Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
CONT-PR-764996 → A-10-2025-0050
- From
- CONT-PR-764996 report parliamentary committee draft of 20 Jan 2025
- To
- A-10-2025-0050 Plenary report of 1 Apr 2025
- Changes
- 28 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +24 added · −9 removed · 20 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2024/2022(DEC)
- Title (from)
- on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023, Section IV – Court of Justice
- Title (to)
- on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023, Section IV – Court of Justice
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
The resolution now grants discharge without postponement and adds strong calls for monitoring member state compliance with CJEU rulings.16 Adds numerous provisions on ethics, transparency, and integrity, including independent ethics committee, recusal policy, and conflict-of-interest screening.141516 Expands sections on gender balance, staff diversity, and multilingualism, with calls for annual reports and better representation.91011 Strengthens cybersecurity and AI oversight, adding calls for human oversight, collaboration with EU agencies, and a robust cybersecurity strategy.21222324 Other changes are substantive updates to figures, added welcomes for environmental and training efforts, and new paragraphs on traineeships and cooperation.3457
The notes class 28 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 0 as wording only.
Changes that matter, 28
Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.
Change 1
Removed1. Grants the Registrar of the Court of Justice of the European Union discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Justice of the European Union for the financial year 2023 / Postpones its decision on granting the Registrar of the Court of Justice of the European Union discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Justice of the European Union for the financial year 2023;
Added1. Grants the Registrar of the Court of Justice of the European Union discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Justice of the European Union for the financial year 2023;
AI: Note on change 1 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Restores the grant of discharge to the Registrar of the Court of Justice for 2023, removing the postponement of the decision.
Change 2 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
RemovedC. whereas Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union provides that “The Union shall respect the equality of Member States before the Treaties as well as their national identities, inherent in their fundamental structures, political and constitutional, inclusive of regional and local self-government. It shall respect their essential State functions [...]”;
AI: Note on change 2 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Drops a recital citing Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union on respect for national identities.
Change 3 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed5. Notes that the budget allocated for the CJEU in 20332023 amounted to EUR 486 025 796, which represented an increase of 3,73,9 % compared to 2022; notes that this increase was mainly related to salary adjustments forecasted for 2023; stresses that the budget of the CJEU is essentially administrative, with around 75 % of the appropriations related to expenditure for its members and staff, and almost all of the rest related to expenditure for buildings and IT;
AI: Note on change 3 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Corrects the budget year to 2023, updates the increase percentage to 3.9%, and adds that the budget is mainly administrative with 75% for staff.
Change 4 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed9. Notes that the CJEU’s mission budget, which stood at EUR 616638 000 for both staff and Members in 2023, continued to decrease by 3,3 % in 2023 compared to 2022; notes that 85,1 % of the appropriations for missions in 2023 were used compared to 46,6 % in 2022 due to the persistent travel restrictions in application at that time;
AI: Note on change 4 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Updates the mission budget figure to EUR 638,000 and notes a decrease of 3.3% in 2023.
Change 5 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed11. Notes that, in 2023, the Court of Justice ruled on five cases concerning the principle of primacy in the context of four preliminary rulings brought by the courts in Germany, Ireland, PolandPoland, and Romania, andas well as one infringement case concerning Poland; emphasisesstresses thatthe supremacyfundamental importance of nationalthe constitutionsprinciple remainsof theprimacy absoluteof principleUnion law, which governsensures the relationshipuniform betweeninterpretation theand constitutionsapplication of theUnion Memberslaw across all Member States and safeguards the rule of law as a core value of the Union; strongly reaffirms that the primacy of Union law;law notesis furtherthe cornerstone of the Union’s legal order and highlights the pivotal role of the CJEU in upholding the rule of law across the Union. Furthermore, notes that the General Court ruled on six cases in relationrelated to measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law inby Hungary;the Hungarian government, which systematically undermines core Union values; urges the Commission to take decisive enforcement actions against any Member State that challenges or disregards the binding nature of CJEU rulings;
AI: Note on change 5 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Rewords paragraph on primacy cases, adds Poland to list, stresses fundamental importance of primacy, and adds calls for enforcement actions against member states disregarding rulings.
