Group

S&D

Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats

Seats: 135 of 718 current members
Cohesion, final votes: 0.94ⓘ over 619 of 620 final votes (enough members voting)
Cohesion, all roll calls: 0.93ⓘ over 5 926 of 5 928 roll calls (enough members voting)
On the winning side: 571 of 619ⓘ final votes decided by a simple majority where its clear line matched the outcome — of 620 final votes, 1 failed for want of an absolute majority and is not counted

More facts (6)

Official name: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
Code: S&D
Alignment: Centre-left · social democracy
Founded: 1953 (as Socialist Group; S&D since 2009)
Closest line: Renew — 97 % of 563 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 11 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Official name: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
Code: S&D
Alignment: Centre-left · social democracy
Founded: 1953 (as Socialist Group; S&D since 2009)
Closest line: Renew — 97 % of 563 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 11 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Cite this page

Link to this page

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index of the group on final roll-call votes, per quarter (1 = all voted the same way). Members counted in their group on the day; a vote counts for the group when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted, and a gap is a quarter with fewer than 20 votes counted. The other groups are the faint lines.

S&D: 0.94 over the whole period (619 votes), 0.96 in Q4 2024 and 0.93 in Q3 2026.

Data as a table

Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
Period	S&D	The Left	Greens	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN
Q3 2024	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—8 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes
Q4 2024	0.9657 votes	0.8157 votes	0.9457 votes	0.8357 votes	0.8657 votes	0.7457 votes	0.7457 votes	0.8757 votes
Q1 2025	0.9730 votes	0.7130 votes	0.9330 votes	0.9130 votes	0.9230 votes	0.7330 votes	0.7630 votes	0.8130 votes
Q2 2025	0.9484 votes	0.7884 votes	0.9384 votes	0.9584 votes	0.9384 votes	0.7184 votes	0.7184 votes	0.8784 votes
Q3 2025	0.9458 votes	0.7658 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9358 votes	0.9458 votes	0.8258 votes	0.7258 votes	0.8558 votes
Q4 2025	0.94121 votes	0.84121 votes	0.95121 votes	0.86121 votes	0.88121 votes	0.78121 votes	0.73121 votes	0.87121 votes
Q1 2026	0.9489 votes	0.7588 votes	0.8989 votes	0.8689 votes	0.9189 votes	0.7589 votes	0.7189 votes	0.8689 votes
Q2 2026	0.9599 votes	0.7599 votes	0.9299 votes	0.92100 votes	0.94100 votes	0.76100 votes	0.7299 votes	0.8299 votes
Q3 2026	0.9372 votes	0.7572 votes	0.9172 votes	0.8672 votes	0.8972 votes	0.7572 votes	0.6772 votes	0.8772 votes
Whole period	0.94	0.77	0.93	0.89	0.91	0.76	0.72	0.85
Votes considered	619	618	619	619	620	620	619	619

620 of 794 decisions of the term had a final vote recorded by name; those are the votes counted. A gap: fewer than 20 votes counted in the quarter (method). Cohesion of every group.

Cohesion by committee and topic

The group’s Agreement Index over the term’s roll calls, by the dossier’s lead committee and by topic. Topics are model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked).

By lead committee (25)

Lead committee: the committee that led the dossier. Votes: the term’s roll calls on its dossiers. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Lead committee	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign AffairsAFET	639	0.93
BudgetsBUDG	375	0.93
Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI	337	0.92
Budgetary ControlCONT	323	0.98
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE	323	0.94
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM	287	0.98
Economic and Monetary AffairsECON	249	0.92
International TradeINTA	203	0.88
Legal AffairsJURI	195	0.96
Employment and Social AffairsEMPL	193	0.98
Industry, Research and EnergyITRE	175	0.94
Housing Crisis (special committee)HOUS	154	0.82
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO	122	0.98
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI	87	0.82
European Democracy Shield (special committee)EUDS	85	0.97
Constitutional AffairsAFCO	70	0.92
FisheriesPECH	65	0.96
PetitionsPETI	61	0.90
Security and DefenceSEDE	49	0.89
DevelopmentDEVE	44	0.96
Culture and EducationCULT	28	0.94
Public HealthSANT	23	0.90
Regional DevelopmentREGI	11	—
Transport and TourismTRAN	8	—
LEGILEGI	2	—

