Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

AFET-PR-782288 → A-10-2026-0140

From
AFET-PR-782288 report parliamentary committee draft of 16 Feb 2026
To
A-10-2026-0140 Plenary report of 11 May 2026
Changes
8 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+90 added · −18 removed · 6 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the 2025 Commission report on Georgia
Title (to)
on the 2025 Commission report on Georgia
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds extensive new recitals and paragraphs on Georgia's democratic backsliding, political repression, and human rights abuses.168 Strengthens calls for EU sanctions against Georgian officials and Ivanishvili, and for conditional engagement with the authorities.567 Adds details on elections, legislation, and foreign policy misalignment, including new concerns about sanctions circumvention and Russian influence.18 Updates wording and adds references to institutions and public support for EU integration.234 The other changes are formal and wording: rephrasing and minor textual adjustments.3

The notes class 7 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 1 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 2 of 4: Paragraphs 61–120

Change 3

Changed2. Notes with deep disappointment that Georgian Dream has not only suspended but effectively reversed Georgia’s course of European integration; regrets the fact that there has been backsliding in the implementation of all nine priorities that were the conditions for granting Georgia candidate status; highlights the absurdityinconsistency of the claims by Georgian Dream that EU integration remains the main priority, while at the same time its highest officials and government-affiliated media run an orchestrated and systematic campaign spreading manipulative Russian-style narratives, disinformation and conspiracy theories against the EU, its officials and diplomats;

Change 4

Changed3. Deplores the fact that, since the rigged October 2024 parliamentary elections, Georgian Dream has further intensified its trajectory towards full authoritarianism; is dismayed at the rapid dismantling of Georgia’s democratic foundations through targeted attacks against its democratic institutions, fundamental freedoms and democratic pluralism;pluralism, which is totally at odds with the democratic development required for EU membership; shares the Commission’s assessment that crucial institutionsinstitutions, such as the Central Election Commission, the Communications Commission, the High Council of Justice, the Constitutional Court, the Prosecutor’s Office, the National Bank, and law enforcement and security agencies, lack impartialityimpartiality, independence and independence;democratic oversight; stresses that Georgia cannot make any progress in the European accession process as long as it does not return to the path of democratic reforms and, inter alia, guarantee free, fair and competitive elections, protect the independence of official institutions, effectively address oligarchic control and improve the protection of human rights and media freedom;

Change 5

Changed4. Stresses that targeted personal sanctions imposed by the EU and its Member States against Bidzina Ivanishvili, key Georgian Dream leaders, judges, prosecutors and other officials responsible for the continuous democratic backsliding in Georgia, electoral fraud, serious human rights violations and the persecution of political opponents and activistsactivists, areand against complicit owners of companies and media outlets linked to Georgian Dream, would be an important instrument against impunity; welcomes the fact that, in the absence of unanimity at EU level, an increasing number of Member States have introduced individual visa bans and other sanctions against Georgian officials; urges other Member States to follow suit;

Change 6

Added5. Reiterates its strong call for the EU and its Member States to introduce immediate and targeted personal sanctions against Bidzina Ivanishvili, his family members and his companies and calls for the EU to freeze his assets and to cooperate on this matter with other jurisdictions, in particular the United Kingdom and the United States;

Added6. Condemns the systemic impunity of officials and institutions responsible for political repression, harassment of journalists and human rights defenders, and persecution of opposition figures; emphasises that the EU response to date has been inadequate and belated in view of the accelerating authoritarian consolidation in Georgia; urges the Council and the Member States to urgently adopt coordinated, EU-wide restrictive measures against all responsible politicians, officials and enablers, including the expansion of sanctions lists, comprehensive asset freezes and visa bans targeting those responsible for state capture, repression and regime-sponsored propaganda; urges the incoming Hungarian Government to lift the blockade imposed by its predecessor on EU-wide targeted sanctions against Ivanishvili and the broader Georgian Dream leadership; calls on the Council to explore collective mechanisms when unanimity is not possible in order to ensure an effective and unified EU response;

Continued backsliding on democracy and the rule of law and the autocratic consolidation of power