Change 6 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Removed12. Notes that 821 new cases were submitted to the Court of Justice in 2023, compared to 806 in 2022, out of which 63% were references for preliminary ruling and 28,6% were appeals against decisions of the General Court; notes that the General Court saw a major increase of cases with 1 271 new cases in 2023 compared to 904 in 2022, including an exceptional series of 404 joint cases submitted in October 2023; notes that in 2023 for the General Court, 37% of the new cases, including the series of 404 joint cases, concerned actions relating to institutional law, 24,3% concerned actions relating to intellectual property and 6 % concerned disputes between institutions of the Union and their staff;
Added12. Condemns any national measures or legislative actions that seek to undermine the codification and enforcement of CJEU judgments; calls for the establishment of a formal monitoring mechanism to track Member State compliance with CJEU rulings and recommends linking compliance with EU funding disbursement under the rule of law conditionality framework;
Added13. Notes that 821 new cases were submitted to the Court of Justice in 2023, compared to 806 in 2022, out of which 63% were references for preliminary ruling and 28,6% were appeals against decisions of the General Court; notes that the General Court saw a major increase of cases with 1 271 new cases in 2023 compared to 904 in 2022, including an exceptional series of 404 joint cases submitted in October 2023; notes that in 2023 for the General Court, 37% of the new cases, including the series of 404 joint cases, concerned actions relating to institutional law, 24,3% concerned actions relating to intellectual property and 6 % concerned disputes between institutions of the Union and their staff; notes that the total number of pending cases remains stable when compared to previous years: considering the previously mentioned 404 cases as a single case, 2 587 cases were pending at the end of 2023, compared to 2 585 at the end of 2022 and 2 541 at the end of 2021;
AI: Note on change 6 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a new paragraph condemning national measures undermining CJEU judgments and calling for a monitoring mechanism linked to EU funding.
Change 7 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed14.15. NotesWelcomes thatthe decrease in the average durationlength of proceedings for the cases closed by the Court of JusticeJustice, whereas in 2023 that average was 16,1 months, compared to 16,4 months in 2022; notes that the average duration for the cases closed by the General Court was 18,2 months, compared to 16,2 months in 2022, which the General Court explained was due to the nature and related complexity of the proceedings managed in 2023;
AI: Note on change 7 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Renumbers paragraph and changes wording to welcome decrease in average length of proceedings, adding data for direct actions and preliminary rulings.
Change 8 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Removed15. Welcomes the performance-based approach developed by the CJEU, allowing the CJEU to take decisions based on the level of achievement of its objectives, measured through a set of workload and operational indicators; notes that the key performance indicators used by the CJEU cover a wide range of specific areas in support of the five management objectives relating to the proper functioning of the CJEU, digitalisation and emerging technologies, openness and transparency, multilingualism and human resources management;
Added16. Notes the decrease in the average time taken to deal with direct actions before the Court of Justice (from 23,5 months in 2022 to 20,8 months in 2023) and with references for preliminary rulings (from 17,3 months to 16,8 months); notes that, as regards the litigation before the Court of Justice, there was a significant increase in the number of direct actions, in particular in the field of the environment, and that the questions referred to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling in 2023 related principally to the area of freedom, security and justice, followed by taxation, consumer protection and transport; notes that, as regards the litigation before the General Court, there was an increase of cases in the fields of intellectual property and economic and monetary policy, including banking;
Added17. Notes with satisfaction the high use rate of e-Curia in 2023, with 10 502 e-Curia accounts being registered: 94 % of lodgements before the General Court were made via e-Curia, which is the same as in 2022, while the use rate of e-Curia at the Court of Justice went up to approximately 89 %, compared to 87 % in 2022;
Added18. Appreciates the progress made in digitising the judicial archives with a view to preserving documents for future consultation and facilitating access for researchers and the public by means of a digital portal;
Added19. Welcomes the performance-based approach developed by the CJEU, allowing the CJEU to take decisions based on performance outcomes and the level of achievement of its objectives, measured through a set of workload and operational indicators; notes that the key performance indicators used by the CJEU cover a wide range of specific areas in support of the five management objectives relating to the proper functioning of the CJEU, digitalisation and emerging technologies, openness and transparency, multilingualism and human resources management;
AI: Note on change 8 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds paragraphs on case statistics, e-Curia usage, digitisation of archives, and performance-based approach, renumbering existing text.
