Member

Mario MANTOVANI

ECR · Italy

Group: ECR
Country: Italy
Roll-call participation: 65.7 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line: 88.2 %ⓘ of 338 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.2 %

More facts (5)

National party: FdL FRATELLI D' ITALIA
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 7 of 293 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), EMPL (substitute), JURI (vice-chair)
Member id: 4395

National party: FdL FRATELLI D' ITALIA
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 7 of 293 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), EMPL (substitute), JURI (vice-chair)
Member id: 4395

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

65.7 %

339 of 516 roll calls while in office

ECR median: 92.2 % (−26.5 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

88.2 %

298 of 338 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.2 % (+0.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.4 %

7 of 293 votes where their group had a clear line

1 opposite (for ↔ against), 6 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

12.4 %

42 of 339 votes cast

Participation 65.7 % — ECR median 92.2 %, 78 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 78 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Mario MANTOVANI	65.7 %
ECR median	92.2 %
Lowest in the group	10.5 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	78

With majority line 88.2 % — ECR median 87.2 %, 78 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 78 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Mario MANTOVANI	88.2 %
ECR median	87.2 %
Lowest in the group	61.8 %
Highest in the group	97.6 %
Members	78

2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 8 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	21
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	0
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	0
8 Oct 2024	1	0
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	0
22 Oct 2024	10	0
23 Oct 2024	129	0
24 Oct 2024	13	0
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	10
28 Nov 2024	57	55
17 Dec 2024	13	0
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Carlo FIDANZA	Carlo FIDANZA	ECR	Italy	100 % of 4 034 shared	81 %
Select Francesco VENTOLA	Francesco VENTOLA	ECR	Italy	99 % of 3 781 shared	81 %
Select Alessandro CIRIANI	Alessandro CIRIANI	ECR	Italy	99 % of 3 575 shared	81 %
Select Francesco TORSELLI	Francesco TORSELLI	ECR	Italy	99 % of 4 140 shared	81 %
Select Daniele POLATO	Daniele POLATO	ECR	Italy	99 % of 4 156 shared	81 %
Select Denis NESCI	Denis NESCI	ECR	Italy	99 % of 4 206 shared	81 %
Select Alberico GAMBINO	Alberico GAMBINO	ECR	Italy	99 % of 3 447 shared	81 %
Select Antonella SBERNA	Antonella SBERNA	ECR	Italy	99 % of 3 838 shared	81 %
Select Stefano CAVEDAGNA	Stefano CAVEDAGNA	ECR	Italy	99 % of 3 743 shared	81 %
Select Lara MAGONI	Lara MAGONI	ECR	Italy	99 % of 4 111 shared	81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Patriots	Portugal	75 % of 4 016 shared	68 %
Select Antonín STANĚK	Antonín STANĚK	Patriots	Czechia	74 % of 2 327 shared	68 %
Select Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Patriots	Spain	74 % of 3 911 shared	68 %
Select Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 2 971 shared	68 %
Select Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 4 074 shared	68 %
Select Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 4 184 shared	68 %
Select Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 4 111 shared	68 %
Select Nikola BARTŮŠEK	Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group	ECR	Czechia	73 % of 3 446 shared	62 %
Select Hermann TERTSCH	Hermann TERTSCH	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 3 098 shared	68 %
Select Branko GRIMS	Branko GRIMS changed group	No group	Slovenia	72 % of 3 844 shared	50 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Vice-chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-AL Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with IndiaD-IN Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	22 Jul 2024

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.'	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	27 Apr 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 as regards amendments adopted by the Assembly of the Lisbon Union on 14 July 2025 to the Common Regulations under the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	27 Apr 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	JURI	9 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	JURI	3 Dec 2025
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	14 Apr 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation · 2 declarations	JURI	7 Apr 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation		21 Oct 2024
No dossier named	Committee vice-chair	JURI	19 Jul 2024

