Skip to content

Member

Jana NAGYOVÁ

Patriots · Czechia

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Czechia
Roll-call participation
98.6 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line
70.2 %ⓘ of 503 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 77.2 %
More facts (5)
National party
ANO 2011
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
84 of 385 votesⓘ
Committees
BUDG, ENVI, ITRE, TRAN (substitute)
Member id
256843
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.6 %

509 of 516 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 93.3 % (+5.3 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

70.2 %

353 of 503 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 77.2 % (−7.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

21.8 %

84 of 385 votes where their group had a clear line

27 opposite (for ↔ against), 51 abstained against the line, 6 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

19.1 %

97 of 509 votes cast

Participation 98.6 % — Patriots median 93.3 %, 86 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 86 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Jana NAGYOVÁ98.6 %
Patriots median93.3 %
Lowest in the group23.1 %
Highest in the group100.0 %
Members86
With majority line 70.2 % — Patriots median 77.2 %, 86 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 86 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Jana NAGYOVÁ70.2 %
Patriots median77.2 %
Lowest in the group67.3 %
Highest in the group95.1 %
Members86
  • 2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202421
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249291
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 20241312
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245756
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244545

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Klara DOSTALOVA PatriotsCzechia98 % of 4 026 shared74 %
Ondřej KNOTEK PatriotsCzechia98 % of 4 651 shared74 %
Tomáš KUBÍN PatriotsCzechia98 % of 4 794 shared74 %
Jaroslava POKORNÁ JERMANOVÁ PatriotsCzechia98 % of 4 446 shared74 %
Jaroslav BŽOCH PatriotsCzechia98 % of 4 836 shared74 %
Jaroslav KNOT PatriotsCzechia97 % of 2 376 shared74 %
Ondřej KOVAŘÍK Former memberPatriotsCzechia96 % of 1 154 shared74 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia86 % of 3 367 shared74 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia79 % of 2 772 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal77 % of 4 915 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia72 % of 1 262 shared57 %
Mario MANTOVANI ECRItaly71 % of 3 794 shared68 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance71 % of 4 465 shared68 %
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA ECRPoland70 % of 4 633 shared68 %
Alessandro CIRIANI ECRItaly70 % of 4 433 shared68 %
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI ECRPoland70 % of 5 065 shared68 %
Stefano CAVEDAGNA ECRItaly70 % of 4 465 shared68 %
Ruggero RAZZA ECRItaly70 % of 4 115 shared68 %
Georgiana TEODORESCU ECRRomania70 % of 4 841 shared68 %
Marco SQUARTA ECRItaly70 % of 3 963 shared68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeMember5 May 2025now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember20 Jan 2025now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN CommitteeSubstitute24 Apr 2026now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with IndiaD-IN DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Feb 2025now
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeSubstitute12 Dec 20244 May 2025
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember16 Sept 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
European Union Space Services Agency and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/696Shadow rapporteur for an opinionBUDG23 Sept 2026
Protection of rail passengers with single ticketsShadow rapporteurTRAN22 Sept 2026
Connecting Europe through high-speed railShadow rapporteurTRAN28 May 2026
European Union Space Services Agency and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/696Shadow rapporteurITRE27 May 2026
Establishing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, for the period 2028-2034 laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/695Shadow rapporteur for an opinionBUDG7 Apr 2026
Establishing the Specific Programme implementing Horizon Europe - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034, laying down the rules for participation and dissemination under that ProgrammeShadow rapporteur for an opinionBUDG24 Mar 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationENVI19 Mar 2026
Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153Shadow rapporteur for an opinionBUDG6 Mar 2026
Amending Decision (EU) 2015/1814 as regards the market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorShadow rapporteurENVI3 Mar 2026
Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869Shadow rapporteurITRE26 Feb 2026

Show all 30 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

20 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 29 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 20 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 51

