Member

Sigrid FRIIS

Renew · Denmark

Group: Renew
Country: Denmark
Roll-call participation: 97.7 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line: 96.4 %ⓘ of 501 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 96.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: B Det Radikale Venstre
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 10 of 488 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI (substitute), ITRE
Member id: 257038

National party: B Det Radikale Venstre
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 10 of 488 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI (substitute), ITRE
Member id: 257038

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.7 %

504 of 516 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 96.3 % (+1.4 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.4 %

483 of 501 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 96.1 % (+0.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.0 %

10 of 488 votes where their group had a clear line

6 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.8 %

4 of 504 votes cast

Participation 97.7 % — Renew median 96.3 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Sigrid FRIIS	97.7 %
Renew median	96.3 %
Lowest in the group	38.0 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	77

With majority line 96.4 % — Renew median 96.1 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Sigrid FRIIS	96.4 %
Renew median	96.1 %
Lowest in the group	77.6 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	77

2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	19
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	89
7 Oct 2024	2	1
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	127
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	1
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	56
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Elena YONCHEVA	Elena YONCHEVA changed group	ECR	Bulgaria	97 % of 225 shared	92 %
Select Taner KABILOV	Taner KABILOV changed group	ECR	Bulgaria	97 % of 473 shared	92 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	96 % of 4 699 shared	92 %
Select Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Renew	Netherlands	96 % of 4 761 shared	92 %
Select Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Renew	Netherlands	96 % of 4 220 shared	92 %
Select Martin HOJSÍK	Martin HOJSÍK	Renew	Slovakia	95 % of 4 288 shared	92 %
Select Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ	Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ	Renew	Slovakia	95 % of 2 855 shared	92 %
Select Lucia YAR	Lucia YAR	Renew	Slovakia	95 % of 4 759 shared	92 %
Select Michal WIEZIK	Michal WIEZIK	Renew	Slovakia	95 % of 4 324 shared	92 %
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Renew	Slovakia	95 % of 4 667 shared	92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Bernd LANGE	Bernd LANGE	S&D	Germany	89 % of 4 529 shared	86 %
Select Birgit SIPPEL	Birgit SIPPEL	S&D	Germany	89 % of 3 778 shared	86 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	89 % of 2 937 shared	86 %
Select Tobias CREMER	Tobias CREMER	S&D	Germany	89 % of 4 320 shared	86 %
Select René REPASI	René REPASI	S&D	Germany	89 % of 4 588 shared	86 %
Select Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	S&D	Spain	89 % of 4 362 shared	86 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	89 % of 4 320 shared	86 %
Select Sven MIKSER	Sven MIKSER	S&D	Estonia	89 % of 4 681 shared	86 %
Select Gabriele BISCHOFF	Gabriele BISCHOFF	S&D	Germany	89 % of 4 572 shared	86 %
Select Lina GÁLVEZ	Lina GÁLVEZ	S&D	Spain	89 % of 3 965 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Substitute	20 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for Northern cooperation and for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary CommitteeDEEA Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with PalestineDPAL Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working group	Member	27 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on the Welfare and Conservation of AnimalsIG10-27 Intergroup / working group	Member	8 Jan 2025	now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	19 Jan 2025
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	8 Jul 2026

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ITRE	8 Apr 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards the extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ITRE	8 Apr 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	2 Mar 2026
Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ENVI	30 Jan 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ITRE	11 Dec 2025
European Parliament Delegation to COP29 to the Republic of Azerbaijan	Official delegation		12 Nov 2024
Information security in the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	20 Sept 2024
European Parliament Delegation to COP28	Official delegation		11 Sept 2024

Show all 8 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

43 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 47 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	The impact of the implementation of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) on SMEs, its administrative burden and challenges for the European Single Market (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Electrification Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2026	Need for an adaptation of the EU legal framework on sustainable biofuels (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Reviewing the ETS system to support European competitiveness (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
30 Apr 2026	How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 33

