Greens · Group · EU Parl Watch Research

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index of the group on final roll-call votes, per quarter (1 = all voted the same way). Members counted in their group on the day; a vote counts for the group when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted, and a gap is a quarter with fewer than 20 votes counted. The other groups are the faint lines.

Greens: 0.93 over the whole period (619 votes), 0.94 in Q4 2024 and 0.91 in Q3 2026.

Data as a table

Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
Period	Greens	The Left	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN
Q3 2024	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—8 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes
Q4 2024	0.9457 votes	0.8157 votes	0.9657 votes	0.8357 votes	0.8657 votes	0.7457 votes	0.7457 votes	0.8757 votes
Q1 2025	0.9330 votes	0.7130 votes	0.9730 votes	0.9130 votes	0.9230 votes	0.7330 votes	0.7630 votes	0.8130 votes
Q2 2025	0.9384 votes	0.7884 votes	0.9484 votes	0.9584 votes	0.9384 votes	0.7184 votes	0.7184 votes	0.8784 votes
Q3 2025	0.9458 votes	0.7658 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9358 votes	0.9458 votes	0.8258 votes	0.7258 votes	0.8558 votes
Q4 2025	0.95121 votes	0.84121 votes	0.94121 votes	0.86121 votes	0.88121 votes	0.78121 votes	0.73121 votes	0.87121 votes
Q1 2026	0.8989 votes	0.7588 votes	0.9489 votes	0.8689 votes	0.9189 votes	0.7589 votes	0.7189 votes	0.8689 votes
Q2 2026	0.9299 votes	0.7599 votes	0.9599 votes	0.92100 votes	0.94100 votes	0.76100 votes	0.7299 votes	0.8299 votes
Q3 2026	0.9172 votes	0.7572 votes	0.9372 votes	0.8672 votes	0.8972 votes	0.7572 votes	0.6772 votes	0.8772 votes
Whole period	0.93	0.77	0.94	0.89	0.91	0.76	0.72	0.85
Votes considered	619	618	619	619	620	620	619	619

620 of 794 decisions of the term had a final vote recorded by name; those are the votes counted. A gap: fewer than 20 votes counted in the quarter (method). Cohesion of every group.

Cohesion by committee and topic

The group’s Agreement Index over the term’s roll calls, by the dossier’s lead committee and by topic. Topics are model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked).

By lead committee (25)

Lead committee: the committee that led the dossier. Votes: the term’s roll calls on its dossiers. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Lead committee	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign AffairsAFET	639	0.93
BudgetsBUDG	375	0.92
Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI	337	0.95
Budgetary ControlCONT	323	0.97
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE	323	0.96
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM	287	0.99
Economic and Monetary AffairsECON	249	0.92
International TradeINTA	203	0.88
Legal AffairsJURI	195	0.96
Employment and Social AffairsEMPL	193	0.98
Industry, Research and EnergyITRE	175	0.95
Housing Crisis (special committee)HOUS	154	0.96
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO	122	0.97
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI	87	0.96
European Democracy Shield (special committee)EUDS	85	0.95
Constitutional AffairsAFCO	70	0.98
FisheriesPECH	65	0.99
PetitionsPETI	61	0.95
Security and DefenceSEDE	49	0.85
DevelopmentDEVE	44	0.99
Culture and EducationCULT	28	0.97
Public HealthSANT	23	1.00
Regional DevelopmentREGI	11	—
Transport and TourismTRAN	8	—
LEGILEGI	2	—

By topic (model-assigned) (15)

Topic: model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked). Votes: the term’s roll calls on decisions with that topic. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Topic	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign affairs	2 136	0.91
Economy & single market	1 257	0.93
EU budget & funds	1 092	0.93
Defence & security	703	0.87
Justice, rule of law & rights	610	0.97
Jobs, social affairs & equality	606	0.99
Climate & environment	519	0.97
Agriculture, food & fisheries	364	0.93
Digital, AI & data	297	0.95
EU institutions & Parliament	292	0.97
Trade & customs	269	0.90
Health	260	0.96
Migration & asylum	122	0.96
Energy	92	0.98
Transport & tourism	84	0.98

Agreement with other groups

How often the group took the same line as each other group on the term’s final votes, groups at the date of each vote.

