Sitting · Plenary
Thursday 24 March 2022
- Date
- Thursday 24 March 2022
- Part-session
- unknown
- Decisions
- 0 decisions
- Votes
- 78 votes · 78 roll calls
More facts (4)
- Voting time
- 11:36–12:12
- Amendments
- 45
- Previous sitting
- Wednesday 23 March 2022
- Next sitting
- Monday 4 April 2022
Decisions, 0
Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.
No decision was voted on this day.
All votes, 0
Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.
No vote of this kind on this day.
Open these votes in the register to filter them further.
Other votes, 78
Votes the official records do not link to any decision of the day.
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amendment 3 to Article 2, point 1 More flexible use of funds under the AMIF Regulations in light of the war in Ukraine – C9-0056/2022 – Article 2, point 1 – Am 3 | Roll call | 125 for, 442 against, 7 abstained | |
| 2 | Amendment 4 to Article 2, point 2 C9-0056/2022 – Article 2, point 2 – Am 4 | Roll call | 115 for, 424 against, 5 abstained | |
| 3 | Amendment 5 to Article 3, point 1 C9-0056/2022 – Article 3, point 1 – Am 5 | Roll call | 118 for, 460 against, 2 abstained | |
| 4 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 2 Need for an urgent EU action plan to ensure food security inside and outside the EU in light of the Russian invasion of Ukraine – RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 2 – Am 1 | Roll call | 99 for, 459 against, 25 abstained | |
| 5 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 2 – Am 13 | Roll call | 150 for, 424 against, 12 abstained |
Show the other 73 votesShow the other 73 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 2 – Am 29 | Roll call | 147 for, 391 against, 51 abstained | |
| 7 | Amendment 41 to paragraph 4 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 4 – Am 41 | Roll call | 396 for, 163 against, 28 abstained | |
| 8 | Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 6 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 6 – Am 42 | Roll call | 273 for, 304 against, 11 abstained | |
| 9 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 8 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 8 – Am 2 | Roll call | 263 for, 307 against, 18 abstained | |
| 10 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 8 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 8 – Am 3 | Roll call | 110 for, 462 against, 11 abstained | |
| 11 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 12 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 12 – Am 14 | Roll call | 174 for, 361 against, 54 abstained | |
| 12 | Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 12 – Am 15 | Roll call | 155 for, 426 against, 5 abstained | |
| 13 | Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 12 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 12 – Am 16 | Roll call | 155 for, 418 against, 11 abstained | |
| 14 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 15 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 15 – Am 4 | Roll call | 67 for, 476 against, 41 abstained | |
| 15 | Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 16 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 16 – Am 17 | Roll call | 145 for, 434 against, 11 abstained | |
| 16 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 21 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 21 – Am 5 | Roll call | 220 for, 321 against, 48 abstained | |
| 17 | Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 21 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 21 – Am 43 | Roll call | 525 for, 15 against, 48 abstained | |
| 18 | Amendment 27 to paragraph 22 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 22 – Am 27 | Roll call | 493 for, 84 against, 13 abstained | |
| 19 | Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 22 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 22 – Am 44 | Roll call | 265 for, 249 against, 71 abstained | |
| 20 | Paragraph 25 — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 25/2 | Roll call | 496 for, 70 against, 17 abstained | |
| 21 | Paragraph 26 — part 1 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 26/1 | Roll call | 522 for, 24 against, 38 abstained | |
| 22 | Paragraph 26 — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 26/2 | Roll call | 383 for, 162 against, 45 abstained | |
| 23 | Paragraph 26 — part 3 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 26/3 | Roll call | 428 for, 139 against, 18 abstained | |
| 24 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 26 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 26 – Am 12 | Roll call | 293 for, 285 against, 12 abstained | |
| 25 | Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 26 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 26 – Am 18 | Roll call | 163 for, 410 against, 14 abstained | |
| 26 | Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 29 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 20 | Roll call | 166 for, 411 against, 10 abstained | |
