Text · Plenary report
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/947 as regards increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee
Report A-10-2025-0221 · COM(2025)0262 – C100107/2025 – 2025/0262(COD)
- Kind
- Plenary report A-10-2025-0221
- Date
- 10 November 2025
- Committee
- Committee on Foreign Affairs Committee on Development
- Rapporteur
- Charles Goerens, David McAllister
- Dossier
- 2025/0262(COD)
More facts (4)
- Voted
- 10 Mar 2026 Passed 441 for, 105 against, 81 abstained
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- EXT, DIPL, CDEV
- Reference
- COM(2025)0262 – C100107/2025 – 2025/0262(COD)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Parliament's amended version of the proposed regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2021/947 to increase the efficiency of the External Action Guarantee. It sets out conditions for using surpluses and reducing the EIB's guarantee cover, while strengthening transparency, accountability, and alignment with EU objectives.
Position. The committees propose amendments to the Commission proposal, adding conditions on efficiency measures, strengthening transparency and accountability, and excluding certain Chinese entities from EFSD+ funding.
Key points
- Measures to enhance the External Action Guarantee's efficiency must align with EU foreign policy objectives, including promoting democracy, human rights, and the rule of law, and must not undermine the primary goal of poverty eradication.
- Partnerships should consolidate democratic institutions, strengthen regional stability, diversify supply chains, and uphold the rules-based international order, while mainstreaming climate, biodiversity, gender equality, and human rights.
- Calls for stronger visibility of EU-funded actions, including systematic display of the EU flag and logo, and for coherence between the EU and member states to present a unified effort.
- Supports greater private sector involvement and reducing external dependencies, particularly on China and Russian energy, while prioritising growth plans for enlargement countries.
- Emphasises a focused approach to the wider neighbourhood, including the Middle East, North Africa, the Gulf, Central Asia, and the Southern Caucasus, with additional resources for stability and recovery where needed.
- Stresses that the minimum financial envelope for Sub-Saharan Africa under Regulation (EU) 2021/947 is not being attained and should be met.
- External Action Guarantee support should promote reforms in rule of law, democratic governance, and anti-corruption in partner and enlargement countries.
- The Guarantee should strengthen human development, including education, health, social inclusion, and poverty reduction, and promote local ownership and complementarity with national strategies.
- Chinese companies associated with the Belt and Road Initiative or state-owned or influenced by the Chinese Communist Party should not secure EFSD+ funds.
- The Commission should prepare an evaluation of the External Action Guarantee by early 2027, focusing on delivery and impact, and assess whether guarantee capacity and provisioning are adequate.
- Requires enhanced transparency and accountability, including detailed annual reports to Parliament on EFSD+ use, additionality, and development impact.
- Supports simplification of blending operations and reporting, but insists it must not weaken transparency or accountability to Parliament and the Council.
Who is affected
- The European Commission and implementing partners like the EIB, EBRD, and development finance institutions, which face simplified procedures but stricter reporting and accountability.
- Chinese companies linked to the Belt and Road Initiative or state-owned or influenced by the Chinese Communist Party, which are to be excluded from EFSD+ funding.
- Partner countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, enlargement countries, and the wider neighbourhood, which should see more aligned and visible EU support.
Figures and deadlines
- Reduction of the EIB's guarantee cover for sovereign operations from 65% to 60%.
- Evaluation of the External Action Guarantee to be prepared by early 2027.
