Group

EPP

European People’s Party

Seats: 184 of 718 current members
Cohesion, final votes: 0.91ⓘ over 620 final votes
Cohesion, all roll calls: 0.89ⓘ over 5 922 of 5 928 roll calls (enough members voting)
On the winning side: 565 of 619ⓘ final votes decided by a simple majority where its clear line matched the outcome — of 620 final votes, 1 failed for want of an absolute majority and is not counted

More facts (6)

Official name: European People’s Party
Code: PPE
Alignment: Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism
Founded: 1953 (as Christian Democratic Group)
Closest line: Renew — 97 % of 553 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 36 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Official name: European People’s Party
Code: PPE
Alignment: Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism
Founded: 1953 (as Christian Democratic Group)
Closest line: Renew — 97 % of 553 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 36 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Cite this page

Link to this page

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index of the group on final roll-call votes, per quarter (1 = all voted the same way). Members counted in their group on the day; a vote counts for the group when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted, and a gap is a quarter with fewer than 20 votes counted. The other groups are the faint lines.

EPP: 0.91 over the whole period (620 votes), 0.86 in Q4 2024 and 0.89 in Q3 2026.

Data as a table

Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
Period	EPP	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	ECR	Patriots	ESN
Q3 2024	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—8 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes
Q4 2024	0.8657 votes	0.8157 votes	0.9457 votes	0.9657 votes	0.8357 votes	0.7457 votes	0.7457 votes	0.8757 votes
Q1 2025	0.9230 votes	0.7130 votes	0.9330 votes	0.9730 votes	0.9130 votes	0.7330 votes	0.7630 votes	0.8130 votes
Q2 2025	0.9384 votes	0.7884 votes	0.9384 votes	0.9484 votes	0.9584 votes	0.7184 votes	0.7184 votes	0.8784 votes
Q3 2025	0.9458 votes	0.7658 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9358 votes	0.8258 votes	0.7258 votes	0.8558 votes
Q4 2025	0.88121 votes	0.84121 votes	0.95121 votes	0.94121 votes	0.86121 votes	0.78121 votes	0.73121 votes	0.87121 votes
Q1 2026	0.9189 votes	0.7588 votes	0.8989 votes	0.9489 votes	0.8689 votes	0.7589 votes	0.7189 votes	0.8689 votes
Q2 2026	0.94100 votes	0.7599 votes	0.9299 votes	0.9599 votes	0.92100 votes	0.76100 votes	0.7299 votes	0.8299 votes
Q3 2026	0.8972 votes	0.7572 votes	0.9172 votes	0.9372 votes	0.8672 votes	0.7572 votes	0.6772 votes	0.8772 votes
Whole period	0.91	0.77	0.93	0.94	0.89	0.76	0.72	0.85
Votes considered	620	618	619	619	619	620	619	619

620 of 794 decisions of the term had a final vote recorded by name; those are the votes counted. A gap: fewer than 20 votes counted in the quarter (method). Cohesion of every group.

Cohesion by committee and topic

The group’s Agreement Index over the term’s roll calls, by the dossier’s lead committee and by topic. Topics are model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked).

By lead committee (25)

Lead committee: the committee that led the dossier. Votes: the term’s roll calls on its dossiers. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Lead committee	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign AffairsAFET	639	0.88
BudgetsBUDG	375	0.91
Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI	337	0.75
Budgetary ControlCONT	323	0.91
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE	323	0.86
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM	287	0.67
Economic and Monetary AffairsECON	249	0.95
International TradeINTA	203	0.93
Legal AffairsJURI	195	0.97
Employment and Social AffairsEMPL	193	0.84
Industry, Research and EnergyITRE	175	0.91
Housing Crisis (special committee)HOUS	154	0.95
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO	122	0.95
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI	87	0.80
European Democracy Shield (special committee)EUDS	85	0.94
Constitutional AffairsAFCO	70	0.79
FisheriesPECH	65	0.83
PetitionsPETI	61	0.92
Security and DefenceSEDE	49	0.92
DevelopmentDEVE	44	0.79
Culture and EducationCULT	28	0.94
Public HealthSANT	23	0.85
Regional DevelopmentREGI	11	—
Transport and TourismTRAN	8	—
LEGILEGI	2	—