Show 20 more changes
Change 9 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed20.24. NotesWelcomes the CJEU’s detailed responses to the questionnaire from Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control, provided as part of the current discharge procedure, particularly regarding staff distribution at the end of 2023; notes that the gender composition of the Court of Justice and the General Court continues to be very unbalanced; expresses its appreciation of the letter from the President of the General Court to the President of the Conference of the Representatives of the Member States in 2024, calling on Member States to take the need for gender balance into account when nominating candidates for the replacement of Judges and Advocates General; reiterates its callcalls on theMember CouncilStates to reconsider the nomination procedure withtake the aim of tackling this problem with concrete actions, such as making it compulsoryneed for Member Statesgender tobalance nominateinto ataccount leastwhen twonominating candidates of differentfor gendersthe forreplacement eachof vacancy;judges;
AI: Note on change 9 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Rewords paragraph on gender balance, adding appreciation for CJEU responses and calls on member states to consider gender balance in nominations.
Change 10 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed21.25. NotesTakes note that, inof 2023,the 2 303 officials and agents serving at the staffend of 2023, 61 % are women; welcomes the CJEUfact wasthat composedthe proportion of 61,27women in administrative positions is 55 %, and especially the fact that, in managerial posts, the proportion has increased to 43 %, compared to 40 % womenin 2022 and 38,732021, confirming the upward trend recorded since 2018 (41 % men;in 2020, 39 % in 2019 and 37,5 % in 2018); notes thathowever womenthat representation of women was the highest in assistant grades, whereas it was the lowest in senior management positions,positions; withcalls 43,75%on the CJEU to ensure a greater representation of women in senior management positions and 56,25take %further men;measures to promote gender balance at all levels; welcomes the efforts deployed by the CJEU in favour of equality, inclusion and diversity, especially at recruitment stage;
AI: Note on change 10 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Rewords paragraph on staff gender composition, adding specific percentages and calls for greater representation of women in senior management.
Change 11 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Removed22. Welcomes that all Union nationalities are represented in the staff of the CJEU, but notes that certain nationalities are more represented than others; notes that, in 2023, the CJEU continued its efforts to promote a better geographical balance among its staff, in particular by fostering the visibility and attractiveness of its job vacancies, creating and offering more favourable job conditions to attract temporary agents from certain less-represented Member States and communicating widely to varied audiences on the job opportunities at the CJEU; notes that a significant effort was made to attract many talented young people from different Member States though the CJEU’s internship programme;
Added26. Calls on the CJEU to publish an annual Gender and Diversity Report to provide transparency on gender representation at all levels of the institution, including Judges, Advocates General, and administrative staff, as well as to provide for concrete measures of improving gender parity in senior positions;
Removed23. Welcomes the work done by the High Level Interinstitutional Group on enhancing the attractiveness of Luxembourg as a place of work for staff; notes that the budgetary authority approved for the financial year 2025 the necessary appropriations in order to allow the granting of a housing allowance to staff at lower grades, as recommended by the High Level Interinstitutional Group; asks that Parliament be updated on the progress of such initiatives intended to improve the attractiveness of Luxembourg as a place of work;
Added27. Welcomes that all Union nationalities are represented in the staff of the CJEU, but notes that certain nationalities are more represented than others; welcomes the continued efforts of the CJEU to promote a better geographical balance among its staff, in particular by fostering the visibility and attractiveness of its job vacancies, creating and offering more favourable job conditions to attract temporary agents from certain less-represented Member States and communicating widely to varied audiences on the job opportunities at the CJEU in 2023; notes that a significant effort was made to attract many talented young people from different Member States though the CJEU’s internship programme; invites the CJEU to examine whether trainees are proportionally represented from all member states;
Added28. Urges the CJEU to promote a multilingual working environment, recognizing its potential to enhance the fair distribution of nationalities among its staff; calls on all EU institutions to uphold and ensure the principle of multilingualism;
Added29. Welcomes the work done by the High Level Interinstitutional Group on enhancing the attractiveness of Luxembourg as a place of work for staff; calls on the CJEU to maintain and enhance cooperation with other Luxembourg-based institutions across different initiatives; notes with appreciation that the budgetary authority approved for the financial year 2025 the necessary appropriations in order to allow the granting of a housing allowance to staff at lower grades, as recommended by the High Level Interinstitutional Group; asks that Parliament be updated on the progress of such initiatives intended to improve the attractiveness of Luxembourg as a place of work;
AI: Note on change 11 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds paragraphs on gender report, multilingualism, and updates on geographical balance and Luxembourg attractiveness, renumbering existing text.