Change 7

Changed5.7. Regrets that Georgian Dream has not taken any steps to create an opening forreverse aits dialogueanti-democratic withand theanti-European EU;course; considers it impossible tothat engageengagement with the Georgian authorities untilshould therebe isstrictly aconditional clearon reversalthem oftaking tangible and verifiable steps reversing their current course of democratic backsliding, repression, restrictions and fierce Russian-style anti-EU disinformation; callsmaintains, ontherefore, its previous positions regarding the Membernon-recognition Statesof tothe maintainlegitimacy aof unitedthe parliament and coordinatedthe approachpresident regardingappointed contactsby withit; regrets the Georgianfact authorities;that condemnsthe parliament of Georgia is a de facto one-party parliament that is rubber-stamping legislative initiatives aimed at dismantling the relentlessfoundations aggressiveof rhetorica againstpluralistic parliamentary democracy; notes with concern the EUfact andthat Memberthe States’de diplomats,facto politiciansparliament andof officials;Georgia has declared its temporary withdrawal from the EuroNest Parliamentary Assembly;

Change 8

Removed6. Points out that the municipal elections of 4 October 2025 were boycotted by the majority of the opposition parties; regrets that the amendments to Georgia’s Electoral Code further strengthened the dominance of the ruling party and introduced new restrictions on registration for local observers, media and electoral subjects; stresses that the lack of observation from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)/the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights due to a late invitation and from local observer organisations due to repression against them seriously affects the transparency of the electoral process and the credibility of its results;

Added8. Reiterates its call for the EU’s and the Member States’ representatives and members of parliament to refrain from holding meetings with representatives of the regime, starting with the current de facto president, as long as the Georgian authorities continue their democratic backsliding and repression; calls on the Member States to consolidate a united and coordinated approach regarding limiting political contacts with the Georgian Dream authorities to matters of strict necessity, while maintaining and strengthening engagement with Georgian civil society, independent media, and academic institutions; condemns the persistent aggressive rhetoric against the EU and Member States’ diplomats, politicians and officials; stresses the importance of continuing to promote European norms, democratic values and the European path among the Georgian population and political forces committed to democratic principles;

Removed7. Condemns the adoption of increasingly restrictive legislation that aims to make it practically impossible for international financial support to reach civil society and media; highlights the most recent amendments to the Law on Grants announced on 28 January 2026, which significantly broaden the scope of what is considered a ‘grant’ and make receiving grants or funding from abroad without prior government authorisation a criminal offence punishable by up to six years’ imprisonment;

Added9. Notes with concern the aggressive rhetoric against the United States, the United Kingdom and other allies;

Removed8. Is concerned that Georgian Dream has already adopted a number of legislative acts that aim to stifle civil society and independent media; reiterates its call to release all political prisoners and other illegally detained persons without delay; warns that the Georgian Government’s efforts to transform Georgia’s vibrant civil society into a tightly controlled environment of government-aligned organisations constitute a further step towards becoming an authoritarian regime; calls on the Georgian authorities to repeal these legislative acts as a tangible step back towards its EU path;

Added10. Calls on the Georgian authorities to restore merit-based civil service safeguards, reinstate effective legal protection against politically motivated dismissals and ensure effective implementation of the right to access public information;

Removed9. Deplores the continued attempts by the ruling Georgian Dream party to persecute political opponents, including through illegal arrest and detention, threats and physical attacks; condemns the imprisonment of political opponents for refusing to appear before the Temporary Investigative Commission of the Parliament of Georgia; calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all opposition politicians imprisoned on political grounds;

Added11. Points out that the municipal elections of 4 October 2025 were boycotted by the majority of the opposition parties, reflecting the deep mistrust that the majority of society has in the independence of the electoral process; regrets that the amendments to Georgia’s Electoral Code made in December 2024 and March and April 2025 further strengthened the dominance of the ruling party and introduced new restrictions on registration for local observers, media and electoral subjects; reiterates that the Georgian authorities ignored calls by the Venice Commission to repeal the changes made in 2024; stresses that the lack of observation missions from the OSCE/ODIHR owing to a late invitation and from local observer organisations owing to restrictions seriously affected the transparency of the electoral process and the credibility of its results; reiterates its call for an improved electoral environment established by an independent and impartial election administration, for future elections under diligent observation by international and national non-governmental organisations (NGOs); expresses its deep concern about the amendment of the Electoral Code of December 2025 that prohibits Georgian citizens from voting from abroad; stresses that participation in elections is a fundamental constitutional right of every citizen and has to be made possible regardless of one’s place of residence;

