Group

S&D

Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats

Seats: 135 of 718 current members
Cohesion, final votes: 0.94ⓘ over 619 of 620 final votes (enough members voting)
Cohesion, all roll calls: 0.93ⓘ over 5 926 of 5 928 roll calls (enough members voting)
On the winning side: 571 of 619ⓘ final votes decided by a simple majority where its clear line matched the outcome — of 620 final votes, 1 failed for want of an absolute majority and is not counted

More facts (6)

Official name: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
Code: S&D
Alignment: Centre-left · social democracy
Founded: 1953 (as Socialist Group; S&D since 2009)
Closest line: Renew — 97 % of 563 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 11 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Official name: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
Code: S&D
Alignment: Centre-left · social democracy
Founded: 1953 (as Socialist Group; S&D since 2009)
Closest line: Renew — 97 % of 563 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 11 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Cite this page

Link to this page

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index of the group on final roll-call votes, per quarter (1 = all voted the same way). Members counted in their group on the day; a vote counts for the group when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted, and a gap is a quarter with fewer than 20 votes counted. The other groups are the faint lines.

S&D: 0.94 over the whole period (619 votes), 0.96 in Q4 2024 and 0.93 in Q3 2026.

Data as a table

Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
Period	S&D	The Left	Greens	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN
Q3 2024	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—8 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes
Q4 2024	0.9657 votes	0.8157 votes	0.9457 votes	0.8357 votes	0.8657 votes	0.7457 votes	0.7457 votes	0.8757 votes
Q1 2025	0.9730 votes	0.7130 votes	0.9330 votes	0.9130 votes	0.9230 votes	0.7330 votes	0.7630 votes	0.8130 votes
Q2 2025	0.9484 votes	0.7884 votes	0.9384 votes	0.9584 votes	0.9384 votes	0.7184 votes	0.7184 votes	0.8784 votes
Q3 2025	0.9458 votes	0.7658 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9358 votes	0.9458 votes	0.8258 votes	0.7258 votes	0.8558 votes
Q4 2025	0.94121 votes	0.84121 votes	0.95121 votes	0.86121 votes	0.88121 votes	0.78121 votes	0.73121 votes	0.87121 votes
Q1 2026	0.9489 votes	0.7588 votes	0.8989 votes	0.8689 votes	0.9189 votes	0.7589 votes	0.7189 votes	0.8689 votes
Q2 2026	0.9599 votes	0.7599 votes	0.9299 votes	0.92100 votes	0.94100 votes	0.76100 votes	0.7299 votes	0.8299 votes
Q3 2026	0.9372 votes	0.7572 votes	0.9172 votes	0.8672 votes	0.8972 votes	0.7572 votes	0.6772 votes	0.8772 votes
Whole period	0.94	0.77	0.93	0.89	0.91	0.76	0.72	0.85
Votes considered	619	618	619	619	620	620	619	619

620 of 794 decisions of the term had a final vote recorded by name; those are the votes counted. A gap: fewer than 20 votes counted in the quarter (method). Cohesion of every group.

Cohesion by committee and topic

The group’s Agreement Index over the term’s roll calls, by the dossier’s lead committee and by topic. Topics are model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked).

By lead committee (25)

Lead committee: the committee that led the dossier. Votes: the term’s roll calls on its dossiers. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Lead committee	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign AffairsAFET	639	0.93
BudgetsBUDG	375	0.93
Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI	337	0.92
Budgetary ControlCONT	323	0.98
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE	323	0.94
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM	287	0.98
Economic and Monetary AffairsECON	249	0.92
International TradeINTA	203	0.88
Legal AffairsJURI	195	0.96
Employment and Social AffairsEMPL	193	0.98
Industry, Research and EnergyITRE	175	0.94
Housing Crisis (special committee)HOUS	154	0.82
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO	122	0.98
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI	87	0.82
European Democracy Shield (special committee)EUDS	85	0.97
Constitutional AffairsAFCO	70	0.92
FisheriesPECH	65	0.96
PetitionsPETI	61	0.90
Security and DefenceSEDE	49	0.89
DevelopmentDEVE	44	0.96
Culture and EducationCULT	28	0.94
Public HealthSANT	23	0.90
Regional DevelopmentREGI	11	—
Transport and TourismTRAN	8	—
LEGILEGI	2	—

