Group

Renew

Renew Europe

Seats: 78 of 718 current members
Cohesion, final votes: 0.89ⓘ over 619 of 620 final votes (enough members voting)
Cohesion, all roll calls: 0.91ⓘ over 5 927 of 5 928 roll calls (enough members voting)
On the winning side: 558 of 619ⓘ final votes decided by a simple majority where its clear line matched the outcome — of 620 final votes, 1 failed for want of an absolute majority and is not counted

More facts (6)

Official name: Renew Europe
Code: Renew
Alignment: Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism
Founded: 2019 (successor of ALDE, 1976)
Closest line: EPP — 97 % of 553 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 5 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Official name: Renew Europe
Code: Renew
Alignment: Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism
Founded: 2019 (successor of ALDE, 1976)
Closest line: EPP — 97 % of 553 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 5 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Cite this page

Link to this page

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index of the group on final roll-call votes, per quarter (1 = all voted the same way). Members counted in their group on the day; a vote counts for the group when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted, and a gap is a quarter with fewer than 20 votes counted. The other groups are the faint lines.

Renew: 0.89 over the whole period (619 votes), 0.83 in Q4 2024 and 0.86 in Q3 2026.

Data as a table

Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
Period	Renew	The Left	Greens	S&D	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN
Q3 2024	—8 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes
Q4 2024	0.8357 votes	0.8157 votes	0.9457 votes	0.9657 votes	0.8657 votes	0.7457 votes	0.7457 votes	0.8757 votes
Q1 2025	0.9130 votes	0.7130 votes	0.9330 votes	0.9730 votes	0.9230 votes	0.7330 votes	0.7630 votes	0.8130 votes
Q2 2025	0.9584 votes	0.7884 votes	0.9384 votes	0.9484 votes	0.9384 votes	0.7184 votes	0.7184 votes	0.8784 votes
Q3 2025	0.9358 votes	0.7658 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9458 votes	0.8258 votes	0.7258 votes	0.8558 votes
Q4 2025	0.86121 votes	0.84121 votes	0.95121 votes	0.94121 votes	0.88121 votes	0.78121 votes	0.73121 votes	0.87121 votes
Q1 2026	0.8689 votes	0.7588 votes	0.8989 votes	0.9489 votes	0.9189 votes	0.7589 votes	0.7189 votes	0.8689 votes
Q2 2026	0.92100 votes	0.7599 votes	0.9299 votes	0.9599 votes	0.94100 votes	0.76100 votes	0.7299 votes	0.8299 votes
Q3 2026	0.8672 votes	0.7572 votes	0.9172 votes	0.9372 votes	0.8972 votes	0.7572 votes	0.6772 votes	0.8772 votes
Whole period	0.89	0.77	0.93	0.94	0.91	0.76	0.72	0.85
Votes considered	619	618	619	619	620	620	619	619

620 of 794 decisions of the term had a final vote recorded by name; those are the votes counted. A gap: fewer than 20 votes counted in the quarter (method). Cohesion of every group.

Cohesion by committee and topic

The group’s Agreement Index over the term’s roll calls, by the dossier’s lead committee and by topic. Topics are model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked).

By lead committee (25)

Lead committee: the committee that led the dossier. Votes: the term’s roll calls on its dossiers. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Lead committee	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign AffairsAFET	639	0.92
BudgetsBUDG	375	0.91
Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI	337	0.86
Budgetary ControlCONT	323	0.93
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE	323	0.92
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM	287	0.93
Economic and Monetary AffairsECON	249	0.95
International TradeINTA	203	0.92
Legal AffairsJURI	195	0.93
Employment and Social AffairsEMPL	193	0.75
Industry, Research and EnergyITRE	175	0.96
Housing Crisis (special committee)HOUS	154	0.96
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO	122	0.90
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI	87	0.74
European Democracy Shield (special committee)EUDS	85	0.97
Constitutional AffairsAFCO	70	0.93
FisheriesPECH	65	0.90
PetitionsPETI	61	0.90
Security and DefenceSEDE	49	0.91
DevelopmentDEVE	44	0.86
Culture and EducationCULT	28	0.95
Public HealthSANT	23	0.91
Regional DevelopmentREGI	11	—
Transport and TourismTRAN	8	—
LEGILEGI	2	—

By topic (model-assigned) (15)

Topic: model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked). Votes: the term’s roll calls on decisions with that topic. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Topic	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign affairs	2 136	0.93
Economy & single market	1 257	0.93
EU budget & funds	1 092	0.91
Defence & security	703	0.93
Justice, rule of law & rights	610	0.95
Jobs, social affairs & equality	606	0.88
Climate & environment	519	0.91
Agriculture, food & fisheries	364	0.77
Digital, AI & data	297	0.94
EU institutions & Parliament	292	0.94
Trade & customs	269	0.93
Health	260	0.88
Migration & asylum	122	0.84
Energy	92	0.94
Transport & tourism	84	0.99

Agreement with other groups

How often the group took the same line as each other group on the term’s final votes, groups at the date of each vote.