Same line: of the votes compared, the share where the two groups’ clear lines were the same. Votes compared: final votes where both groups had a clear line (at least two thirds of their votes cast, at least 10 members voting); a vote where either was divided is left out. A count instead of a share under 20 votes.
Group	Same line	Votes compared
S&D	90 %	593
Renew	87 %	549
EPP	81 %	557
The Left	74 %	491
ECR	63 %	496
Patriots	41 %	477
ESN	24 %	574

Agreement between every pair of groups, winning sides and pivotal groups

Members, 53

Members whose group is Greens now (former members: on their last day in office), with their record. Switchers are marked ⇄ and counted in the group of each vote’s date.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Open in the member register

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members of Greens
Select	Member, sort Z to A	Country, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Alexandra GEESE	Alexandra GEESE	Germany	89.9 % of 2 891	−5.2 pts median 95.1 %	98.3 % of 2 598	+1.0 pts median 97.2 %	1.0 % of 2 542	4.0 % of 2 598
Select Alice KUHNKE	Alice KUHNKE	Sweden	98.5 % of 2 891	+3.5 pts median 95.1 %	96.3 % of 2 849	−0.9 pts median 97.2 %	2.9 % of 2 787	4.5 % of 2 849
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Spain	84.3 % of 2 891	−10.8 pts median 95.1 %	88.0 % of 2 438	−9.3 pts median 97.2 %	10.9 % of 2 376	3.7 % of 2 438
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Germany	98.3 % of 2 891	+3.3 pts median 95.1 %	98.6 % of 2 843	+1.4 pts median 97.2 %	0.7 % of 2 781	4.2 % of 2 843
Select Anna STROLENBERG	Anna STROLENBERG	Netherlands	99.3 % of 2 891	+4.2 pts median 95.1 %	97.1 % of 2 870	−0.1 pts median 97.2 %	1.6 % of 2 807	4.3 % of 2 870
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Italy	91.9 % of 2 891	−3.2 pts median 95.1 %	92.2 % of 2 656	−5.0 pts median 97.2 %	6.7 % of 2 606	3.7 % of 2 656
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Netherlands	98.9 % of 2 891	+3.8 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 860	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.4 % of 2 798	3.7 % of 2 860
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Italy	89.9 % of 2 891	−5.2 pts median 95.1 %	91.8 % of 2 600	−5.4 pts median 97.2 %	7.2 % of 2 554	3.5 % of 2 600
Select Damian BOESELAGER	Damian BOESELAGER	Germany	97.5 % of 2 891	+2.4 pts median 95.1 %	96.8 % of 2 819	−0.4 pts median 97.2 %	1.8 % of 2 758	4.5 % of 2 819
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	98.7 % of 2 891	+3.6 pts median 95.1 %	98.2 % of 2 854	+0.9 pts median 97.2 %	0.9 % of 2 791	3.9 % of 2 854
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	97.1 % of 2 891	+2.0 pts median 95.1 %	94.2 % of 2 807	−3.0 pts median 97.2 %	4.8 % of 2 744	2.6 % of 2 807
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	90.8 % of 2 891	−4.3 pts median 95.1 %	91.4 % of 2 624	−5.8 pts median 97.2 %	7.6 % of 2 574	4.1 % of 2 624
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	92.0 % of 2 891	−3.1 pts median 95.1 %	98.9 % of 2 660	+1.6 pts median 97.2 %	0.6 % of 2 599	4.2 % of 2 660
