Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2025-0074 → TA-10-2025-0077

From
A-10-2025-0074 Plenary report of 23 Apr 2025
To
TA-10-2025-0077 Adopted text of 7 May 2025
Changes
128 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+27 added · −36 removed · 119 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023, Section III – Commission, executive agencies and the ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds
Title (to)
Discharge 2023: EU general budget - Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-flash · 11 Sept 2026

Parliament adds new provisions on institutional integrity, foreign interference, and the European Public Prosecutor's Office, and on the 'Rearm EU' initiative and Russia as a State sponsor of terrorism.2179 It adds new paragraphs on transparency of EU funding, including calls for additional resources for the Transparency Register secretariat and for implementing Court of Auditors recommendations on NGOs.2332 It adds a paragraph on an investigation involving the former Commissioner for Justice and calls for cooperation with Belgian authorities.100 It adds 'anti-Christian' to the list of movements whose views are opposed to EU fundamental values.20 The other changes are formal or wording: updated titles and citations, expanded abbreviations, corrected punctuation and decimal separators, and rephrased passages.1246

The notes class 7 changes as substance, 13 as formal, 80 as wording only; 28 smaller changes were not described.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 17 of 19: Paragraphs 610–611

(ix) prepare a report analysing the reasons why the vast majority of harassment complaints (requests for assistance) in the Commission are dismissed, most of them without even opening an administrative inquiry, and recommending how such dysfunctionality of the formal procedure can be addressed;

(x) ensure that as of 2025, requests for assistance in harassment cases are followed up with a proper administrative inquiry by the Investigation and Disciplinary Office (IDOC) or OLAF so as to ensure that harassers are held accountable and sanctioned proportionately to their wrongdoing;

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0074 and TA-10-2025-0077”. Text, 7 May 2025. from A-10-2025-0074, to TA-10-2025-0077, reference 2024/2019(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0074/compare/TA-10-2025-0077?all=1&part=17 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-05-07,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0074 and TA-10-2025-0077}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0074/compare/TA-10-2025-0077?all=1&part=17}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0074/compare/TA-10-2025-0077?all=1&part=17},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0074, to TA-10-2025-0077, reference 2024/2019(DEC). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}