Same line: of the votes compared, the share where the two groups’ clear lines were the same. Votes compared: final votes where both groups had a clear line (at least two thirds of their votes cast, at least 10 members voting); a vote where either was divided is left out. A count instead of a share under 20 votes.
Group	Same line	Votes compared
EPP	97 %	553
S&D	97 %	563
Greens	87 %	549
ECR	75 %	463
The Left	59 %	459
Patriots	46 %	440
ESN	23 %	545

Agreement between every pair of groups, winning sides and pivotal groups

Members, 76

Members whose group is Renew now (former members: on their last day in office), with their record. Switchers are marked ⇄ and counted in the group of each vote’s date.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Open in the member register

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members of Renew
Select	Member, sort Z to A	Country, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Abir AL-SAHLANI	Abir AL-SAHLANI	Sweden	82.1 % of 5 928	−8.4 pts median 90.4 %	92.8 % of 4 861	−2.7 pts median 95.5 %	6.3 % of 4 735	1.7 % of 4 865
Select Ana VASCONCELOS	Ana VASCONCELOS	Portugal	93.0 % of 5 928	+2.5 pts median 90.4 %	94.4 % of 5 507	−1.1 pts median 95.5 %	4.5 % of 5 351	2.4 % of 5 511
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Germany	67.0 % of 5 928	−23.4 pts median 90.4 %	92.8 % of 3 968	−2.7 pts median 95.5 %	6.1 % of 3 857	2.0 % of 3 972
Select Anna STÜRGKH	Anna STÜRGKH	Austria	74.5 % of 5 928	−15.9 pts median 90.4 %	96.8 % of 4 416	+1.2 pts median 95.5 %	2.0 % of 4 300	1.1 % of 4 417
Select Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Finland	88.8 % of 5 928	−1.6 pts median 90.4 %	97.7 % of 5 259	+2.2 pts median 95.5 %	1.4 % of 5 124	1.2 % of 5 264
Select Anouk VAN BRUG	Anouk VAN BRUG	Netherlands	75.1 % of 5 928	−15.4 pts median 90.4 %	93.0 % of 4 446	−2.5 pts median 95.5 %	5.7 % of 4 323	0.8 % of 4 451
Select Asger CHRISTENSEN	Asger CHRISTENSEN	Denmark	92.1 % of 5 928	+1.7 pts median 90.4 %	90.2 % of 5 457	−5.3 pts median 95.5 %	8.7 % of 5 307	2.5 % of 5 462
Select Barry ANDREWS	Barry ANDREWS	Ireland	87.7 % of 5 928	−2.8 pts median 90.4 %	91.7 % of 5 192	−3.8 pts median 95.5 %	7.5 % of 5 061	0.9 % of 5 197
Select Barry COWEN	Barry COWEN	Ireland	83.2 % of 5 928	−7.2 pts median 90.4 %	92.2 % of 4 931	−3.3 pts median 95.5 %	7.0 % of 4 805	0.9 % of 4 932
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Netherlands	75.3 % of 5 928	−15.2 pts median 90.4 %	91.9 % of 4 459	−3.7 pts median 95.5 %	7.0 % of 4 338	1.3 % of 4 462
Select Benoit CASSART	Benoit CASSART	Belgium	91.6 % of 5 928	+1.1 pts median 90.4 %	95.4 % of 5 423	−0.1 pts median 95.5 %	3.4 % of 5 281	1.0 % of 5 428
Select Bernard GUETTA	Bernard GUETTA	France	88.4 % of 5 928	−2.1 pts median 90.4 %	95.9 % of 5 234	+0.4 pts median 95.5 %	2.9 % of 5 092	1.0 % of 5 239
Select Billy KELLEHER	Billy KELLEHER	Ireland	95.8 % of 5 928	+5.3 pts median 90.4 %	92.2 % of 5 673	−3.3 pts median 95.5 %	6.9 % of 5 518	1.1 % of 5 678