By topic (model-assigned) (15)

Topic: model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked). Votes: the term’s roll calls on decisions with that topic. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Topic	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign affairs	2 136	0.93
Economy & single market	1 257	0.92
EU budget & funds	1 092	0.94
Defence & security	703	0.92
Justice, rule of law & rights	610	0.95
Jobs, social affairs & equality	606	0.98
Climate & environment	519	0.94
Agriculture, food & fisheries	364	0.85
Digital, AI & data	297	0.94
EU institutions & Parliament	292	0.93
Trade & customs	269	0.90
Health	260	0.93
Migration & asylum	122	0.94
Energy	92	0.95
Transport & tourism	84	0.95

Agreement with other groups

How often the group took the same line as each other group on the term’s final votes, groups at the date of each vote.

Same line: of the votes compared, the share where the two groups’ clear lines were the same. Votes compared: final votes where both groups had a clear line (at least two thirds of their votes cast, at least 10 members voting); a vote where either was divided is left out. A count instead of a share under 20 votes.
Group	Same line	Votes compared
Renew	97 %	563
EPP	91 %	571
Greens	90 %	593
ECR	72 %	506
The Left	66 %	502
Patriots	46 %	484
ESN	27 %	587

Agreement between every pair of groups, winning sides and pivotal groups

Members, 139

Members whose group is S&D now (former members: on their last day in office), with their record. Switchers are marked ⇄ and counted in the group of each vote’s date.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Open in the member register