Change 12 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Removed25. Notes that the number of working days of sickness leave was 20 198 in 2023, corresponding to a reduction of 14,78 % compared to 2022; notes with concern that the medical service reported 11 cases of burnout in 2023; notes that the CJEU has undertaken a thorough analysis of diagnostic reports to identify instances of professional burnout and has put a focus on preventive measures, especially the reinforcement of its medical and social workers’ team, the prevention of psychosocial risks in the workplace and awareness-raising activities; encourages the CJEU to maintain focus on this problem in order to prevent any further cases associated with burnout;
Added31. Welcomes the ongoing awareness-raising, information and training campaigns aiming at promoting inclusion, mutual respect, cooperation and support for people with disabilities and their helpers;
Removed26. Notes that an administrative enquiry was launched in 2023 on an alleged case of sexual harassment concerning a member of staff and that this case was closed in 2024 with a sanction; notes that a procedure of assistance for alleged harassment concerning a judge was also filed in 2023 but no harassment was established in that case; notes that an interdepartmental working group, established in March 2023, therefore ahead of the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, examined the rules and procedures in place in the CJEU to prevent harassment and made some recommendations with a view to improving these rules and procedures; encourages the CJEU to follow up and continue to show no tolerance for harassment in the workplace;
Added32. Notes that the number of working days of sick leave was 20 198 in 2023, corresponding to a reduction of 14,78 % compared to 2022; notes with concern that the medical service reported 11 cases of burnout in 2023; welcomes a thorough analysis of diagnostic reports undertaken by the CJEU to identify instances of professional burnout and the CJEU’s focus on preventive measures, especially the reinforcement of its medical and social workers’ team, the prevention of psychosocial risks in the workplace and the introduction of awareness-raising activities for management on the right to disconnect and the risks of over-performance; encourages the CJEU to maintain focus on this problem in order to prevent any further cases associated with burnout and inform the Parliament of the measures taken in this regard;
Added33. Notes that an administrative enquiry was launched in 2023 on an alleged case of sexual harassment concerning a member of staff and that this case was closed in 2024 with a sanction; expresses concern that a procedure of assistance for alleged harassment concerning a judge was also filed in 2023 but no harassment was established in that case; notes that an interdepartmental working group, established in March 2023, therefore ahead of the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, examined the rules and procedures in place in the CJEU to prevent harassment and made some recommendations with a view to improving these rules and procedures; encourages the CJEU to follow up and continue to show no tolerance for harassment in the workplace by introducing mandatory training on unconscious bias and ethical standards for all judges and senior officials to prevent abuse of power;
AI: Note on change 12 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds paragraphs on sick leave, harassment, and disability inclusion, with new calls for mandatory training and reporting.
Change 13 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed27.34. Notes with satisfaction that, as requested in previous discharge recommendations, the new code of conduct on the rights and obligations of officials and other servants of the CJEU reflecting the CJEU’s values and commitment to ethics was drawn up in 2023 and adopted in March 2024; notes that the code of conduct includes provisions on conflict of interests, duty of loyalty, duty of confidentiality and discretion, outside activities, occupational activities after leaving the service and publications and also applies to seconded national experts and trainee judges hosted under the European Judicial Training Network; notes that, in 2023, awareness-raising activities and revamped training on the code of conduct were organised for staff and managers, with a particular focus on newcomers; calls for a mandatory training for all staff on a regular basis and asks that Parliament be kept informed about the implementation of the code of conduct;
AI: Note on change 13 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds call for mandatory regular training on code of conduct for all staff.
Change 14 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed29.36. Notes that, further to the adoption of the code of conduct for Members and former Members of the CJEU, the declaration of interests of the Members have been published online to avoid any potential conflict of interest in the handling of cases; notes that the CJEU is constantly reassessing its internal rules on this matter with a view to updating those rules and to ensuring the highest possible standards of ethical behaviour; calls on the CJEU to establish an independent ethics committee to oversee compliance with the code of conduct and investigate potential breaches; calls for mandatory annual ethics training for all CJEU personnel, including Judges and Advocates General to preserve the integrity of the Court; asks the CJEU to inform Parliament about the results of any further assessment of the effectiveness of that measure aimed at the prevention of conflicts of interest;
AI: Note on change 14 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds calls for an independent ethics committee and mandatory annual ethics training for all personnel.