Removed10. Expresses deep concern over the constitutional lawsuit filed by 88 Members of the Georgian Parliament, requesting that the activities of three major opposition parties – United National Movement, Coalition for Change and the Strong Georgia-Lelo coalition – be declared unconstitutional and that their registration be revoked;

Added12. Condemns the adoption of unprecedented and increasingly restrictive legislation aimed at making it practically impossible for international support, including financial means, to reach civil society and media, and at cutting them off from any independent funding; highlights the most recent amendments to the Law on Grants, which came into force on 5 March 2026, which significantly broaden the scope of what is considered a ‘grant’ and make receiving grants or funding from abroad without prior government authorisation a criminal offence punishable by up to six years’ imprisonment; notes that this is a direct violation of the EU-Georgia Association Agreement; calls for the protection of political foundations, international NGOs, and development agencies; reminds the Georgian authorities that any harassment of EU Member State organisations will lead to direct consequences;

Removed11. Welcomes the activation of the Moscow Mechanism by the OSCE at the initiative of 24 member countries, which opens the opportunity to send an expert mission to assess Georgia’s implementation of OSCE commitments; calls on the Georgian authorities to fully cooperate with the expert mission;

Added13. Notes that these amendments follow those made to the Law on Grants adopted in April 2025, which already significantly narrowed options for international financial support and introduced the requirement for international donors to seek pre-approval for grants from state authorities and restrictive monitoring and punitive administrative liability for recipients, aimed at deterring organisations from accepting international assistance, including funding from the EU; stresses that the broad definition of a ‘grant’ can cover wide-ranging transactions subject to prior approval and can make any citizen a potential target of persecution by the government; notes with concern the prohibition of party membership for eight years for any person ever employed by an organisation that has relied on foreign funding, thus banning a large number of socially active individuals from participating in party politics; strongly urges the EU and its Member States to take immediate action to safeguard and sustain the remaining independent media and civil society organisations in Georgia;

Removed12. Notes the Commission’s proposal to suspend visa-free travel for holders of Georgian diplomatic, service and official passports across all EU Member States, as a direct consequence of the Georgian Dream regime’s actions in breach of fundamental values; regrets that EU-wide visa bans for Georgian officials responsible for democratic backsliding and repression have not been possible due to opposition from Hungary and Slovakia; warns that continued inaction by the Georgian authorities could lead to the suspension of visa-free travel for the entire population, for which Georgian Dream would be fully responsible;

Added14. Deplores the continued attempts by the ruling Georgian Dream party to persecute political opponents, including through illegal arrest and detention, threats and physical attacks; condemns the imprisonment of political opponents for refusing to appear before the Temporary Investigative Commission of the de facto parliament of Georgia, which was used by Georgian Dream as a form of political show trial aimed at opening the way for the further persecution of political opponents and the banning of opposition parties; stresses that the existence of political prisoners is incompatible with Georgia’s obligations under the EU-Georgia Association Agreement; calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all those imprisoned on political grounds, including opposition politicians and former officials; notes that two opposition politicians were pardoned by the de facto president ahead of the municipal elections to ensure a semblance of competitive elections; strongly reiterates its demand for the immediate release of former President Mikheil Saakashvili on humanitarian grounds for the purpose of him seeking the necessary medical treatment abroad; calls, furthermore, on the Georgian Dream authorities to ensure that Members of the European Parliament are granted unhindered access to Mikheil Saakashvili and other political prisoners;

RemovedAlignment on foreign policy matters

Added15. Notes that, despite a guilty plea and the existence of credible public evidence of corruption, the imprisonment of former Prime Minister Irakli Gharibashvili raises serious concerns as to whether the proceedings met fair trial standards; stresses that the case reflects broader concerns about politically influenced justice, informal power structures and internal divisions within the ruling Georgian Dream party, including the role of Bidzina Ivanishvili;

Removed13. Regrets that the level of Georgia’s alignment with statements by the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and with Council decisions on sanctions has further decreased to 40 %; is particularly disappointed that Georgia did not systematically align with international and EU initiatives in support of Ukraine;

