Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-9-2023-0303 → TA-9-2024-0351

From
A-9-2023-0303 Plenary report of 26 Oct 2023
To
TA-9-2024-0351 Adopted text of 24 Apr 2024
Changes
Not comparable
Paragraphs
+12 added · −125 removed · 1 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/65/EU to make public capital markets in the Union more attractive for companies and to facilitate access to capital for small and medium-sized enterprises and repealing Directive 2001/34/EC
Title (to)
Increasing the attractiveness of public capital markets and facilitating access to capital for SMEs – amending Directive

These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 1 of 3: DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

RemovedDRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

AddedTEXTS ADOPTED

Removedon the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/65/EU to make public capital markets in the Union more attractive for companies and to facilitate access to capital for small and medium-sized enterprises and repealing Directive 2001/34/EC

AddedP9_TA(2024)0351

Removed(COM(2022)0760 – C90415/2022 – 2022/0405(COD))

AddedIncreasing the attractiveness of public capital markets and facilitating access to capital for SMEs – amending Directive

AddedCommittee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

AddedPE749.149

AddedEuropean Parliament legislative resolution of 24 April 2024 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/65/EU to make public capital markets in the Union more attractive for companies and to facilitate access to capital for small and medium-sized enterprises and repealing Directive 2001/34/EC (COM(2022)0760 – C9-0415/2022 – 2022/0405(COD))

5 unchanged paragraphs

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2022)0760),

– having regard to Article 294(2) and Articles 50, 51(2) and 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C90415/2022),

– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Changed– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 23 March 20232023,

Removed– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A9-0303/2023),

Added– having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the responsible committee under Rule 74(4) of its Rules of Procedure and the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 14 February 2024 to approve Parliament’s position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Added– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

Added– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A9-0303/2023),

1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

Change 1

RemovedAMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT*

AddedP9_TC1-COD(2022)0405

Removedto the Commission proposal

AddedPosition of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 April 2024 with a view to the adoption of Directive (EU) 2024/… of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/65/EU to make public capital markets in the Union more attractive for companies and to facilitate access to capital for small and medium-sized enterprises and repealing Directive 2001/34/EC

Removed---------------------------------------------------------

Added(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive (EU) 2024/2811.)

Removed2022/0405 (COD)

RemovedProposal for a

RemovedDIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Removedamending Directive 2014/65/EU to make public capital markets in the Union more attractive for companies and to facilitate access to capital for small and medium-sized enterprises and repealing Directive 2001/34/EC

Removed(Text with EEA relevance)

RemovedTHE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

RemovedHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 50, 53(1) and 114 thereof,

RemovedHaving regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

RemovedAfter transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,

RemovedHaving regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,

RemovedActing in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,

RemovedWhereas:

Removed(1) Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council has been amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council, which introduced proportionate alleviations to enhance the use of SME growth markets and to reduce the excessive regulatory requirements for issuers seeking admission of securities on SME growth markets, while preserving an appropriate level of investor protection and market integrity. However, to streamline the listing process and to render the regulatory treatment of companies more flexible and proportionate to their size, further amendments to Directive 2014/65/EU are necessary.

Removed(2) Directive 2014/65/EU and Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2017/593 set out the conditions under which the provision of investment research by third parties to investment firms providing portfolio management or other investment or ancillary services is not to be regarded as an inducement. In order to foster more investment research on companies in the Union, in particular small and medium capitalisation companies, and to bring those companies greater visibility and more prospect of attracting potential investors, it is necessary to introduce▌ amendments to that Directive.

Removed(3) The provisions concerning research laid down in Directive 2014/65/EU require investment firms to separate payments which they receive as brokerage commissions from the compensation perceived for providing investment research (‘research unbundling rules’), or to pay for investment research from their own resources and assess the quality of the research they purchase based on robust quality criteria and the ability of such research to contribute to better investment decisions. In 2021, those rules have been amended by Directive (EU) 2021/338 of the European Parliament and of the Council to allow for bundled payments for execution services and research for small and medium capitalisation companies below a market capitalisation of EUR 1 billion. The decline of investment research has, however, not slowed down.

