Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2025-0032 → TA-10-2025-0043

From
A-10-2025-0032 Plenary report of 20 Mar 2025
To
TA-10-2025-0043 Adopted text of 1 Apr 2025
Changes
6 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+4 added · −3 removed · 7 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Mariusz Kamiński
Title (to)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Mariusz Kamiński
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The versions differ in substance by moving the statement that Kamiński was not an MEP at the time of the alleged offence from a standalone recital to an addition in another recital.34 Other changes are wording: minor rephrasing and punctuation adjustments in several recitals.1256

The notes class 2 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 4 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Changes that matter, 6

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

Changed– having heard Mariusz Kamiński on 30 January 2025 in accordance with Rule 9(6) of its Rules of Procedure and having regard to the documentdocuments submitted by him,

AI: Note on change 1 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Replaces "document" with "documents" in the reference to the hearing of Mariusz Kamiński.

Report a problem

Change 2

ChangedB. whereas the request indicates that the actions Mariusz Kamiński is alleged to have engaged in on 21 and 28 December 2023 in Warsaw, with premeditated intent and at short intervals, violated the five-year ban on holding a public position which had been imposed in a final and binding judgment handed down on 20 December 2023 by the Regional Court in Warsaw, insofar as Mariusz Kamiński performed the duties of a Member of the Sejm (the lower house of the Polish Parliament) of the Republic of Poland by participating in the session of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland held on 21 December 2023,2023 which included taking part in votes,votes and taking part in a meeting held by the Sejm’s Administration and Internal Affairs Committee on 28 December 2023; whereas the alleged actions constitute an offence under Article 244 of the Polish Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 12 of that Code;

AI: Note on change 2 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes repeated phrase "of the Republic of Poland" and adjusts punctuation in the description of the alleged offence.

Report a problem

Change 3

ChangedC. whereas the above charges were brought against Mariusz Kamiński on 18 April 2024; whereas Mariusz Kamiński was elected to the European Parliament in the European elections in June 2024; whereas Mariusz Kamiński was not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence;

AI: Note on change 3 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds a new recital stating that Mariusz Kamiński was not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence.

Report a problem

Change 4

RemovedD. whereas Mariusz Kamiński was not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence;

AI: Note on change 4 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Drops the recital that previously stated Mariusz Kamiński was not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence.

Report a problem

Change 5

ChangedI.H. whereas, in accordance with Rule 5(2) of its Rules of Procedure, parliamentary immunity is not a Member’s personal privilege of the Member but a guarantee of the independence of Parliament as a whole, and of its Members;

AI: Note on change 5 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Rephrases the recital on parliamentary immunity, moving "of the Member" and adding "Member's" to clarify it is not a personal privilege.

Report a problem

Change 6

ChangedJ.I. whereas, in this case, Parliament has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, which is to say factual elements indicating that the intention underlying the legal proceedings in question is to undermine the Member’s political activity in his capacity as a Member of the European Parliament;

AI: Note on change 6 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds "has" to the statement that Parliament found no evidence of fumus persecutionis.

Report a problem

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0032 and TA-10-2025-0043”. Text, 1 April 2025. from A-10-2025-0032, to TA-10-2025-0043, reference 2024/2046(IMM). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0032/compare/TA-10-2025-0043 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-04-01,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0032 and TA-10-2025-0043}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-01},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0032/compare/TA-10-2025-0043}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0032/compare/TA-10-2025-0043},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0032, to TA-10-2025-0043, reference 2024/2046(IMM). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}