Added16. Calls on the Georgian authorities to implement independent accountability mechanisms, ensure judicial impartiality, and hold perpetrators of politically motivated abuses responsible in accordance with international human rights standards;

Removed14. Notes that Georgia has still not aligned with the vast majority of sanctions against Russia, Belarus and Iran; calls on the Georgian authorities to strengthen cooperation to prevent the territory of Georgia and/or legal entities registered in Georgia from being used to circumvent EU restrictive measures;

Added17. Calls for a comprehensive reform of the High Council of Justice in line with the Venice Commission recommendations, including the introduction of fixed non-renewable terms, transparent appointment procedures and extraordinary integrity checks for senior judicial office-holders with the meaningful involvement of international experts, in order to strengthen judicial independence and public trust in the judiciary; notes with disappointment the dissolution of the Anti-Corruption Bureau that was established in 2022, which was one of the key requirements for the EU to grant Georgia candidate status; calls on the Georgian authorities to amend the appointment procedure for the post of Prosecutor General by requiring a qualified parliamentary majority, and to align the Law on the Prosecutor’s Office with European standards;

Removed15. Notes that, having abandoned the path of Euro-Atlantic integration, Georgian Dream is making a strategic turn towards cooperation with China, Russia and Iran;

Added18. Urges the Public Defender of Georgia to intensify the execution of his mandate and use all available mechanisms to safeguard human rights, while engaging in constructive dialogue and collaboration with human rights defenders and civil society in Georgia; emphasises the necessity to prevent any selective application of his mandate, as referenced in the 2025 Commission Report on Georgia; highlights the Public Defender’s distinct authority to request legislative opinions from the OSCE/ODIHR regarding authoritarian or non-democratic legislation;

Removed16. Reiterates its condemnation in the strongest possible terms of Russia’s ongoing occupation of Georgia’s regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia and the continued ‘borderisation’ process, which constitutes a violation of Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity;

Added19. Regrets the lack of progress made on de-oligarchisation and calls on the Georgian authorities to adopt a systemic approach in line with relevant Venice Commission recommendations, including through strengthened transparency requirements, effective conflict of interest rules and safeguards against undue influence over political and economic decision-making;

Added20. Strongly condemns the attempts by the Georgian authorities to ban opposition parties; calls on the authorities to immediately halt these attempts and to withdraw the constitutional lawsuit filed by 88 members of the de facto parliament of Georgia requesting that the activities of three major opposition parties – United National Movement, Coalition for Change and the Strong Georgia-Lelo coalition – be declared unconstitutional and that their registration be revoked; underlines the fact that such actions pose a dangerous threat to fundamental democratic principles and political pluralism; emphasises that a healthy democracy requires fair and free competition between various political parties;

Added21. Expresses strong disapproval of the recent introduction of a new article in the Criminal Code that prohibits ‘public and systematic’ criticism of the authorities or questioning of their legitimacy, as well as ‘any other public and systematic action by the same person’, which remains open to interpretation yet provides for imprisonment of up to three years; highlights that this allows for the de facto criminalisation of freedom of expression and calls on the government to denounce this law;

AddedCrackdown on civil liberties and fundamental rights

Added22. Is extremely concerned that Georgian Dream has already adopted a number of legislative acts that aim to stifle civil society and independent media and curb pluralism, such as the Foreign Agents Registration Act, restrictive amendments to the Broadcasting Law, the Law on Public Service, the Law on Assemblies and Manifestations, and stricter provisions in the Criminal Code and the Administrative Offences Code; condemns, in particular, legislative measures that increase fines under administrative codes, which increasingly result in the imprisonment of protesters who are unable to pay those fines; reiterates its call to release all political prisoners and other illegally detained persons without delay; warns that the Georgian authorities’ efforts to transform Georgia’s vibrant civil society into a tightly controlled environment of government-aligned organisations constitute a further step towards becoming an authoritarian regime; recalls that most of these laws copy the early developments under Putin’s totalitarian regime in Russia; calls on the Georgian authorities to repeal these legislative acts as a tangible step back towards its EU path;

Added23. Condemns the degrading and inhuman treatment reportedly inflicted on Elene Khoshtaria during her detention; demands her immediate and unconditional release and the immediate withdrawal of politically motivated charges against her;