By topic (model-assigned) (15)

Topic: model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked). Votes: the term’s roll calls on decisions with that topic. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Topic	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign affairs	2 136	0.93
Economy & single market	1 257	0.92
EU budget & funds	1 092	0.94
Defence & security	703	0.92
Justice, rule of law & rights	610	0.95
Jobs, social affairs & equality	606	0.98
Climate & environment	519	0.94
Agriculture, food & fisheries	364	0.85
Digital, AI & data	297	0.94
EU institutions & Parliament	292	0.93
Trade & customs	269	0.90
Health	260	0.93
Migration & asylum	122	0.94
Energy	92	0.95
Transport & tourism	84	0.95

Agreement with other groups

How often the group took the same line as each other group on the term’s final votes, groups at the date of each vote.

Same line: of the votes compared, the share where the two groups’ clear lines were the same. Votes compared: final votes where both groups had a clear line (at least two thirds of their votes cast, at least 10 members voting); a vote where either was divided is left out. A count instead of a share under 20 votes.
Group	Same line	Votes compared
Renew	97 %	563
EPP	91 %	571
Greens	90 %	593
ECR	72 %	506
The Left	66 %	502
Patriots	46 %	484
ESN	27 %	587

Agreement between every pair of groups, winning sides and pivotal groups

Members, 139

Members whose group is S&D now (former members: on their last day in office), with their record. Switchers are marked ⇄ and counted in the group of each vote’s date.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Open in the member register

