Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
AFET-PR-769896 → A-10-2025-0093
- From
- AFET-PR-769896 report parliamentary committee draft of 18 Feb 2025
- To
- A-10-2025-0093 Plenary report of 20 May 2025
- Changes
- 13 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +74 added · −37 removed · 13 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2025/2020(INI)
- Title (from)
- on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro
- Title (to)
- on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
The report adds a new geopolitical context, stressing EU enlargement momentum and Montenegro's leading role, with a target of EU membership by 2028.12 It expands sections on foreign policy, security, and countering malign influence, including new calls for NATO cooperation and condemnation of interference.5 It significantly broadens coverage of rule of law, judiciary, corruption, and elections, adding detailed recommendations and concerns.6 It adds extensive new paragraphs on human rights, minorities, media freedom, civil society, and socio-economic reforms, including specific concerns about foreign debt and procurement.78 The other changes are formal and wording: updated forwarding instructions and rephrased explanatory statement.9101112
The notes class 8 changes as substance, 1 as formal, 4 as wording only.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 1 of 4: MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
9 unchanged paragraphs
on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro
(2025/2020(INI))
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Montenegro, of the other part, which entered into force on 1 May 2010,
– having regard to Montenegro’s application for membership of the European Union of 15 December 2008,
– having regard to the Commission opinion of 9 November 2010 on Montenegro’s application for membership of the European Union (COM(2010)0670), the European Council’s decision of 16-17 December 2010 to grant Montenegro candidate status and the European Council’s decision of 29 June 2012 to open EU accession negotiations with Montenegro,
– having regard to Regulation (EU) 2021/1529 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 September 2021 establishing the Instrument for Pre-Accession assistance (IPA III),
– having regard to Regulation (EU) 2024/1449 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on establishing the Reform and Growth Facility for the Western Balkans,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Thessaloniki European Council meeting of 19-20 June 2003,
Changed– having regard to the declarationsSofia Declaration of the EU-Western Balkans Summitssummit of 13 December 202317 inMay Brussels,2018 and ofthe 18Sofia DecemberPriority 2024Agenda inannexed Brussels,thereto,
Added– having regard to the declarations of the EU-Western Balkans summits of 13 December 2023 in Brussels, and of 18 December 2024 in Brussels,
5 unchanged paragraphs
– having regard to the Berlin Process launched on 28 August 2014,
– having regard to the Commission communication of 6 October 2020 entitled ‘An Economic and Investment Plan for the Western Balkans’ (COM(2020)0641),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 8 November 2023 entitled ‘2023 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy’ (COM(2023)0690), accompanied by the Commission staff working document entitled ‘Montenegro 2023 Report’ (SWD(2023)0694),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 8 November 2023 entitled ‘New growth plan for the Western Balkans’ (COM(2023)0691),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 20 March 2024 on pre-enlargement reforms and policy reviews (COM(2024)0146),
Changed– having regard to the Commission communication of 24 July 2024 entitled ‘2024 Rule of Law Report’ (COM(2024)0800), accompanied by the Commission staff working document entitled ‘2024 Rule of Law Report – The rule of law situation in the European Union.Union: Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Montenegro’ (SWD(2024)0829),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 30 October 2024 entitled ‘2024 Communication on EU enlargement policy’ (COM(2024)0690), accompanied by the Commission staff working document entitled ‘Montenegro 2024 Report’ (SWD(2024)0694),
– having regard to the Commission’s overview and country assessments of 31 May 2023 and of 13 June 2024 of the economic reform programme of Montenegro, and to the joint conclusions of the Economic and Financial Dialogue between the EU and the Western Balkans and Türkiye adopted by the Council on 16 May 2023 and to the joint conclusions of the Economic and Financial Dialogue between the EU and the Western Balkans Partners, Türkiye, Georgia, Republic of Moldova and Ukraine adopted by the Council on 14 May 2024,
Changed– having regard to the EU-Montenegro Intergovernmental Accession Conferences of 22 June 2021, 13 December 2021, 29 January 2024, 26 June 2024,2024 and 16 December 2024,
– having regard to the 11th EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Council on 14 July 2022,
– having regard to the declaration and recommendations adopted at the 22nd meeting of the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee, held on 31 October and 1 November 2024,
– having regard to Montenegro’s accession to NATO on 5 June 2017,
Changed– having regard to Special Report 01/2022 of the European Court of Auditors of 10 January 2022,2022 entitled ‘EU support for the Rulerule of Lawlaw in the Western Balkans: despite efforts, fundamental problems persist’,
Added– having regard to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (the Istanbul Convention), ratified by Montenegro in 2013, and to the recommendations of the Commission on gender equality and combating gender-based violence,
Added– having regard to the World Press Freedom Index report published annually by Reporters Without Borders,
Added– having regard to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) data on the Ukraine Refugee Situation as of April 2025,
– having regard to its recommendation of 23 November 2022 to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the new EU strategy for enlargement,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Montenegro,