Legal basis. Articles 209 and 212 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (17)
Draft european parliament legislative resolution
–having regard to Article 294(2) and Articles 209 and 212 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C100107/2025),
–having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Development (A10-0221/2025),
2.Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
3.Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (-1) The Union’s external financing instruments, including the EFSD+, continue to be guided by the Union’s foreign policy objectives as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, notably the promotion of democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter, while also reinforcing the Union’s capacity to act as a global strategic player , safeguarding partners’ sovereignty, countering external interference, and strengthening resilience to geopolitical and economic shocks. Measures to enhance the efficiency of the External Action Guarantee should be pursued in a manner fully consistent with those objectives while ensuring greater alignment between Union policies and partner countries’ own priorities. Such measures are also crucial to positioning the Union as a reliable and sustainable partner and promoting Union values and standards in global investment. Funds allocated under Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a have the primary objective of reducing and, in the long term, eradicating poverty, in accordance with Article 208 of the TFEU, as also laid down in the European Consensus on Development, and in alignment with the UN's 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. | |
| 1a Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 June 2021 establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe, amending and repealing Decision No 466/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EU) 2017/1601 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1) The global geopolitical and geoeconomic context requires that the Union reaffirms its commitment to establish mutually beneficial partnerships with partner countries. | (1) The global geopolitical and geoeconomic context requires that the Union reaffirms its commitment to establish mutually beneficial partnerships with partner countries, in order to consolidate democratic institutions and strengthen regional stability and security, thereby tackling the root causes of migration and human trafficking. At the same time, such partnerships should aim to diversify supply chains and uphold the rules-based international order, taking into account factors such as stances towards Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, thereby fostering sustainable prosperity and advancing human development. Concrete action to face challenges related to climate change, biodiversity, gender equality and respect for human rights should be mainstreamed in the Union’s external action as they have significant implications for stability and sustainable development. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1a) The Union’s strategic ambitions under Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council require not only financial and technical delivery but also strong public and diplomatic visibility in order to maximise geopolitical impact and citizen engagement. The Union and its Member States collectively remain the world’s largest providers of official development assistance. That fact, however, is not sufficiently visible, especially when using indirect management with implementing partners such as blended finance operations with many stakeholders within the EFSD+. Accordingly, communication regarding Union-funded actions should be strengthened and greater coherence between the Union and its Member States is needed to present external action as a unified Union effort. Doing so requires systematically displaying the EU flag and logo and agreeing visibility strategies with Member States and delegations. In particular, the Union must manage potential tensions between national visibility objectives and the collective European narrative, as uncoordinated or competing communication risks diluting the Union’s identity and weakening the strategic impact of its engagement worldwide. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (2) The Draghi report recommends ensuring a greater involvement of the private sector and to reduce excessive external dependencies by securing supply of raw materials, clean energy, sustainable transport fuels, and clean tech from across the world, thereby upgrading and leveraging the Global Gateway1 as well as the growth plans for the enlargement countries, which require additional resources. | (2) The Draghi report recommends ensuring greater involvement of the private sector. The report further advises to reduce excessive external dependencies by securing supply of raw materials, clean energy, sustainable transport fuels, and clean tech from across the world, thereby upgrading and leveraging the Global Gateway1 as well giving specific priority to the growth plans for the enlargement countries, which require additional resources. At the same time, the challenges related to the growing reliance on private financing to tackle global development shortfalls must be taken into account. The report further highlights the need to accelerate efforts to reduce reliance on Russian energy and to strengthen Europe’s resilience by diversifying away from excessive dependencies, particularly on China. |