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members of S&D
Select	Member, sort Z to A	Country, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Adnan DIBRANI	Adnan DIBRANI	Sweden	97.5 % of 5 928	+7.7 pts median 89.9 %	93.3 % of 5 780	−3.0 pts median 96.3 %	6.1 % of 5 683	4.0 % of 5 782
Select Alessandra MORETTI	Alessandra MORETTI	Italy	94.2 % of 5 928	+4.3 pts median 89.9 %	97.3 % of 5 581	+1.1 pts median 96.3 %	2.0 % of 5 488	2.2 % of 5 583
Select Alessandro ZAN	Alessandro ZAN	Italy	93.9 % of 5 928	+4.1 pts median 89.9 %	94.2 % of 5 567	−2.0 pts median 96.3 %	4.9 % of 5 471	2.2 % of 5 569
Select Alex AGIUS SALIBA	Alex AGIUS SALIBA	Malta	78.6 % of 5 928	−11.3 pts median 89.9 %	81.9 % of 4 657	−14.4 pts median 96.3 %	17.6 % of 4 581	5.6 % of 4 659
Select Alicia HOMS GINEL	Alicia HOMS GINEL	Spain	84.5 % of 5 928	−5.3 pts median 89.9 %	98.3 % of 5 009	+2.0 pts median 96.3 %	1.1 % of 4 939	2.0 % of 5 011
Select Ana Catarina MENDES	Ana Catarina MENDES	Portugal	90.5 % of 5 928	+0.7 pts median 89.9 %	98.5 % of 5 365	+2.3 pts median 96.3 %	1.1 % of 5 274	1.8 % of 5 366
Select Andi CRISTEA	Andi CRISTEA	Romania	90.9 % of 5 503	+1.1 pts median 89.9 %	95.3 % of 5 001	−0.9 pts median 96.3 %	4.2 % of 4 922	3.6 % of 5 003
Select André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	Portugal	85.3 % of 5 928	−4.6 pts median 89.9 %	98.9 % of 5 054	+2.7 pts median 96.3 %	0.8 % of 4 963	1.9 % of 5 056
Select Andreas SCHIEDER	Andreas SCHIEDER	Austria	93.9 % of 5 928	+4.1 pts median 89.9 %	96.5 % of 5 567	+0.3 pts median 96.3 %	3.0 % of 5 485	2.8 % of 5 569
Select Annalisa CORRADO	Annalisa CORRADO	Italy	79.5 % of 5 928	−10.3 pts median 89.9 %	96.7 % of 4 711	+0.4 pts median 96.3 %	2.7 % of 4 641	1.9 % of 4 713
Select Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN	Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN	Ireland	76.2 % of 5 928	−13.7 pts median 89.9 %	95.6 % of 4 515	−0.6 pts median 96.3 %	3.9 % of 4 439	2.9 % of 4 516
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	France	79.0 % of 5 928	−10.9 pts median 89.9 %	93.1 % of 4 681	−3.1 pts median 96.3 %	6.2 % of 4 621	2.0 % of 4 682
Select Bernd LANGE	Bernd LANGE	Germany	90.2 % of 5 928	+0.4 pts median 89.9 %	98.1 % of 5 348	+1.8 pts median 96.3 %	1.2 % of 5 253	1.6 % of 5 350
Select Biljana BORZAN	Biljana BORZAN	Croatia	92.0 % of 5 928	+2.1 pts median 89.9 %	92.9 % of 5 449	−3.4 pts median 96.3 %	6.5 % of 5 359	3.9 % of 5 451
Select Birgit SIPPEL	Birgit SIPPEL	Germany	78.6 % of 5 928	−11.2 pts median 89.9 %	97.1 % of 4 660	+0.8 pts median 96.3 %	2.2 % of 4 589	0.8 % of 4 662
Select Brando BENIFEI	Brando BENIFEI	Italy	78.5 % of 5 928	−11.4 pts median 89.9 %	95.9 % of 4 651	−0.3 pts median 96.3 %	3.4 % of 4 578	2.0 % of 4 653
