Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from resolution motion to adopted text
B-10-2024-0147 → TA-10-2024-0040
- From
- B-10-2024-0147 resolution motion of 23 Oct 2024
- To
- TA-10-2024-0040 Adopted text of 26 Nov 2024
- Changes
- 4 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +4 added · −1 removed · 5 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2024/2834(RSP)
- Title (from)
- on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and eight of its sub-combinations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
- Title (to)
- Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and eight of its sub-combinations
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
The resolution now calls for ensuring convergence of standards in trade negotiations instead of withdrawing the draft decision, and adds a call to repeal the adopted decision.34 The other changes are formal: updated references to the adopted decision.12
The notes class 2 changes as substance, 2 as formal, 0 as wording only.
Changes that matter, 4
Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.
Change 1
Changed1. Considers that the draftImplementing CommissionDecision implementing(EU) decision2024/2629 exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003;
AI: Note on change 1 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Updates the reference to the draft Commission implementing decision to the adopted Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2629.
Change 2
Changed2. Considers that the draftImplementing CommissionDecision implementing(EU) decision2024/2629 is not consistent with Union law, in that it is not compatible with the aim of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, which is, in accordance with the general principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council, to provide the basis for ensuring a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests, in relation to GM food and feed, while ensuring the effective functioning of the internal market;
AI: Note on change 2 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Updates the reference to the draft Commission implementing decision to the adopted Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2629.
Change 3
Changed3. Calls on the Commission to withdrawensure itsconvergence draftof implementingstandards decisionbetween the Union and toits submitpartners ain newfree drafttrade agreement negotiations, in order to themeet committee;Union safety standards;
AI: Note on change 3 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Replaces the call to withdraw the draft decision and submit a new one with a call to ensure convergence of standards with partners in free trade agreement negotiations to meet Union safety standards.
Change 4
Added4. Calls on the Commission to repeal Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2629 and to submit a new draft to the committee;
AI: Note on change 4 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds a call for the Commission to repeal Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2629 and submit a new draft to the committee.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “Changes between B-10-2024-0147 and TA-10-2024-0040”. Text, 26 November 2024. from B-10-2024-0147, to TA-10-2024-0040, reference 2024/2834(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0147/compare/TA-10-2024-0040 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-11-26,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between B-10-2024-0147 and TA-10-2024-0040}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-11-26},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0147/compare/TA-10-2024-0040}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0147/compare/TA-10-2024-0040},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from B-10-2024-0147, to TA-10-2024-0040, reference 2024/2834(RSP). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}