| 1 “The Global Gateway”, Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, JOIN(2021) 30 final, 1.12.2021 | 1 “The Global Gateway”, Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, JOIN(2021) 30 final, 1.12.2021 |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3) In addition to a more focused approach to enlargement, the political guidelines of the 2024-2029 Commission recognise the importance of a more focused approach to our wider neighbourhood, especially the Middle East, North Africa and the Gulf. The strategic relevance should be supported by concrete projects and strategic investments, both a regional level, e.g. T-MED, and at bilateral level through the implementation of the Strategic Partnerships. Depending on the evolution of the situation on the ground, additional resources could also be needed to maintain stability and support early recovery/reconstruction among key partners in the Middle East. | (3) In addition to a more focused approach to enlargement, the political guidelines of the 2024-2029 Commission recognise the importance of a more focused approach to our wider neighbourhood, especially the Middle East, North Africa and the Gulf as well as Central Asia and the Southern Caucasus. The strategic relevance should be supported by concrete projects and strategic investments, both at regional level, e.g. T-MED, and at bilateral level through the implementation of Strategic Partnerships. Depending on the evolution of the situation on the ground, additional resources might also be required to maintain stability and support early recovery among key partners in the Middle East. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3a) The political guidelines also set the goal of creating long-term, mutually beneficial partnerships and recognise the need for a new impetus in Union’s partnership with Africa. Furthermore, Article 6(2), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council stipulates a minimum financial envelope for Sub-Saharan Africa which is currently not being attained. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3b) In partner and enlargement countries, Union financial support under the External Action Guarantee should explicitly promote reform in the areas of rule of law, democratic governance and the fight against corruption, thereby underpinning credibility and public trust in the accession processes. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3c) It is essential that the External Action Guarantee strengthens the human development dimension, ensuring that supported projects have a positive impact on education, health, social inclusion and poverty reduction in partner countries, in line with the UN 2030 Agenda. To that end, the implementation of the External Action Guarantee should promote local ownership and ensure complementarity with the national development strategies of partner countries, while adopting a differentiated approach that reflects the specific needs, vulnerabilities and development priorities of low- and middle-income countries. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (4) An important Union financing instrument to deliver on the Global Gateway objectives and the strategic investments is the European Fund for Sustainable Development Plus (EFSD+), and notably its budgetary guarantee, a component of the External Action Guarantee established by Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Efficiency gains on the External Action Guarantee would allow funding EU external action priorities, including possibly scaling up the Global Gateway. | (4) An important Union financing instrument to deliver on the Global Gateway objectives and the strategic investments is the European Fund for Sustainable Development Plus (EFSD+), and notably its budgetary guarantee, a component of the External Action Guarantee established by Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council2. Efficiency gains on the External Action Guarantee would allow funding EU external action priorities, including possibly scaling up the Global Gateway, taking into account that the EFSD+ requires additional effort from Union delegations to deal with guarantee operations. In those operations, attention is expected to be paid to the specific investment priorities of EU enlargement countries and the distinct nature and needs of fragile contexts, less developed countries, low income countries and countries in debt distress, including small island states, which face specific vulnerabilities related to climate change, food insecurity, and political instability etc. |
| 2 Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 June 2021 establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe, amending and repealing Decision No 466/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EU) 2017/1601 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 (OJ L 209, 14.6.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/947/oj). | 2 Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 June 2021 establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe, amending and repealing Decision No 466/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EU) 2017/1601 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 (OJ L 209, 14.6.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/947/oj). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (4a) The EU and beneficiary partners should ensure that Chinese companies and entities do not secure funds under the EFSD+, particularly where such companies are associated with the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative or owned by the Chinese state or influenced by the Chinese Communist Party. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (5a) In view of the negotiations on the post-2027 multiannual financial framework, in line with Article 42(5) of Regulation (EU) 2021/947 and following the recommendation of ECA Opinion 03/2024, the Commission should consider preparing an evaluation of the External Action Guarantee, with emphasis not only on the use of the Guarantee but also on project delivery and impact on the ground, including the Guarantee’s contribution to the overarching objectives of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI). The Commission should apply the lessons learnt to its next proposals. It should in particular evaluate whether the current maximum guarantee capacity and the levels of provisioning are adequate, taking into account the escalated geopolitical risks and volatile global environments. That evaluation should be prepared by early 2027 and should be carried out in close consultation with the European Parliament, Member States and relevant stakeholders, in order to ensure transparency and accountability. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (5b) While efficiency and simplification of procedures for implementing partners are necessary, they must be accompanied by enhanced transparency and accountability in the financing of the EU’s external actions. Reporting obligations should therefore continue to provide clear information on risk exposure, development impact and the geopolitical relevance of the operations concerned. The European Parliament should receive a detailed annual report on the use of resources from the EFSD+ guarantee including a breakdown by sectors and regions, the impact on the sustainable Development goals and the level of participation of civil society organisations. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (6) The guarantee cover of EFSD+ could be increased until 2027 with surpluses from the European Sustainable Development Fund (EFSD) and by using more efficiently the Union guarantee by reducing its EU liability under the EIB’s exclusive dedicated investment window for operations with sovereign counterparts and non-commercial sub-sovereign counterparts from 65 % to 60 %. The latter would only come into effect after amending the corresponding guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB. The assignment of surpluses from legacy instruments to the benefit of EFSD+ is without prejudice to the negotiations on the post-2027 multiannual financial framework. | (6) The guarantee cover of EFSD+ could be increased until 2027 with surpluses from the European Sustainable Development Fund (EFSD) and by using more efficiently the Union guarantee by reducing its EU liability under the EIB’s exclusive dedicated investment window for operations with sovereign counterparts and non-commercial sub-sovereign counterparts from 65 % to 60 %. The latter would only come into effect after amending the corresponding guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB. The assignment of surpluses from legacy instruments to the benefit of EFSD+ is without prejudice to the negotiations on the post-2027 multiannual financial framework. At the same time, the increased reliance on the External Action Guarantee and financial instruments to advance geopolitical goals and to achieve the sustainable development goals and the objectives of Regulation (EU) 2021/947 require enhanced democratic accountability. Simplification of procedures should not weaken transparency or the Commission’s accountability towards the European Parliament as budgetary authority. The European Parliament should be duly informed of the implementation and outcomes of the simplification process. The European Parliament and the Council, as the budgetary authority of the Union, should therefore, in a timely manner, be systematically, comprehensively and regularly informed about the performance of EFSD and EFSD+, including clear information on the fund leveraging, the fund allocation to programmes and projects, total surpluses and deficits identified, the origin of any surpluses and the amounts proposed for reallocation, thus allowing an assessment of the results achieved and of additionality and leverage effects, through clear tracking from the initial budgetary line to the results on the ground. The EFSD+ website should function as a fully compliant and easily accessible public information portal. The website should go beyond basic project descriptions and publish all data and documentation required by Regulation (EU) 2021/947, especially focusing on contributions to objectives of that Regulation, additionality, and leverage effects achieved. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (8a) The reassignments of the EFSD guarantee surpluses are particularly pertinent in view of the Union’s geostrategic interests and the stability of partner countries, as well as the increased scarcity of resources to fund development cooperation and humanitarian aid. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (9) The capacity of the EIB, the EBRD and the DFIs to efficiently implement additional resources should be increased by the simplification of the framework for blending operations, the consolidation of guarantee and technical assistance agreements with the same implementing partner and the reduction of the financial reporting from a quarterly frequency to a semi-annual one. | (9) The capacity of the EIB, the EBRD and the DFIs to efficiently implement additional resources should be increased by the simplification of the framework for blending operations, the consolidation of guarantee and technical assistance agreements with the same implementing partner and the reduction of the financial reporting from a quarterly frequency to a semi-annual one. Such simplification is crucial to mobilise private investment at scale, increase the leverage effect of Union funds and create a more predictable environment for private partners willing to co-invest in sustainable development. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (10a) Article 2(10) of Regulation (EU) 2021/947 provides a precise definition of additionality, a key evaluation requirement for EFSD+. In its Opinion 03/2024, on the Commission’s evaluation of the External Action Guarantee, the European Court of Auditors (ECA) noted that the Commission has yet to demonstrate to what extent the External Action Guarantee has mobilised additional investment beyond what would otherwise have occurred. In future, the Commission should provide clear and regular reporting on the additionality of EFSD+ operations, including evidence that supported portfolios carry a higher risk profile than comparable normal investment activities of implementing partners. |
Back matter, 1
Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.
Annex: declarations of input 4 blocks
The rapporteur declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not include in his report input from interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies, to be listed in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.
The rapporteur declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not include in his report input from interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies, to be listed in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.
Procedure pages and committee votes
How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.