Select Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Netherlands	85.5 % of 5 928	−5.0 pts median 90.4 %	96.6 % of 5 062	+1.1 pts median 95.5 %	2.3 % of 4 920	0.7 % of 5 067
Select Charles GOERENS	Charles GOERENS	Luxembourg	93.3 % of 5 928	+2.9 pts median 90.4 %	97.3 % of 5 526	+1.8 pts median 95.5 %	1.8 % of 5 377	1.2 % of 5 531
Select Christine SINGER	Christine SINGER	Germany	91.6 % of 5 928	+1.2 pts median 90.4 %	80.7 % of 5 428	−14.8 pts median 95.5 %	18.5 % of 5 291	4.3 % of 5 433
Select Christophe GRUDLER	Christophe GRUDLER	France	92.6 % of 5 928	+2.2 pts median 90.4 %	95.3 % of 5 484	−0.3 pts median 95.5 %	3.5 % of 5 333	1.3 % of 5 489
Select Ciaran MULLOOLY	Ciaran MULLOOLY	Ireland	75.9 % of 5 928	−14.5 pts median 90.4 %	87.1 % of 4 498	−8.4 pts median 95.5 %	12.2 % of 4 389	5.1 % of 4 502
Select Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ	Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ	Ireland	92.1 % of 5 928	+1.7 pts median 90.4 %	91.5 % of 5 458	−4.1 pts median 95.5 %	7.7 % of 5 308	1.1 % of 5 462
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Lithuania	93.3 % of 5 928	+2.8 pts median 90.4 %	98.3 % of 5 524	+2.8 pts median 95.5 %	1.1 % of 5 369	0.6 % of 5 529
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Romania	87.9 % of 5 928	−2.5 pts median 90.4 %	98.0 % of 5 207	+2.5 pts median 95.5 %	1.2 % of 5 057	0.7 % of 5 212
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Finland	97.8 % of 5 928	+7.4 pts median 90.4 %	96.9 % of 5 795	+1.3 pts median 95.5 %	2.1 % of 5 635	0.9 % of 5 800
Select Emma WIESNER	Emma WIESNER	Sweden	78.1 % of 5 928	−12.4 pts median 90.4 %	93.1 % of 4 624	−2.4 pts median 95.5 %	5.8 % of 4 502	1.6 % of 4 628
Select Engin EROGLU	Engin EROGLU	Germany	92.2 % of 5 928	+1.8 pts median 90.4 %	79.1 % of 5 463	−16.4 pts median 95.5 %	19.9 % of 5 313	5.0 % of 5 468
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Romania	72.4 % of 5 928	−18.0 pts median 90.4 %	95.5 % of 4 291	−0.1 pts median 95.5 %	3.6 % of 4 177	1.8 % of 4 292
Select Fabienne KELLER	Fabienne KELLER	France	97.9 % of 5 928	+7.4 pts median 90.4 %	95.9 % of 5 798	+0.3 pts median 95.5 %	2.8 % of 5 639	1.0 % of 5 803
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Netherlands	98.6 % of 5 928	+8.2 pts median 90.4 %	97.1 % of 5 840	+1.6 pts median 95.5 %	1.9 % of 5 682	0.8 % of 5 845
Select Gilles BOYER	Gilles BOYER	France	99.5 % of 5 928	+9.1 pts median 90.4 %	95.3 % of 5 893	−0.2 pts median 95.5 %	3.3 % of 5 731	1.4 % of 5 898
Select Grégory ALLIONE	Grégory ALLIONE	France	85.7 % of 5 928	−4.7 pts median 90.4 %	95.6 % of 5 080	+0.1 pts median 95.5 %	3.1 % of 4 950	0.9 % of 5 081
Select Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER	Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER	Austria	84.0 % of 5 928	−6.4 pts median 90.4 %	96.7 % of 4 975	+1.2 pts median 95.5 %	2.1 % of 4 840	1.2 % of 4 980
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Belgium	96.9 % of 5 928	+6.4 pts median 90.4 %	96.5 % of 5 737	+1.0 pts median 95.5 %	2.7 % of 5 586	0.9 % of 5 742
Select Hristo PETROV	Hristo PETROV	Bulgaria	92.7 % of 5 928	+2.3 pts median 90.4 %	96.2 % of 5 493	+0.7 pts median 95.5 %	2.8 % of 5 344	1.4 % of 5 497