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
30 Jun 2026	Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698	Written questionwith 43 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
4 Jun 2026	Revision of Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 and phase-out of CO₂ stunning of pigs E-10-2026-002317	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	21 Aug 2026
16 Apr 2026	EU action to implement a whale stranding emergency plan E-10-2026-001579	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	7 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026	Compliance of Google’s ‘developer verification’ and ‘advanced flow’ mechanisms with the Digital Markets Act E-10-2026-001411	Written question	5 Jun 2026
5 Feb 2026	When and how will the Commission deliver on its commitment to revise the EU’s animal welfare legislation? O-10-2026-000006	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
4 Feb 2026	Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446	Written questionwith 81 co-authors	10 Apr 2026
16 Dec 2025	Welfare of wild animals E-10-2025-004965	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	12 Feb 2026
9 Dec 2025	Participation of Israel in the Horizon Europe programme E-10-2025-004869	Written questionwith 43 co-authors	7 Apr 2026
8 Dec 2025	Value added tax on sport and fitness services – impact on public health and prevention of lifestyle-related diseases E-10-2025-004847	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	23 Feb 2026
13 Oct 2025	Ambition and scope of the upcoming revision of on-farm animal welfare legislation E-10-2025-004010	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	16 Dec 2025
8 Oct 2025	Exports of chemicals banned in the EU E-10-2025-003973	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	21 Jan 2026
3 Oct 2025	Conflict of interest and regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) P-10-2025-003902	Priority written questionwith 23 co-authors	21 Jan 2026
25 Sept 2025	Activities of Danish companies indirectly supporting Russia’s war efforts and undermining EU sanctions against the Russian regime E-10-2025-003734	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	19 Nov 2025
20 May 2025	Mink farming and the protection of animal welfare E-10-2025-002013	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	30 Jul 2025
12 May 2025	Evidence supporting Commission statement about ‘undue lobbying activities’ by NGOs receiving grants under the LIFE programme P-10-2025-001870	Priority written questionwith 2 co-authors	14 Jul 2025
2 May 2025	Urgency of regulating trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and phasing out PFAS pesticides to safeguard water resilience and public health in the EU E-10-2025-001786	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	3 Jul 2025
28 Apr 2025	Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) E-10-2025-001693	Written questionwith 30 co-authors	2 Jul 2025
13 Apr 2025	Compliance with the directive on the welfare of pigs E-10-2025-001516	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	2 Jul 2025
25 Mar 2025	Draft 15th amendment to the Hungarian Constitution E-10-2025-001233	Written questionwith 32 co-authors	23 Jul 2025
14 Mar 2025	Country benchmarking in the EU Deforestation Regulation E-10-2025-001107	Written question	20 Jun 2025
12 Mar 2025	Menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2025-001083	Written questionwith 38 co-authors	16 Jun 2025
12 Mar 2025	Period poverty in the EU: actions by the Commission E-10-2025-001082	Written questionwith 40 co-authors	13 Jun 2025
19 Feb 2025	Use by Danish Fishers PO of EMFAF funding intended to promote sustainable fisheries P-10-2025-000770	Priority written question	25 Mar 2025
4 Feb 2025	Ensuring transparent and publicly accessible data on grid costs E-10-2025-000476	Written question	25 Mar 2025
28 Jan 2025	Meta’s discriminatory terms and conditions against the LGBTQIA+ community under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-000384	Written questionwith 34 co-authors	28 Mar 2025
13 Jan 2025	Targeted amendment of the Habitats Directive to downgrade the protection status of the wolf E-10-2025-000102	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	14 Mar 2025
23 Dec 2024	Prevention of cruelty during animal transport at borders to non-EU states E-10-2024-003083	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	10 Mar 2025
2 Dec 2024	Potential downgrade of the protection status of the wolf E-10-2024-002717	Written questionwith 27 co-authors	18 Feb 2025
28 Nov 2024	Blatant disregard of International Criminal Court decisions by the Hungarian Prime Minister E-10-2024-002697	Written questionwith 45 co-authors	6 Feb 2025
12 Nov 2024	The Commission’s plans to include the revision of the outstanding proposals on animal welfare in its work plan for 2025 O-10-2024-000014	Oral questionwith 37 co-authors	Not yet answered
6 Nov 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against Russia B-10-2024-0162	Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors	—

Amendments tabled in committee, 111

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790938	CJ53	6
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790932	CJ53	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790933	CJ53	4
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790005	CJ53	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936	CJ53	2
10 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ENVI-AM-789913	ENVI	24
29 Jun 2026	UN Climate Change Conference 2026 in Antalya, Turkey (COP31) ENVI-AM-790214	ENVI	16
29 Jun 2026	UN Climate Change Conference 2026 in Antalya, Turkey (COP31) ENVI-AM-790213	ENVI	26
26 Jun 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) ENVI-AM-790221	ENVI	4

Show all 111 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

Delegation Denmark National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257038?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Sigrid FRIIS”. Member record. memberId 257038. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257038?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257038. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257038?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257038,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Sigrid FRIIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257038?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257038?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257038. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257038. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Renew

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 33

Amendments tabled in committee, 111

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928