Group

Renew

Renew Europe

Seats: 78 of 718 current members
Cohesion, final votes: 0.89ⓘ over 619 of 620 final votes (enough members voting)
Cohesion, all roll calls: 0.91ⓘ over 5 927 of 5 928 roll calls (enough members voting)
On the winning side: 558 of 619ⓘ final votes decided by a simple majority where its clear line matched the outcome — of 620 final votes, 1 failed for want of an absolute majority and is not counted

More facts (6)

Official name: Renew Europe
Code: Renew
Alignment: Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism
Founded: 2019 (successor of ALDE, 1976)
Closest line: EPP — 97 % of 553 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 5 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Official name: Renew Europe
Code: Renew
Alignment: Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism
Founded: 2019 (successor of ALDE, 1976)
Closest line: EPP — 97 % of 553 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 5 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Cite this page

Link to this page

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index of the group on final roll-call votes, per quarter (1 = all voted the same way). Members counted in their group on the day; a vote counts for the group when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted, and a gap is a quarter with fewer than 20 votes counted. The other groups are the faint lines.

Renew: 0.89 over the whole period (619 votes), 0.83 in Q4 2024 and 0.86 in Q3 2026.

Data as a table

Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
Period	Renew	The Left	Greens	S&D	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN
Q3 2024	—8 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes
Q4 2024	0.8357 votes	0.8157 votes	0.9457 votes	0.9657 votes	0.8657 votes	0.7457 votes	0.7457 votes	0.8757 votes
Q1 2025	0.9130 votes	0.7130 votes	0.9330 votes	0.9730 votes	0.9230 votes	0.7330 votes	0.7630 votes	0.8130 votes
Q2 2025	0.9584 votes	0.7884 votes	0.9384 votes	0.9484 votes	0.9384 votes	0.7184 votes	0.7184 votes	0.8784 votes
Q3 2025	0.9358 votes	0.7658 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9458 votes	0.8258 votes	0.7258 votes	0.8558 votes
Q4 2025	0.86121 votes	0.84121 votes	0.95121 votes	0.94121 votes	0.88121 votes	0.78121 votes	0.73121 votes	0.87121 votes
Q1 2026	0.8689 votes	0.7588 votes	0.8989 votes	0.9489 votes	0.9189 votes	0.7589 votes	0.7189 votes	0.8689 votes
Q2 2026	0.92100 votes	0.7599 votes	0.9299 votes	0.9599 votes	0.94100 votes	0.76100 votes	0.7299 votes	0.8299 votes
Q3 2026	0.8672 votes	0.7572 votes	0.9172 votes	0.9372 votes	0.8972 votes	0.7572 votes	0.6772 votes	0.8772 votes
Whole period	0.89	0.77	0.93	0.94	0.91	0.76	0.72	0.85
Votes considered	619	618	619	619	620	620	619	619

620 of 794 decisions of the term had a final vote recorded by name; those are the votes counted. A gap: fewer than 20 votes counted in the quarter (method). Cohesion of every group.

Cohesion by committee and topic

The group’s Agreement Index over the term’s roll calls, by the dossier’s lead committee and by topic. Topics are model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked).

By lead committee (25)

Lead committee: the committee that led the dossier. Votes: the term’s roll calls on its dossiers. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Lead committee	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign AffairsAFET	639	0.92
BudgetsBUDG	375	0.91
Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI	337	0.86
Budgetary ControlCONT	323	0.93
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE	323	0.92
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM	287	0.93
Economic and Monetary AffairsECON	249	0.95
International TradeINTA	203	0.92
Legal AffairsJURI	195	0.93
Employment and Social AffairsEMPL	193	0.75
Industry, Research and EnergyITRE	175	0.96
Housing Crisis (special committee)HOUS	154	0.96
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO	122	0.90
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI	87	0.74
European Democracy Shield (special committee)EUDS	85	0.97
Constitutional AffairsAFCO	70	0.93
FisheriesPECH	65	0.90
PetitionsPETI	61	0.90
Security and DefenceSEDE	49	0.91
DevelopmentDEVE	44	0.86
Culture and EducationCULT	28	0.95
Public HealthSANT	23	0.91
Regional DevelopmentREGI	11	—
Transport and TourismTRAN	8	—
LEGILEGI	2	—

By topic (model-assigned) (15)

Topic: model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked). Votes: the term’s roll calls on decisions with that topic. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Topic	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign affairs	2 136	0.93
Economy & single market	1 257	0.93
EU budget & funds	1 092	0.91
Defence & security	703	0.93
Justice, rule of law & rights	610	0.95
Jobs, social affairs & equality	606	0.88
Climate & environment	519	0.91
Agriculture, food & fisheries	364	0.77
Digital, AI & data	297	0.94
EU institutions & Parliament	292	0.94
Trade & customs	269	0.93
Health	260	0.88
Migration & asylum	122	0.84
Energy	92	0.94
Transport & tourism	84	0.99

Agreement with other groups

How often the group took the same line as each other group on the term’s final votes, groups at the date of each vote.