Select Gordan BOSANAC	Gordan BOSANAC	Croatia	97.4 % of 2 891	+2.4 pts median 95.1 %	96.3 % of 2 817	−1.0 pts median 97.2 %	3.1 % of 2 755	4.4 % of 2 817
Select Hannah NEUMANN	Hannah NEUMANN	Germany	86.4 % of 2 891	−8.7 pts median 95.1 %	98.1 % of 2 497	+0.8 pts median 97.2 %	0.9 % of 2 438	4.2 % of 2 497
Select Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Italy	81.6 % of 2 891	−13.5 pts median 95.1 %	91.3 % of 2 360	−6.0 pts median 97.2 %	7.5 % of 2 311	3.6 % of 2 360
Select Isabella LÖVIN	Isabella LÖVIN	Sweden	99.6 % of 2 891	+4.5 pts median 95.1 %	96.5 % of 2 880	−0.7 pts median 97.2 %	2.8 % of 2 818	4.5 % of 2 880
Select Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Spain	91.6 % of 2 891	−3.5 pts median 95.1 %	89.2 % of 2 649	−8.0 pts median 97.2 %	9.8 % of 2 588	4.9 % of 2 649
Select Jutta PAULUS	Jutta PAULUS	Germany	87.7 % of 2 891	−7.4 pts median 95.1 %	98.5 % of 2 535	+1.3 pts median 97.2 %	0.8 % of 2 487	3.7 % of 2 535
Select Kai TEGETHOFF	Kai TEGETHOFF	Germany	99.7 % of 2 891	+4.6 pts median 95.1 %	97.3 % of 2 882	+0.1 pts median 97.2 %	1.5 % of 2 819	4.3 % of 2 882
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Germany	92.8 % of 2 891	−2.2 pts median 95.1 %	98.1 % of 2 684	+0.8 pts median 97.2 %	1.0 % of 2 626	3.5 % of 2 684
Select Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Netherlands	98.0 % of 2 891	+2.9 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 834	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.4 % of 2 772	3.9 % of 2 834
Select Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Denmark	96.4 % of 2 891	+1.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.4 % of 2 786	+0.2 pts median 97.2 %	1.9 % of 2 723	4.5 % of 2 786
Select Lena SCHILLING	Lena SCHILLING	Austria	97.1 % of 2 891	+2.0 pts median 95.1 %	97.5 % of 2 807	+0.2 pts median 97.2 %	1.7 % of 2 745	4.8 % of 2 807
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Italy	89.1 % of 2 891	−6.0 pts median 95.1 %	89.2 % of 2 575	−8.0 pts median 97.2 %	9.8 % of 2 517	5.8 % of 2 575
Select Majdouline SBAI	Majdouline SBAI	France	62.5 % of 2 891	−32.6 pts median 95.1 %	92.9 % of 1 807	−4.4 pts median 97.2 %	5.8 % of 1 761	2.9 % of 1 807
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Finland	70.7 % of 2 891	−24.4 pts median 95.1 %	99.4 % of 2 045	+2.1 pts median 97.2 %	0.1 % of 2 005	3.9 % of 2 045
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	France	95.3 % of 2 891	+0.2 pts median 95.1 %	93.4 % of 2 754	−3.9 pts median 97.2 %	5.6 % of 2 692	2.6 % of 2 754
Select Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Czechia	86.3 % of 2 891	−8.8 pts median 95.1 %	96.1 % of 2 495	−1.2 pts median 97.2 %	3.0 % of 2 440	4.7 % of 2 495
Select Martin HÄUSLING	Martin HÄUSLING	Germany	96.2 % of 2 891	+1.1 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 781	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.2 % of 2 721	4.8 % of 2 781
Select Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Latvia	97.3 % of 2 891	+2.2 pts median 95.1 %	93.6 % of 2 812	−3.7 pts median 97.2 %	5.3 % of 2 750	6.5 % of 2 812