Added24. Expresses deep concern at the continued misuse of administrative detention against protesters and activists; notes the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Mekvabishvili v. Georgia, which found that reliance solely on police testimony without independent evidence undermined fair-trial guarantees and contributed to the imposition of disproportionate sanctions against peaceful demonstrators; calls on the Georgian authorities to reform its administrative-offence procedures to bring them in line with the European Convention on Human Rights;

Added25. Condemns credible reports of excessive use of force, torture and ill-treatment against protesters and detainees, including recent findings by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) documenting allegations of police abuse and systematic deficiencies in safeguards and accountability; calls on the Georgian authorities to ensure prompt, independent and effective investigations, prosecute those responsible, and fully implement CPT recommendations;

Added26. Condemns the growing trend of Georgian law enforcement agents using verbal and physical abuse against protesters, threats of rape and other gender-based violence and unlawful strip searches as part of a campaign to intimidate dissidents, especially women protesters, and stifle Georgians’ human rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly;

Added27. Condemns adopted legislation that provides for automatic detention and the imposition of subsequent criminal penalties, including imprisonment of up to one year, for individuals peacefully protesting on pavements and pedestrian areas; underlines that such measures are repressive instruments intended to suppress dissent for political purposes; deplores the frequent detention of individuals for sharing their opinions on social media;

Added28. Expresses its utmost alarm at the allegations that a prohibited chemical agent may have been used in Georgia against individuals in the context of protests; stresses that, if confirmed, the use of any chemical agent against civilians would constitute a grave violation of fundamental human rights, international humanitarian norms and Georgia’s obligations under international law, including the prohibition of chemical weapons; deplores the inadequate investigation conducted by the Georgian authorities into this matter; calls for an immediate, independent and transparent international investigation into these allegations; calls for an examination by the United Nation’s Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and urges the Member States to refer this case for further investigation;

Added29. Expresses deep concern over the systematic violation of human rights in Georgia and discrimination against vulnerable groups, including LGBTIQ+ persons; stresses that these violations are incompatible with Georgia’s obligations under the EU-Georgia Association Agreement and international human rights standards; calls on the Georgian authorities to uphold the rights to freedom of expression, assembly, association and political participation, and to ensure the safety and protection of, and effective legal remedies for, all human rights defenders and activists; calls strongly for the EU and the Member States to monitor these violations, provide support and protection to at-risk individuals, and link progress made on EU assistance, cooperation and accession to tangible improvements in human rights protection;

Added30. Urges the de facto parliament of Georgia to rescind the Law on Family Values and the Protection of Minors, whose provisions starkly violate human rights, including the rights to equality, non-discrimination, education, health, freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association, as well as privacy, liberty and security; stands with the LGBTIQ+ community of Georgia and views with deep abhorrence the law’s false equivalence between consensual same-sex relationships and incest; recalls that similar laws in Russia under the Putin regime have paved the way for the expansive repression of minorities and, ultimately, an atmosphere of intimidation and discrimination in Russia;

Added31. Expresses serious concern about the situation in Georgia’s Chiatura region as a consequence of the mining of manganese for the EU market and calls for the implementation of the CSDDD, as the EU carries a responsibility for the well-being of local residents and for the protection of the environment affected by the damage caused;

Added32. Reiterates its opposition to the backsliding on labour laws and labour rights in Georgia, as seen in the 2024 amendments to the Law on Public Service; calls on the Georgian authorities to abide by labour law standards and refrain from restricting labour rights; recalls that the EU acquis includes alignment with International Labour Organization conventions, the European Social Charter and EU legislation on working conditions;

Added33. Welcomes the activation of the so-called Moscow Mechanism by the OSCE at the initiative of 24 participating States, which opened the opportunity to send an expert mission to assess Georgia’s implementation of OSCE commitments, in particular with regard to the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms since the spring of 2024; calls on the Georgian authorities to engage substantively with its findings and to implement its recommendations within clear deadlines, including on the release of persons held for political reasons, the repeal of legislation incompatible with international obligations, and accountability for ill-treatment; stresses that, should the authorities fail to take concrete and verifiable steps to implement its recommendations, participating States and relevant international institutions should consider appropriate follow-up measures to ensure accountability, including targeted sanctions and the use of relevant international legal mechanisms; calls on the EU Member States participating in the OSCE to actively support an extension of the mission’s mandate, given the systematic and well-documented violations requiring comprehensive independent assessment;

