Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2024-0021 → TA-10-2024-0069

From
A-10-2024-0021 Plenary report of 4 Dec 2024
To
TA-10-2024-0069 Adopted text of 18 Dec 2024
Changes
1 change to the text
Paragraphs
+4 added · −9 removed · 1 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration
Title (to)
United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The versions differ only in formal points: the explanatory statement is removed in the adopted text.1

The notes class 0 changes as substance, 1 as formal, 0 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Changes that matter, 1

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

RemovedEXPLANTORY STATEMENT

RemovedThe UN ‘Mauritius’ Convention on transparency for Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) marks a step towards greater public access to documents and hearings, as well as the inclusion of civil society in disputes brought by investors against States under investment treaties.

RemovedIts ratification by the EU has been a long standing request by the Parliament, including in the 2022 European Parliament resolution on the Future of EU International Investment Policy. Under the arbitration rules that commonly govern ISDS proceedings, disputes can remain hidden from public view from their launch until their conclusion. One of the parties can demand this secrecy, even though cases can target democratically decided measures, and lead to awards in the billions. Ensuring full transparency should be a minimum requirement.

RemovedThe Mauritius Convention facilitates the application of the United Nations Commission of International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Transparency Rules to investment treaties concluded prior to 1 April 2014. These rules require all documents, including tribunal decisions and party submissions, to be made public; that hearings be open to the public; and that interested parties, such as civil society organisations, be allowed to make submissions to the tribunal. All EU agreements concluded after 2014 already include similar transparency requirements.

RemovedThe convention retroactively applies to investment treaties signed before the introduction of the UNCITRAL transparency rules. Contracting parties who ratify the convention can have the new rules applied in disputes under older treaties, without the need to renegotiate them individually.

RemovedApproximately 1,200 agreements involving EU Member States fall under the scope of the Convention. The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is the only treaty covered at EU level.

Show 1 more line

RemovedRatifying the Convention is a first step in the broader reform of investment dispute settlement within the framework of the United Nations Commission for International Trade Law for the creation of a Multilateral Investment Court. Its method should be replicated, for instance in the framework of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's work to align investment treaties with the Paris Agreement climate goals.

AI: Note on change 1 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Drops the explanatory statement from the committee report.

Report a problem

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Changes between A-10-2024-0021 and TA-10-2024-0069”. Text, 18 December 2024. from A-10-2024-0021, to TA-10-2024-0069, reference 2015/0012(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2024-0021/compare/TA-10-2024-0069 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-12-18,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2024-0021 and TA-10-2024-0069}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2024-0021/compare/TA-10-2024-0069}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2024-0021/compare/TA-10-2024-0069},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2024-0021, to TA-10-2024-0069, reference 2015/0012(NLE). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}