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members of S&D
Select	Member, sort A to Z	Country, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Adnan DIBRANI	Adnan DIBRANI	Sweden	97.5 % of 5 928	+7.7 pts median 89.9 %	93.3 % of 5 780	−3.0 pts median 96.3 %	6.1 % of 5 683	4.0 % of 5 782
Select Alessandra MORETTI	Alessandra MORETTI	Italy	94.2 % of 5 928	+4.3 pts median 89.9 %	97.3 % of 5 581	+1.1 pts median 96.3 %	2.0 % of 5 488	2.2 % of 5 583
Select Alessandro ZAN	Alessandro ZAN	Italy	93.9 % of 5 928	+4.1 pts median 89.9 %	94.2 % of 5 567	−2.0 pts median 96.3 %	4.9 % of 5 471	2.2 % of 5 569
Select Alex AGIUS SALIBA	Alex AGIUS SALIBA	Malta	78.6 % of 5 928	−11.3 pts median 89.9 %	81.9 % of 4 657	−14.4 pts median 96.3 %	17.6 % of 4 581	5.6 % of 4 659
Select Alicia HOMS GINEL	Alicia HOMS GINEL	Spain	84.5 % of 5 928	−5.3 pts median 89.9 %	98.3 % of 5 009	+2.0 pts median 96.3 %	1.1 % of 4 939	2.0 % of 5 011
Select Ana Catarina MENDES	Ana Catarina MENDES	Portugal	90.5 % of 5 928	+0.7 pts median 89.9 %	98.5 % of 5 365	+2.3 pts median 96.3 %	1.1 % of 5 274	1.8 % of 5 366
Select Andi CRISTEA	Andi CRISTEA	Romania	90.9 % of 5 503	+1.1 pts median 89.9 %	95.3 % of 5 001	−0.9 pts median 96.3 %	4.2 % of 4 922	3.6 % of 5 003
Select André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	Portugal	85.3 % of 5 928	−4.6 pts median 89.9 %	98.9 % of 5 054	+2.7 pts median 96.3 %	0.8 % of 4 963	1.9 % of 5 056
Select Andreas SCHIEDER	Andreas SCHIEDER	Austria	93.9 % of 5 928	+4.1 pts median 89.9 %	96.5 % of 5 567	+0.3 pts median 96.3 %	3.0 % of 5 485	2.8 % of 5 569
Select Annalisa CORRADO	Annalisa CORRADO	Italy	79.5 % of 5 928	−10.3 pts median 89.9 %	96.7 % of 4 711	+0.4 pts median 96.3 %	2.7 % of 4 641	1.9 % of 4 713
Select Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN	Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN	Ireland	76.2 % of 5 928	−13.7 pts median 89.9 %	95.6 % of 4 515	−0.6 pts median 96.3 %	3.9 % of 4 439	2.9 % of 4 516
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	France	79.0 % of 5 928	−10.9 pts median 89.9 %	93.1 % of 4 681	−3.1 pts median 96.3 %	6.2 % of 4 621	2.0 % of 4 682
Select Bernd LANGE	Bernd LANGE	Germany	90.2 % of 5 928	+0.4 pts median 89.9 %	98.1 % of 5 348	+1.8 pts median 96.3 %	1.2 % of 5 253	1.6 % of 5 350
Select Biljana BORZAN	Biljana BORZAN	Croatia	92.0 % of 5 928	+2.1 pts median 89.9 %	92.9 % of 5 449	−3.4 pts median 96.3 %	6.5 % of 5 359	3.9 % of 5 451
Select Birgit SIPPEL	Birgit SIPPEL	Germany	78.6 % of 5 928	−11.2 pts median 89.9 %	97.1 % of 4 660	+0.8 pts median 96.3 %	2.2 % of 4 589	0.8 % of 4 662
Select Brando BENIFEI	Brando BENIFEI	Italy	78.5 % of 5 928	−11.4 pts median 89.9 %	95.9 % of 4 651	−0.3 pts median 96.3 %	3.4 % of 4 578	2.0 % of 4 653