By topic (model-assigned) (15)

Topic: model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked). Votes: the term’s roll calls on decisions with that topic. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Topic	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign affairs	2 136	0.89
Economy & single market	1 257	0.93
EU budget & funds	1 092	0.91
Defence & security	703	0.93
Justice, rule of law & rights	610	0.89
Jobs, social affairs & equality	606	0.76
Climate & environment	519	0.83
Agriculture, food & fisheries	364	0.80
Digital, AI & data	297	0.94
EU institutions & Parliament	292	0.89
Trade & customs	269	0.92
Health	260	0.74
Migration & asylum	122	0.90
Energy	92	0.90
Transport & tourism	84	0.87

Agreement with other groups

How often the group took the same line as each other group on the term’s final votes, groups at the date of each vote.

Same line: of the votes compared, the share where the two groups’ clear lines were the same. Votes compared: final votes where both groups had a clear line (at least two thirds of their votes cast, at least 10 members voting); a vote where either was divided is left out. A count instead of a share under 20 votes.
Group	Same line	Votes compared
Renew	97 %	553
S&D	91 %	571
Greens	81 %	557
ECR	78 %	472
The Left	53 %	468
Patriots	50 %	449
ESN	26 %	555

Agreement between every pair of groups, winning sides and pivotal groups

Members, 197

Members whose group is EPP now (former members: on their last day in office), with their record. Switchers are marked ⇄ and counted in the group of each vote’s date.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Open in the member register