| 27 | Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 21 | Roll call | 142 for, 436 against, 9 abstained | |
| 28 | Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 29 — part 1 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 19/1 | Roll call | 482 for, 90 against, 16 abstained | |
| 29 | Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 29 — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 19/2 | Roll call | 138 for, 426 against, 21 abstained | |
| 30 | Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 29 — part 3 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 19/3 | Roll call | 512 for, 72 against, 2 abstained | |
| 31 | Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 36 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 36 – Am 22 | Roll call | 348 for, 204 against, 37 abstained | |
| 32 | Amendment 28 to paragraph 39 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 39 – Am 28 | Roll call | 138 for, 432 against, 19 abstained | |
| 33 | Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 39 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 39 – Am 23 | Roll call | 140 for, 435 against, 10 abstained | |
| 34 | Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 39 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 39 – Am 24 | Roll call | 146 for, 375 against, 66 abstained | |
| 35 | Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 39 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 39 – Am 30 | Roll call | 139 for, 426 against, 15 abstained | |
| 36 | Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 39 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 39 – Am 31 | Roll call | 165 for, 406 against, 13 abstained | |
| 37 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 42 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 42 – Am 7 | Roll call | 273 for, 295 against, 15 abstained | |
| 38 | Paragraph 47 — part 1 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 47/1 | Roll call | 562 for, 21 against, 6 abstained | |
| 39 | Paragraph 47 — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 47/2 | Roll call | 464 for, 114 against, 7 abstained | |
| 40 | Paragraph 47 — part 3 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 47/3 | Roll call | 551 for, 12 against, 15 abstained | |
| 41 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 47 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 47 – Am 8 | Roll call | 274 for, 289 against, 20 abstained | |
| 42 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 47 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 47 – Am 9 | Roll call | 254 for, 306 against, 21 abstained | |
| 43 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 47 – Am 10 | Roll call | 298 for, 276 against, 7 abstained | |
| 44 | Amendment 45 to paragraph 48 — part 1 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 48 – Am 45/1 | Roll call | 270 for, 241 against, 75 abstained | |
| 45 | Amendment 45 to paragraph 48 — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 48 – Am 45/2 | Roll call | 259 for, 314 against, 10 abstained | |
| 46 | Paragraph 49 — part 1 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 49/1 | Roll call | 447 for, 75 against, 54 abstained | |
| 47 | Paragraph 49 — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 49/2 | Roll call | 444 for, 68 against, 71 abstained | |
| 48 | Paragraph 49 — part 3 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 49/3 | Roll call | 429 for, 120 against, 34 abstained | |
| 49 | Paragraph 49 — part 4 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 49/4 | Roll call | 493 for, 56 against, 35 abstained | |
| 50 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 49 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 49 – Am 11 | Roll call | 284 for, 278 against, 25 abstained | |
| 51 | Amendment 32 to paragraph 53 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 53 – Am 32/rev | Roll call | 465 for, 100 against, 21 abstained | |
| 52 | Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 53 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 53 – Am 33/rev | Roll call | 429 for, 127 against, 26 abstained | |
| 53 | Paragraph 54 — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 54/2 | Roll call | 469 for, 88 against, 28 abstained | |
| 54 | Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 55 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 55 – Am 25 | Roll call | 209 for, 349 against, 29 abstained | |
| 55 | Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 57 RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 57 – Am 26 | Roll call | 193 for, 326 against, 69 abstained | |
| 56 | Recital M — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital M/2 | Roll call | 552 for, 27 against, 6 abstained | |
| 57 | Recital AE — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital AE/2 | Roll call | 479 for, 105 against, 2 abstained | |
| 58 | Recital AK — part 2 RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital AK/2 | Roll call | 544 for, 13 against, 27 abstained | |