Select Bruno GONÇALVES	Bruno GONÇALVES	Portugal	85.7 % of 5 928	−4.2 pts median 89.9 %	95.5 % of 5 077	−0.7 pts median 96.3 %	4.0 % of 4 987	2.1 % of 5 079
Select Bruno TOBBACK	Bruno TOBBACK	Belgium	95.1 % of 5 928	+5.2 pts median 89.9 %	98.3 % of 5 634	+2.1 pts median 96.3 %	1.2 % of 5 540	1.9 % of 5 636
Select Camilla LAURETI	Camilla LAURETI	Italy	97.7 % of 5 928	+7.9 pts median 89.9 %	99.0 % of 5 791	+2.7 pts median 96.3 %	0.8 % of 5 703	2.0 % of 5 793
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	Portugal	92.2 % of 5 928	+2.3 pts median 89.9 %	99.0 % of 5 462	+2.7 pts median 96.3 %	0.6 % of 5 373	1.7 % of 5 464
Select Cecilia STRADA	Cecilia STRADA	Italy	92.7 % of 5 928	+2.8 pts median 89.9 %	92.2 % of 5 492	−4.0 pts median 96.3 %	7.0 % of 5 399	2.4 % of 5 494
Select César LUENA	César LUENA	Spain	93.5 % of 5 928	+3.6 pts median 89.9 %	96.9 % of 5 540	+0.7 pts median 96.3 %	2.2 % of 5 445	2.1 % of 5 542
Select Chloé RIDEL	Chloé RIDEL	France	63.3 % of 5 928	−26.5 pts median 89.9 %	92.9 % of 3 753	−3.4 pts median 96.3 %	6.5 % of 3 693	2.5 % of 3 754
Select Christel SCHALDEMOSE	Christel SCHALDEMOSE	Denmark	95.3 % of 5 928	+5.4 pts median 89.9 %	90.9 % of 5 647	−5.4 pts median 96.3 %	8.7 % of 5 563	3.4 % of 5 648
Select Christophe CLERGEAU	Christophe CLERGEAU	France	84.6 % of 5 928	−5.2 pts median 89.9 %	92.7 % of 5 015	−3.6 pts median 96.3 %	6.6 % of 4 929	2.4 % of 5 017
Select Claire FITA	Claire FITA	France	77.4 % of 5 928	−12.5 pts median 89.9 %	92.8 % of 4 586	−3.4 pts median 96.3 %	6.4 % of 4 513	2.4 % of 4 587
Select Claudiu MANDA	Claudiu MANDA	Romania	45.8 % of 5 928	−44.1 pts median 89.9 %	93.8 % of 2 714	−2.5 pts median 96.3 %	5.8 % of 2 678	4.3 % of 2 715
Select Costas MAVRIDES	Costas MAVRIDES	Cyprus	66.9 % of 5 928	−22.9 pts median 89.9 %	93.9 % of 3 966	−2.3 pts median 96.3 %	5.8 % of 3 901	2.2 % of 3 968
Select Cristina MAESTRE	Cristina MAESTRE	Spain	91.4 % of 5 928	+1.5 pts median 89.9 %	97.1 % of 5 416	+0.9 pts median 96.3 %	2.0 % of 5 324	1.8 % of 5 418
Select Csaba MOLNÁR	Csaba MOLNÁR	Hungary	76.5 % of 5 928	−13.4 pts median 89.9 %	95.2 % of 4 530	−1.1 pts median 96.3 %	4.3 % of 4 458	1.1 % of 4 532
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	Romania	60.4 % of 5 928	−29.4 pts median 89.9 %	95.5 % of 3 581	−0.7 pts median 96.3 %	4.1 % of 3 527	1.7 % of 3 583
Select Daniel ATTARD	Daniel ATTARD	Malta	84.4 % of 5 928	−5.5 pts median 89.9 %	85.0 % of 4 999	−11.3 pts median 96.3 %	14.5 % of 4 921	6.0 % of 5 001
Select Dario NARDELLA	Dario NARDELLA	Italy	66.8 % of 5 928	−23.1 pts median 89.9 %	96.5 % of 3 957	+0.3 pts median 96.3 %	2.7 % of 3 889	2.2 % of 3 959
