Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2026-0121 → TA-10-2026-0189

From
A-10-2026-0121 Plenary report of 23 Apr 2026
To
TA-10-2026-0189 Adopted text of 21 May 2026
Changes
12 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+7 added · −24 removed · 15 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward
Title (to)
The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds calls for a Baltic fisheries recovery fund, differentiated access rules, and action on cormorants and harbour porpoises.81011 Rewrites recitals to broaden pressures on fish stocks beyond fishing and to balance sustainability with socio-economic needs.134 Drops criticism of the Council's 2026 catch limits and a statement on limited scientific data on predator impacts.57 Adds concerns about Russian fishery products and emphasizes generational renewal and socio-economic losses.912 The other changes are formal or wording: a decimal separator and a typo fix.26

The notes class 10 changes as substance, 1 as formal, 1 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Changes that matter, 12

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

ChangedA. whereas the EU’s multiannual plan for Baltic Sea fisheries (Baltic MAP Regulation), in a context of increasing environmental pressures on the Baltic Sea ecosystem, has not delivered on its overarching ecological and socio-economic objectives; whereas it has not achieved the restoration and maintenance of populations of harvested specieshelped abovemaintain levelsfishing whichpressure canin produceline thewith maximum sustainable yield (MSY), despite its 2020 legal deadline, and has not(MSY) contributedlevels; sufficientlywhereas, todespite resolvingsignificant particularlyfishing complexeffort stockreductions situationsin suchthe aspast thosefew ofyears, thesome easternfish andstocks westernhave Balticdeteriorated coddue stocks,to nora hascombination itof consistentlypressures supportedbeyond thefishing effectiveactivity, implementationincluding ofeutrophication, theoffshore ecosystem-basedenergy, approachpredator toimpacts, fisheriespollution, management,habitat ordegradation implementedand theclimate-driven precautionaryecosystem approach,changes, resulting in significant socio-economic challengesconsequences for parts of the fisheries sector;

AI: Note on change 1 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Rewrites recital A to state that the plan helped maintain fishing pressure at MSY levels, but some stocks deteriorated due to pressures beyond fishing, including eutrophication, offshore energy, and climate change.

Report a problem

Change 2

ChangedK. whereas the most recent EU-wide assessment of the socio-economic value of the marine recreational fisheries (MRF) sector dates back to 2017, and its recommendations have not yet been implemented to fully unlock the potential of this low-impact activity as a recognised component of the EU blue economy strategy; whereas available data indicates that an estimated 8-10 million EU citizens are engaged in the recreational fisheries sector; whereas in the Baltic Sea region, this constitutes a major socio-economic activity, generating an economic contribution of about EUR 1.51,5 billion and supporting the creation of over 14 000 full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs;

AI: Note on change 2 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Changes the decimal separator in the amount from '1.5' to '1,5' billion, aligning with EU formatting conventions.

Report a problem

Change 3

ChangedN. whereas, according to thewhereas ICESmultiple Balticoverlapping Ecosystempressures Overview,including fishing is the main activity impactingactivity, theagriculture, marineforestry ecosystem,run-off, viaeutrophication, selectiveoxygen extractiondepletion, ofchemical species,pollution and the combination of this activitygrowing withpopulations agricultureof andmarine forestry,predators, together with waste water discharge, pose major pressures on the ecosystem through nutrient and organic enrichment;enrichment and food-web disruption; whereas this affects fisheries in the whole Baltic Sea ecoregion; whereas progress has been achieved in reducing nutrient inputs and hazardous substances, yet the combined influence continues to affect fish stocks, the survival of larvae and young fish, and more effort is needed in this regard,across accordingall tocontributing thesectors Europeanin Environmentthis Agency;regard;

AI: Note on change 3 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Rewrites recital N to list multiple pressures (agriculture, forestry, pollution, predators) instead of focusing on fishing as the main impact, and calls for effort across all contributing sectors.

