Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from resolution motion to resolution motion joint

B-10-2025-0219 → RC-10-2025-0219

From
B-10-2025-0219 resolution motion of 31 Mar 2025
To
RC-10-2025-0219 resolution motion joint of 2 Apr 2025
Changes
Not comparable
Paragraphs
+17 added · −11 removed · 1 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on Immediate risk of further repression by Lukashenka’s regime in Belarus – threats from the Investigative Committee
Title (to)
on the immediate risk of further repression by Lukashenka’s regime in Belarus – threats from the Investigative Committee

These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.

Changes that matter, 1

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

Removedwhereas the Belarusian authorities are scaling up practises of internal and transnational repression against its citizens; whereas the Investigative Committee is a preliminary inquiry body that reports directly to Lukashenka; whereas in 2024, legislative amendments granted the Investigative Committee access to the personal data of Belarusians without their consent;

AddedA. whereas the Lukashenka regime has been escalating internal and transnational repression to dismantle the structures representing the democratic forces of Belarus;

Removedwhereas the Investigative Committee has opened “special proceedings” against hundreds of Belarusians in exile, including 104 persons who had rallied in different European cities and 257 participants who had run in the elections to the Coordination Council in exile; whereas they were charged under various articles of the Criminal Code for discrediting Belarus, conspiring to seize State power, creating an extremist group, among others;

AddedB. whereas UN experts recently confirmed arbitrary arrests and detentions, accompanied by torture or ill treatment and even reported evidence for crimes against humanity; whereas more than 1 200 political prisoners, including Viktoryia Kulsha, Volha Mayorava, Alena Hnauk and Andrzej Poczobut, are still jailed;

Removedwhereas the UN Group of Independent Experts on the Situation of Human Rights in Belarus have stated in its 7 February 2025 report that the Belarusian authorities continue to rely on arbitrary arrests and detentions, accompanied by torture or ill-treatment, as its primary method of repressing society; whereas they also note that the thousands of Belarusians arrested and tried on politically motivated grounds are systematically subjected to a separate and harsher regime of detention designed to punish and humiliate them;

AddedC. whereas the Belarusian Investigative Committee has opened ‘special proceedings’ against hundreds of Belarusians who joined rallies in various European cities or ran in the Coordination Council’s elections; whereas the families of the Belarusian diaspora were threatened with imprisonment and asset confiscation if they participated in Freedom Day protests;

Show 19 more lines

Removedwhereas the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has reported evidence for crimes against humanity committed by the Lukashenka regime, specifically in the context of unlawful imprisonment and persecution;

AddedD. whereas Lukashenka’s regime is exploiting the expiry of many Belarusian passports to force the diaspora to return to Belarus;

RemovedContinues to stand in unwavering solidarity with the people of Belarus and demands the immediate and unconditional release and effective rehabilitation of all political prisoners;

AddedE. whereas the Belarusian regime’s increasing cooperation with Russian security services heightens the risk of coordinated repression, surveillance and hybrid threats in EU territory;

RemovedCondemns the Belarusian authorities for its policy of transnational repression against its citizens abroad; deplores the “special proceedings” by the Investigative Committee targeting Belarusians in exile and considers them clear examples of transnational repression by the Belarusian authorities;

AddedF. whereas Belarusian state media dominates the information landscape; whereas US funding cuts have severely affected Belarus’s civil society and free media;

RemovedCalls on the EU and Member States to swiftly step up efforts to support and protect Belarusians in exile in the EU and those looking to flee Belarus; reiterates its call on the Commission and Member States to simplify the procedures for obtaining visas, residence permits and provisional identification documents for those fleeing Belarus for political reasons; calls on the EU and Member States to prepare procedures to deal with cases of statelessness of Belarusians in the EU who cannot return to Belarus to renew identity documents;

Added1. Demands that Lukashenka’s regime immediately cease its repression, including the surveillance of exiles and demonstrators, and release and rehabilitate all political prisoners;

RemovedWelcomes the work of the UN Group of Independent Experts on the Human Rights situation in Belarus and supports the recommendations from its recent report; echoes the recommendation by OHCHR for UN Member States to consider working towards accountability through national proceedings, based on accepted principles of extraterritorial and universal jurisdiction, consistent with international due process;

Added2. Strongly condemns the continued expansion of repression by the Lukashenka regime, which now targets Belarusians abroad with criminal prosecution, asset seizures and other measures designed to silence dissent;

RemovedInstructs its President to forward this resolution to the VP/HR, the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, OHCHR, the representatives of the Belarusian democratic forces and the authorities of Belarus.

Added3. Calls for EU-wide legal support and protection for exiled Belarusians by simplifying procedures for obtaining visas, resident permits and provisional IDs for individuals made stateless by extraterritorial persecution;

Added4. Reiterates its non-recognition of Lukashenka and considers the persecution of Belarusian citizens for peaceful democratic activities abroad via Investigative Committee ‘special proceedings’ to be a direct violation of the Member States’ territorial sovereignty; urges, therefore, the countries concerned to disregard Interpol arrest warrants for the extradition of Lukashenka’s political opponents;

Added5. Welcomes the sanctions on the President Property Management Directorate and the Central Election Commission, which issued politically motivated judgments;

Added6. Urges the Member States to impose further sanctions equal to those imposed on Russia, particularly on officials responsible for transnational repression;

Added7. Urges the EU and its Member States to increase political, financial and technical support for the independent media, human rights defenders, trade unions and civil society initiatives operating within and outside Belarus, including monitoring trials and increasing the visibility of political prisoners;

Added8. Calls on the VP/HR to use INTCEN and EDMO to counteract Belarusian intelligence operations and disinformation;

Added9. Urges the International Criminal Court to expedite proceedings on crimes against humanity by Lukashenka’s regime and demands that Member States pursue accountability through national proceedings, based on the principle of universal jurisdiction;

Added10. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the VP/HR, the Council, the representatives of the Belarusian democratic forces and the Belarusian de facto authorities.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between B-10-2025-0219 and RC-10-2025-0219”. Text, 2 April 2025. from B-10-2025-0219, to RC-10-2025-0219. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2025-0219/compare/RC-10-2025-0219 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-04-02,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between B-10-2025-0219 and RC-10-2025-0219}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2025-0219/compare/RC-10-2025-0219}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2025-0219/compare/RC-10-2025-0219},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from B-10-2025-0219, to RC-10-2025-0219. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}