Change 15 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Added37. Welcomes the publication of the declarations of interests of the Members of the CJEU but calls for the introduction of a standard pre-appointment screening process to identify and mitigate potential conflicts of interest at an early stage; urges the Council to establish transparent guidelines for Member States when nominating candidates for judicial positions at the CJEU;
Added38. Urges the CJEU to introduce a mandatory recusal policy for judges in cases where they have past professional affiliations with litigants appearing before the Court; calls for stricter conflict-of-interest screening for judges and high-ranking staff, including regular updates to financial disclosure requirements; asks for the publication of real-time recusal decisions in cases where judges declare a conflict of interest, ensuring greater transparency in the judicial process and reinforcing public confidence in the impartiality and integrity of the CJEU;
AI: Note on change 15 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds paragraphs calling for pre-appointment screening, recusal policy, and publication of recusal decisions.
Change 16 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed31.40. Notes that the list of external activities carried out by the Members of both the Court of Justice and the General Court has been published on the CJEU website since 2018; further notes that the list is difficult to read for the general public and recommends its revision to ensure greater clarity and informativeness; notes that the prior authorisation by the general meeting of the Court of Justice or by the plenary conference of the General Court is only granted when the external activity is compatible with the requirements of the code of conduct and with the Members’ obligations to be available for judicial activities; asks the CJEU to inform the discharge authority about any initiatives to improve the readability of the information related to external activities, in line with previous discharge recommendations;
AI: Note on change 16 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds recommendation to revise list of external activities for clarity and informativeness.
Change 17 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed32.41. Notes that the rules governing Members’ travels, missions and use of drivers and cars, as updated in 2021, provide that only the running costs resulting from the car use for purposes related to the execution of a mission order or to the exercise of hisorhis or her mandate within a limit of 10 000 km are borne by the CJEU; reiterates its opinion that the use of the car fleet outside of the strict performance of the duties of the Members of the CJEU should not take place under any circumstances, notes that the CJEU reported to be in discussion with other institutions in order to obtain a harmonised set of rules for the use of official vehicles, while respecting the autonomy of each institution; invites all Union institutions to agree on a single system to be applied horizontally, which would reduce the confusion and increase transparency and efficiency in the use of public money; asks the CJEU to keep Parliament informed of any progress in this matter;
AI: Note on change 17 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds invitation for all Union institutions to agree on a single system for official vehicle use.
Change 18 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed36.45. Notes that, in 2023, the CJEU consolidated the streaming service for hearings of the Court of Justice and of the General Court on the Curia website, thus facilitating the access of citizens to the judicial activities of the CJEU; welcomes the improvement of the CVRIA website, in terms of its structure, functionalities and content; welcomes that the delivery of judgments of the Court of Justice, the reading of opinions of the Advocates General, the hearings of the Grand Chamber and certain hearings of chambers sitting with five Judges have been broadcast live on the Curia website since 2023; calls on the CJEU to further improve transparency by broadcasting all hearings of the two Courts on its website and permanently storing them online;
AI: Note on change 18 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds welcome for improvement of CVRIA website and calls for broadcasting all hearings.
Change 19 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed3746. Welcomes that, further to the reform of its Statute, the CJEU will publish statements of case or written observations lodged in preliminary ruling proceedings after the closure of such proceedings, except in cases of objection to the publication of a person’s statement of case or observation; underlines that such publication will improve transparency and access to justice for citizens and calls on the CJEU to publish all documents related to a file on its website; calls on the CJEU to implement a procedure that could be used by any person to access in house all the documents related to a case;
AI: Note on change 19 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds call to publish all documents related to a file and implement a procedure for access.
Change 20 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Added49. Invites the Court to simplify the process of finding specific rulings on e-curia; welcomes efforts to make the interface more client-friendly and intuitive;
AI: Note on change 20 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds paragraph inviting the Court to simplify finding rulings on e-Curia and make interface more user-friendly.