Show all 8 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

23 contributions recorded; 6 on behalf of their group; 31 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 (debate) on behalf of ECR	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Cutting red tape to enable a competitive and clean transition – the urgent need to shorten and simplify permitting (debate) on behalf of ECR	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Accession to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (joint debate) on behalf of ECR	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies (debate) on behalf of ECR	Speech · 2 min	Read
18 Dec 2025	European Democracy Shield – very large online platform algorithms, foreign interference and the spread of disinformation (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	2030 Consumer Agenda (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
26 Nov 2025	Defence of Democracy package (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Digital Package (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 23 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 39

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
1 Sept 2026	Paolo De Rosa’s links with the Autistici/Inventati hacker group and Italy’s Democratic Party P-10-2026-003407	Priority written questionwith 20 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation (EU) of 27 March 2026 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/688 as regards infection with bluetongue virus (serotypes 1-24) and infection with epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus and introducing a derogation for movements of registered equine animals B-10-2026-0342	Motion for a resolutionwith 40 co-authors	—
23 Feb 2026	Protecting Italy’s ‘Hosiery District’ in the light of the EU’s anti-dumping proceeding on imports of polyamide yarns originating in China (C/2025/4120) E-10-2026-000751	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	13 Apr 2026
26 Dec 2025	EU funding and media campaigns undermining regional policies promoting motherhood E-10-2025-005064	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	20 Feb 2026
27 Nov 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on banning all application and enforcement of Sharia law in the EU B-10-2025-0553	Motion for a resolutionwith 53 co-authors	—
10 Nov 2025	Sale of childlike sex dolls on the Shein e-commerce platform E-10-2025-004433	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	6 Jan 2026
6 Nov 2025	Nitrogen and urea prices and CBAM rules: mitigating the impact on farmers E-10-2025-004386	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	2 Feb 2026
5 Nov 2025	The US customs measures for EU goods that are affecting Europe’s engineering sector E-10-2025-004377	Written questionwith 14 co-authors	8 Jan 2026
20 Oct 2025	Timeline for the decoupling of energy prices from the gas price E-10-2025-004126	Written questionwith 28 co-authors	8 Jan 2026
16 Oct 2025	Suitability of Francesca Albanese as the Special Rapporteur of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) E-10-2025-004073	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	19 Feb 2026
2 Sept 2025	Health tourism and EU-UK trade in puberty blockers for minors E-10-2025-003357	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	12 Nov 2025
1 Sept 2025	European Court of Auditors special report 11/2025 on Transparency of EU funding granted to NGOs E-10-2025-003339	Written questionwith 57 co-authors	25 Nov 2025
3 Jul 2025	Simplifying Regulation (EU) 2024/1787 on methane E-10-2025-002719	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	30 Sept 2025
16 Jun 2025	Possibility of triggering extraordinary Erasmus+ measures to support students impacted by the conflict in Gaza E-10-2025-002413	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	30 Jul 2025
28 May 2025	Recognition of expenses for demography as investment for budgetary balance E-10-2025-002128	Written questionwith 41 co-authors	5 Sept 2025
7 May 2025	Cutting red tape and the failure to extend the Omnibus provisions for SMEs to banking supervision and prudential requirements E-10-2025-001837	Written questionwith 1 co-author	11 Jul 2025
10 Apr 2025	Major problems with EU funding for non-governmental organisations, according to the European Court of Auditors E-10-2025-001482	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	26 Jun 2025
28 Mar 2025	Safeguarding fisheries activity in Italy: urgent need for a revision of EU legislation to protect fisheries businesses and the fisheries sector E-10-2025-001307	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	27 May 2025
18 Mar 2025	Escalation of violence against Christian minorities in Syria and the need for EU intervention P-10-2025-001149	Priority written questionwith 18 co-authors	24 Apr 2025
10 Mar 2025	Possible challenges in the multiannual financial framework and resources for agriculture and cohesion E-10-2025-001031	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	6 May 2025
13 Feb 2025	Transgender athletes competing in women’s sports E-10-2025-000679	Written questionwith 14 co-authors	11 Apr 2025