Same line: of the votes compared, the share where the two groups’ clear lines were the same. Votes compared: final votes where both groups had a clear line (at least two thirds of their votes cast, at least 10 members voting); a vote where either was divided is left out. A count instead of a share under 20 votes.
Group	Same line	Votes compared
EPP	97 %	553
S&D	97 %	563
Greens	87 %	549
ECR	75 %	463
The Left	59 %	459
Patriots	46 %	440
ESN	23 %	545

Agreement between every pair of groups, winning sides and pivotal groups

Members, 76

Members whose group is Renew now (former members: on their last day in office), with their record. Switchers are marked ⇄ and counted in the group of each vote’s date.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Open in the member register

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members of Renew
Select	Member, sort Z to A	Country, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Abir AL-SAHLANI	Abir AL-SAHLANI	Sweden	82.1 % of 5 928	−8.4 pts median 90.4 %	92.8 % of 4 861	−2.7 pts median 95.5 %	6.3 % of 4 735	1.7 % of 4 865
Select Ana VASCONCELOS	Ana VASCONCELOS	Portugal	93.0 % of 5 928	+2.5 pts median 90.4 %	94.4 % of 5 507	−1.1 pts median 95.5 %	4.5 % of 5 351	2.4 % of 5 511
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Germany	67.0 % of 5 928	−23.4 pts median 90.4 %	92.8 % of 3 968	−2.7 pts median 95.5 %	6.1 % of 3 857	2.0 % of 3 972
Select Anna STÜRGKH	Anna STÜRGKH	Austria	74.5 % of 5 928	−15.9 pts median 90.4 %	96.8 % of 4 416	+1.2 pts median 95.5 %	2.0 % of 4 300	1.1 % of 4 417
Select Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Finland	88.8 % of 5 928	−1.6 pts median 90.4 %	97.7 % of 5 259	+2.2 pts median 95.5 %	1.4 % of 5 124	1.2 % of 5 264
Select Anouk VAN BRUG	Anouk VAN BRUG	Netherlands	75.1 % of 5 928	−15.4 pts median 90.4 %	93.0 % of 4 446	−2.5 pts median 95.5 %	5.7 % of 4 323	0.8 % of 4 451
Select Asger CHRISTENSEN	Asger CHRISTENSEN	Denmark	92.1 % of 5 928	+1.7 pts median 90.4 %	90.2 % of 5 457	−5.3 pts median 95.5 %	8.7 % of 5 307	2.5 % of 5 462
Select Barry ANDREWS	Barry ANDREWS	Ireland	87.7 % of 5 928	−2.8 pts median 90.4 %	91.7 % of 5 192	−3.8 pts median 95.5 %	7.5 % of 5 061	0.9 % of 5 197
Select Barry COWEN	Barry COWEN	Ireland	83.2 % of 5 928	−7.2 pts median 90.4 %	92.2 % of 4 931	−3.3 pts median 95.5 %	7.0 % of 4 805	0.9 % of 4 932
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Netherlands	75.3 % of 5 928	−15.2 pts median 90.4 %	91.9 % of 4 459	−3.7 pts median 95.5 %	7.0 % of 4 338	1.3 % of 4 462
Select Benoit CASSART	Benoit CASSART	Belgium	91.6 % of 5 928	+1.1 pts median 90.4 %	95.4 % of 5 423	−0.1 pts median 95.5 %	3.4 % of 5 281	1.0 % of 5 428
Select Bernard GUETTA	Bernard GUETTA	France	88.4 % of 5 928	−2.1 pts median 90.4 %	95.9 % of 5 234	+0.4 pts median 95.5 %	2.9 % of 5 092	1.0 % of 5 239
Select Billy KELLEHER	Billy KELLEHER	Ireland	95.8 % of 5 928	+5.3 pts median 90.4 %	92.2 % of 5 673	−3.3 pts median 95.5 %	6.9 % of 5 518	1.1 % of 5 678
