Member

Reinier VAN LANSCHOT

Greens · Netherlands

Group: Greens Verts/ALE
Country: Netherlands
Roll-call participation: 98.5 %ⓘ of 66 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.9 % · 2024 (from july), final votes
With majority line: 95.4 %ⓘ of 65 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.8 %

More facts (5)

National party: Volt
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 0 of 61 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, IMCO (substitute), SEDE
Member id: 256978

National party: Volt
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 0 of 61 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, IMCO (substitute), SEDE
Member id: 256978

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.5 %

65 of 66 final votes while in office

Greens median: 97.0 % (+1.5 pts)

Chamber median: 93.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.4 %

62 of 65 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.8 % (−1.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 61 votes where their group had a clear line

Abstention ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 65 votes cast

Participation 98.5 % — Greens median 97.0 %, 53 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 53 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	98.5 %
Greens median	97.0 %
Lowest in the group	1.5 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	53

With majority line 95.4 % — Greens median 96.8 %, 49 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 49 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	95.4 %
Greens median	96.8 %
Lowest in the group	84.6 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	49

2024 (from July), 66 final votes; 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 16 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	6
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	5

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Kai TEGETHOFF	Kai TEGETHOFF	Greens	Germany	100 % of 5 165 shared	94 %
Select Anna STROLENBERG	Anna STROLENBERG	Greens	Netherlands	99 % of 5 734 shared	94 %
Select Nela RIEHL	Nela RIEHL	Greens	Germany	99 % of 5 334 shared	94 %
Select Damian BOESELAGER	Damian BOESELAGER	Greens	Germany	99 % of 5 527 shared	94 %
Select Bas EICKHOUT	Bas EICKHOUT Former member	Greens	Netherlands	97 % of 4 593 shared	94 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	97 % of 5 324 shared	94 %
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Greens	Finland	97 % of 4 966 shared	94 %
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Greens	Belgium	97 % of 5 028 shared	94 %
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Greens	Germany	97 % of 5 699 shared	94 %
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Greens	Germany	97 % of 5 457 shared	94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Mohammed CHAHIM	Mohammed CHAHIM	S&D	Netherlands	88 % of 5 043 shared	83 %
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	88 % of 4 530 shared	83 %
Select Thijs REUTEN	Thijs REUTEN	S&D	Netherlands	88 % of 5 601 shared	83 %
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	88 % of 5 096 shared	83 %
Select Marit MAIJ	Marit MAIJ	S&D	Netherlands	88 % of 5 735 shared	83 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	87 % of 4 876 shared	83 %
Select Lara WOLTERS	Lara WOLTERS	S&D	Netherlands	87 % of 5 304 shared	83 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	87 % of 4 028 shared	83 %
Select Katarina BARLEY	Katarina BARLEY	S&D	Germany	87 % of 4 119 shared	83 %
Select Murielle LAURENT	Murielle LAURENT	S&D	France	87 % of 5 298 shared	83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE Committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-RU Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Partnership Committee, the EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association CommitteeDSCA Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working group	Member	14 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working group	Member	11 Mar 2025	now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Cloud and AI Development Act	Rapporteur	IMCO	14 Sept 2026
Institutional aspects of the Common European Defence Union	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	3 Sept 2026
Establishing the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE)	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	19 May 2026
Institutional aspects of the Common European Defence Union	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	11 May 2026
Institutional aspects of the Common European Defence Union	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	11 May 2026
The Institutional Framework of the European Union and its interaction with national authorities in the application of Union law, with particular reference to Article 19 TEU	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	11 May 2026
European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	23 Mar 2026
Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	17 Feb 2026
Laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AFCO	3 Feb 2026
Flagship European defence projects of common interest	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	IMCO	14 Nov 2025

Show all 27 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

79 contributions recorded; 14 on behalf of their group; 93 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) - Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) - Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
6 Jul 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Preparation of the European Council (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 47

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
10 Sept 2026	EU exports of banned pesticides E-10-2026-003605	Written questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Jul 2026	Impact of the recent US Supreme Court ruling on the EU–US Data Privacy Framework and European data sovereignty E-10-2026-002823	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
22 Jun 2026	Proposed EUR 2 billion State aid to Tata Steel Nederland E-10-2026-002566	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	26 Aug 2026
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0307	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—
11 Jun 2026	Appointment of Jim Hagemann Snabe as Special Envoy for Industrial Artificial Intelligence E-10-2026-002410	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
1 Jun 2026	Action by EU Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič regarding trade restrictions on goods from illegal Israeli settlements E-10-2026-002215	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	17 Sept 2026
8 May 2026	Export of alumina from a Member State entering the Russian military supply chain E-10-2026-001908	Written questionwith 18 co-authors	29 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026	Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia E-10-2026-001705	Written questionwith 49 co-authors	14 Jul 2026

Show all 47 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 20

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
13 May 2026	Establishing the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE) CJ55-AM-788873	CJ55	32
27 Mar 2026	European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded AFCO-AM-786733	AFCO	8
6 Feb 2026	Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission AFCO-AM-784243	AFCO	10
14 Nov 2025	Flagship European defence projects of common interest IMCO-AM-779537	IMCO	16
28 Oct 2025	Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects CJ60-AM-778323	CJ60	51
24 Oct 2025	Amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2011/65/EU, 2013/53/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, 2014/68/EU and 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards digitalisation and common specifications IMCO-AM-779373	IMCO	1
24 Oct 2025	Amending Regulations (EU) No 765/2008, (EU) 2016/424, (EU) 2016/425, (EU) 2016/426, (EU) 2023/1230, (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/1781 as regards digitalisation and common specifications IMCO-AM-779374	IMCO	17
24 Oct 2025	Amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2011/65/EU, 2013/53/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, 2014/68/EU and 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards digitalisation and common specifications IMCO-AM-779372	IMCO	13
23 Oct 2025	Amending Directives 2009/43/EC and 2009/81/EC, as regards the simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and the simplification of security and defence procurement CJ60-AM-779329	CJ60	36
11 Sept 2025	European Defence Readiness 2030: assessment of needs SEDE-AM-776929	SEDE	12

Show all 20 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism

National delegation

Delegation Netherlands National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256978?period=2024&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Reinier VAN LANSCHOT”. Member record. memberId 256978. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256978?period=2024&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256978. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256978?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256978,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Reinier VAN LANSCHOT}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256978?period=2024&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256978?period=2024&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256978. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256978. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Greens

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 47

Amendments tabled in committee, 20

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928