Removed(4) Compared to larger firms, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) continue to be characterised by a lower amount of analyst research, a higher probability of losing coverage, a lower quality of research and limited secondary market liquidity. In order to revitalise the market for investment research and to ensure sufficient research coverage of companies, in particular the small and medium capitalisation companies, ▌unbundling rules should be further adjusted. Investment firms should have more flexibility to choose the way in which they wish to organise the payments of execution services and research. However, doing so would require a level of transparency to be maintained vis-a-vis clients as to the payment choice made by investment firms. Investment firms should inform their clients whether they apply a separate or joint payment for execution services and the provision of third party research. Investment firms should ensure that clients receive appropriate information by keeping records of the charges attributable to research and execution services and also via the provision of an annual report on those payments to clients.

Removed(4a) The adjustment of unbundling rules alone will not suffice to revitalise the market of research investment and address the longstanding shortage of research coverage of small and medium capitalisation companies. The measures introduced in this Directive should not undermine the progress made in terms of price transparency, reduction of conflicts of interest and other regulatory objectives of MiFID II. Further measures should be introduced to improve the coverage of SMEs and the promotion of independent research in the market.

Removed(5) In addition, to further support the coverage of small and medium capitalisation companies by investment research, research material paid fully or partially by issuers should be labelled as ‘issuer-sponsored research’. To ensure an adequate level of objectivity and independence of such research material, such material should be produced in line with a code of conduct developed or endorsed by ESMA by means of regulatory technical standards. For that purpose, investment firms should have in place governance and organisational procedures to ensure that the issuer-sponsored research they produce, use or distribute is produced in compliance with that code of conduct and with the requirements laid down in this Directive. Member States should ensure that competent authorities have all the necessary supervisory and investigatory powers to ensure that investment firms comply with those requirements. In order to support more visibility of the issuer-sponsored research, issuers should▌ submit their issuer-sponsored research to the relevant collection body as defined▌ in [Article 2 (2) ] of Regulation (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and the Council.

Removed(6) Directive 2014/65/EU introduced the SME growth market category to increase the visibility and profile of markets specialised in SMEs and foster the development of common regulatory standards in the Union of markets specialised in SMEs. SME growth markets play a key function in facilitating access to capital for those smaller issuers by catering for their needs. To foster the development of such specialised markets and to limit the organisational burden for the operators of multilateral trading facilities (MTFs), it is necessary to allow the segment of a MTF to apply to become a SME growth market provided that such segment is clearly separated from the rest of the MTF.

Removed(6a) Member States should require that a financial instrument of an issuer which is admitted to trading on an SME growth market is able to be traded on another trading venue only if the issuer has been informed and has not objected. Shares in SMEs are often illiquid by nature as they have a smaller market capitalisation and a lower trading volume. Issuers should therefore be able to object to being traded on another trading venue, as that could reduce the risks of fragmentation of liquidity.

Removed(7) Directive 2001/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council lays down rules concerning listing on Union markets. That Directive aims at coordinating the rules on the admission of securities to official stock exchange listing and on information to be published on those securities to provide equivalent protection for investors at Union level. That Directive also lays down the rules of the regulatory and supervisory framework for Union primary markets. In the course of the years, Directive 2001/34/EC has been amended significantly several times. Directives 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council have replaced most of the provisions harmonising the conditions for the provision of information regarding requests for the admission of securities to official stock exchange listing and the information on securities admitted to trading, and have made large parts of Directive 2001/34/EC redundant. Directive 2001/34/EC as a minimum harmonisation Directive gives Member States a rather broad discretion to deviate from the rules laid down in that Directive, which has led to market fragmentation in the Union. To drive market harmonisation at Union level and create a single rule book, Directive 2001/34/EC should be repealed.