Select Delara BURKHARDT	Delara BURKHARDT	Germany	77.1 % of 5 928	−12.8 pts median 89.9 %	96.9 % of 4 568	+0.7 pts median 96.3 %	2.2 % of 4 483	1.6 % of 4 569
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	Romania	60.5 % of 5 928	−29.4 pts median 89.9 %	94.2 % of 3 583	−2.1 pts median 96.3 %	5.4 % of 3 530	3.8 % of 3 585
Select Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Finland	90.3 % of 5 928	+0.4 pts median 89.9 %	95.4 % of 5 350	−0.9 pts median 96.3 %	4.2 % of 5 255	4.0 % of 5 352
Select Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Spain	99.2 % of 5 928	+9.3 pts median 89.9 %	97.3 % of 5 877	+1.1 pts median 96.3 %	1.9 % of 5 781	2.3 % of 5 879
Select Elio DI RUPO	Elio DI RUPO	Belgium	89.9 % of 5 928	±0.0 pts median 89.9 %	90.2 % of 5 326	−6.1 pts median 96.3 %	9.2 % of 5 240	2.4 % of 5 328
Select Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Austria	98.9 % of 5 928	+9.1 pts median 89.9 %	96.2 % of 5 863	−0.1 pts median 96.3 %	3.2 % of 5 771	3.4 % of 5 864
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Italy	83.9 % of 5 928	not compared median 89.9 %	96.3 % of 4 970	not compared median 96.3 %	3.2 % of 4 886	2.7 % of 4 973
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	France	70.3 % of 5 928	−19.5 pts median 89.9 %	92.8 % of 4 169	−3.5 pts median 96.3 %	6.5 % of 4 109	2.2 % of 4 170
Select Eric SARGIACOMO	Eric SARGIACOMO	France	93.2 % of 5 928	+3.3 pts median 89.9 %	93.0 % of 5 520	−3.2 pts median 96.3 %	6.3 % of 5 438	2.5 % of 5 522
Select Estelle CEULEMANS	Estelle CEULEMANS	Belgium	94.0 % of 5 928	+4.2 pts median 89.9 %	85.5 % of 5 572	−10.8 pts median 96.3 %	13.7 % of 5 475	3.3 % of 5 574
Select Evelyn REGNER	Evelyn REGNER	Austria	97.1 % of 5 928	+7.3 pts median 89.9 %	95.6 % of 5 756	−0.7 pts median 96.3 %	3.6 % of 5 659	2.8 % of 5 758
Select Evin INCIR	Evin INCIR	Sweden	99.5 % of 5 928	+9.6 pts median 89.9 %	93.7 % of 5 894	−2.6 pts median 96.3 %	5.6 % of 5 797	3.6 % of 5 896
Select Francisco ASSIS	Francisco ASSIS	Portugal	81.0 % of 5 928	−8.8 pts median 89.9 %	98.6 % of 4 801	+2.3 pts median 96.3 %	1.1 % of 4 727	1.7 % of 4 803
Select François KALFON	François KALFON	France	89.7 % of 5 928	−0.2 pts median 89.9 %	92.9 % of 5 315	−3.3 pts median 96.3 %	6.5 % of 5 239	3.0 % of 5 317
Select Gabriela FIREA	Gabriela FIREA	Romania	65.7 % of 5 928	−24.1 pts median 89.9 %	94.4 % of 3 894	−1.9 pts median 96.3 %	5.1 % of 3 821	4.3 % of 3 895
Select Gabriele BISCHOFF	Gabriele BISCHOFF	Germany	96.2 % of 5 928	+6.4 pts median 89.9 %	97.9 % of 5 701	+1.6 pts median 96.3 %	1.4 % of 5 608	1.8 % of 5 703
Select Georgia TRAMACERE	Georgia TRAMACERE	Italy	89.0 % of 2 244	−0.8 pts median 89.9 %	95.9 % of 1 998	−0.3 pts median 96.3 %	3.0 % of 1 950	2.2 % of 1 998