Select Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Bulgaria	92.6 % of 5 928	+2.2 pts median 90.4 %	97.7 % of 5 485	+2.2 pts median 95.5 %	1.5 % of 5 339	1.2 % of 5 490
Select Irena JOVEVA	Irena JOVEVA	Slovenia	94.5 % of 5 928	+4.0 pts median 90.4 %	92.2 % of 5 594	−3.3 pts median 95.5 %	6.8 % of 5 441	1.1 % of 5 599
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Latvia	76.7 % of 5 928	−13.8 pts median 90.4 %	94.1 % of 4 540	−1.4 pts median 95.5 %	5.0 % of 4 423	1.3 % of 4 544
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Germany	96.9 % of 5 928	+6.5 pts median 90.4 %	92.6 % of 5 741	−2.9 pts median 95.5 %	6.3 % of 5 592	2.1 % of 5 746
Select Jana TOOM	Jana TOOM	Estonia	85.7 % of 5 928	−4.7 pts median 90.4 %	96.7 % of 5 076	+1.2 pts median 95.5 %	2.3 % of 4 932	0.8 % of 5 081
Select Jeannette BALJEU	Jeannette BALJEU	Netherlands	87.9 % of 5 928	−2.5 pts median 90.4 %	92.3 % of 5 207	−3.3 pts median 95.5 %	6.5 % of 5 064	1.2 % of 5 211
Select Jérémy DECERLE	Jérémy DECERLE	France	85.7 % of 3 503	−4.8 pts median 90.4 %	95.2 % of 2 999	−0.3 pts median 95.5 %	3.5 % of 2 912	1.6 % of 3 001
Select Joachim STREIT	Joachim STREIT	Germany	83.9 % of 5 928	−6.6 pts median 90.4 %	77.5 % of 4 967	−18.0 pts median 95.5 %	21.6 % of 4 828	5.0 % of 4 972
Select João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO	João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO	Portugal	82.2 % of 5 928	−8.3 pts median 90.4 %	94.2 % of 4 867	−1.3 pts median 95.5 %	4.6 % of 4 739	2.9 % of 4 872
Select Karin KARLSBRO	Karin KARLSBRO	Sweden	97.3 % of 5 928	+6.9 pts median 90.4 %	93.9 % of 5 763	−1.6 pts median 95.5 %	4.9 % of 5 605	0.6 % of 5 768
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Finland	79.1 % of 5 928	−11.3 pts median 90.4 %	95.6 % of 4 687	+0.1 pts median 95.5 %	3.5 % of 4 577	0.9 % of 4 691
Select Laurence FARRENG	Laurence FARRENG	France	92.5 % of 5 928	+2.1 pts median 90.4 %	95.1 % of 5 479	−0.5 pts median 95.5 %	3.8 % of 5 327	0.9 % of 5 484
Select Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ	Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ	Slovakia	65.3 % of 5 928	−25.1 pts median 90.4 %	97.0 % of 3 867	+1.5 pts median 95.5 %	2.1 % of 3 766	1.2 % of 3 871
Select Lucia YAR	Lucia YAR	Slovakia	99.0 % of 5 928	+8.5 pts median 90.4 %	96.9 % of 5 863	+1.4 pts median 95.5 %	2.1 % of 5 705	1.2 % of 5 868
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Slovakia	93.8 % of 5 928	+3.3 pts median 90.4 %	96.9 % of 5 554	+1.4 pts median 95.5 %	2.0 % of 5 403	1.3 % of 5 559
Select Malik AZMANI	Malik AZMANI	Netherlands	98.9 % of 5 928	+8.5 pts median 90.4 %	92.3 % of 5 859	−3.2 pts median 95.5 %	6.5 % of 5 699	1.3 % of 5 864
Select Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Germany	81.0 % of 5 928	−9.4 pts median 90.4 %	92.6 % of 4 797	−2.9 pts median 95.5 %	5.9 % of 4 664	2.1 % of 4 802
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Slovenia	89.0 % of 5 928	−1.5 pts median 90.4 %	97.9 % of 5 270	+2.4 pts median 95.5 %	1.3 % of 5 120	0.6 % of 5 275