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members of EPP
Select	Member, sort Z to A	Country, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Letizia MORATTI	Letizia MORATTI	Italy	71.3 % of 5 928	−18.6 pts median 89.9 %	93.7 % of 4 228	+0.1 pts median 93.6 %	4.4 % of 4 027	1.9 % of 4 228
Select Lídia PEREIRA	Lídia PEREIRA	Portugal	89.9 % of 5 928	±0.0 pts median 89.9 %	94.7 % of 5 330	+1.1 pts median 93.6 %	3.5 % of 5 061	3.6 % of 5 330
Select Liesbet SOMMEN	Liesbet SOMMEN	Belgium	95.8 % of 5 928	+5.9 pts median 89.9 %	94.3 % of 5 679	+0.7 pts median 93.6 %	4.3 % of 5 410	1.7 % of 5 679
Select Liudas MAŽYLIS	Liudas MAŽYLIS	Lithuania	99.6 % of 5 503	+9.7 pts median 89.9 %	97.0 % of 5 479	+3.3 pts median 93.6 %	1.1 % of 5 225	2.1 % of 5 479
Select Loránt VINCZE	Loránt VINCZE	Romania	87.1 % of 5 928	−2.8 pts median 89.9 %	89.9 % of 5 162	−3.7 pts median 93.6 %	8.1 % of 4 935	2.5 % of 5 162
Select Loucas FOURLAS	Loucas FOURLAS	Cyprus	65.7 % of 5 928	−24.3 pts median 89.9 %	90.2 % of 3 892	−3.5 pts median 93.6 %	7.7 % of 3 708	3.7 % of 3 892
Select Luděk NIEDERMAYER	Luděk NIEDERMAYER	Czechia	96.0 % of 5 928	+6.1 pts median 89.9 %	90.1 % of 5 690	−3.5 pts median 93.6 %	8.7 % of 5 414	6.6 % of 5 690
Select Lukas MANDL	Lukas MANDL	Austria	89.6 % of 5 928	−0.4 pts median 89.9 %	93.2 % of 5 309	−0.5 pts median 93.6 %	4.4 % of 5 051	2.7 % of 5 309
Select Łukasz KOHUT	Łukasz KOHUT	Poland	96.8 % of 5 928	+6.9 pts median 89.9 %	91.6 % of 5 740	−2.0 pts median 93.6 %	6.1 % of 5 464	2.2 % of 5 740
Select Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Poland	93.1 % of 5 928	+3.2 pts median 89.9 %	92.0 % of 5 521	−1.6 pts median 93.6 %	5.6 % of 5 257	1.9 % of 5 521
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	Germany	78.5 % of 5 928	−11.4 pts median 89.9 %	99.1 % of 4 654	+5.5 pts median 93.6 %	0.4 % of 4 516	0.4 % of 4 654
Select Manuela RIPA	Manuela RIPA	Germany	87.9 % of 5 928	−2.0 pts median 89.9 %	83.5 % of 5 211	−10.1 pts median 93.6 %	15.5 % of 4 985	3.9 % of 5 211
Select Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	Spain	94.7 % of 5 928	+4.8 pts median 89.9 %	93.8 % of 5 615	+0.2 pts median 93.6 %	3.9 % of 5 350	2.8 % of 5 615
Select Marco FALCONE	Marco FALCONE	Italy	90.1 % of 5 928	+0.2 pts median 89.9 %	94.2 % of 5 343	+0.6 pts median 93.6 %	4.3 % of 5 095	2.7 % of 5 343
Select Maria WALSH	Maria WALSH	Ireland	80.1 % of 5 928	−9.8 pts median 89.9 %	90.1 % of 4 750	−3.5 pts median 93.6 %	8.8 % of 4 516	2.4 % of 4 750
Select Marie-Sophie CHRIST	Marie-Sophie CHRIST	Germany	95.5 % of 1 683	+5.6 pts median 89.9 %	97.1 % of 1 608	+3.5 pts median 93.6 %	1.9 % of 1 546	1.6 % of 1 608