National delegations

The group’s current members by country and national party.

Country: the delegation. Members: the group’s current members from that country. National parties: their parties, with the number of members of each.
Country	Members	National parties
Spain	20	PSOE 19 · PSC-PSOE 1
Italy	19	PD 19
Germany	14	SPD 14
France	13	PS 10 · Place publique 3
Romania	11	PSD 9 · PSD 1 · PUSL 1
Portugal	8	PS 8
Austria	5	SPÖ 5
Sweden	5	S 5
Belgium	4	PS 2 · Vooruit 2
Greece	4	KINAL 4

Show all 25 delegations

Line on the final votes, 620

The group’s line on every final roll-call vote of the term, newest first, with its members counted in the group they sat in on the day.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.
Date	Vote	Majority line	In the group	Result
16 Jun 2026	Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 129 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 563 for, 44 against, 56 abstained
16 Jun 2026	Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 119 for, 8 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 560 for, 75 against, 25 abstained
16 Jun 2026	Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 114 for, 4 against, 11 abstained	Adopted 423 for, 57 against, 174 abstained
16 Jun 2026	Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 110 for, 18 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 444 for, 152 against, 54 abstained
16 Jun 2026	Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 109 for, 14 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 440 for, 151 against, 50 abstained
21 May 2026	The need to reduce work-related fatalities Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 70 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 395 for, 12 against, 41 abstained
21 May 2026	Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Abstained	In the group: 3 for, 4 against, 79 abstained	Adopted 263 for, 83 against, 154 abstained
21 May 2026	The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 97 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 337 for, 178 against, 44 abstained
21 May 2026	Rights, support and protection of victims of crime Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 106 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 440 for, 49 against, 84 abstained
21 May 2026	The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 104 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 469 for, 38 against, 62 abstained
21 May 2026	Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 106 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 480 for, 5 against, 83 abstained
21 May 2026	Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 107 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 516 for, 14 against, 39 abstained
21 May 2026	Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package) Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Majority line: For	In the group: 106 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 369 for, 126 against, 84 abstained
21 May 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Majority line: For	In the group: 90 for, 15 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 294 for, 194 against, 86 abstained
21 May 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Majority line: For	In the group: 90 for, 16 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 294 for, 192 against, 90 abstained
20 May 2026	Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 106 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained
20 May 2026	Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU trade Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 122 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 527 for, 62 against, 59 abstained
20 May 2026	Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 119 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 369 for, 160 against, 112 abstained
20 May 2026	The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 99 for, 14 against, 9 abstained	Adopted 518 for, 31 against, 102 abstained
20 May 2026	EU-Canada Agreement laying down the conditions for the participation of Canadian legal entities and products originating in Canada to procurement under the SAFE Instrument Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 121 for, 1 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 466 for, 169 against, 14 abstained
20 May 2026	EU-Cook Islands Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (2025-2032): Implementing Protocol Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 121 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 476 for, 101 against, 74 abstained
20 May 2026	EC-São Tomé and Príncipe Fisheries Partnership Agreement (2025–2029): Implementing Protocol Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 121 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 545 for, 89 against, 15 abstained
20 May 2026	EU-Lebanon Agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and the authorities of Lebanon competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 112 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 581 for, 12 against, 45 abstained
20 May 2026	United Nations Convention against Cybercrime Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 102 for, 1 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 497 for, 91 against, 46 abstained
20 May 2026	EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 119 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 423 for, 16 against, 208 abstained
20 May 2026	International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives: amendment of Article 36 Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 122 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 644 for, 1 against, 2 abstained
20 May 2026	EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 113 for, 0 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 493 for, 104 against, 45 abstained
19 May 2026	Research Fund for Coal and Steel: research programme and multiannual technical and financial guidelines Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 115 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 537 for, 17 against, 83 abstained
19 May 2026	Screening of foreign investments in the Union Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 125 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 508 for, 64 against, 90 abstained
19 May 2026	Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 123 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 606 for, 16 against, 39 abstained
30 Apr 2026	Supporting democratic resilience in Armenia Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 106 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 476 for, 47 against, 48 abstained
30 Apr 2026	Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 106 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 446 for, 63 against, 52 abstained
30 Apr 2026	Banking Union – annual report 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 110 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 376 for, 187 against, 17 abstained
30 Apr 2026	Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 110 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 404 for, 102 against, 67 abstained
30 Apr 2026	How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 72 for, 32 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 426 for, 119 against, 40 abstained
30 Apr 2026	Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 113 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 401 for, 116 against, 68 abstained
30 Apr 2026	Financial literacy and the rise of finfluencers in the context of the savings and investments union Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 114 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 502 for, 46 against, 42 abstained
30 Apr 2026	Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 113 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 507 for, 31 against, 35 abstained
30 Apr 2026	Convention Establishing an International Claims Commission for Ukraine Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 108 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 465 for, 57 against, 47 abstained
30 Apr 2026	New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 105 for, 1 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 439 for, 52 against, 71 abstained
30 Apr 2026	Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 112 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 511 for, 21 against, 42 abstained
29 Apr 2026	Genetically modified soybean MON 94637 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 102 for, 1 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 412 for, 145 against, 11 abstained
29 Apr 2026	Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 118 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained
29 Apr 2026	The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 107 for, 0 against, 13 abstained	Adopted 387 for, 191 against, 46 abstained
29 Apr 2026	Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 118 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 328 for, 199 against, 98 abstained
29 Apr 2026	Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/008 BE/Liberty - Belgium Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 121 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 586 for, 48 against, 16 abstained
29 Apr 2026	EU-Norway Agreement on transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 106 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 532 for, 72 against, 26 abstained
29 Apr 2026	EU-USA-Iceland-Norway Air Transport Agreement, and EU-Iceland-Norway Ancillary Agreement on the application of the Air Transport Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 121 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 631 for, 6 against, 10 abstained
29 Apr 2026	International Cocoa Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 121 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 601 for, 13 against, 34 abstained
29 Apr 2026	EU-Iceland agreement on transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data to prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 104 for, 0 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 532 for, 75 against, 28 abstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

Connections

Top partners and the committees where the group’s cohesion is lowest or highest.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/sd?dir=desc&scope=all&vpage=3
Official source: Political groups, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: members and their memberships
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)”. Political group. code S&D. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/sd?dir=desc&scope=all&vpage=3 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Political groups, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/show-current?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-group-sd,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S\&D)}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/sd?dir=desc&scope=all&vpage=3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/sd?dir=desc&scope=all&vpage=3},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Political group. code S\&D. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}