Change 21 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed43.53. Notes that the CJEU implemented several projects based on artificial intelligence (AI), such as the automation of document analysis for references to applicable legislation and assistance with invoice verification through robotic processes,processes and hearing transcription, in line with its new AI integration strategy adopted in June 2023; underlines that it is of vital importance that AI is used in a manner which fully preserves the independence, the quality and the serenity of the legal processes, is in full consideration of ethical matters and is used under human oversight and allowing human intervention in order to avoid negative consequences or risks, or stop the system if it does not perform as intended; notes that, as part of that strategy, the CJEU set up an AI management board composed of Membersmembers of the Court of Justice and of the General Court to oversee the ethical aspects of AI use within the CJEU and to set clear boundaries for its application; welcomes the staff guidelines on the use of AI issued by the board; welcomes the initiatives in place to upskill employees in digital competencies through the training path developed in cooperation with the Interinstitutional Committee for Digital Transformation (ETA); emphasises that the digitalisation of justice and the adoption of emerging technologies such as AI will offer significant advantages for the efficient functioning of the Court; recommends however that the Court of justice anticipate the associated cybersecurity risks and strengthen even more its collaboration with the EU Agency for Cybersecurity and CERT-EU;
AI: Note on change 21 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds emphasis on human oversight of AI and cybersecurity collaboration with EU Agency for Cybersecurity and CERT-EU.
Change 22 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed44.54. Notes that no EDPS enquiries were communicated to the CJEU in 2023; notes that, in 2023, EDPS had not addressed any specific recommendation to the CJEU following its investigation regarding the use of cloud services by Amazon web services; notes that EDPS published a decision in 2023 confirming compliance of the CJEU's use of cloud videoconferencing services with data protection law; reiterates however its concerns regarding the use of external cloud services, given the growing threats about cybersecurity and digital sovereignty;
AI: Note on change 22 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds reiteration of concerns about external cloud services due to cybersecurity and digital sovereignty.
Change 23 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed45. Notes55. thatWelcomes the CJEU adoptedadoption of a cyber roadmap in 2023 and strengthenedstrengthening of its cybersecurity operational capabilities to better protect its systems against the increasing number of cyberattacks,cyberattacks; amongunderlines whichfurthermore phishingthat attacksa remainedrobust cybersecurity strategy is an essential tool to fight against foreign interferences aiming to undermine the mostintegrity significantof threat;the European Institutions; notes that the CJEU has taken various measures to reinforce its cybersecurity preparedness and ability to recover from security incidents, including through its participation in the governance of the Interinstitutional Cybersecurity Board and through a combination of cybersecurity controls and tools in line with the recommendations of CERT-EU; notes that the budgetary authority approved for the financial year 2025 the necessary appropriations for two additional posts in order to reinforce the CJEU’s staff capacities in the field of cybersecurity;
AI: Note on change 23 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Rewords paragraph on cybersecurity, adding emphasis on robust strategy against foreign interference and noting measures taken.
Change 24 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Added56. Welcomes the measures taken, such as cybersecurity audits, staff training and rapid incident response protocols, to protect the CJEU's technological infrastructure from cyber threats; stresses that the digitisation of justice and the use of new technologies such as artificial intelligence will bring many benefits in terms of the smooth functioning of the CJEU, but also entail risks that the Court needs to pre-empt and protect itself against; suggests in this regard that the Court of Justice develop a cybersecurity strategy and step up collaboration with other Union institutions, in particular ENISA (the EU Agency for Cybersecurity), on the prevention of cyber-attacks, the number and sophistication of which are growing exponentially in Europe;
Added57. Welcomes the initiative to assign fictitious names to anonymised cases, by using a computerised automatic name generator, in order to strengthen the protection of personal data and facilitate the identification of individual cases;
Added58. Notes with satisfaction the amendment to the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, which will clarify and simplify judicial procedures, including the possibility of using videoconferencing for hearings, electronic signature of decisions and the designation of pilot cases;
AI: Note on change 24 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds paragraphs welcoming cybersecurity measures, fictitious names for anonymised cases, and amendment to Rules of Procedure.
