Sitting · Plenary
Thursday 8 July 2021
- Date
- Thursday 8 July 2021
- Part-session
- unknown
- Decisions
- 0 decisions
- Votes
- 70 votes · 70 roll calls
More facts (4)
- Voting time
- 13:06–16:53
- Amendments
- 29
- Previous sitting
- Wednesday 7 July 2021
- Next sitting
- Monday 13 September 2021
Decisions, 0
Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.
No decision was voted on this day.
All votes, 0
Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.
No vote of this kind on this day.
Open these votes in the register to filter them further.
Other votes, 70
Votes the official records do not link to any decision of the day.
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Separate vote on paragraph 5 RC-B9-0382/2021 – § 5 | Roll call | 622 for, 27 against, 47 abstained | |
| 2 | Paragraph 5 — part 1 RC-B9-0400/2021/REV – § 5/1 | Roll call | 624 for, 52 against, 20 abstained | |
| 3 | Paragraph 5 — part 2 RC-B9-0400/2021/REV – § 5/2 | Roll call | 618 for, 39 against, 39 abstained | |
| 4 | Paragraph 5 — part 3 RC-B9-0400/2021/REV – § 5/3 | Roll call | 616 for, 41 against, 39 abstained | |
| 5 | Paragraph 5 — part 4 RC-B9-0400/2021/REV – § 5/4 | Roll call | 618 for, 39 against, 39 abstained |
Show the other 65 votesShow the other 65 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Paragraph 8 — part 1 The death penalty in Saudi Arabia, notably the cases of Mustafa Hashem al-Darwish and Abdullah al-Howaiti – RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 8/1 | Roll call | 422 for, 217 against, 56 abstained | |
| 7 | Paragraph 8 — part 2 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 8/2 | Roll call | 623 for, 36 against, 36 abstained | |
| 8 | Paragraph 17 — part 1 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 17/1 | Roll call | 593 for, 12 against, 88 abstained | |
| 9 | Paragraph 17 — part 2 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 17/2 | Roll call | 620 for, 2 against, 71 abstained | |
| 10 | Paragraph 20 — part 1 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 20/1 | Roll call | 673 for, 2 against, 20 abstained | |
| 11 | Paragraph 20 — part 2 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 20/2 | Roll call | 619 for, 41 against, 35 abstained | |
| 12 | Separate vote on paragraph 21 B9-0412/2021 – § 21 | Roll call | 460 for, 152 against, 72 abstained | |
| 13 | Paragraph 21 — part 1 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 21/1 | Roll call | 638 for, 26 against, 31 abstained | |
| 14 | Paragraph 21 — part 2 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 21/2 | Roll call | 416 for, 260 against, 19 abstained | |
| 15 | Paragraph 22 — part 1 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 22/1 | Roll call | 616 for, 7 against, 72 abstained | |
| 16 | Paragraph 22 — part 2 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 22/2 | Roll call | 384 for, 285 against, 26 abstained | |
| 17 | Paragraph 23 — part 1 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 23/1 | Roll call | 638 for, 45 against, 12 abstained | |
| 18 | Paragraph 23 — part 2 RC-B9-0392/2021 – § 23/2 | Roll call | 547 for, 63 against, 83 abstained | |
| 19 | Paragraph 27 — part 1 B9-0412/2021 – § 27/1 | Roll call | 515 for, 140 against, 27 abstained | |
| 20 | Paragraph 27 — part 2 B9-0412/2021 – § 27/2 | Roll call | 478 for, 164 against, 35 abstained | |
| 21 | Separate vote on citation 16 B9-0412/2021 – Citation 16 | Roll call | 364 for, 297 against, 19 abstained | |
| 22 | Recital O — part 1 B9-0369/2021 – Recital O/1 | Roll call | 626 for, 12 against, 58 abstained | |
| 23 | Recital P — part 1 RC-B9-0392/2021 – Recital P/1 | Roll call | 639 for, 3 against, 51 abstained | |
| 24 | Recital O — part 2 B9-0369/2021 – Recital O/2 | Roll call | 584 for, 50 against, 62 abstained | |
| 25 | Recital P — part 2 RC-B9-0392/2021 – Recital P/2 | Roll call | 387 for, 293 against, 13 abstained | |
| 26 | Separate vote on recital D B9-0412/2021 – Recital D | Roll call | 518 for, 142 against, 20 abstained | |
