Skip to content

Member · Former member

Filip TUREK

Patriots · Czechia · left on 3 October 2025

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Czechia
Roll-call participation
91.3 %ⓘ of 2 298 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
75.3 %ⓘ of 2 091 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (4)
National party
AUTO Motoristé sobě
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 3 Oct 2025 (left on 3 October 2025)
Against clear line
272 of 1 623 votesⓘ
Member id
256850
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.3 %

2 099 of 2 298 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (+0.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

75.3 %

1 574 of 2 091 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (−7.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

16.8 %

272 of 1 623 votes where their group had a clear line

158 opposite (for ↔ against), 71 abstained against the line, 43 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

6.6 %

138 of 2 099 votes cast

Participation 91.3 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Filip TUREK91.3 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 75.3 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Filip TUREK75.3 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 2 298

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Final votePassed 378 for, 173 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 278 to recital 37 58 for, 515 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 277 to recital 35 55 for, 512 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 259, adding text after recital 26 178 for, 385 against, 0 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 258, adding text after recital 23 179 for, 387 against, 0 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 257 to recital 15 180 for, 392 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendments 275 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 20 173 for, 386 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendments 274 + 297 (voted as one) to Article 19 175 for, 386 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 294 to Article 13, paragraph 3, après le point c 63 for, 504 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 292 to Article 13, paragraph 3, après le point c 53 for, 461 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 254 to Article 13, paragraph 3, après le point b 56 for, 512 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 116 to Article 7, paragraph 9 369 for, 199 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 270 to Article 7, paragraph 9 176 for, 382 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 280 to Article 4, paragraph 2, après le sous-point i 60 for, 502 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 279 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 15 96 for, 459 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 151 391 for, 180 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 123 376 for, 195 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 122 378 for, 191 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 121 358 for, 208 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 120 361 for, 209 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 119 357 for, 206 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 118 371 for, 194 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 117 386 for, 174 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 100 370 for, 196 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season Final votePassed 425 for, 106 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season Amendment 8, adding text after recital 10 100 for, 440 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season Amendment 3, adding text after recital 9 102 for, 427 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
8 May 2025The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season Amendment 2, adding text after recital 8 — part 1 94 for, 478 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season Amendment 7, adding text after recital 1 366 for, 140 against, 67 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season Amendment 5, adding text after Article 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 Article 6a (c), after paragraph 5 — part 1 92 for, 472 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season Amendment 4 to Article 1, après l'alinéa 1 Règlement (UE) 2017/1938; Article 6 bis, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 75 for, 465 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025The protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus) Final votePassed 371 for, 162 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025The protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus) Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) 171 for, 365 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Final votePassed 458 for, 101 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 2, adding text after recital 5 209 for, 339 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 1, adding text after recital 5 146 for, 372 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 8 to recital 5 207 for, 349 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 18 to recital 5 180 for, 350 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 7 to recital 4 178 for, 350 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 6 to recital 3 206 for, 349 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 17 to recital 3 180 for, 353 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 16 to recital 3 180 for, 348 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 5 to recital 2 202 for, 350 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 15 to recital 2 179 for, 349 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 14, adding text after recital 1 182 for, 353 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 13, adding text after recital 1 205 for, 350 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 12, adding text after recital 1 199 for, 354 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 23 to Article 1, paragraph 1, après le point 3 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 15, paragraph 1 159 for, 347 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 11 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 3 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 8 207 for, 348 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 Amendment 22 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 3 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 8 178 for, 351 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 17 of 56 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland74 % of 1 650 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal74 % of 1 972 shared74 %
Tomasz BUCZEK changed group PatriotsPoland73 % of 1 982 shared74 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium73 % of 2 093 shared74 %
Anna Maria CISINT PatriotsItaly73 % of 1 499 shared74 %
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PatriotsPortugal72 % of 2 020 shared74 %
Barbara BONTE PatriotsBelgium72 % of 1 997 shared74 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain72 % of 2 039 shared74 %
Pierre PIMPIE PatriotsFrance72 % of 1 956 shared74 %
Gerolf ANNEMANS PatriotsBelgium72 % of 1 810 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany72 % of 954 shared65 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance72 % of 1 561 shared68 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany71 % of 1 619 shared70 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance71 % of 2 006 shared70 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance70 % of 1 916 shared68 %
Markus BUCHHEIT ESNGermany70 % of 1 832 shared70 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany70 % of 1 796 shared70 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance70 % of 2 012 shared68 %
Siegbert Frank DROESE ESNGermany70 % of 1 687 shared70 %
René AUST ESNGermany70 % of 1 856 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

6 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 8 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
10 Sept 2025After 10 years, time to end mass migration now - protect our women and children (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Sept 2025Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: simplification and strengthening (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2025Need for the EU to scale up clean technologies (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Mar 2025Action Plan for the Automotive Industry (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
27 Nov 2024Topical debate (Rule 169) - Budapest Declaration on the New European Competitiveness Deal - A future for the farming and manufacturing sectors in the EU (topical debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 3 minRead
8 Oct 2024The crisis facing the EU’s automotive industry, potential plant closures and the need to enhance competitiveness and maintain jobs in Europe (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 6 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 50

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
23 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the brutal murders of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska and US political activist Charlie Kirk, and the need to defend vulnerable individuals and uphold law and order B-10-2025-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 82 co-authors—
22 Sept 2025Risk of unfair competition due to method of calculating tyre emissions E-10-2025-003665Written questionwith 14 co-authors3 Dec 2025
18 Sept 2025Classification of political expressions and satire under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-003616Written questionwith 39 co-authors18 Nov 2025
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
12 Sept 2025EU funding of non-governmental organisations E-10-2025-003526Written questionwith 35 co-authors21 Nov 2025
16 Jul 2025Missing CBAM benchmark values and impending competitive disadvantages for European companies E-10-2025-002914Written question8 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0319Motion for a resolutionwith 76 co-authors—
20 Jun 2025NGO funding through the LIFE programme E-10-2025-002493Written questionwith 33 co-authors27 Aug 2025
19 Jun 2025Delegated act on low carbon hydrogen E-10-2025-002477Written question14 Aug 2025
18 Jun 2025Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1184 on renewable fuels of non-biological origin E-10-2025-002461Written question31 Jul 2025

Show all 50 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 49

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
23 Sept 2025Laying a framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest, and amending Regulation (EU) 2024/795 ENVI-AM-776969 ENVI5
2 Sept 2025Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality ITRE-AM-776811 ITRE1
16 Jul 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections ENVI-AM-775712 ENVI7
10 Jul 2025Protection of minors online IMCO-AM-774602 IMCO2
2 Jul 2025on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/695, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/1153, (EU) 2023/1525 and 2024/795, as regards incentivising defence-related investments in the EU budget to implement the ReArm Europe Plan ITRE-AM-775462 ITRE11
30 Jun 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) ENVI-AM-775454 ENVI7
30 Jun 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) ENVI-AM-775453 ENVI2
4 Jun 2025Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 CJ52-AM-774328 CJ526
4 Jun 2025Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 CJ52-AM-774325 CJ5214
22 May 2025Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement ITRE-AM-773329 ITRE6

Show all 49 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Czechia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Filip TUREK”. Member record. memberId 256850. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256850?page=16&vscope=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256850. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256850?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256850,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Filip TUREK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256850?page=16&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256850?page=16&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256850. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256850. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}