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	Germany	97.5 % of 5 928	+7.5 pts median 89.9 %	98.0 % of 5 777	+4.4 pts median 93.6 %	1.1 % of 5 497	0.9 % of 5 777
Select Markus FERBER	Markus FERBER	Germany	95.1 % of 5 928	+5.2 pts median 89.9 %	96.8 % of 5 639	+3.2 pts median 93.6 %	1.7 % of 5 375	1.1 % of 5 639
Select Marta WCISŁO	Marta WCISŁO	Poland	95.3 % of 5 928	+5.4 pts median 89.9 %	90.6 % of 5 652	−3.1 pts median 93.6 %	6.7 % of 5 378	2.3 % of 5 652
Select Martine KEMP	Martine KEMP	Luxembourg	88.5 % of 5 503	−1.4 pts median 89.9 %	96.0 % of 4 871	+2.3 pts median 93.6 %	2.3 % of 4 627	1.8 % of 4 871
Select Massimiliano SALINI	Massimiliano SALINI	Italy	98.5 % of 5 928	+8.6 pts median 89.9 %	90.3 % of 5 842	−3.3 pts median 93.6 %	7.8 % of 5 560	2.5 % of 5 842
Select Matej TONIN	Matej TONIN	Slovenia	98.6 % of 5 928	+8.7 pts median 89.9 %	90.2 % of 5 843	−3.4 pts median 93.6 %	7.4 % of 5 563	1.7 % of 5 843
Select Michael GAHLER	Michael GAHLER	Germany	94.5 % of 5 928	+4.6 pts median 89.9 %	98.0 % of 5 601	+4.4 pts median 93.6 %	1.2 % of 5 329	0.7 % of 5 601
Select Michał SZCZERBA	Michał SZCZERBA	Poland	97.5 % of 5 928	+7.6 pts median 89.9 %	90.8 % of 5 778	−2.9 pts median 93.6 %	6.9 % of 5 501	1.8 % of 5 778
Select Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Poland	90.9 % of 5 928	+1.0 pts median 89.9 %	91.9 % of 5 391	−1.7 pts median 93.6 %	5.6 % of 5 123	1.7 % of 5 391
Select Michalis HADJIPANTELA	Michalis HADJIPANTELA	Cyprus	87.4 % of 5 928	−2.5 pts median 89.9 %	91.5 % of 5 182	−2.1 pts median 93.6 %	6.8 % of 4 924	3.2 % of 5 182
Select Mika AALTOLA	Mika AALTOLA	Finland	83.0 % of 5 928	−6.9 pts median 89.9 %	97.8 % of 4 921	+4.2 pts median 93.6 %	1.2 % of 4 673	0.5 % of 4 921
Select Milan ZVER	Milan ZVER	Slovenia	90.1 % of 5 928	+0.2 pts median 89.9 %	80.1 % of 5 344	−13.5 pts median 93.6 %	17.3 % of 5 067	3.8 % of 5 344
Select Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Romania	78.8 % of 5 928	−11.2 pts median 89.9 %	98.2 % of 4 669	+4.6 pts median 93.6 %	0.6 % of 4 452	1.0 % of 4 669
Select Miriam LEXMANN	Miriam LEXMANN	Slovakia	90.3 % of 5 928	+0.4 pts median 89.9 %	76.9 % of 5 353	−16.7 pts median 93.6 %	20.8 % of 5 095	7.8 % of 5 353
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	Poland	89.4 % of 5 928	−0.5 pts median 89.9 %	91.5 % of 5 298	−2.1 pts median 93.6 %	6.0 % of 5 042	2.0 % of 5 298
Select Monika HOHLMEIER	Monika HOHLMEIER	Germany	79.6 % of 5 928	−10.3 pts median 89.9 %	96.5 % of 4 717	+2.9 pts median 93.6 %	2.3 % of 4 491	1.6 % of 4 717
Select Nadine MORANO	Nadine MORANO	France	88.5 % of 5 928	−1.4 pts median 89.9 %	73.8 % of 5 249	−19.8 pts median 93.6 %	24.8 % of 5 001	5.4 % of 5 249
Select Niclas HERBST	Niclas HERBST	Germany	95.9 % of 5 928	+6.0 pts median 89.9 %	97.4 % of 5 685	+3.7 pts median 93.6 %	1.7 % of 5 414	1.3 % of 5 685