| 59 | Recital M — part 3 RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital M/3 | Roll call | 353 for, 200 against, 26 abstained | |
| 60 | Recital AK — part 3 RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital AK/3 | Roll call | 479 for, 58 against, 46 abstained | |
| 61 | Amendment 1 to recital 18 C9-0056/2022 – Recital 18 – Am 1 | Roll call | 118 for, 455 against, 6 abstained | |
| 62 | Amendment 2, adding text after recital 19 C9-0056/2022 – After recital 19 – Am 2 | Roll call | 119 for, 431 against, 8 abstained | |
| 63 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution MFF 2021-2027: fight against oligarch structures, protection of EU funds from fraud and conflict of interest – A9-0039/2022 – Petri Sarvamaa – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) | Roll call | 409 for, 61 against, 42 abstained | |
| 64 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Roaming Regulation (recast) – A9-0286/2021 – Angelika Winzig – Provisional agreement – Am 74 | Roll call | 581 for, 2 against, 5 abstained | |
| 65 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology – A9-0240/2021 – Johan Van Overtveldt – Provisional agreement – Am 2 | Roll call | 527 for, 28 against, 31 abstained | |
| 66 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Computerised system for the cross-border electronic exchange of data in the area of judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters (e-CODEX system) – A9-0288/2021 – Emil Radev, Nuno Melo – Provisional agreement – Am 71 | Roll call | 571 for, 7 against, 10 abstained | |
| 67 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2021/007 FR/Selecta – France – A9-0048/2022 – Eider Gardiazabal Rubial – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) | Roll call | 556 for, 21 against, 10 abstained | |
| 68 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution RC-B9-0160/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) | Roll call | 413 for, 120 against, 49 abstained | |
| 69 | Final vote Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Italy – A9-0046/2022 – Juan Fernando López Aguilar – Draft Council implementing decision | Roll call | 547 for, 38 against, 4 abstained | |
| 70 | Final vote Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Italy – A9-0047/2022 – Juan Fernando López Aguilar – Draft Council implementing decision | Roll call | 546 for, 36 against, 6 abstained | |
| 71 | Final vote Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Greece – A9-0049/2022 – Juan Fernando López Aguilar – Draft Council implementing decision | Roll call | 546 for, 33 against, 9 abstained | |
| 72 | Final vote Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Italy – A9-0050/2022 – Juan Fernando López Aguilar – Draft Council implementing decision | Roll call | 546 for, 37 against, 3 abstained | |
| 73 | Final vote Macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova – A9-0043/2022 – Markéta Gregorová – Commission proposal | Roll call | 558 for, 20 against, 10 abstained | |
| 74 | Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Brazil Agreement on short-stay visa waiver for holders of ordinary passports – A9-0029/2022 – Paulo Rangel – Draft Council decision | Roll call | 585 for, 3 against, 0 abstained | |
| 75 | Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Brazil Agreement on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports – A9-0030/2022 – Paulo Rangel – Draft Council decision | Roll call | 587 for, 3 against, 0 abstained | |
| 76 | Final vote Refugees in Europe: CARE – C9-0057/2022 – Commission proposal | Roll call | 562 for, 2 against, 3 abstained | |
| 77 | Final vote C9-0056/2022 – Commission proposal | Roll call | 575 for, 4 against, 3 abstained | |
| 78 | Final vote Status Agreement between the EU and Moldova on Frontex operational activities – C9-0120/2022 – Proposal for a Council decision | Roll call | 543 for, 34 against, 10 abstained |
Connections
The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2022). “Sitting of Thursday 24 March 2022”. Sitting, 24 March 2022. sitting MTG-PL-2022-03-24. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-03-24 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 March 2022 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-03-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 March 2022 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-03-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2022-03-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2022-03-24/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2022-03-24,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Sitting of Thursday 24 March 2022}},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-24},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-03-24}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-03-24},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2022-03-24. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-03-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-03-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2022-03-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}