Skip to content

Member · Former member

Carola RACKETE

The Left · Germany · left on 15 September 2025

Group
The Left
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
88.5 %ⓘ of 2 298 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
92.6 %ⓘ of 2 027 votes where the group had a line · The Left median 92.8 %
More facts (4)
National party
Independent
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 15 Sept 2025 (left on 15 September 2025)
Against clear line
76 of 1 866 votesⓘ
Member id
256927
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

88.5 %

2 033 of 2 298 roll calls while in office

The Left median: 88.5 % (±0.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.6 %

1 877 of 2 027 votes where their group had a line

The Left median: 92.8 % (−0.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.1 %

76 of 1 866 votes where their group had a clear line

20 opposite (for ↔ against), 44 abstained against the line, 12 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

6.0 %

121 of 2 033 votes cast

Participation 88.5 % — The Left median 88.5 %, 47 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Carola RACKETE88.5 %
The Left median88.5 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.3 %
Members47
With majority line 92.6 % — The Left median 92.8 %, 47 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Carola RACKETE92.6 %
The Left median92.8 %
Lowest in the group81.9 %
Highest in the group96.9 %
Members47
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 2 298

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 25 118 for, 522 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 137 for, 478 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 25 143 for, 478 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 25 309 for, 304 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 24 182 for, 466 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 24 184 for, 412 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 86, adding text after paragraph 22 118 for, 549 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 22 125 for, 524 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 82, adding text after paragraph 22 145 for, 529 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 22 326 for, 315 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 337 for, 311 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 21 252 for, 381 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 21 127 for, 497 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 21 160 for, 481 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 21 75 for, 519 against, 86 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 20 106 for, 523 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 19 191 for, 463 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 19 372 for, 279 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 189 for, 471 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 308 for, 309 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 81, adding text after paragraph 17 129 for, 499 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 27 to paragraph 17 151 for, 442 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 16 194 for, 387 against, 90 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 15 131 for, 513 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 15 225 for, 439 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 14 318 for, 246 against, 114 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 14 155 for, 437 against, 86 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 13 to paragraph 14 139 for, 443 against, 96 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 206 for, 457 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 12 195 for, 466 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 12 206 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 12 231 for, 411 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 30 to paragraph 12 328 for, 297 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 24 to paragraph 12 221 for, 420 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 11 321 for, 318 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 11 213 for, 450 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 11 178 for, 473 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 11 210 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 11 212 for, 448 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 11 172 for, 465 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 11 172 for, 428 against, 76 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 29 to paragraph 11 342 for, 310 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 37 to paragraph 11 151 for, 468 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 10 158 for, 475 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 7 77 for, 586 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 6 93 for, 517 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 6 66 for, 568 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 6 100 for, 505 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 4 193 for, 464 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 4 192 for, 456 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 15 of 56 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within The Left

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ilaria SALIS The LeftItaly93 % of 1 761 shared87 %
Martin SCHIRDEWAN The LeftGermany92 % of 1 923 shared87 %
Estrella GALÁN The LeftSpain92 % of 1 861 shared87 %
Mimmo LUCANO The LeftItaly91 % of 1 121 shared87 %
Özlem DEMIREL The LeftGermany91 % of 1 760 shared87 %
Damien CARÊME The LeftFrance91 % of 1 969 shared87 %
Anthony SMITH The LeftFrance91 % of 2 013 shared87 %
Marina MESURE The LeftFrance91 % of 1 987 shared87 %
Arash SAEIDI The LeftFrance91 % of 1 807 shared87 %
Leila CHAIBI The LeftFrance91 % of 1 941 shared87 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ana MIRANDA PAZ GreensSpain87 % of 1 997 shared77 %
Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ GreensSpain86 % of 1 795 shared77 %
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ GreensSpain85 % of 1 966 shared77 %
Diana RIBA I GINER GreensSpain84 % of 1 663 shared77 %
Cristina GUARDA GreensItaly84 % of 1 492 shared77 %
Mélissa CAMARA GreensFrance84 % of 1 983 shared77 %
Benedetta SCUDERI GreensItaly83 % of 1 812 shared77 %
Ignazio Roberto MARINO GreensItaly83 % of 1 844 shared77 %
Leoluca ORLANDO GreensItaly83 % of 1 844 shared77 %
David CORMAND GreensFrance83 % of 1 961 shared77 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 5 on behalf of their group; 27 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
9 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine, the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 2025One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
2 Apr 2025Outcome of the recent COP16 biodiversity negotiations in Rome (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 1 minRead
13 Mar 2025A Vision for Agriculture and Food (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
13 Feb 2025EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2025One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2025The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: the need for the European Union to contribute to resolving the humanitarian crisis of persons missing in wars and conflicts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2025Need to enforce the Digital Services Act to protect democracy on social media platforms including against foreign interference and biased algorithms (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2025One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2025Powering Europe’s future - advancing the fusion industry for energy independence and innovation (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 1 minRead

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 36

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0402Motion for a resolutionwith 71 co-authors—
23 Jul 2025Infiltration and surveillance: risks to fundamental rights, democracy and political pluralism in Italy E-10-2025-003048Written questionwith 14 co-authors25 Nov 2025
8 Jul 2025Health access in Gaza and a corridor from Gaza to East Jerusalem hospitals E-10-2025-002776Written questionwith 28 co-authors9 Oct 2025
2 Jun 2025Access for humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip E-10-2025-002193Written questionwith 21 co-authors4 Aug 2025
28 May 2025Urgent activation of the EU Blocking Statute, as requested by Parliament in its 2024 annual report on human rights and democracy in the world E-10-2025-002163Written questionwith 21 co-authors30 Jul 2025
28 May 2025EU-Israel Association Agreement O-10-2025-000019Oral questionwith 39 co-authorsNot yet answered
28 May 2025Gaza: offer of EU assistance in sidelining UN humanitarian agencies and consultation with Palestinian counterparts E-10-2025-002153Written questionwith 27 co-authors15 Jul 2025
27 May 2025Israel’s intention to take full control of the Gaza strip and remove the Palestinian population from the area – EU’s actions and reactions E-10-2025-002127Written questionwith 24 co-authors1 Aug 2025
22 May 2025Proposed liquefied natural gas facility in Pesaro, Italy E-10-2025-002065Written question7 Jul 2025
16 May 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan O-10-2025-000018Oral questionwith 6 co-authorsNot yet answered

Show all 36 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 9

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
21 May 2025Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements ENVI-AM-773311 ENVI26
21 May 2025Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements ENVI-AM-774216 ENVI40
20 May 2025The EU strategic objectives for the 20th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), to be held in to be held in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, from 24 November to 05 December 2025 ENVI-AM-773348 ENVI42
13 May 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain AGRI-AM-773314 AGRI11
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-772125 AGRI8
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-773080 AGRI7
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-773077 AGRI12
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-773078 AGRI7
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-773079 AGRI3

Show all 9 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Carola RACKETE”. Member record. memberId 256927. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256927?page=27&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256927. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256927?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256927,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Carola RACKETE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256927?page=27&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256927?page=27&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256927. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256927. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}