Select Bruno GONÇALVES	Bruno GONÇALVES	Portugal	85.7 % of 5 928	−4.2 pts median 89.9 %	95.5 % of 5 077	−0.7 pts median 96.3 %	4.0 % of 4 987	2.1 % of 5 079
Select Bruno TOBBACK	Bruno TOBBACK	Belgium	95.1 % of 5 928	+5.2 pts median 89.9 %	98.3 % of 5 634	+2.1 pts median 96.3 %	1.2 % of 5 540	1.9 % of 5 636
Select Camilla LAURETI	Camilla LAURETI	Italy	97.7 % of 5 928	+7.9 pts median 89.9 %	99.0 % of 5 791	+2.7 pts median 96.3 %	0.8 % of 5 703	2.0 % of 5 793
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	Portugal	92.2 % of 5 928	+2.3 pts median 89.9 %	99.0 % of 5 462	+2.7 pts median 96.3 %	0.6 % of 5 373	1.7 % of 5 464
Select Cecilia STRADA	Cecilia STRADA	Italy	92.7 % of 5 928	+2.8 pts median 89.9 %	92.2 % of 5 492	−4.0 pts median 96.3 %	7.0 % of 5 399	2.4 % of 5 494
Select César LUENA	César LUENA	Spain	93.5 % of 5 928	+3.6 pts median 89.9 %	96.9 % of 5 540	+0.7 pts median 96.3 %	2.2 % of 5 445	2.1 % of 5 542
Select Chloé RIDEL	Chloé RIDEL	France	63.3 % of 5 928	−26.5 pts median 89.9 %	92.9 % of 3 753	−3.4 pts median 96.3 %	6.5 % of 3 693	2.5 % of 3 754
Select Christel SCHALDEMOSE	Christel SCHALDEMOSE	Denmark	95.3 % of 5 928	+5.4 pts median 89.9 %	90.9 % of 5 647	−5.4 pts median 96.3 %	8.7 % of 5 563	3.4 % of 5 648
Select Christophe CLERGEAU	Christophe CLERGEAU	France	84.6 % of 5 928	−5.2 pts median 89.9 %	92.7 % of 5 015	−3.6 pts median 96.3 %	6.6 % of 4 929	2.4 % of 5 017
Select Claire FITA	Claire FITA	France	77.4 % of 5 928	−12.5 pts median 89.9 %	92.8 % of 4 586	−3.4 pts median 96.3 %	6.4 % of 4 513	2.4 % of 4 587
Select Claudiu MANDA	Claudiu MANDA	Romania	45.8 % of 5 928	−44.1 pts median 89.9 %	93.8 % of 2 714	−2.5 pts median 96.3 %	5.8 % of 2 678	4.3 % of 2 715
Select Costas MAVRIDES	Costas MAVRIDES	Cyprus	66.9 % of 5 928	−22.9 pts median 89.9 %	93.9 % of 3 966	−2.3 pts median 96.3 %	5.8 % of 3 901	2.2 % of 3 968
Select Cristina MAESTRE	Cristina MAESTRE	Spain	91.4 % of 5 928	+1.5 pts median 89.9 %	97.1 % of 5 416	+0.9 pts median 96.3 %	2.0 % of 5 324	1.8 % of 5 418
Select Csaba MOLNÁR	Csaba MOLNÁR	Hungary	76.5 % of 5 928	−13.4 pts median 89.9 %	95.2 % of 4 530	−1.1 pts median 96.3 %	4.3 % of 4 458	1.1 % of 4 532
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	Romania	60.4 % of 5 928	−29.4 pts median 89.9 %	95.5 % of 3 581	−0.7 pts median 96.3 %	4.1 % of 3 527	1.7 % of 3 583
Select Daniel ATTARD	Daniel ATTARD	Malta	84.4 % of 5 928	−5.5 pts median 89.9 %	85.0 % of 4 999	−11.3 pts median 96.3 %	14.5 % of 4 921	6.0 % of 5 001
Select Dario NARDELLA	Dario NARDELLA	Italy	66.8 % of 5 928	−23.1 pts median 89.9 %	96.5 % of 3 957	+0.3 pts median 96.3 %	2.7 % of 3 889	2.2 % of 3 959