| 27 | Separate vote on recital O B9-0412/2021 – Recital O | Roll call | 481 for, 152 against, 44 abstained | |
| 28 | Amendment 1 Review of the macroeconomic legislative framework – A9-0212/2021 – Margarida Marques – Am 1 | Roll call | 133 for, 419 against, 142 abstained | |
| 29 | Amendment 2 A9-0212/2021 – Margarida Marques – Am 2 | Roll call | 128 for, 505 against, 62 abstained | |
| 30 | Amendment 3 A9-0212/2021 – Margarida Marques – Am 3 | Roll call | 148 for, 477 against, 70 abstained | |
| 31 | Amendment 2 Establishment of Antarctic Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and the conservation of Southern Ocean biodiversity – B9-0369/2021 – Am 2 | Roll call | 309 for, 370 against, 16 abstained | |
| 32 | Amendment 3 B9-0369/2021 – Am 3 | Roll call | 136 for, 540 against, 19 abstained | |
| 33 | Amendment 4 B9-0369/2021 – Am 4 | Roll call | 108 for, 568 against, 19 abstained | |
| 34 | Amendment 1 B9-0369/2021 – Am 1 | Roll call | 150 for, 530 against, 15 abstained | |
| 35 | Amendment 2 Situation in Nicaragua – RC-B9-0400/2021/REV – Am 2 | Roll call | 56 for, 603 against, 37 abstained | |
| 36 | Amendment 3 RC-B9-0400/2021/REV – Am 3 | Roll call | 120 for, 559 against, 17 abstained | |
| 37 | Amendment 1 RC-B9-0400/2021/REV – Am 1 | Roll call | 129 for, 555 against, 10 abstained | |
| 38 | Amendment 3 The repression of the opposition in Turkey, specifically HDP – RC-B9-0406/2021 – Am 3 | Roll call | 177 for, 489 against, 11 abstained | |
| 39 | Amendment 2 RC-B9-0406/2021 – Am 2 | Roll call | 100 for, 558 against, 21 abstained | |
| 40 | Amendment 1 RC-B9-0406/2021 – Am 1 | Roll call | 134 for, 534 against, 10 abstained | |
| 41 | Amendment 1 Breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the adopted legal changes in the Hungarian Parliament – B9-0412/2021 – Am 1 | Roll call | 261 for, 304 against, 121 abstained | |
| 42 | Amendment 2 B9-0412/2021 – Am 2 | Roll call | 357 for, 311 against, 15 abstained | |
| 43 | Amendment 3 B9-0412/2021 – Am 3 | Roll call | 364 for, 306 against, 14 abstained | |
| 44 | Amendment 1 The case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran – RC-B9-0382/2021 – Am 1 | Roll call | 336 for, 353 against, 7 abstained | |
| 45 | Amendment 3 RC-B9-0382/2021 – Am 3 | Roll call | 305 for, 345 against, 46 abstained | |
| 46 | Amendment 2 RC-B9-0382/2021 – Am 2 | Roll call | 176 for, 496 against, 21 abstained | |
| 47 | Amendment 4 RC-B9-0382/2021 – Am 4 | Roll call | 336 for, 271 against, 89 abstained | |
| 48 | Amendment 5 RC-B9-0382/2021 – Am 5 | Roll call | 326 for, 329 against, 41 abstained | |
| 49 | Amendment 1 Hong Kong, notably the case of Apple Daily – RC-B9-0385/2021 – Am 1 | Roll call | 22 for, 616 against, 53 abstained | |
| 50 | Amendment 2 RC-B9-0385/2021 – Am 2 | Roll call | 27 for, 616 against, 47 abstained | |
| 51 | Amendment 3 RC-B9-0385/2021 – Am 3 | Roll call | 139 for, 453 against, 99 abstained | |
| 52 | Amendment 4 RC-B9-0385/2021 – Am 4 | Roll call | 102 for, 505 against, 84 abstained | |
| 53 | Amendment 1 RC-B9-0392/2021 – Am 1 | Roll call | 285 for, 398 against, 12 abstained | |
| 54 | Amendment 2 RC-B9-0392/2021 – Am 2 | Roll call | 293 for, 394 against, 8 abstained | |
| 55 | Composition numérique des commissions spéciales et de la commission d’enquête — B9-0414/2021 — Proposition de décision 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 Composition numérique des commissions spéciales et de la commission d’enquête – B9-0414/2021 – Proposition de décision 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 | Roll call | 680 for, 3 against, 5 abstained | |
| 56 | Referral back to committee A9-0216/2021 – Nicolás González Casares – Referral back (Rule 59(4)) | Roll call | 665 for, 20 against, 11 abstained | |
| 57 | Referral back to committee A9-0203/2021 – Grace O'Sullivan – Referral back (Rule 59(4)) | Roll call | 603 for, 90 against, 3 abstained | |
| 58 | Amendment 4 — part 1 B9-0369/2021 – Am § 4/1 | Roll call | 619 for, 15 against, 62 abstained | |
| 59 | Amendment 4 — part 2 B9-0369/2021 – Am § 4/2 | Roll call | 548 for, 75 against, 72 abstained | |