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
9 Sept 2026The 28th regime/EU Inc.: can the Commission guarantee the soundness of its legal basis? P-10-2026-003589Priority written questionwith 17 co-authorsNot yet answered
16 Jul 2026Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035Written questionwith 42 co-authors11 Sept 2026
10 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines B-10-2026-0280Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
7 May 2026Interpretation of Annex V (Row 1) to the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation on grouped packaging and impact on supply chains E-10-2026-001896Written questionwith 17 co-authors16 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026Digital gambling advertising E-10-2026-001710Written questionwith 16 co-authors3 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026De facto mandatory nature of the codes of conduct on disinformation and hate speech E-10-2026-001432Written questionwith 23 co-authors15 Jun 2026
18 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation amending Annex III to Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential B-10-2026-0178Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors—
3 Feb 2026Ensuring patient safety for all Europeans: the need to establish a warning system for disqualified medical professionals E-10-2026-000428Written questionwith 24 co-authors27 Mar 2026
28 Jan 2026Transparency of the Commission’s relations with the arms industry P-10-2026-000352Priority written questionwith 13 co-authors31 Mar 2026
27 Jan 2026Extending anti-dumping duties to Chinese hybrid vehicles E-10-2026-000346Written questionwith 10 co-authors13 Apr 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors—
17 Dec 2025Music and arts festival organisers under the Package Travel Directive P-10-2025-004984Priority written questionwith 11 co-authors4 Mar 2026
16 Dec 2025Expansion of Erasmus and the rule of law E-10-2025-004957Written questionwith 22 co-authors26 Feb 2026
15 Dec 2025Procedural gaps and the agricultural and supply-chain impact of the proposed REACH restriction on calcium cyanamide E-10-2025-004943Written questionwith 7 co-authors11 Feb 2026
8 Dec 2025The Automotive Omnibus E-10-2025-004851Written questionwith 19 co-authors18 Feb 2026
2 Dec 2025Inquiry on politicians on university boards E-10-2025-004762Written questionwith 20 co-authors23 Mar 2026
1 Dec 2025Regulatory barriers to critical raw material extraction in the EU E-10-2025-004738Written questionwith 15 co-authors28 Jan 2026
14 Nov 2025Providing financial and regulatory incentives for nuclear energy in the EU E-10-2025-004561Written questionwith 47 co-authors23 Mar 2026
4 Nov 2025Reassessing the 2035 combustion engine ban in light of advanced biofuels E-10-2025-004328Written questionwith 21 co-authors5 Mar 2026
17 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 8 July 2025 supplementing Directive (EU) 2024/1788 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuels B-10-2025-0464Motion for a resolutionwith 48 co-authors—
25 Sept 2025Deforestation Regulation – objection to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1093 P-10-2025-003737Priority written questionwith 25 co-authors23 Jan 2026
18 Sept 2025Classification of political expressions and satire under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-003616Written questionwith 39 co-authors18 Nov 2025
12 Sept 2025EU funding of non-governmental organisations E-10-2025-003526Written questionwith 35 co-authors21 Nov 2025
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
26 Jun 2025Potential electricity grid imbalance due to intermittent supply from renewables E-10-2025-002586Written questionwith 22 co-authors19 Sept 2025
20 Jun 2025NGO funding through the LIFE programme E-10-2025-002493Written questionwith 33 co-authors27 Aug 2025
18 Jun 2025Removing barriers to enable delivery of sustainable aviation fuel to the EU E-10-2025-002460Written question16 Oct 2025
11 Jun 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Clean Industrial Deal B-10-2025-0278Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors—
16 May 2025Proposed annual roadworthiness tests for vehicles more than 10 years old E-10-2025-001972Written questionwith 28 co-authors17 Jul 2025
30 Apr 2025Proposed ban on lead in ammunition P-10-2025-001769Priority written questionwith 12 co-authors13 Jun 2025
1 Apr 2025Commission’s response to the impact of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) on the competitiveness of EU businesses E-10-2025-001325Written questionwith 19 co-authors13 May 2025
1 Apr 2025Mandatory targets for corporate fleets E-10-2025-001328Written questionwith 47 co-authors15 May 2025
21 Mar 2025Amendment to Regulation 2019/631 on CO<sub>2</sub> emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles P-10-2025-001219Priority written questionwith 15 co-authors24 Apr 2025