Select Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE	Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE	Spain	89.0 % of 5 928	−1.0 pts median 89.9 %	93.2 % of 5 273	−0.4 pts median 93.6 %	4.3 % of 4 997	2.2 % of 5 273
Select Niels Flemming HANSEN	Niels Flemming HANSEN	Denmark	97.8 % of 5 928	+7.9 pts median 89.9 %	90.8 % of 5 800	−2.9 pts median 93.6 %	8.3 % of 5 520	2.4 % of 5 800
Select Niels GEUKING	Niels GEUKING	Germany	98.9 % of 5 928	+9.0 pts median 89.9 %	97.9 % of 5 865	+4.2 pts median 93.6 %	0.9 % of 5 599	1.6 % of 5 865
Select Nikolina BRNJAC	Nikolina BRNJAC	Croatia	70.5 % of 5 928	−19.4 pts median 89.9 %	92.7 % of 4 182	−0.9 pts median 93.6 %	5.4 % of 3 998	1.6 % of 4 182
Select Nina CARBERRY	Nina CARBERRY	Ireland	93.3 % of 5 928	+3.4 pts median 89.9 %	92.1 % of 5 532	−1.5 pts median 93.6 %	6.9 % of 5 275	2.1 % of 5 532
Select Norbert HERHAMMER	Norbert HERHAMMER	Germany	72.5 % of 891	−17.4 pts median 89.9 %	98.1 % of 646	+4.5 pts median 93.6 %	1.1 % of 614	0.8 % of 646
Select Norbert LINS	Norbert LINS	Germany	97.2 % of 5 928	+7.3 pts median 89.9 %	97.8 % of 5 764	+4.2 pts median 93.6 %	1.2 % of 5 482	0.9 % of 5 764
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	Germany	98.3 % of 5 928	+8.4 pts median 89.9 %	98.3 % of 5 830	+4.7 pts median 93.6 %	0.8 % of 5 548	0.8 % of 5 830
Select Ondřej KOLÁŘ	Ondřej KOLÁŘ	Czechia	95.5 % of 5 928	+5.6 pts median 89.9 %	89.6 % of 5 662	−4.1 pts median 93.6 %	9.0 % of 5 410	7.3 % of 5 662
Select Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA	Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA	Spain	92.3 % of 5 928	+2.4 pts median 89.9 %	93.6 % of 5 474	±0.0 pts median 93.6 %	4.1 % of 5 215	1.9 % of 5 474
Select Pascal ARIMONT	Pascal ARIMONT	Belgium	93.6 % of 5 928	+3.7 pts median 89.9 %	90.5 % of 5 550	−3.1 pts median 93.6 %	7.5 % of 5 284	4.1 % of 5 550
Select Paulius SAUDARGAS	Paulius SAUDARGAS	Lithuania	98.8 % of 5 928	+8.9 pts median 89.9 %	95.4 % of 5 856	+1.8 pts median 93.6 %	3.2 % of 5 588	1.8 % of 5 856
Select Paulo CUNHA	Paulo CUNHA	Portugal	97.7 % of 5 928	+7.8 pts median 89.9 %	95.1 % of 5 792	+1.5 pts median 93.6 %	3.2 % of 5 514	3.1 % of 5 792
Select Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL	Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL	Portugal	88.0 % of 5 928	−1.9 pts median 89.9 %	95.5 % of 5 219	+1.9 pts median 93.6 %	2.9 % of 4 954	2.8 % of 5 219
Select Pekka TOVERI	Pekka TOVERI	Finland	88.4 % of 5 928	−1.5 pts median 89.9 %	98.5 % of 5 241	+4.8 pts median 93.6 %	0.8 % of 5 000	0.6 % of 5 241
Select Peter AGIUS	Peter AGIUS	Malta	80.0 % of 5 928	−9.9 pts median 89.9 %	92.9 % of 4 743	−0.7 pts median 93.6 %	5.4 % of 4 534	3.3 % of 4 743