Added– having regard to its resolution of 29 February 2024 on deepening EU integration in view of future enlargement,
– having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
Changed– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A10-0000/2025),(A10-0093/2025),
A. whereas enlargement is a key EU foreign policy tool and a strategic geopolitical investment in peace, stability, security and prosperity;
Change 1
RemovedB. whereas each country is judged on its own merits;
AddedB. whereas the new enlargement momentum, sparked by the changing geopolitical reality and the EU membership applications by several Eastern Partnership countries, has prompted the EU to accelerate its efforts towards delivering on its long-overdue commitments to the Western Balkans; whereas the future of the Western Balkan countries lies within the EU;
RemovedC. whereas Montenegro has gone furthest in the accession process and has significant public support therefor;
AddedC. whereas each country is judged on its own merits in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria, including full respect for democracy, the rule of law, good governance, fundamental EU values and alignment with EU foreign and security policy; whereas the implementation of necessary reforms in the area of ‘fundamentals’ determines the timetable and progress in the accession process;
AddedD. whereas Montenegro has gone furthest in the accession process, with all 33 chapters of the EU acquis open and six provisionally closed, and has significant public support therefor;
AddedE whereas the EU is Montenegro’s largest trading partner, investor and provider of financial assistance;
AddedF whereas Montenegro is exposed to malign foreign influence, disinformation campaigns and other forms of influence, including election meddling, hybrid warfare strategies and unfavourable investments from non-EU actors, particularly Russia and China, which are trying to influence Montenegro’s political, economic and strategic trajectory and threaten democratic processes and media integrity, jeopardising the country’s prospects for EU accession;
AddedG. whereas on 8 June 2024, an ‘All-Serb Assembly’ took place in Belgrade with the participation of high-ranking parliamentarians under the slogan ‘One people, one Assembly’;
Commitment to EU accession
Change 2
Changed1. Recognises Montenegro’s firm commitment to EU accession and confirmsreaffirms its full support for the country’s future EU membership; welcomes Montenegro’s leading regional position in the EU accession process as well as the overwhelming support of Montenegro’s citizens and the majority of political actors for joining the EU in 2028;
Change 3
Changed2. Welcomes Montenegro’s positive progress in enacting EU-related reforms and measures, underpinned by an ambitious timeline and calls for collective efforts of political actors, civil society and citizens; commends Montenegro for meeting the interim benchmarks for Chapters 23 and 2424, which continue to determine the overall pace of negotiations, and for receiving a positive Interim Benchmark Assessment Report; welcomes the closure of three more negotiating chapters, bringing the total to six;
Change 4
Changed3. Encourages all political actors to stay focused on EU integration and the required reforms; stresses the need for political stability, commitment and constructive engagement in consensus building across party lines in order to move swiftly and more effectively towards closing additional chapters;chapters in 2025, so as to achieve the country’s ambitious timeline; stresses that adoptedthe reforms adopted must be implemented effectively implementedand consistently to ensure genuine progress;progress and full alignment with EU legislation; calls for a strengthening of the functioning of, and coordination between, state institutions in order to achieve political stability and advance the country’s substantial progress in implementing key EU-related reforms, in particular electoral and judicial reforms and the fight against organised crime and corruption;
Change 5
Removed4. Welcomes Montenegro’s sustained full alignment with the EU’s common foreign and security policy, including EU restrictive measures, inter alia those related to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine; encourages Montenegro to strengthen the enforcement of restrictive measures and avoid their circumvention;
Added4. Underlines that the credibility of the EU, including its enlargement policy as a whole, would be affected if tangible progress achieved by certain Western Balkan countries does not translate into clear advancements on the EU accession path;
Removed5. Commends Montenegro for its humanitarian and material support to Ukraine; recalls that Montenegro hosts a large number of Ukrainian refugees;
Added5. Welcomes Montenegro’s sustained full alignment with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), including EU restrictive measures, inter alia, those related to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and those targeted against cyberattacks, as well as its support for the international rules-based order at UN level; encourages Montenegro to strengthen the enforcement of restrictive measures and avoid their circumvention and to seize the assets of those sanctioned; calls on all government representatives to respect and promote CFSP alignment and EU values and refrain from any activities that may threaten Montenegro’s strategic path towards EU membership and its sovereignty; is highly concerned, in this context, by public high officials’ statements in support of the President of the Republika Srpska entity, Milorad Dodik, who is undermining the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina; regrets the participation of high-ranking parliamentarians from Montenegro in the ‘All-Serbian Assembly’ in Belgrade as well as their support for the declaration adopted on that occasion undermining the sovereignty of Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo;