Report a problem

Change 4

ChangedS. whereas Baltic fishin stockssetting aretotal atallowable recordcatches low(TACs) levels;for whereas2026, Member States musthave followbalanced relevantenvironmental EUsustainability legislationwith suchsocio-economic assustainability, thepreserving MSFD;a minimum level of activity while continuing to support fish stock recovery; whereas some Baltic fish stocks are deteriorating despite huge reductions in fishing effort; whereas the MSFD also requires goodthe environmentalMember statusStates to beachieve achievedgood environmental status through balanced food webs, stocks with a healthy sizewebs and agehealthy distribution,stocks andas addresses,well amongas otherto things,tackle contaminants, eutrophication, invasive species, marine litterlitter, andpollution from energy generation, including underwater noise;noise, and climate change;

AI: Note on change 4 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Rewrites recital S to emphasize balancing environmental sustainability with socio-economic sustainability when setting TACs, and adds pressures from energy generation and climate change.

Report a problem

Change 5

ChangedAJ. whereas in accordance with Article 43(3) TFEU, decisions on the setting of total allowable catches (TACs) and other fishing opportunities are the exclusive competence of the Council and, therefore, of the Member States; whereas these decisions must take full account of the latest scientific data and the diversity of environmental conditions in the Baltic Sea region; whereas the Council agreement on 2026 catch limits for the Baltic Sea diverged from the Commission proposal and was not adopted with unanimity as concerns were raised in relation to how scientific advice has been taken into account; whereas this decision raised concerns of potentially putting at risk the fish populations and marine ecosystems of the Baltic Sea;

AI: Note on change 5 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Drops the sentence criticizing the Council's 2026 catch limits decision for diverging from scientific advice and not being unanimous.

Report a problem

Change 6

ChangedAM. whereas the implementation of Article 5 of the Baltic MAP regarding TAC decisions, technical rules and remedial measures has not been sufficient; whereas where actions have beentakenbeen taken ‘to ensure rapid return of the stock concerned to levels above those capable of producing MSY’ they have not reached their aim;

AI: Note on change 6 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Fixes a typo by splitting 'beentaken' into 'been taken'.

Report a problem

Change 7

ChangedAZ. whereas natural predation forms part of the Baltic ecosystem; whereas there is a growing population of certain protected species in the Baltic Sea such as grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) and great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbosinensis); whereas significant impact by seals and cormorants on juvenile cod survival, particularly for Western Baltic Cod, may occur as well as on aquaculture and fishing gear; whereas scientific evidence shows that they have mostly a localised species- and stock-specific impact on fish populations, while data on the extent of this impact are mostly limited and need to be improved through monitoring and targeted research;populations; whereas all factors affecting fish populations have to be considered in order to rebuild Baltic Sea fish stocks; whereas an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management should also integrate environmental factors; whereas addressing these interactions requires targeted and effective management measures based on the best available science and dialogue with all stakeholders; whereas on the adoption of a European cormorant management plan aimed at mitigating the growing impact of cormorants on fish stocks, fisheries and aquaculture, Parliament outlined a series of potential measures to address the ongoing challenges posed by cormorant populations;

AI: Note on change 7 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Shortens recital AZ by removing the statement that scientific evidence on seal and cormorant impact is limited and needs improvement.

Report a problem

Change 8

Changed4. Calls for the mobilisation of social and financial support, including support for affected communities, local investment, temporary compensation and bridging aid for fishers in line with EU rules to prevent undue hardship and preserve cultural heritage; notes that while temporary measures address immediate ecological concerns, permanent cessation tools are designed to adjust fishing capacity with fishing opportunities in the long-term; calls therefore for a clear separation between temporary and permanent cessation in support schemes; acknowledges that small and medium-scale Baltic fishing enterprises have received no adequate economic compensation for the losses incurred since the closure of targeted cod fisheries in 2019; calls on the Commission to establish a dedicated Baltic fisheries recovery and transition fund to support fleet restructuring, technology modernisation, compensation for losses caused by species-specific fishing prohibitions, and the preservation of coastal fishing communities and their cultural heritage;

AI: Note on change 8 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds a call for a dedicated Baltic fisheries recovery and transition fund to compensate small and medium-scale enterprises for losses since 2019.