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	France	92.9 % of 2 891	−2.1 pts median 95.1 %	93.9 % of 2 687	−3.4 pts median 97.2 %	5.1 % of 2 626	2.7 % of 2 687
Select Michael BLOSS	Michael BLOSS	Germany	97.0 % of 2 891	+1.9 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 803	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.2 % of 2 742	4.1 % of 2 803
Select Mounir SATOURI	Mounir SATOURI	France	98.2 % of 2 891	+3.1 pts median 95.1 %	93.7 % of 2 840	−3.5 pts median 97.2 %	5.3 % of 2 779	2.7 % of 2 840
Select Nela RIEHL	Nela RIEHL	Germany	85.6 % of 2 891	−9.5 pts median 95.1 %	97.1 % of 2 474	−0.1 pts median 97.2 %	1.8 % of 2 427	4.1 % of 2 474
Select Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Romania	62.8 % of 2 891	−32.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.3 % of 1 815	+0.1 pts median 97.2 %	1.9 % of 1 776	3.3 % of 1 815
Select Pär HOLMGREN	Pär HOLMGREN	Sweden	99.7 % of 2 891	+4.6 pts median 95.1 %	96.7 % of 2 883	−0.6 pts median 97.2 %	2.6 % of 2 821	4.4 % of 2 883
Select Rasmus ANDRESEN	Rasmus ANDRESEN	Germany	89.8 % of 2 891	−5.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.8 % of 2 596	+0.5 pts median 97.2 %	1.5 % of 2 535	4.3 % of 2 596
Select Rasmus NORDQVIST	Rasmus NORDQVIST	Denmark	99.6 % of 2 891	+4.5 pts median 95.1 %	97.7 % of 2 879	+0.5 pts median 97.2 %	1.7 % of 2 816	4.6 % of 2 879
Select Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Netherlands	96.5 % of 2 891	+1.4 pts median 95.1 %	97.2 % of 2 789	±0.0 pts median 97.2 %	1.6 % of 2 730	4.3 % of 2 789
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Belgium	74.9 % of 2 891	−20.2 pts median 95.1 %	99.6 % of 2 164	+2.3 pts median 97.2 %	0.1 % of 2 118	3.2 % of 2 164
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Belgium	95.1 % of 2 891	±0.0 pts median 95.1 %	93.5 % of 2 749	−3.7 pts median 97.2 %	5.3 % of 2 688	3.6 % of 2 749
Select Sergey LAGODINSKY	Sergey LAGODINSKY	Germany	64.4 % of 2 891	−30.6 pts median 95.1 %	96.0 % of 1 863	−1.2 pts median 97.2 %	3.0 % of 1 827	5.2 % of 1 863
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Germany	87.9 % of 2 891	−7.2 pts median 95.1 %	98.7 % of 2 542	+1.5 pts median 97.2 %	0.6 % of 2 501	4.0 % of 2 542
Select Thomas WAITZ	Thomas WAITZ	Austria	90.8 % of 2 891	−4.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.6 % of 2 626	+0.3 pts median 97.2 %	1.6 % of 2 567	4.7 % of 2 626
Select Tilly METZ	Tilly METZ	Luxembourg	98.9 % of 2 891	+3.8 pts median 95.1 %	95.5 % of 2 860	−1.7 pts median 97.2 %	3.3 % of 2 798	3.5 % of 2 860
Select Tineke STRIK	Tineke STRIK	Netherlands	98.5 % of 2 891	+3.4 pts median 95.1 %	97.8 % of 2 847	+0.5 pts median 97.2 %	1.7 % of 2 784	3.8 % of 2 847
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Spain	82.6 % of 2 891	−12.5 pts median 95.1 %	88.4 % of 2 387	−8.8 pts median 97.2 %	10.6 % of 2 331	4.1 % of 2 387
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Finland	84.8 % of 2 891	−10.2 pts median 95.1 %	99.2 % of 2 453	+1.9 pts median 97.2 %	0.2 % of 2 393	3.5 % of 2 453
Select Villy SØVNDAL	Villy SØVNDAL	Denmark	94.7 % of 2 891	−0.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.7 % of 2 739	+0.4 pts median 97.2 %	1.9 % of 2 689	4.7 % of 2 739