Select Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Netherlands	85.5 % of 5 928	−5.0 pts median 90.4 %	96.6 % of 5 062	+1.1 pts median 95.5 %	2.3 % of 4 920	0.7 % of 5 067
Select Charles GOERENS	Charles GOERENS	Luxembourg	93.3 % of 5 928	+2.9 pts median 90.4 %	97.3 % of 5 526	+1.8 pts median 95.5 %	1.8 % of 5 377	1.2 % of 5 531
Select Christine SINGER	Christine SINGER	Germany	91.6 % of 5 928	+1.2 pts median 90.4 %	80.7 % of 5 428	−14.8 pts median 95.5 %	18.5 % of 5 291	4.3 % of 5 433
Select Christophe GRUDLER	Christophe GRUDLER	France	92.6 % of 5 928	+2.2 pts median 90.4 %	95.3 % of 5 484	−0.3 pts median 95.5 %	3.5 % of 5 333	1.3 % of 5 489
Select Ciaran MULLOOLY	Ciaran MULLOOLY	Ireland	75.9 % of 5 928	−14.5 pts median 90.4 %	87.1 % of 4 498	−8.4 pts median 95.5 %	12.2 % of 4 389	5.1 % of 4 502
Select Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ	Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ	Ireland	92.1 % of 5 928	+1.7 pts median 90.4 %	91.5 % of 5 458	−4.1 pts median 95.5 %	7.7 % of 5 308	1.1 % of 5 462
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Lithuania	93.3 % of 5 928	+2.8 pts median 90.4 %	98.3 % of 5 524	+2.8 pts median 95.5 %	1.1 % of 5 369	0.6 % of 5 529
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Romania	87.9 % of 5 928	−2.5 pts median 90.4 %	98.0 % of 5 207	+2.5 pts median 95.5 %	1.2 % of 5 057	0.7 % of 5 212
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Finland	97.8 % of 5 928	+7.4 pts median 90.4 %	96.9 % of 5 795	+1.3 pts median 95.5 %	2.1 % of 5 635	0.9 % of 5 800
Select Emma WIESNER	Emma WIESNER	Sweden	78.1 % of 5 928	−12.4 pts median 90.4 %	93.1 % of 4 624	−2.4 pts median 95.5 %	5.8 % of 4 502	1.6 % of 4 628
Select Engin EROGLU	Engin EROGLU	Germany	92.2 % of 5 928	+1.8 pts median 90.4 %	79.1 % of 5 463	−16.4 pts median 95.5 %	19.9 % of 5 313	5.0 % of 5 468
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Romania	72.4 % of 5 928	−18.0 pts median 90.4 %	95.5 % of 4 291	−0.1 pts median 95.5 %	3.6 % of 4 177	1.8 % of 4 292
Select Fabienne KELLER	Fabienne KELLER	France	97.9 % of 5 928	+7.4 pts median 90.4 %	95.9 % of 5 798	+0.3 pts median 95.5 %	2.8 % of 5 639	1.0 % of 5 803
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Netherlands	98.6 % of 5 928	+8.2 pts median 90.4 %	97.1 % of 5 840	+1.6 pts median 95.5 %	1.9 % of 5 682	0.8 % of 5 845
Select Gilles BOYER	Gilles BOYER	France	99.5 % of 5 928	+9.1 pts median 90.4 %	95.3 % of 5 893	−0.2 pts median 95.5 %	3.3 % of 5 731	1.4 % of 5 898
Select Grégory ALLIONE	Grégory ALLIONE	France	85.7 % of 5 928	−4.7 pts median 90.4 %	95.6 % of 5 080	+0.1 pts median 95.5 %	3.1 % of 4 950	0.9 % of 5 081
Select Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER	Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER	Austria	84.0 % of 5 928	−6.4 pts median 90.4 %	96.7 % of 4 975	+1.2 pts median 95.5 %	2.1 % of 4 840	1.2 % of 4 980
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Belgium	96.9 % of 5 928	+6.4 pts median 90.4 %	96.5 % of 5 737	+1.0 pts median 95.5 %	2.7 % of 5 586	0.9 % of 5 742
Select Hristo PETROV	Hristo PETROV	Bulgaria	92.7 % of 5 928	+2.3 pts median 90.4 %	96.2 % of 5 493	+0.7 pts median 95.5 %	2.8 % of 5 344	1.4 % of 5 497