National delegations

The group’s current members by country and national party.

Country: the delegation. Members: the group’s current members from that country. National parties: their parties, with the number of members of each.
Country	Members	National parties
Germany	31	CDU 23 · CSU 6 · Familien-Partei DE 1 · ÖDP 1
Poland	23	KO 18 · PSL 2 · No party 3
Spain	22	PP 22
Romania	10	PNL 8 · UDMR 2
Italy	9	FI 8 · SVP 1
Greece	7	N.D. 7
Hungary	7	TISZA 7
Portugal	7	PSD 4 · AD 2 · CDS-PP 1
Bulgaria	6	GERB 4 · DSB 1 · SDS 1
Croatia	6	HDZ 6

Show all 27 delegations

Line on the final votes, 620

The group’s line on every final roll-call vote of the term, newest first, with its members counted in the group they sat in on the day.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.
Date	Vote	Majority line	In the group	Result
11 Mar 2026	Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 164 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained
11 Mar 2026	Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 155 for, 1 against, 7 abstained	Adopted 458 for, 103 against, 63 abstained
11 Mar 2026	Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 163 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 446 for, 100 against, 72 abstained
10 Mar 2026	The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 136 for, 1 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 399 for, 78 against, 69 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 161 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 528 for, 21 against, 62 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 151 for, 9 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 460 for, 71 against, 88 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 159 for, 5 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 602 for, 9 against, 8 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 147 for, 5 against, 8 abstained	Adopted 367 for, 166 against, 84 abstained
10 Mar 2026	European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 164 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 493 for, 92 against, 44 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 162 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 441 for, 105 against, 81 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Establishing an EU talent pool Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 148 for, 9 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 414 for, 182 against, 21 abstained
10 Mar 2026	Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 161 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 498 for, 90 against, 28 abstained
24 Feb 2026	Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 149 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 437 for, 82 against, 70 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 116 for, 4 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 363 for, 71 against, 81 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 93 for, 15 against, 24 abstained	Adopted 340 for, 141 against, 68 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 84 for, 39 against, 21 abstained	Adopted 332 for, 209 against, 33 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 129 for, 10 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 143 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 555 for, 0 against, 26 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 146 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 502 for, 2 against, 59 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 146 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 524 for, 3 against, 41 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 145 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 514 for, 3 against, 56 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified cotton T304-40 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 56 for, 100 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 428 for, 156 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 57 for, 106 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 463 for, 164 against, 21 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2) Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 56 for, 109 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 462 for, 169 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 54 for, 111 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 461 for, 169 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	EU strategic defence and security partnerships Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 164 for, 3 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 440 for, 119 against, 85 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 167 for, 0 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 552 for, 24 against, 75 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Amending the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 159 for, 6 against, 7 abstained	Adopted 490 for, 130 against, 32 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/006 BE/Audi – Belgium Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 171 for, 1 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 593 for, 55 against, 9 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/792 establishing the Ukraine Facility Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 158 for, 6 against, 7 abstained	Adopted 473 for, 140 against, 32 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the Ukraine Support Loan for 2026 and 2027 Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 159 for, 6 against, 7 abstained	Adopted 458 for, 140 against, 44 abstained
10 Feb 2026	European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 167 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 443 for, 71 against, 117 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Framework for achieving climate neutrality Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 107 for, 62 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 413 for, 226 against, 12 abstained
10 Feb 2026	European Union designs (codification) Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 176 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 613 for, 5 against, 29 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 170 for, 7 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 483 for, 102 against, 67 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Amending the Measuring Instruments Directive Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 174 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 594 for, 25 against, 23 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Amending regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 176 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 625 for, 15 against, 11 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 168 for, 8 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 396 for, 226 against, 30 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 167 for, 2 against, 7 abstained	Adopted 408 for, 184 against, 60 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 153 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 385 for, 165 against, 35 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 170 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 562 for, 9 against, 57 abstained
22 Jan 2026	European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 170 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 471 for, 68 against, 71 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 171 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 318 for, 247 against, 67 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 170 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 483 for, 68 against, 76 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Conviction and imminent sentencing of Jimmy Lai in Hong Kong Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 168 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 503 for, 9 against, 100 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Case of Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 170 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 582 for, 0 against, 35 abstained
22 Jan 2026	Motion of censure on the Commission Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against	In the group: 1 for, 159 against, 4 abstained	Rejected 165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained
21 Jan 2026	Addressing impunity through EU sanctions, including the EU Global Human Rights sanctions regime (so-called ‘EU Magnitsky Act’) Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 159 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 440 for, 127 against, 59 abstained
21 Jan 2026	Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 157 for, 5 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 421 for, 120 against, 108 abstained
21 Jan 2026	Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 163 for, 2 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 395 for, 197 against, 70 abstained

Connections

Top partners and the committees where the group’s cohesion is lowest or highest.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ppe?page=3&vall=all&vpage=5
Official source: Political groups, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: members and their memberships
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “European People’s Party (EPP)”. Political group. code PPE. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ppe?page=3&vall=all&vpage=5 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Political groups, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/show-current?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-group-ppe,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{European People’s Party (EPP)}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ppe?page=3&vall=all&vpage=5}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ppe?page=3&vall=all&vpage=5},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Political group. code PPE. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}