6 Feb 2025	Immigration and crime: arrests for facilitating illegal immigration in Italy E-10-2025-000554	Written questionwith 19 co-authors	2 May 2025
5 Feb 2025	Implementation of the Bolkestein Directive and the new Italian healthcare accreditation system’s compliance issues E-10-2025-000542	Written questionwith 1 co-author	14 May 2025
4 Feb 2025	Removal of the ‘TITO’ inscription from Sabotin in Slovenia E-10-2025-000484	Written questionwith 19 co-authors	22 May 2025
30 Jan 2025	Green transition and RRF: assessment of how climate action resources have been used E-10-2025-000422	Written questionwith 14 co-authors	13 Mar 2025
29 Jan 2025	Inquiry into the Chinese Government’s role in financing and running DeepSeek, and in applying censorship E-10-2025-000394	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	24 Apr 2025
27 Jan 2025	Commission funding to environmental NGOs to condition the views of Members of the European Parliament E-10-2025-000357	Written questionwith 64 co-authors	5 May 2025
10 Dec 2024	‘Do you know the ingredients in your alcoholic drink?’ campaign against alcoholic drinks E-10-2024-002836	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	21 Mar 2025
27 Nov 2024	Untapped potential of AI and revitalising the technology sector and innovative national and European companies E-10-2024-002670	Written question	6 Mar 2025
20 Nov 2024	‘Men Having Babies’ surrogacy conference E-10-2024-002599	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	26 Mar 2025
14 Nov 2024	Brenner and road transport restrictions P-10-2024-002533	Priority written questionwith 23 co-authors	19 Dec 2024
13 Nov 2024	Fashion-sector companies unable to the EU ‘Fit for 55’ plan’s carbon footprint targets E-10-2024-002513	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	19 Mar 2025
23 Oct 2024	Placing Ryplazim on the market in Europe E-10-2024-002234	Written questionwith 22 co-authors	6 Jan 2025
13 Sept 2024	Commission taking action in response to Afghanistan’s Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice Law E-10-2024-001711	Written questionwith 18 co-authors	31 Oct 2024
3 Sept 2024	Presence of dangerous substances in fast fashion clothing from third countries and the safety of European consumers E-10-2024-001611	Written questionwith 16 co-authors	4 Nov 2024
29 Aug 2024	Shortage of health and social care workers in Europe: need to bolster national health services and staff training E-10-2024-001566	Written questionwith 1 co-author	18 Oct 2024
27 Aug 2024	Funding of the ‘DragTivism Jr’ project through Erasmus+ E-10-2024-001554	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	7 Nov 2024
8 Aug 2024	Urgent strengthening of the EU’s aerial fire-fighting fleet and development of a European partnership E-10-2024-001501	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	28 Oct 2024
29 Jul 2024	Blasphemy at the opening ceremony of the 2024 Olympic Games in Paris E-10-2024-001448	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	Not yet answered

Amendments tabled in committee, 30

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131	JURI	28
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128	JURI	24
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129	JURI	24
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130	JURI	43
29 Jun 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) JURI-AM-790236	JURI	10
29 Jun 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) JURI-AM-790241	JURI	28
25 Jun 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 as regards amendments adopted by the Assembly of the Lisbon Union on 14 July 2025 to the Common Regulations under the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications JURI-AM-790209	JURI	6
19 May 2026	Establishing the Justice programme for the period 2028-2034 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/693 CJ03-AM-788926	CJ03	13
23 Apr 2026	Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities EMPL-AM-787039	EMPL	38
20 Apr 2026	Establishment of European Business Wallets JURI-AM-787721	JURI	11

Show all 30 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European Conservatives and Reformists ECR · Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical

National delegation

Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/4395?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Mario MANTOVANI”. Member record. memberId 4395. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/4395?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/4395. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/4395?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-4395,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Mario MANTOVANI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/4395?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/4395?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 4395. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/4395. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ECR

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 39

Amendments tabled in committee, 30

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928