Change 25 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed48.61. Notes with satisfaction that, in 2023, the CJEU continued to significantly reduce its energy consumption and carbon footprint compared to 2015, which is the baseline for the implementation of the CJEU’s eco-management and audit scheme strategy, thanks to energy-saving measures and optimisation of its heating, cooling and lighting infrastructures; notes that heating consumption was reduced by 33,5 %, electricity by 28,7 %, water by 20,1 %, office paper by 63 %, office and canteen waste by 43% and greenhouse gas emissions by 30,2 % in 2023 compared to 2015; noteswelcomes that the CJEU applied green procurement criteria in 10 calls for tenderstender above EUR 60 000; welcomes the CJEU’s commitment to the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS); encourages the CJEU to continue its efforts in reducing its environmental impact, with a strategy to reach carbon neutrality by 2035;
AI: Note on change 25 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds welcome for EMAS commitment and encouragement to reach carbon neutrality by 2035.
Change 26 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed51.64. NotesWelcomes the efforts of the European Judicial Training Network (EJTN) in training national judges on EU law; notes with appreciation that, in line with the CJEU’s declaration entitled “Supporting the European Judicial Training Network (EJTN)EJTN to shape a sustainable European judicial culture”, the CJEU and the EJTN sought to increase the diversity of long-term trainees in 2023, with the aim of ultimately increasing their number to one per Member State; notes that the measures taken have already been successful since the CJEU has trainees from some Member States which previously did not actively participate in the programme; notes that 15 remunerated traineeships were offered for the year 2023-24; calls on the CJEU to further develop its knowledge-sharing initiatives, including joint case-law databases and virtual collaboration platforms to support national courts in complex legal interpretations;
AI: Note on change 26 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds welcome for EJTN efforts and calls for further knowledge-sharing initiatives.
Change 27 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Removed52. Notes that, in 2023, the CJEU has continued to work towards maintaining the established dialogue with national courts, and in particular with the constitutional and supreme courts, and that the CJEU hosted a number of meetings, including the annual meeting of national judges;
Added65. Emphasises that traineeships should be remunerated in compliance with the European Parliament's resolution of 14 June 2023 on Quality Traineeships in the Union (2020/2005(INL)), which calls for all internships in Europe to be paid; welcomes that currently all trainees at the CJEU receive a grant during their stay, mainly from the CJEU and, in some specific cases, from other sources; take notes that the CJEU only accepts a few trainees (less than 10 per year) paid by other sources, and for short periods (on average 2 months); welcomes that in such cases, the CJEU administration carefully checks that these trainees receive a grant, allowance or remuneration for this traineeship, paid directly by their employer or academic institution;
Added66. Appreciates that the CJEU fully cooperates with OLAF, the Court of Auditors, the EDPS and the European Ombudsman; notes that, in 2023, the CJEU has continued to work towards maintaining the established dialogue with national courts, and in particular with the constitutional and supreme courts, and that the CJEU hosted a number of meetings, including the annual meeting of national judges; encourages deeper cooperation between the CJEU and national courts to strengthen uniform application of Union law; recommends establishing a permanent judicial exchange programme for judges from Member States to work alongside their CJEU counterparts, fostering best practices in the interpretation of Union law;
AI: Note on change 27 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds paragraphs on traineeships remuneration and cooperation with OLAF, Court of Auditors, EDPS, and Ombudsman, plus judicial exchange programme.
Change 28 under “2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed53.67. Notes that, in 2023, the CJEU strengthened its efforts to engage with Union citizens by enhancing its outreach on social media; notes that, at the end of 2023, the number of subscribers to the CJEU’s LinkedIn account increased by 32 % and the number of followers on the CJEU’s two accounts on X (formerly Twitter) by 9%,while9 %,while the views on its YouTube channel increased by 84,96 % compared to the previous year;
AI: Note on change 28 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Updates social media growth figures and corrects percentage sign.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Changes between CONT-PR-764996 and A-10-2025-0050”. Text, 1 April 2025. from CONT-PR-764996, to A-10-2025-0050, reference 2024/2022(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CONT-PR-764996/compare/A-10-2025-0050 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-04-01,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between CONT-PR-764996 and A-10-2025-0050}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-04-01},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CONT-PR-764996/compare/A-10-2025-0050}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CONT-PR-764996/compare/A-10-2025-0050},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from CONT-PR-764996, to A-10-2025-0050, reference 2024/2022(DEC). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}