Select Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Bulgaria	92.6 % of 5 928	+2.2 pts median 90.4 %	97.7 % of 5 485	+2.2 pts median 95.5 %	1.5 % of 5 339	1.2 % of 5 490
Select Irena JOVEVA	Irena JOVEVA	Slovenia	94.5 % of 5 928	+4.0 pts median 90.4 %	92.2 % of 5 594	−3.3 pts median 95.5 %	6.8 % of 5 441	1.1 % of 5 599
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Latvia	76.7 % of 5 928	−13.8 pts median 90.4 %	94.1 % of 4 540	−1.4 pts median 95.5 %	5.0 % of 4 423	1.3 % of 4 544
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Germany	96.9 % of 5 928	+6.5 pts median 90.4 %	92.6 % of 5 741	−2.9 pts median 95.5 %	6.3 % of 5 592	2.1 % of 5 746
Select Jana TOOM	Jana TOOM	Estonia	85.7 % of 5 928	−4.7 pts median 90.4 %	96.7 % of 5 076	+1.2 pts median 95.5 %	2.3 % of 4 932	0.8 % of 5 081
Select Jeannette BALJEU	Jeannette BALJEU	Netherlands	87.9 % of 5 928	−2.5 pts median 90.4 %	92.3 % of 5 207	−3.3 pts median 95.5 %	6.5 % of 5 064	1.2 % of 5 211
Select Jérémy DECERLE	Jérémy DECERLE	France	85.7 % of 3 503	−4.8 pts median 90.4 %	95.2 % of 2 999	−0.3 pts median 95.5 %	3.5 % of 2 912	1.6 % of 3 001
Select Joachim STREIT	Joachim STREIT	Germany	83.9 % of 5 928	−6.6 pts median 90.4 %	77.5 % of 4 967	−18.0 pts median 95.5 %	21.6 % of 4 828	5.0 % of 4 972
Select João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO	João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO	Portugal	82.2 % of 5 928	−8.3 pts median 90.4 %	94.2 % of 4 867	−1.3 pts median 95.5 %	4.6 % of 4 739	2.9 % of 4 872
Select Karin KARLSBRO	Karin KARLSBRO	Sweden	97.3 % of 5 928	+6.9 pts median 90.4 %	93.9 % of 5 763	−1.6 pts median 95.5 %	4.9 % of 5 605	0.6 % of 5 768
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Finland	79.1 % of 5 928	−11.3 pts median 90.4 %	95.6 % of 4 687	+0.1 pts median 95.5 %	3.5 % of 4 577	0.9 % of 4 691
Select Laurence FARRENG	Laurence FARRENG	France	92.5 % of 5 928	+2.1 pts median 90.4 %	95.1 % of 5 479	−0.5 pts median 95.5 %	3.8 % of 5 327	0.9 % of 5 484
Select Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ	Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ	Slovakia	65.3 % of 5 928	−25.1 pts median 90.4 %	97.0 % of 3 867	+1.5 pts median 95.5 %	2.1 % of 3 766	1.2 % of 3 871
Select Lucia YAR	Lucia YAR	Slovakia	99.0 % of 5 928	+8.5 pts median 90.4 %	96.9 % of 5 863	+1.4 pts median 95.5 %	2.1 % of 5 705	1.2 % of 5 868
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Slovakia	93.8 % of 5 928	+3.3 pts median 90.4 %	96.9 % of 5 554	+1.4 pts median 95.5 %	2.0 % of 5 403	1.3 % of 5 559
Select Malik AZMANI	Malik AZMANI	Netherlands	98.9 % of 5 928	+8.5 pts median 90.4 %	92.3 % of 5 859	−3.2 pts median 95.5 %	6.5 % of 5 699	1.3 % of 5 864
Select Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Germany	81.0 % of 5 928	−9.4 pts median 90.4 %	92.6 % of 4 797	−2.9 pts median 95.5 %	5.9 % of 4 664	2.1 % of 4 802
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Slovenia	89.0 % of 5 928	−1.5 pts median 90.4 %	97.9 % of 5 270	+2.4 pts median 95.5 %	1.3 % of 5 120	0.6 % of 5 275