Select Delara BURKHARDT	Delara BURKHARDT	Germany	77.1 % of 5 928	−12.8 pts median 89.9 %	96.9 % of 4 568	+0.7 pts median 96.3 %	2.2 % of 4 483	1.6 % of 4 569
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	Romania	60.5 % of 5 928	−29.4 pts median 89.9 %	94.2 % of 3 583	−2.1 pts median 96.3 %	5.4 % of 3 530	3.8 % of 3 585
Select Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Finland	90.3 % of 5 928	+0.4 pts median 89.9 %	95.4 % of 5 350	−0.9 pts median 96.3 %	4.2 % of 5 255	4.0 % of 5 352
Select Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Spain	99.2 % of 5 928	+9.3 pts median 89.9 %	97.3 % of 5 877	+1.1 pts median 96.3 %	1.9 % of 5 781	2.3 % of 5 879
Select Elio DI RUPO	Elio DI RUPO	Belgium	89.9 % of 5 928	±0.0 pts median 89.9 %	90.2 % of 5 326	−6.1 pts median 96.3 %	9.2 % of 5 240	2.4 % of 5 328
Select Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Austria	98.9 % of 5 928	+9.1 pts median 89.9 %	96.2 % of 5 863	−0.1 pts median 96.3 %	3.2 % of 5 771	3.4 % of 5 864
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Italy	83.9 % of 5 928	not compared median 89.9 %	96.3 % of 4 970	not compared median 96.3 %	3.2 % of 4 886	2.7 % of 4 973
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	France	70.3 % of 5 928	−19.5 pts median 89.9 %	92.8 % of 4 169	−3.5 pts median 96.3 %	6.5 % of 4 109	2.2 % of 4 170
Select Eric SARGIACOMO	Eric SARGIACOMO	France	93.2 % of 5 928	+3.3 pts median 89.9 %	93.0 % of 5 520	−3.2 pts median 96.3 %	6.3 % of 5 438	2.5 % of 5 522
Select Estelle CEULEMANS	Estelle CEULEMANS	Belgium	94.0 % of 5 928	+4.2 pts median 89.9 %	85.5 % of 5 572	−10.8 pts median 96.3 %	13.7 % of 5 475	3.3 % of 5 574
Select Evelyn REGNER	Evelyn REGNER	Austria	97.1 % of 5 928	+7.3 pts median 89.9 %	95.6 % of 5 756	−0.7 pts median 96.3 %	3.6 % of 5 659	2.8 % of 5 758
Select Evin INCIR	Evin INCIR	Sweden	99.5 % of 5 928	+9.6 pts median 89.9 %	93.7 % of 5 894	−2.6 pts median 96.3 %	5.6 % of 5 797	3.6 % of 5 896
Select Francisco ASSIS	Francisco ASSIS	Portugal	81.0 % of 5 928	−8.8 pts median 89.9 %	98.6 % of 4 801	+2.3 pts median 96.3 %	1.1 % of 4 727	1.7 % of 4 803
Select François KALFON	François KALFON	France	89.7 % of 5 928	−0.2 pts median 89.9 %	92.9 % of 5 315	−3.3 pts median 96.3 %	6.5 % of 5 239	3.0 % of 5 317
Select Gabriela FIREA	Gabriela FIREA	Romania	65.7 % of 5 928	−24.1 pts median 89.9 %	94.4 % of 3 894	−1.9 pts median 96.3 %	5.1 % of 3 821	4.3 % of 3 895
Select Gabriele BISCHOFF	Gabriele BISCHOFF	Germany	96.2 % of 5 928	+6.4 pts median 89.9 %	97.9 % of 5 701	+1.6 pts median 96.3 %	1.4 % of 5 608	1.8 % of 5 703
Select Georgia TRAMACERE	Georgia TRAMACERE	Italy	89.0 % of 2 244	−0.8 pts median 89.9 %	95.9 % of 1 998	−0.3 pts median 96.3 %	3.0 % of 1 950	2.2 % of 1 998