National delegations

The group’s current members by country and national party.

Country: the delegation. Members: the group’s current members from that country. National parties: their parties, with the number of members of each.
Country	Members	National parties
Germany	15	GRÜNE. 12 · V 3
Netherlands	6	PRO 4 · Volt 2
France	5	Les Écologistes 5
Spain	4	BNG 1 · Catalunya en Comú 1 · Compromís 1 · ERC 1
Italy	4	E.Verde 2 · No party 2
Denmark	3	F 3
Sweden	3	MP 3
Austria	2	Die Grünen 2
Belgium	2	ECOLO 1 · GROEN 1
Finland	2	VIHR 2

Show all 17 delegations

Line on the final votes, 620

The group’s line on every final roll-call vote of the term, newest first, with its members counted in the group they sat in on the day.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.
Date	Vote	Majority line	In the group	Result
23 Oct 2024	Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 49 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained
23 Oct 2024	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 0 for, 49 against, 0 abstained	Rejected 233 for, 360 against, 59 abstained
22 Oct 2024	2022 discharge: EU general budget – European Council and Council Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 48 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 431 for, 131 against, 83 abstained
22 Oct 2024	Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2024/001 BE/Match-Smatch Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 51 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 601 for, 47 against, 17 abstained
22 Oct 2024	Draft amending budget No 4/2024: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to some decentralised agencies Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 51 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 522 for, 115 against, 25 abstained
22 Oct 2024	Draft amending budget No 2/2024: entering the surplus of the financial year 2023 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 51 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 531 for, 91 against, 35 abstained
22 Oct 2024	Establishing the Ukraine Loan Cooperation Mechanism and providing exceptional macro-financial assistance to Ukraine Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 518 for, 56 against, 61 abstained
10 Oct 2024	The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 540 for, 23 against, 47 abstained
9 Oct 2024	The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 50 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 495 for, 73 against, 86 abstained
9 Oct 2024	Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 51 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 508 for, 53 against, 104 abstained
8 Oct 2024	Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Italy, Slovenia, Austria, Greece and France further to natural disasters that occurred in 2023 Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 632 for, 7 against, 3 abstained
19 Sept 2024	Situation in Venezuela Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 0 for, 47 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 309 for, 201 against, 12 abstained
19 Sept 2024	Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 41 for, 5 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 425 for, 131 against, 63 abstained
19 Sept 2024	The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 0 for, 46 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 380 for, 182 against, 51 abstained
19 Sept 2024	EU/USA Agreement on the launch of Galileo satellites from U.S. Territory Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 48 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 582 for, 16 against, 17 abstained
19 Sept 2024	The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 549 for, 21 against, 37 abstained
19 Sept 2024	The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 565 for, 8 against, 43 abstained
18 Sept 2024	Maximum residue levels for cyproconazole Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 522 for, 127 against, 28 abstained
18 Sept 2024	Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 516 for, 129 against, 27 abstained
17 Jul 2024	The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 41 for, 3 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 495 for, 137 against, 47 abstained

Show all 20 votes on this page

Connections

Top partners and the committees where the group’s cohesion is lowest or highest.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/greens-efa?period=2025&vpage=13
Official source: Political groups, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: members and their memberships
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Greens / European Free Alliance (Greens)”. Political group. code Verts/ALE. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/greens-efa?period=2025&vpage=13 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Political groups, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/show-current?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-group-greens-efa,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Greens / European Free Alliance (Greens)}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/greens-efa?period=2025&vpage=13}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/greens-efa?period=2025&vpage=13},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Political group. code Verts/ALE. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}