| 60 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution The case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran – RC-B9-0382/2021 – Motion for a resolution 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 | Roll call | 666 for, 5 against, 16 abstained | |
| 61 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Hong Kong, notably the case of Apple Daily – RC-B9-0385/2021 – Motion for a resolution 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 | Roll call | 578 for, 29 against, 73 abstained | |
| 62 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution The death penalty in Saudi Arabia, notably the cases of Mustafa Hashem al-Darwish and Abdullah al-Howaiti – RC-B9-0392/2021 – Motion for a resolution 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 | Roll call | 661 for, 3 against, 23 abstained | |
| 63 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Review of the macroeconomic legislative framework – A9-0212/2021 – Margarida Marques – Motion for a resolution 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 | Roll call | 461 for, 94 against, 133 abstained | |
| 64 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Situation in Nicaragua – RC-B9-0400/2021/REV – Motion for a resolution 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 | Roll call | 629 for, 19 against, 40 abstained | |
| 65 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution The repression of the opposition in Turkey, specifically HDP – RC-B9-0406/2021 – Motion for a resolution 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 | Roll call | 603 for, 2 against, 67 abstained | |
| 66 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Establishment of Antarctic Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and the conservation of Southern Ocean biodiversity – B9-0369/2021 – Motion for a resolution 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 | Roll call | 588 for, 21 against, 79 abstained | |
| 67 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the adopted legal changes in the Hungarian Parliament – B9-0412/2021 – Motion for a resolution 08/07/2021 15:53:14.480 | Roll call | 459 for, 147 against, 58 abstained | |
| 68 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution A new ERA for Research and Innovation – B9-0370/2021 – Motion for a resolution | Roll call | 634 for, 5 against, 57 abstained | |
| 69 | Final vote European Medicines Agency – A9-0216/2021 – Nicolás González Casares – Commission proposal | Roll call | 587 for, 28 against, 81 abstained | |
| 70 | Final vote General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030 – A9-0203/2021 – Grace O'Sullivan – Commission proposal | Roll call | 518 for, 130 against, 47 abstained |
Connections
The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 30 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2021). “Sitting of Thursday 8 July 2021”. Sitting, 8 July 2021. sitting MTG-PL-2021-07-08. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2021-07-08 (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2021 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2021-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2021 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2021-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2021-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2021-07-08/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2021-07-08,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Sitting of Thursday 8 July 2021}},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-07-08},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2021-07-08}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2021-07-08},
urldate = {2026-09-30},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2021-07-08. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2021-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2021-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2021-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}