National delegations

The group’s current members by country and national party.

Country: the delegation. Members: the group’s current members from that country. National parties: their parties, with the number of members of each.
Country	Members	National parties
France	13	Ren 6 · MoDem 3 · Hor 2 · Sans parti 1 · UDI 1
Germany	9	FDP 5 · Freie Wähler 3 · PdF 1
Netherlands	7	VVD 4 · D66 3
Ireland	6	FF 4 · Ind. 2
Slovakia	6	PS 6
Belgium	5	MR 3 · Anders 1 · LesEng 1
Denmark	4	V 2 · B 1 · M 1
Bulgaria	3	PP-DB 2 · DPS 1
Finland	3	KESK 2 · SFP 1
Romania	3	USR 2 · PMP 1

Show all 21 delegations

Line on the final votes, 39

The group’s line on every final roll-call vote of the term, newest first, with its members counted in the group they sat in on the day.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.
Date	Vote	Majority line	In the group	Result
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 27 for, 31 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 32 for, 33 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 417 for, 167 against, 15 abstained
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 30 for, 41 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 460 for, 189 against, 14 abstained
8 Jul 2026	Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 14 for, 40 against, 19 abstained	Adopted 388 for, 248 against, 24 abstained
7 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse Request for urgent procedure	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 28 for, 46 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 331 for, 304 against, 11 abstained
18 Jun 2026	Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 14 for, 45 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 294 for, 245 against, 28 abstained
17 Jun 2026	General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products Final vote	Majority line: Against	In the group: 15 for, 55 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 325 for, 304 against, 29 abstained
26 Mar 2026	Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Final vote	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 33 for, 29 against, 6 abstained	Rejected 228 for, 311 against, 92 abstained
26 Mar 2026	Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 12 for, 31 against, 22 abstained	Adopted 389 for, 206 against, 32 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified cotton T304-40 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 29 for, 33 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 428 for, 156 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 31 for, 35 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 463 for, 164 against, 21 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2) Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 31 for, 35 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 462 for, 169 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 33 for, 34 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 461 for, 169 against, 22 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 16 for, 33 against, 18 abstained	Adopted 396 for, 226 against, 30 abstained
21 Jan 2026	Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 24 for, 46 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 334 for, 324 against, 11 abstained
17 Dec 2025	Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 11 for, 31 against, 23 abstained	Adopted 384 for, 237 against, 31 abstained
16 Dec 2025	Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 28 for, 34 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 455 for, 169 against, 8 abstained
16 Dec 2025	Genetically modified maize NK603 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 31 for, 33 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 479 for, 173 against, 8 abstained
27 Nov 2025	Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 6 for, 57 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 337 for, 245 against, 12 abstained
26 Nov 2025	Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 30 for, 28 against, 9 abstained	Rejected 359 for, 188 against, 76 abstained
26 Nov 2025	Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 5 for, 62 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 360 for, 298 against, 8 abstained
26 Nov 2025	Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders Final vote	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 29 for, 36 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 402 for, 250 against, 8 abstained
25 Nov 2025	Genetically modified maize MON 87427 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 30 for, 35 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 426 for, 157 against, 17 abstained
25 Nov 2025	Genetically modified soybean MON 87708 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 30 for, 36 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 453 for, 179 against, 14 abstained
25 Nov 2025	Genetically modified cotton MON 88913 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 30 for, 36 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 452 for, 182 against, 13 abstained
25 Nov 2025	Genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 31 for, 34 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 456 for, 166 against, 21 abstained
25 Nov 2025	Genetically modified maize DAS1131 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 30 for, 33 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 453 for, 171 against, 19 abstained
13 Nov 2025	Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Final vote	Majority line: Against	In the group: 17 for, 46 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 382 for, 249 against, 13 abstained
21 Oct 2025	Monitoring framework for resilient European forests Proposal to reject the text	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 20 for, 46 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 370 for, 264 against, 9 abstained
9 Jul 2025	Deforestation Regulation - list of countries presenting a low or high risk Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against	In the group: 12 for, 59 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 373 for, 289 against, 26 abstained
9 Jul 2025	European Climate Law Request for urgent procedure	Majority line: For	In the group: 65 for, 1 against, 5 abstained	Rejected 300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained
17 Jun 2025	Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 48 for, 2 against, 10 abstained	Rejected 282 for, 340 against, 26 abstained
8 May 2025	Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 22 for, 34 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 373 for, 150 against, 10 abstained
7 May 2025	Amending of the ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review Request for urgent procedure	Majority line: Against	In the group: 0 for, 54 against, 13 abstained	Adopted 316 for, 291 against, 27 abstained
12 Feb 2025	Genetically modified maize MON 95275 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 29 for, 37 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 467 for, 156 against, 18 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize MON 94804 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 31 for, 37 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 468 for, 166 against, 14 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize MON 810 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 33 for, 35 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 464 for, 163 against, 27 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and eight of its sub-combinations Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 32 for, 35 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 476 for, 169 against, 14 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 33 for, 36 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 474 for, 171 against, 13 abstained

Show all 39 votes on this page

Connections

Top partners and the committees where the group’s cohesion is lowest or highest.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/renew?scope=all&vline=lost
Official source: Political groups, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: members and their memberships
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Renew Europe (Renew)”. Political group. code Renew. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/renew?scope=all&vline=lost (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Political groups, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/show-current?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-group-renew,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Renew Europe (Renew)}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/renew?scope=all&vline=lost}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/renew?scope=all&vline=lost},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Political group. code Renew. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}