Skip to content

Dossier · Own-initiative report

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

Reference
2025/2061(INI) Own-initiative report
Where it stands
Parliament adopted the text on 18 December 2025. This is its final position on the matter.
Stage
Parliament’s position
Lead committee
Budgets BUDG
More facts (6)
Authors
Jean-Marc GERMAIN, Monika HOHLMEIER
Shadow rapporteurs
10 members
Decisions in plenary
1
Versions
2 versions
Opinions from
LIBE

Where it stands

The steps of this kind of dossier and how far it has come, from the procedure file.

  1. Referred to committee (done) 13 March 2025
  2. Committee work (done) Report adopted 20 November 2025
  3. Tabled for plenary (done) 25 November 2025
  4. Plenary vote (done) Adopted 18 December 2025
  5. Parliament’s position (done) Final

Parliament sets out its own position on a topic. The resolution is not binding but signals what Parliament wants.

People

Committees and members responsible for the dossier, as the procedure file names them. Groups as recorded there.

Lead committee
Budgets BUDG
Authors
Jean-Marc GERMAIN (S&D), Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP)
Opinion: LIBE
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs · rapporteur Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ (EPP)

Decisions in plenary, 1

Every decision Parliament took on this dossier, newest first.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained, and how it was recorded.
DateDecisionKindEffectFinal vote
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime ResolutionsAdopted386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained by roll call

Voting grid

Export

Every roll-call vote on the dossier, in date and voting order, with each group's line at the date of the vote.

Each group's clear line at the date of the vote: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided; “< 10 voted” when fewer took part. Result: outcome, for–against–abstained (method).

  1. Rejected 178–393–13

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  2. Rejected 184–392–2

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  3. Rejected 173–393–13

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  4. Rejected 191–387–6

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  5. Rejected 184–390–8

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  6. Rejected 199–372–4

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  7. Rejected 179–396–9

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  8. Adopted 411–152–20

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  9. Adopted 414–152–20

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  10. Rejected 170–386–28

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  11. Rejected 183–388–10

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  12. Rejected 200–382–2

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  13. Rejected 197–378–7

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  14. Rejected 181–384–13

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  15. Rejected 187–377–16

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  16. Rejected 189–376–13

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  17. Adopted 386–184–15

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
Add members’ columns
The people on this dossier — pick up to 6. Each gets a column with their own position.

Versions, 2

The text of the dossier, version by version, newest first. Compare shows what changed between two consecutive versions.

  1. Adopted by Parliament18 Dec 2025

    Adopted text TA10-0343/2025 TA-10-2025-0343

    Compare with tabled for plenary

  2. Tabled for plenary25 Nov 2025

    Report A10-0240/2025 A-10-2025-0240

AI: Each version in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
  • Adopted text TA10-0343/2025: Parliament's resolution assesses the EU's rule of law conditionality regime, which links EU funding to respect for the rule of law. It finds implementation insufficient and calls for more consistent, transparent and timely application across all member states.
  • Report A10-0240/2025: Parliament's resolution assesses the implementation of the EU's rule of law conditionality regime, which links EU funding to respect for the rule of law. It finds the regime effective but underused, and calls for more consistent, transparent and timely application across all member states.

Report a problem

Committee opinions: Opinion (LIBE), Draft opinion (LIBE)

What changed, 1

Between consecutive versions, newest pair first. The overviews are written by AI from the two texts; the comparison shows every change.

  1. Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament Report A10-0240/2025 → Adopted text TA10-0343/2025

    No change of substance: the two versions differ only in presentation — cover page, numbering or the parts a report carries that the adopted text does not.

    Compare the two versions

Timeline, 10

Every recorded step, newest first, grouped by stage; the latest stage is open.

Plenary stage 4 steps · 25 Nov 2025–18 Dec 2025
  1. 18 December 2025

    Plenary vote

    Sitting of 18 Dec 2025 Report A10-0240/2025Adopted text TA10-0343/2025

  2. 17 December 2025

    Debated in plenary

    MEPs debated the text in the chamber ahead of the vote.

    Sitting of 17 Dec 2025 Report A10-0240/2025

  3. 9 December 2025

    17 amendments tabled for the plenary vote

    Groups propose changes to the tabled text; each is voted on before the final vote.

    Amendments 1–9Amendments 10–17

  4. 25 November 2025

    Report tabled for plenary

    This is the text all MEPs vote on. Political groups can still table amendments to it.

    Report A10-0240/2025

Committee stage 6 steps · 13 Mar 2025–20 Nov 2025
  1. 20 November 2025

    Committee vote: report adopted

    BUDG (Budgets) voted on the amendments and adopted the report that goes to plenary.

  2. 5 November 2025

    LIBE (Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs) adopted its opinion

    The opinion is attached to the report for the lead committee to consider.

    Opinion (LIBE)

  3. 19 September 2025

    Amendments tabled in committee

    Members of the committee proposed changes to the draft.

    CJ13-AM-776993

  4. 11 September 2025

    Draft opinion from LIBE (Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs)

    An associated committee gives its view to the lead committee.

    Draft opinion (LIBE)

  5. 10 July 2025

    Draft report published

    The rapporteur’s first text. Members can table amendments before the committee votes.

    CJ13-PR-774270

  6. 13 March 2025

    Referred to the BUDG (Budgets) committee

    The lead committee prepares the report; LIBE (Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs) gives an opinion.

Connections

Texts, decisions, people and other dossiers related to this one.

Texts voted on

Dossiers sharing a running issue

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime”. Dossier, 18 December 2025. procId 2025-2061, reference 2025/2061(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2061?grid=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Procedure file (Legislative Observatory, OEIL), https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025%2F2061(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/procedures/2025-2061 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-dossier-2025-2061,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2061?grid=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2061?grid=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Dossier. procId 2025-2061, reference 2025/2061(INI). Official source: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025\%2F2061(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record (CC BY 4.0)}
}