National delegations

The group’s current members by country and national party.

Country: the delegation. Members: the group’s current members from that country. National parties: their parties, with the number of members of each.
Country	Members	National parties
Spain	20	PSOE 19 · PSC-PSOE 1
Italy	19	PD 19
Germany	14	SPD 14
France	13	PS 10 · Place publique 3
Romania	11	PSD 9 · PSD 1 · PUSL 1
Portugal	8	PS 8
Austria	5	SPÖ 5
Sweden	5	S 5
Belgium	4	PS 2 · Vooruit 2
Greece	4	KINAL 4
Croatia	4	SDP 4
Netherlands	4	PRO 4
Denmark	3	A 3
Malta	3	PL 3
Poland	3	NL 3
Bulgaria	2	BSP 2
Estonia	2	SDE 2
Finland	2	SDP 2
Hungary	2	DK 2
Lithuania	2	LSDP 2
Cyprus	1	DI.KO. 1
Ireland	1	LABOUR 1
Luxembourg	1	LSAP 1
Latvia	1	Saskaņa SDP 1
Slovenia	1	SD 1

Line on the final votes, 42

The group’s line on every final roll-call vote of the term, newest first, with its members counted in the group they sat in on the day.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.
Date	Vote	Majority line	In the group	Result
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 0 for, 108 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained
17 Sept 2026	Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 4 for, 105 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained
8 Jul 2026	Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 27 for, 94 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 388 for, 248 against, 24 abstained
7 Jul 2026	Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 4 for, 120 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 316 for, 281 against, 39 abstained
18 Jun 2026	Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 5 for, 98 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 283 for, 199 against, 85 abstained
18 Jun 2026	Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 4 for, 100 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 294 for, 245 against, 28 abstained
17 Jun 2026	General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products Final vote	Majority line: Against	In the group: 3 for, 113 against, 7 abstained	Adopted 325 for, 304 against, 29 abstained
17 Jun 2026	Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against	In the group: 9 for, 106 against, 11 abstained	Adopted 418 for, 218 against, 30 abstained
28 Apr 2026	Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 5 for, 121 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 377 for, 254 against, 31 abstained
26 Mar 2026	Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 95 for, 8 against, 2 abstained	Rejected 228 for, 311 against, 92 abstained
26 Mar 2026	Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Majority line: Against	In the group: 7 for, 85 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 389 for, 206 against, 32 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against	In the group: 20 for, 93 against, 8 abstained	Adopted 396 for, 226 against, 30 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against	In the group: 25 for, 89 against, 7 abstained	Adopted 408 for, 184 against, 60 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 7 for, 105 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 318 for, 247 against, 67 abstained
21 Jan 2026	Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026	Majority line: Against	In the group: 35 for, 90 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 334 for, 324 against, 11 abstained
17 Dec 2025	Simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 126 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Rejected 230 for, 402 against, 28 abstained
17 Dec 2025	Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against	In the group: 7 for, 112 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 405 for, 242 against, 8 abstained
17 Dec 2025	Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Majority line: Against	In the group: 13 for, 107 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 396 for, 202 against, 56 abstained
17 Dec 2025	Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Majority line: Against	In the group: 12 for, 106 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 384 for, 237 against, 31 abstained
16 Dec 2025	Corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against	In the group: 14 for, 112 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 428 for, 218 against, 17 abstained
27 Nov 2025	Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 5 for, 104 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 337 for, 245 against, 12 abstained
26 Nov 2025	Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 89 for, 11 against, 10 abstained	Rejected 359 for, 188 against, 76 abstained
26 Nov 2025	Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 1 for, 126 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 360 for, 298 against, 8 abstained
26 Nov 2025	Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders Final vote	Majority line: Against	In the group: 8 for, 115 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 402 for, 250 against, 8 abstained
13 Nov 2025	Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Final vote	Majority line: Against	In the group: 15 for, 109 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 382 for, 249 against, 13 abstained
21 Oct 2025	Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group Final vote	Majority line: Against	In the group: 10 for, 107 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 327 for, 256 against, 58 abstained
21 Oct 2025	Monitoring framework for resilient European forests Proposal to reject the text	Majority line: Against	In the group: 2 for, 117 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 370 for, 264 against, 9 abstained
11 Sept 2025	Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 1 for, 100 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 355 for, 173 against, 15 abstained
9 Jul 2025	Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add certain countries to the list of high-risk third countries, and to remove other countries from that list Final vote — text as a whole (B10-0318/2025)	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 63 for, 54 against, 12 abstained	Rejected 264 for, 369 against, 55 abstained
9 Jul 2025	Deforestation Regulation - list of countries presenting a low or high risk Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against	In the group: 0 for, 128 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 373 for, 289 against, 26 abstained
9 Jul 2025	European Climate Law Request for urgent procedure	Majority line: For	In the group: 128 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Rejected 300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained
17 Jun 2025	Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 125 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Rejected 282 for, 340 against, 26 abstained
22 May 2025	Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 0 for, 106 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 260 for, 194 against, 110 abstained
8 May 2025	The protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus) Final vote	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 41 for, 54 against, 12 abstained	Adopted 371 for, 162 against, 37 abstained
7 May 2025	Amending of Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 establishing the European Social Fund + (ESF+) as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges Request for urgent procedure	Majority line: Against	In the group: 0 for, 121 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 370 for, 268 against, 16 abstained
7 May 2025	Amending of the ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review Request for urgent procedure	Majority line: Against	In the group: 15 for, 99 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 316 for, 291 against, 27 abstained
6 May 2025	Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2023 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 9 for, 113 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 340 for, 162 against, 150 abstained
1 Apr 2025	Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Final vote	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 46 for, 59 against, 20 abstained	Adopted 452 for, 182 against, 40 abstained
1 Apr 2025	Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Request for urgent procedure	Majority line: Against	In the group: 1 for, 125 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 427 for, 221 against, 14 abstained
14 Nov 2024	Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of application Final vote	Majority line: Against	In the group: 1 for, 119 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 371 for, 240 against, 30 abstained
19 Sept 2024	Situation in Venezuela Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 5 for, 87 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 309 for, 201 against, 12 abstained
19 Sept 2024	The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 14 for, 80 against, 21 abstained	Adopted 380 for, 182 against, 51 abstained

Show all 42 votes on this page

Connections

Top partners and the committees where the group’s cohesion is lowest or highest.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/sd?delegations=all&scope=all&vline=lost
Official source: Political groups, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: members and their memberships
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)”. Political group. code S&D. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/sd?delegations=all&scope=all&vline=lost (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Political groups, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/show-current?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-group-sd,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S\&D)}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/sd?delegations=all&scope=all&vline=lost}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/sd?delegations=all&scope=all&vline=lost},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Political group. code S\&D. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}