Procedure – committee responsible 1 block
| Title | Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/947 as regards increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee | |
| References | COM(2025)0262 – C10-0107/2025 – 2025/0262(COD) | |
| Date submitted to Parliament | 28.5.2025 | |
| Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenary | AFET 19.6.2025 | DEVE 19.6.2025 |
| Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary | BUDG 19.6.2025 | |
| Not delivering opinions Date of decision | BUDG 30.6.2025 | |
| Rapporteurs Date appointed | David McAllister 20.8.2025 | Charles Goerens 20.8.2025 |
| Rule 59 – Joint committee procedure Date announced in plenary | 19.6.2025 | |
| Discussed in committee | 24.9.2025 | |
| Date adopted | 5.11.2025 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 47 10 14 |
| Members present for the final vote | Mika Aaltola, Abir Al-Sahlani, Barry Andrews, Lucia Annunziata, Petras Auštrevičius, Dan Barna, Robert Biedroń, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Helmut Brandstätter, Danilo Della Valle, Özlem Demirel, Elio Di Rupo, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Giorgos Georgiou, Charles Goerens, Christophe Gomart, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Łukasz Kohut, Ondřej Kolář, Andrey Kovatchev, Sergey Lagodinsky, Murielle Laurent, Reinhold Lopatka, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Lukas Mandl, Costas Mavrides, David McAllister, Vangelis Meimarakis, Francisco José Millán Mon, Ana Miranda Paz, Tiago Moreira de Sá, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Hannah Neumann, Leoluca Orlando, Kostas Papadakis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Mounir Satouri, Villy Søvndal, Kristoffer Storm, Stanislav Stoyanov, António Tânger Corrêa, Marta Temido, Riho Terras, Hermann Tertsch, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Hilde Vautmans | |
| Substitutes present for the final vote | Sandra Gómez López, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Paolo Inselvini, Assita Kanko, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, András László, Miriam Lexmann, Marit Maij, Erik Marquardt, Gabriel Mato, Liudas Mažylis, Carolina Morace, Matjaž Nemec, Tineke Strik, Marco Tarquinio | |
| Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final vote | Peter Agius, Sunčana Glavak, Sophia Kircher, Fabrice Leggeri, César Luena, Verena Mertens, André Rougé, Alexandre Varaut | |
| Date tabled | 10.11.2025 |
Final vote by roll call by the committee responsible 3 blocks
47 · For
- EPP
- Mika Aaltola, Peter Agius, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Sunčana Glavak, Christophe Gomart, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Sophia Kircher, Łukasz Kohut, Ondřej Kolář, Andrey Kovatchev, Miriam Lexmann, Reinhold Lopatka, Antonio López-Istúriz White, David McAllister, Lukas Mandl, Gabriel Mato, Liudas Mažylis, Vangelis Meimarakis, Verena Mertens, Francisco José Millán Mon, Riho Terras
- Renew
- Abir Al-Sahlani, Barry Andrews, Petras Auštrevičius, Dan Barna, Helmut Brandstätter, Charles Goerens, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Hilde Vautmans
- S&D
- Lucia Annunziata, Robert Biedroń, Elio Di Rupo, Sandra Gómez López, Murielle Laurent, César Luena, Marit Maij, Costas Mavrides, Matjaž Nemec, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Marco Tarquinio, Marta Temido
- Greens
- Erik Marquardt, Ana Miranda Paz, Mounir Satouri, Villy Søvndal
10 · Against
- ECR
- Małgorzata Gosiewska, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Kristoffer Storm, Sebastian Tynkkynen
- ESN
- Stanislav Stoyanov
- No group
- Kostas Papadakis
- The Left
- Danilo Della Valle, Özlem Demirel, Giorgos Georgiou, Carolina Morace
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
Its dossier
- Dossier Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/947 as regards increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee 2025/0262(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure 10 Mar 2026 Passed
Decisions on this text
- Decision Increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee New EU law · report by David McAllister, Charles Goerens 10 Mar 2026 Passed
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/947 as regards increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee”. Text, 10 March 2026. docId A-10-2025-0221, reference A10-0221/2025, procId 2025-0262. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0221 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2025-0221_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/A-10-2025-0221 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-a-10-2025-0221,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/947 as regards increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-03-10},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0221}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0221},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId A-10-2025-0221, reference A10-0221/2025, procId 2025-0262. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2025-0221\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}