Dossier · Non-legislative procedure
Proposal for a Council decision determining, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded
- Reference
- 2018/0902(NLE) Non-legislative procedure
- Where it stands
- No recorded steps yet.
- Lead committee
- Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE
More facts (6)
- Rapporteurs
- Tineke STRIK, MEP #197531
- Shadow rapporteurs
- 14 members
- Decisions in plenary
- None yet
- Versions
- 1 version
- Opinions from
- AFCO
- Listed as
- 2018/0902R in the vote records
Where it stands
The steps of this kind of dossier and how far it has come, from the procedure file.
- Referred to committee (to come)
- Committee work (to come)
- Tabled for plenary (to come)
- Plenary vote (to come)
- Adopted by the Council (to come)
A decision the Council takes on its own. Depending on the Treaty article, Parliament either gives its consent — accepting or rejecting the text without amending it — or is consulted and gives an opinion.
People
Committees and members responsible for the dossier, as the procedure file names them. Groups as recorded there.
- Lead committee
- Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE
- Rapporteurs
- Tineke STRIK (Greens), MEP #197531 (Greens) former member
- Shadow rapporteurs
- MEP #124992 (The Left) former member, Jean-Paul GARRAUD (ID), MEP #197597 (ID) former member, Isabel WISELER-LIMA (EPP), Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ (EPP), MEP #197678 (S&D) former member, Krzysztof ŚMISZEK (S&D), András LÁSZLÓ (Patriots), Georgiana TEODORESCU (ECR), Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA (ECR), Sophie WILMÈS (Renew), MEP #134605 (Renew) former member, Konstantinos ARVANITIS (The Left), Milan UHRÍK (ESN)
- Opinion: AFCO
- Constitutional Affairs · rapporteur MEP #197507 (S&D) former member
Decisions in plenary, 0
Every decision Parliament took on this dossier, newest first.
No plenary decision on this dossier is in the records yet.
Every roll-call vote on the dossier, in date and voting order, with each group's line at the date of the vote.
Each group's clear line at the date of the vote: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided; “< 10 voted” when fewer took part. Result: outcome, for–against–abstained (method).
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 1
Rejected 184–441–15
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1
Rejected 186–447–11
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 9 to paragraph 2
Rejected 184–450–10
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 2
Adopted 408–213–23
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2
Rejected 182–446–15
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 11 to paragraph 4
Rejected 191–443–9
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 4
Adopted 422–199–24
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 12 to paragraph 7
Rejected 151–443–49
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- Divided
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 2 to paragraph 9
Rejected 225–415–10
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 13 to paragraph 10
Rejected 171–445–27
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- Divided
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 14 to paragraph 12
Rejected 194–439–8
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 15 to paragraph 13
Rejected 187–444–12
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 13
Adopted 425–171–46
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Divided
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 19
Adopted 445–188–11
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 22
Adopted 453–168–22
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 16 to paragraph 24
Rejected 177–451–15
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 24
Adopted 421–203–20
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 1
Adopted 418–183–29
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 2
Adopted 411–209–10
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 17 to paragraph 28
Rejected 163–450–31
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- Divided
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 28
Adopted 432–190–22
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 4 to recital E
Rejected 183–441–17
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after recital H
Rejected 182–447–13
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after recital J
Rejected 144–481–17
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- Divided
- ESN
- For
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital AK
Adopted 440–175–22
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital AP
Adopted 472–130–34
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Divided
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Abst.
- 25 Nov 2025 Recital BD — part 1
Adopted 419–180–30
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Recital BD — part 2
Adopted 416–202–12
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Recital BE — part 1
Adopted 421–178–33
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Recital BE — part 2
Adopted 408–209–11
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Recital BE — part 3
Adopted 411–207–14
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BF
Adopted 422–180–32
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BG
Adopted 418–158–55
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Divided
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Recital BH — part 1
Adopted 420–188–24
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Recital BH — part 2
Adopted 417–199–14
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BI
Adopted 418–160–51
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Divided
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Recital BJ — part 1
Adopted 413–189–32
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Recital BJ — part 2
Adopted 410–190–29
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BK
Adopted 418–190–26
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BP
Adopted 429–188–21
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 25 Nov 2025 Final vote — text as a whole
Adopted 415–193–28
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
Add members’ columns
Versions, 1
The text of the dossier, version by version, newest first. Compare shows what changed between two consecutive versions.
Adopted by Parliament12 Sept 2018
Adopted text TA8-0340/2018 TA-8-2018-0340
AI: Each version in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
- Adopted text TA8-0340/2018: Parliament adopted a resolution calling on the Council to determine, under Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded.
What changed
Between consecutive versions of the text, newest pair first.
No overview of what changed between versions is available for this dossier — fewer than two versions of its text are linked in the open data.
Timeline, 0
Every recorded step, newest first, grouped by stage; the latest stage is open.
No recorded steps yet.
Connections
Texts, decisions, people and other dossiers related to this one.
Texts voted on
Dossiers sharing a running issue
- Dossier Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response 2026/2607(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject 20 May 2026 Adopted
- Dossier The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025 2025/2239(INI) · Own-initiative report 29 Apr 2026 Adopted
- Dossier Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 2025/2135(INI) · Own-initiative report 29 Apr 2026 Adopted
- Dossier Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania 2026/2568(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject 22 Jan 2026 Adopted
- Dossier The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report 2024/2078(INI) · Own-initiative report 18 Jun 2025 Adopted
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 28 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded”. Dossier, 25 November 2025. procId 2018-0902R, reference 2018/0902R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2018-0902R?grid=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/procedures/2018-0902R (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-dossier-2018-0902r,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-11-25},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2018-0902R?grid=all}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2018-0902R?grid=all},
urldate = {2026-09-28},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Dossier. procId 2018-0902R, reference 2018/0902R. Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record (CC BY 4.0)}
}