Removed6. Remains seriously concerned by malign foreign interference, destabilisation efforts, hybrid threats and disinformation campaigns by third country actors and urges Montenegro to adopt countermeasures in cooperation with the EU and NATO; urges the EU and the Montenegrin authorities to boost strategic communication to Montenegrin citizens on the benefits of the enlargement process and EU membership;
Added6. Underlines the strategic importance of Montenegro’s NATO membership and welcomes its active involvement in EU common security and defence policy missions and operations, such as EU Naval Force Operation Atalanta, and in NATO and other international and multilateral missions; welcomes the decision of Montenegro’s Council for Defence and Security to approve the participation of its armed forces in the EU Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine and NATO’s Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine and calls on the Montenegrin Parliament to adopt these decisions, thereby reinforcing the country’s commitment to collective security;
Added7. Commends Montenegro for its humanitarian and material support to Ukraine and for extending the temporary protection mechanism that grants persons fleeing Ukraine the right to stay in Montenegro for one year; recalls that Montenegro is among the Western Balkan countries hosting the largest number of Ukrainian refugees, with over 18 800 refugees from Ukraine registered in Montenegro as of 31 January 2025, according to UNHCR statistics;
Added8. Remains seriously concerned by malign foreign interference, destabilisation efforts, cyberattacks, hybrid threats and disinformation campaigns, including attempts to influence political processes and public opinion, by third-country actors, which discredit the EU and undermine Montenegro’s progress on its accession path; urges Montenegro to adopt countermeasures in stronger cooperation with the EU and NATO and through increased regional cooperation among the Western Balkan countries; notes that religious institutions can be used as a tool for external influence and condemns any undue interference by the Serbian Orthodox Church in this regard; reiterates the importance of building resilience capacity against foreign information manipulation and interference, including through greater oversight of the media landscape, public awareness campaigns and media literacy programmes; recommends that Montenegro establish a dedicated hybrid threat task force;
Added9. Urges the Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS), the Delegation of the EU to Montenegro and the Montenegrin authorities to boost strategic communication to Montenegrin citizens on the benefits of the enlargement process and EU membership, as well as on the concrete accession criteria that Montenegro still needs to fulfil to align with EU requirements; urges them, furthermore, to improve the EU’s visibility in the country, including as regards EU-funded projects; calls for StratCom monitoring to be expanded in order to concentrate on cross-border disinformation threats in the Western Balkan countries and their neighbours; calls on the Commission to further support the efforts of the EEAS and the Western Balkans Task Force so as to expand outreach activities by increasing visibility in local media, fact-checking reports and partnering with civil society organisations to counter false narratives more effectively;
10. Welcomes the Montenegrin Parliament’s renewed engagement in the Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee;
Democracy and the rule of law
Change 6
Removed8. Recognises the Montenegrin Parliament’s key role in the accession process; notes with concern political boycotts and blockades, as well as re-emerging tensions and ethnic polarisation; calls for constructive dialogue and consensus building across the political spectrum, prioritising legislative quality; strongly encourages inclusive and transparent public consultations and regular engagement with civil society in decision-making;
Added11. Recognises the Montenegrin Parliament’s key role in the accession process, notably as regards passing accession-related legislation, and underlines the importance of parliamentary cooperation in this regard; reiterates the European Parliament’s readiness to use its political and technical resources to advance the EU-related reform agenda, including through democracy support activities; notes, with concern, the re-emerging tensions and ethnic polarisation, which are slowing the reform process; calls for constructive dialogue and consensus building across the political spectrum, prioritising legislative quality, and strongly urges that solutions be found through parliamentary dialogue; calls for preventing identity politics from diverting attention from the EU agenda or straining relations with its neighbours, ensuring that Montenegro remains firmly on the EU path; welcomes the agreement between the Montenegrin Prime Minister and opposition leaders to request an opinion from the Venice Commission regarding the termination of the mandate of Constitutional Court judge Dragana Đuranović and for the opposition to return to the parliament;
Removed9. Calls on Montenegro to fully align its electoral legal framework with EU standards, and implement the recommendations of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights; urges Montenegro to increase transparency and oversight of political party spending and prevent the abuse of state resources in line with EU standards;
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Changes between AFET-PR-769896 and A-10-2025-0093”. Text, 20 May 2025. from AFET-PR-769896, to A-10-2025-0093, reference 2025/2020(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-769896/compare/A-10-2025-0093?all=1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-05-20,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between AFET-PR-769896 and A-10-2025-0093}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-05-20},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-769896/compare/A-10-2025-0093?all=1}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-769896/compare/A-10-2025-0093?all=1},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from AFET-PR-769896, to A-10-2025-0093, reference 2025/2020(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}