Added34. Welcomes the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly’s 2025 October resolution urging the Council of Europe’s bodies to ‘use all available means’, including Article 52 of the European Convention on Human Rights and interstate applications to the European Court of Human Rights under Article 33 thereof, to ensure that Georgia upholds its obligations as a Council of Europe member state; calls on the EU Member States and the Council of Europe member states to consider implementing this recommendation;

Added35. Strongly condemns the role of Georgian Dream-aligned media outlets, including Imedi TV, PosTV and Rustavi 2 TV, in disseminating systematic disinformation, smear campaigns and hostile propaganda against the EU and its institutions and representatives, in particular the Head of the EU Delegation to Georgia and EU Member State diplomats; notes the recent decision by the United Kingdom to impose sanctions against Imedi TV and PosTV; calls for the EU institutions to review the accreditation of such media outlets within the EU institutions and encourages the EU Member States to follow the United Kingdom’s example and adopt appropriate and proportionate restrictive measures against individuals and entities responsible for orchestrating and financing these disinformation campaigns, including under the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime; calls for the inclusion on the EU sanctions list of members of the leadership of the Georgian National Communications Commission and the Georgian Public Broadcaster;

Added36. Expresses concern about pressure placed on and legal proceedings brought against the independent media; emphasises that media pluralism and the safety of journalists are essential prerequisites for a democratic society;

Added37. Notes with concern recent reforms in Georgia’s education sector that appear to centralise control over academic institutions, weaken academic freedom and university autonomy and hinder Georgia’s integration with the European higher education system; warns about measures aimed at changing the structure and duration of academic programmes and the introduction of the ‘one city, one faculty’ principle, which limits the range of disciplines offered by individual universities; is worried about regulatory pressure placed on institutions such as Ilia State University following their public support for student protests, while support is extended for private institutions associated with figures close to the ruling elite; stresses that independent education experts warn that the cumulative effect of these measures risks reducing academic pluralism and further politicising the higher-education system;

Added38. Expresses concern over the organised fraudulent call-centre networks operating from Georgia, in particular those targeting EU citizens; underlines that international journalists’ investigations have suggested that high-ranking Georgian Dream officials offer protection to these scam networks in exchange for financial compensation, which helps them to withstand economic sanctions;

Added39. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to suspend visa-free travel for holders of Georgian diplomatic, service and official passports, which has applied since 6 March 2026 across all EU Member States under the revised and more flexible visa suspension mechanism that entered into force on 30 December 2025, as a direct consequence of the Georgian Dream regime’s actions in breach of fundamental values; encourages the Member States to carry out a thorough screening, by conducting an interview and requesting supporting documents from these visa applicants, and refuse visas if there are any doubts about the reliability of the information provided by them; regrets that EU-wide visa bans for Georgian officials responsible for serious human rights violations, democratic backsliding and repression have not been possible due to opposition from the Hungarian and Slovak Governments; notes that the eighth visa suspension mechanism report highlights Georgia’s lack of compliance with key benchmarks and previous recommendations; warns that continued inaction by the Georgian authorities could lead to the suspension of visa-free travel for the entire population, for which Georgian Dream would be fully responsible; calls on the Commission to establish a mechanism whereby civil society activists, journalists and students may continue to have visa-free access to the EU, and to increase direct support for people-to-people exchange programmes such as Erasmus +, Horizon Europe, the European Solidarity Corps and Creative Europe;

AddedAlignment on foreign and security policy matters

Added40. Regrets that the level of Georgia’s alignment with statements by the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and with Council decisions on sanctions has further decreased from 53 % in 2024 to 40 %, demonstrating its lack of commitment to European integration; is particularly disappointed that Georgia did not systematically align with international and EU initiatives in support of Ukraine, including on resolutions adopted by the UN General Assembly, the UN Human Rights Council and the Council of Europe, and has instead strengthened its relations with Russia and supported Russian narratives that aim to shift responsibility for the war of aggression and the crimes committed by Russia;