19 Mar 2025Energy-intensive industries O-10-2025-000010Oral questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Mar 2025Double standards in EU nuclear policy E-10-2025-001101Written questionwith 17 co-authors23 May 2025
13 Mar 2025CO<sub>2</sub> emission performance standards for cars and vans (Regulation (EU) 2019/631) E-10-2025-001085Written questionwith 12 co-authors1 Jul 2025
25 Feb 2025EU funds to environmental lobbying groups to promote the European Green Deal E-10-2025-000838Written questionwith 6 co-authors12 May 2025
25 Feb 2025Commission payments to media in Europe E-10-2025-000839Written questionwith 6 co-authorsNot yet answered
18 Feb 2025Public procurement and EU international agreements following CJEU case C-652/22 P-10-2025-000725Priority written questionwith 4 co-authors16 Apr 2025
4 Feb 2025New ecodesign directive: risk of a ban on wood-burning stoves E-10-2025-000487Written questionwith 1 co-author24 Mar 2025
30 Jan 2025Changes to Commissioner Jørgensen’s mission letter E-10-2025-000416Written questionwith 11 co-authors10 Jun 2025
29 Jan 2025The Commission’s response to the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement E-10-2025-000403Written questionwith 36 co-authors24 Mar 2025
14 Dec 2024New EU fleet-wide CO<sub>2</sub> emission standards for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles P-10-2024-002955Priority written questionwith 22 co-authors15 Jan 2025
5 Dec 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Dismantling Overregulation and Government Encroachment: reclaiming competitiveness and innovation in the European Union B-10-2024-0214Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
29 Nov 2024Union database for biofuels – Article 31a of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 (as amended by Directive (EU) 2023/2413) P-10-2024-002741Priority written questionwith 3 co-authors21 Feb 2025
12 Nov 2024Question on penalties to be imposed on manufacturers from 2025 under the Regulation on CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles E-10-2024-002503Written questionwith 52 co-authors7 Jan 2025
16 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The case of José Daniel Ferrer García in Cuba B-10-2024-0042Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
16 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela B-10-2024-0027Motion for a resolutionwith 9 co-authors—
16 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the “Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice” B-10-2024-0040Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors—
6 Sept 2024Potential retroactive ban on diesel-powered passenger vehicles E-10-2024-001642Written questionwith 15 co-authors31 Jan 2025
29 Jul 2024Preliminary findings against X on breaching the Digital Services Act and a secret deal with other platforms E-10-2024-001450Written questionwith 12 co-authors9 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 126

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
16 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792057 REGI18
10 Sept 2026on the proposal for a Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ITRE-AM-790812 ITRE16
10 Sept 2026Amending Directives 2001/18/EC and 2010/53/EU as regards the placing on the market of genetically modified micro-organisms and the processing of organs CJ64-AM-792138 CJ644
10 Sept 2026Amending Directives 2001/18/EC and 2010/53/EU as regards the placing on the market of genetically modified micro-organisms and the processing of organs CJ64-AM-792139 CJ648
7 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792058 REGI49
28 Jul 2026Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-791123 ENVI32
27 Jul 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791874 CJ722
27 Jul 2026on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2011/61/EU and 2014/65/EU as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791126 ECON1
27 Jul 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790967 CJ722
27 Jul 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791073 CJ721

Show all 126 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Czechia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Jana NAGYOVÁ”. Member record. memberId 256843. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256843?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256843. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256843?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256843,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Jana NAGYOVÁ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256843?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256843?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256843. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256843. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}