Removed(8) Directive 2014/65/EU, like Directive 2001/34/EC, provides for the regulation of markets of financial instruments and strengthens investor protection in the Union. Directive 2014/65/EU also sets out rules on the admission of financial instruments to trading. By extending the scope of Directive 2014/65/EU to cover specific provisions from Directive 2001/34/EC will ensure that all relevant provisions from Directive 2001/34/EC are maintained. A number of provisions of Directive 2001/34/EC, including the requirements on free float and market capitalisation which still apply, are enforced by competent authorities and are considered important rules for seeking admission to trading of shares on regulated markets in the Union by market participants. It is therefore necessary to transfer those rules in Directive 2014/65/EU to set out, in a new provision of that Directive, specific minimum conditions for the admission to trading of shares on regulated markets. The application of that new provision should complement the general provisions on the admission of financial instrument to trading laid down in Directive 2014/65/EU.

Removed(9) To allow for more flexibility for issuers and to make Union capital markets more competitive, the minimum free float requirement should be decreased to 10%, which is a threshold that ensures for a sufficient level of liquidity in the market. The free float requirement laid down in Directive 2001/34/EC that a sufficient number of shares is to be distributed to the public in one or more Member States refers to the public within the Union and the European Economic Area (EU/EEA). That geographical restriction of the free float requirement to the EU/EEA should not be maintained as Directive 2014/65/EU does not provide for such restriction for financial instruments admitted to trading. The requirement that a company is to have published or filed its annual accounts for a specific period of time should not be transferred to Directive 2014/65/EU since Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council already contains a provision to that effect. Directive 2014/65/EU already lays down provisions to designate competent authorities. Thus, the provisions laid down in Directive 2001/34/EC to appoint one or more competent authorities are redundant. The requirement for debt securities that the amount of the loan is not be less than EUR 200 000 are considered obsolete in light of current market practice.

Removed(10) The concept of admission of securities to official listing on stock exchanges provided for in Directive 2001/34/EC is no longer frequently used given market developments, as Directive 2014/65/EU already provides for the concept of ‘admission of financial instruments to trading on a regulated market’. The two concepts ‘admission to official listing’ and ‘admission to trading on a regulated market’ are often used interchangeably in some Member States. That means that, in some Member States, no distinction is made between the two concepts. Furthermore, the dual regime of admission to trading, on the one hand, and admission to official listing, on the other hand, could lead to legal uncertainty at Union level, in particular, due to the fact that the requirements laid down in Directive 2003/71/EC, Directive 2004/109/EC and Directive 2014/57/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council do not apply to instruments admitted to official listing, while those requirements apply to instruments admitted to trading on a regulated market.

Removed(11) To enhance the visibility of listed companies, in particular SMEs and to adapt the listing conditions to improve requirements for issuers, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending Directive 2014/65/EU. The market capitalisation threshold for companies, for which the re-bundling of trading execution and research fees would be possible, should be removed while introducing safeguards to ensure investor protection and maintain a level of transparency regarding the costs associated with research. The adaption of the listing rules in the Union should also reflect market practice for it to be effective and promote competition. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.

Removed(12) Directive 2014/65/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.

Removed(13) Since the objectives of this Directive, namely to ease Union small and medium capitalisation companies’ access to capital markets, and to increase the coherence of Union listing rules cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the improvements and effects sought, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.

RemovedHAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

RemovedDirective 2014/65/EU is amended as follows:

Removed(1) in Article 4(1), point (12) is replaced by the following:

Removed‘(12) ‘SME growth market’ means a MTF, or a segment of a MTF, that is registered as an SME growth market in accordance with Article 33;’;

Removed(2) Article 24 is amended as follows:

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Changes between A-9-2023-0303 and TA-9-2024-0351”. Text, 24 April 2024. from A-9-2023-0303, to TA-9-2024-0351. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0303/compare/TA-9-2024-0351?all=1 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-04-24,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-9-2023-0303 and TA-9-2024-0351}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-04-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0303/compare/TA-9-2024-0351?all=1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0303/compare/TA-9-2024-0351?all=1},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-9-2023-0303, to TA-9-2024-0351. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}