).’;

Added(132) Article 325 is amended as follows:

Added(a) paragraphs 1 to 5 are replaced by the following:

Added‘1. An institution shall calculate the own funds requirements for market risk for all its trading book positions and all its non-trading book positions that are subject to foreign exchange risk or commodity risk in accordance with the following approaches:

Added(a) the alternative standardised approach set out in Chapter 1a;

Added(b) the alternative internal model approach set out in Chapter 1b for those positions assigned to trading desks for which the institution has been granted permission by competent authorities to use that alternative approach as set out in Article 325az(1);

Added(c) the simplified standardised approach referred to in in paragraph 2 of this Article, provided that the institution meets the conditions set out in Article 325a(1).

AddedBy way of derogation from the first subparagraph, an institution shall not calculate an own funds requirements for foreign exchange risk for trading book positions and non-trading book positions that are subject to foreign exchange risk where those positions are deducted from the institution’s own funds. Institutions shall document the use of the provision set out in this paragraph, including its impact, and make the information available upon request of their competent authority.

Added2. The own funds requirements for market risk calculated in accordance with the simplified standardised approach shall be the sum of the following own funds requirements, as applicable:

Added(a) the own funds requirements for position risk referred to in Chapter 2, multiplied by:

Added(i) 1,3, for the general and specific risks of positions in debt instruments, excluding securitisation instruments as referred to in Article 337;

Added(ii) 3,5, for the general and specific risks of positions in equity instruments.

Added(b) the own funds requirements for foreign exchange risk referred to in Chapter 3, multiplied by 1,2;

Added(c) the own funds requirements for commodity risk referred to in Chapter 4, multiplied by 1,9;

Added(d) the own funds requirements for securitisation instruments as referred to in Article 337.

Added3. An institution using the alternative internal model approach referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), to calculate the own funds requirements for market risk of trading book positions and non-trading book positions that are subject to foreign exchange risk or commodity risk shall report to the competent authorities the monthly calculation of the own funds requirements for market risk using the alternative standardised approach referred to in paragraph 1, point (a), for each trading desk to which those positions have been assigned to in accordance with Article 104b.

Added4. An institution may use a combination of the alternative standardised approach referred to in paragraph 1, point (a), and the alternative internal model approach referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), on a permanent basis within a group. The institution shall not use either of those approaches in combination with the simplified standardised approach referred to in paragraph 1, point (c).

Added5. An institution shall not use the alternative internal model approach set out in paragraph 1, point (b), for instruments in their trading book that are securitisation positions or positions included in the alternative correlation trading portfolio (ACTP) set out in paragraphs 6, 7 and 8.’;

Added(b) paragraph 9 is replaced by the following:

Added‘9. EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify how institutions are to calculate the own funds requirements for market risk for non-trading book positions that are subject to foreign exchange risk or commodity risk in accordance with the approaches set out in paragraph 1, points (a) and (b) of this Article, taking into account the requirements set out in Article 104b, paragraphs 5 and 6, where applicable.

AddedEBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by [OP please insert the date = 9 months after entry into force of this Regulation].

AddedPower is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.’;

Added(133) Article 325a is amended as follows:

Added(a) the title is replaced by the following:

Added‘Conditions for using the Simplified Standardised Approach’;

Added(b) in paragraph 1, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

Added‘1. An institution may calculate the own funds requirements for market risk by using the simplified standardised approach referred to in Article 325(1), point (c), provided that the size of the institution's on- and off-balance-sheet business subject to market risk is equal to or less than each of the following thresholds, on the basis of an assessment carried out on a monthly basis using data as of the last day of the month:’;

Added(c) in paragraph 2, point (b) is replaced by the following:

Added‘(b) all non-trading book positions that are subject to foreign exchange risk or commodity risk shall be included, except those positions that are excluded from the calculation of own funds requirements for foreign exchange risk in accordance with Article 104c or that are deducted from the institution’s own funds’;

Added(d) in paragraph 5, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

Added‘5. Institutions shall cease to calculate the own funds requirements for market risk in accordance with the approach set out in Article 325(1), point (c), within three months of either of the following cases:’;

Added(e) paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2023). “Changes between ECON-PR-731818 and A-9-2023-0030”. Text, 10 February 2023. from ECON-PR-731818, to A-9-2023-0030. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-731818/compare/A-9-2023-0030?all=1&part=41 (retrieved 30 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2023-02-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between ECON-PR-731818 and A-9-2023-0030}},
  year = {2023},
  date = {2023-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-731818/compare/A-9-2023-0030?all=1&part=41}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-731818/compare/A-9-2023-0030?all=1&part=41},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from ECON-PR-731818, to A-9-2023-0030. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}