Report a problem

Show 4 more changes

Change 9

Changed7. Stresses that setting multiannual quotas based on the best-available science could give marine ecosystems in the Baltic Sea time to recover and provide businesses with the stability they need to plan investments, maintain employment and maintain port infrastructure;infrastructure, and support generational renewal in the fisheries sector; underlines that prolonged regulatory instability leads to disinvestment, loss of production capacity and the disappearance of family fishing enterprises, constituting an irreversible socio-economic loss for Baltic coastal communities; stresses that the development of such management measures should include effective, timely and systematic stakeholder consultation;

AI: Note on change 9 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds emphasis on generational renewal and warns that regulatory instability causes irreversible socio-economic loss for coastal communities.

Report a problem

Change 10

Changed13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to give priority to improving the socio-economic situation of small-scale coastal fishers; highlights the importance of fishing opportunities and fishing zones in coastal areas for small operators; highlights that Member States can achieve these improvements through their national quota allocations in line with Article 17 CFP, as well as through investments in selective and low-impact gear; calls, furthermore, on the Commission and the Member States to assess and, where appropriate, implement differentiated access rules for Baltic Sea fisheries based on vessel length and gear type, specifically with a view to limiting the competitive pressure exerted by large-scale industrial vessels on small and medium-scale family enterprises and coastal communities;

AI: Note on change 10 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds a call for the Commission and Member States to assess and implement differentiated access rules based on vessel length and gear type to limit industrial pressure.

Report a problem

Change 11

Added37. Stresses the need for the Commission to take urgent and effective action in response to the pressures exerted by great cormorant populations on Baltic Sea fish stocks, ensuring that measures are proportionate, regionally adapted and implemented through effective, targeted and locally tailored management interventions based on the best available scientific data, while enabling Member States to apply practical and situation-specific mitigation measures where necessary in order to address local impacts effectively, thereby supporting the long-term sustainability of fisheries in affected coastal areas;

Added38. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to closely monitor whether measures for the recovery of the critically endangered Baltic harbour porpoise are being effectively implemented and where necessary to take additional measures to avert the main threats to their survival;

Added39. Recalls that Baltic seal populations were brought to the brink of extinction in the 1970s;

AI: Note on change 11 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds three new paragraphs calling for action on cormorant pressures, monitoring harbour porpoise recovery, and recalling seal conservation history.

Report a problem

Change 12

Changed43.46. Strongly condemns the growing presence of Russia’s shadow fleet in the Baltic Sea, with operations that bypass key regulatory standards, increasing the risk of oil spills and other environmental hazards; stresses the potential harm to marine ecosystems, local fisheries and human health; further notes concerns that Russian fishery products continue to reach the EU market through existing trade channels, highlighting the need to ensure the effective closure of any loopholes that may undermine the objectives of EU restrictive measures; calls on the Commission to explore further measures to combat Russia’s shadow fleet, especially in the Baltic Sea region; calls for enhanced regional cooperation and stricter enforcement to mitigate these risks and protect the Baltic’s marine resources; highlights the importance of ensuring the full enforcement of sanctions against Russia;

AI: Note on change 12 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds a sentence noting concerns that Russian fishery products reach the EU market and calling for closure of loopholes in sanctions.

Report a problem

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between A-10-2026-0121 and TA-10-2026-0189”. Text, 21 May 2026. from A-10-2026-0121, to TA-10-2026-0189, reference 2024/2127(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0121/compare/TA-10-2026-0189 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-05-21,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2026-0121 and TA-10-2026-0189}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0121/compare/TA-10-2026-0189}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0121/compare/TA-10-2026-0189},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2026-0121, to TA-10-2026-0189, reference 2024/2127(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}