Added41. Is extremely grateful for the strong solidarity the Georgian people have shown towards Ukraine during Russia’s war of aggression, which reflects widespread public opposition to Russian imperialist policies, the country’s own experience of Russian military aggression, and the strong will of the people to preserve their independence and remain outside Moscow’s sphere of influence; points out that many Georgian volunteers have fought alongside the Ukrainian armed forces, in particular in the Georgian Legion, and that Georgian civil society has participated in humanitarian aid campaigns in support of Ukraine;

Added42. Notes that Georgia has still not aligned with the vast majority of sanctions against Russia, Belarus and Iran; calls on the Georgian authorities to adopt verifiable measures and strengthen cooperation and customs monitoring to prevent the territory of Georgia and/or legal entities registered in Georgia from being used to circumvent EU restrictive measures; considers the current level of alignment and enforcement efforts to be manifestly insufficient and incompatible with the responsibilities of an EU candidate country; stresses that more decisive action is urgently required, including full alignment with EU restrictive measures, effective monitoring and enforcement mechanisms, and transparent cooperation with EU institutions to prevent sanctions evasion, including concerning dual-use goods, oil exports and financial flows linked to Russian and Iranian entities; warns that continued failure to align with the EU’s foreign policy and sanctions regime will have direct consequences for Georgia’s EU accession process; calls for the EU and its Member States to continue closely monitoring Georgia’s compliance with the EU sanctions regime, including risks of sanctions circumvention through Georgian territory or entities registered in Georgia;

Added43. Calls for the EU and its Member States to take urgent and decisive action to halt the systematic circumvention of EU sanctions by Russia facilitated by the Georgian authorities, including by establishing a dedicated EU monitoring mechanism to track trade flows of high-priority dual-use goods and aviation components transiting through Georgia; calls, furthermore, on the Georgian authorities to fully cooperate with these efforts and to publish regular, transparent reports on such trade flows in order to strengthen customs enforcement and prevent further sanctions evasion;

Added44. Is concerned by the potential use of Georgian ports, refining infrastructure and oil-handling facilities to facilitate the re-export or blending of Russian petroleum products in order to circumvent international sanctions regimes; expresses serious concern over reports that Russian crude oil is being shipped to Georgia’s newly built and partially state-financed Kulevi refinery on the Black Sea coast; calls on the Georgian authorities to immediately halt and prevent any such activities and to ensure that Georgian infrastructure is not used to facilitate the circumvention of EU sanctions on Russia; notes that the Kulevi Oil Terminal was not included in the 20th EU sanctions package against Russia based on the commitments from the Georgian authorities and the terminal’s operator that they would strictly comply with EU sanctions; calls for its inclusion in future sanctions if the Georgian authorities and the terminal’s operators do not strictly comply with EU sanctions; calls for enhanced cooperation between the EU and international partners to ensure the full enforcement of restrictive measures;

Added45. Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Anti-Money Laundering Authority, to assess Georgia’s legal and regulatory framework, including provisions of the Georgian Tax Code that may facilitate the use of offshore-registered companies and obscure beneficial ownership, thereby enabling sanctions circumvention and money laundering; calls for the enhanced monitoring and scrutiny of companies registered in Georgia that are owned or controlled by Russian citizens or entities, particularly those established since February 2022; calls on the Georgian authorities to establish an asset recovery office, an asset management office and a register of ultimate beneficial owners in order to strengthen anti-money laundering safeguards and reduce the risk of sanctions circumvention;

Added46. Notes that, having abandoned the path of Euro-Atlantic integration, Georgian Dream is making a strategic turn towards cooperation with China, Russia and Iran, as confirmed in numerous reports; stresses that this reorientation demonstrates a disregard for Georgia’s constitutional commitment to Euro-Atlantic integration and the clear and consistently expressed will of Georgian society; expresses outrage that, instead of addressing credible findings on the growing influence of authoritarian powers, investigations have been launched against the authors of such reports, including Hudson Institute researcher Giorgi Kandelaki and Tinatin Khidasheli;

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between AFET-PR-782288 and A-10-2026-0140”. Text, 11 May 2026. from AFET-PR-782288, to A-10-2026-0140, reference 2025/2257(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-782288/compare/A-10-2026-0140?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-05-11,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between AFET-PR-782288 and A-10-2026-0140}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-782288/compare/A-10-2026-0140?all=1&part=2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-782288/compare/A-10-2026-0140?all=1&part=2},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from AFET-PR-782288, to A-10-2026-0140, reference 2025/2257(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}