National delegations

The group’s current members by country and national party.

Country: the delegation. Members: the group’s current members from that country. National parties: their parties, with the number of members of each.
Country	Members	National parties
France	13	Ren 6 · MoDem 3 · Hor 2 · Sans parti 1 · UDI 1
Germany	9	FDP 5 · Freie Wähler 3 · PdF 1
Netherlands	7	VVD 4 · D66 3
Ireland	6	FF 4 · Ind. 2
Slovakia	6	PS 6
Belgium	5	MR 3 · Anders 1 · LesEng 1
Denmark	4	V 2 · B 1 · M 1
Bulgaria	3	PP-DB 2 · DPS 1
Finland	3	KESK 2 · SFP 1
Romania	3	USR 2 · PMP 1

Show all 21 delegations

Line on the final votes, 620

The group’s line on every final roll-call vote of the term, newest first, with its members counted in the group they sat in on the day.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.
Date	Vote	Majority line	In the group	Result
11 Mar 2026	Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 69 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained
11 Mar 2026	Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 54 for, 11 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 458 for, 103 against, 63 abstained
11 Mar 2026	Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 68 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 446 for, 100 against, 72 abstained
10 Mar 2026	The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 54 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 399 for, 78 against, 69 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 65 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 528 for, 21 against, 62 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 62 for, 1 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 460 for, 71 against, 88 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 66 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 602 for, 9 against, 8 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 62 for, 4 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 367 for, 166 against, 84 abstained
10 Mar 2026	European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 69 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 493 for, 92 against, 44 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 68 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 441 for, 105 against, 81 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Establishing an EU talent pool Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 62 for, 4 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 414 for, 182 against, 21 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 67 for, 1 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 498 for, 90 against, 28 abstained
24 Feb 2026	Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 65 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 437 for, 82 against, 70 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 54 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 363 for, 71 against, 81 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 59 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 340 for, 141 against, 68 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 39 for, 18 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 332 for, 209 against, 33 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 48 for, 3 against, 12 abstained	Adopted 385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 63 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 555 for, 0 against, 26 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 60 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 502 for, 2 against, 59 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 62 for, 1 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 524 for, 3 against, 41 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 63 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 514 for, 3 against, 56 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified cotton T304-40 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 29 for, 33 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 428 for, 156 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 31 for, 35 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 463 for, 164 against, 21 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2) Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 31 for, 35 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 462 for, 169 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 33 for, 34 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 461 for, 169 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	EU strategic defence and security partnerships Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 57 for, 1 against, 10 abstained	Adopted 440 for, 119 against, 85 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 63 for, 1 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 552 for, 24 against, 75 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Amending the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 66 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 490 for, 130 against, 32 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/006 BE/Audi – Belgium Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 62 for, 5 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 593 for, 55 against, 9 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/792 establishing the Ukraine Facility Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 66 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 473 for, 140 against, 32 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the Ukraine Support Loan for 2026 and 2027 Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 66 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 458 for, 140 against, 44 abstained
10 Feb 2026	European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 66 for, 1 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 443 for, 71 against, 117 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Framework for achieving climate neutrality Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 65 for, 2 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 413 for, 226 against, 12 abstained
10 Feb 2026	European Union designs (codification) Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 68 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 613 for, 5 against, 29 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 68 for, 1 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 483 for, 102 against, 67 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Amending the Measuring Instruments Directive Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 69 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 594 for, 25 against, 23 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Amending regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 65 for, 4 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 625 for, 15 against, 11 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 16 for, 33 against, 18 abstained	Adopted 396 for, 226 against, 30 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Abstained · no clear line	In the group: 23 for, 3 against, 41 abstained	Adopted 408 for, 184 against, 60 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 62 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 385 for, 165 against, 35 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 63 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 562 for, 9 against, 57 abstained
22 Jan 2026	European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 64 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 471 for, 68 against, 71 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 62 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 318 for, 247 against, 67 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 63 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 483 for, 68 against, 76 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Conviction and imminent sentencing of Jimmy Lai in Hong Kong Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 64 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 503 for, 9 against, 100 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Case of Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 64 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 582 for, 0 against, 35 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Motion of censure on the Commission Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against	In the group: 2 for, 59 against, 2 abstained	Rejected 165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained
21 Jan 2026	Addressing impunity through EU sanctions, including the EU Global Human Rights sanctions regime (so-called ‘EU Magnitsky Act’) Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 67 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 440 for, 127 against, 59 abstained
21 Jan 2026	Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 68 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 421 for, 120 against, 108 abstained
21 Jan 2026	Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 69 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 395 for, 197 against, 70 abstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

Connections

Top partners and the committees where the group’s cohesion is lowest or highest.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/renew?period=term&vpage=5
Official source: Political groups, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: members and their memberships
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Renew Europe (Renew)”. Political group. code Renew. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/renew?period=term&vpage=5 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Political groups, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/show-current?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-group-renew,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Renew Europe (Renew)}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/renew?period=term&vpage=5}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/renew?period=term&vpage=5},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Political group. code Renew. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}