Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2026-0119 → TA-10-2026-0110

From
A-10-2026-0119 Plenary report of 23 Apr 2026
To
TA-10-2026-0110 Adopted text of 28 Apr 2026
Changes
9 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+4 added · −2 removed · 11 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the request for the waiver of the immunity of Alvise Pérez
Title (to)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Alvise Pérez
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The two versions differ only in wording and formal points: no substantive changes are made to the waiver request.1234

The notes class 0 changes as substance, 2 as formal, 7 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Changes that matter, 9

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

Changed– having heard Alvise Pérez on 24 March 20262026, in accordance with Rule 9(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

AI: Note on change 1 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Updates the date format by adding a comma after the year.

Report a problem

Change 2

ChangedA. whereas, by letter dated 7 October 2025, the President of the Supreme Court of Spain has requested the waiver of the immunity of Alvise Pérez, Member of the European Parliament elected in Spain, in connection with alleged offences that occurred in 2024;

AI: Note on change 2 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes the auxiliary verb 'has' from the phrase 'has requested'.

Report a problem

Change 3

ChangedB. whereas the request indicates that in January and in February 2024 the administrator of a Telegram channel called ‘Alvise Pérez Chat’ allegedly published statements indicating the names of ‘those responsible for the ideological persecution known as hate crimes’, referring in particular to the delegated public prosecutor for hate crimes in Valencia; whereas the statements published on that channel generated an immediate reaction from numerous followers of the channel, who sent more than 1 500 comments to that delegated public prosecutor, mostly of an insulting nature; whereas the alleged conduct maymight constitute the offences of harassment or stalking, incitement to commit assault against an authority or a public official, coercion and/or spreading hate via social media, pursuant to Article 172-ter and to Article 18(1) of the Spanish Criminal Code in connection with Article 553 of the Spanish Criminal Code;

AI: Note on change 3 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Replaces 'may constitute' with 'might constitute' in the description of alleged offences.

Report a problem

Change 4

ChangedC. whereas Alvise Pérez was elected to the European Parliament in the European elections of June 2024,2024 and thereforewas, wastherefore, not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offences;

AI: Note on change 4 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Rephrases the sentence about the timing of election and alleged offences, changing word order and punctuation.

Report a problem

Change 5

ChangedE. whereas Article 9, first paragraph, point (a), of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union provides that, during the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members are to enjoy, in the territory of their own Member State, the immunities accorded to members of the parliament of their Member State;

AI: Note on change 5 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds the word 'Member' before 'State' in the reference to the territory of the Member State.

Report a problem

Change 6

Changed‘(1). Members of CongressDeputies and Senatorssenators shall enjoy freedomabsolute ofprivilege speechin forrespect of opinions expressed in the exerciseperformance of their functions’.duties.

AI: Note on change 6 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Rewords the quotation from the Spanish Constitution, changing 'Members of Congress and Senators' to 'Deputies and senators' and rephrasing the privilege description.

Report a problem

Change 7

Changed(2). During their term of office, Members of Congressdeputies and Senatorssenators shall likewise enjoy freedomalso fromhave arrestimmunity and may only be arrested only if they are found in the eventact of flagrantecommitting delicto.an offence. They maycannot be neither indictedcharged noror triedprosecuted without the prior authorization of theirthe respectiverelevant House’;legislative chamber’;

AI: Note on change 7 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Rewords the quotation about immunity, changing terminology and sentence structure while preserving the meaning.

Report a problem

Change 8

ChangedH. whereas, in accordance with Rule 5(2) of its Rules of Procedure, parliamentary immunity is not a Member’s personal privilege of the Member but a guarantee of the independence of Parliament as a whole and of its Members;

AI: Note on change 8 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Rephrases the statement about parliamentary immunity, moving 'Member's' before 'personal privilege'.

Report a problem

Show 1 more change

Change 9

ChangedI. whereas, in this case, Parliament has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, that is to say factualit elementsdoes indicatingnot appear that the intention underlying the legal proceedings in question is to underminedamage Alvise Pérez’s political activity as a Member of the European Parliament;Parliament and thus Parliament’s independence;

AI: Note on change 9 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Rephrases the conclusion about fumus persecutionis, changing 'factual elements indicating' to 'it does not appear' and 'undermine' to 'damage', and adds a clause about Parliament's independence.

Report a problem

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between A-10-2026-0119 and TA-10-2026-0110”. Text, 28 April 2026. from A-10-2026-0119, to TA-10-2026-0110, reference 2025/2222(IMM). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0119/compare/TA-10-2026-0110 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-04-28,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2026-0119 and TA-10-2026-0110}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0119/compare/TA-10-2026-0110}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0119/compare/TA-10-2026-0110},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2026-0119, to TA-10-2026-0110, reference 2025/2222(IMM). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}