Skip to content

Decision

Amendment of the EIB’s Statute

Effect
Passed
Result
510 for · 105 against · 27 abstained roll call
Date
14 November 2024, 11:27
Kind
New EU law · Consultation
More facts (8)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Joachim Streit
Topics
EU institutions & ParliamentEU budget & fundsEconomy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
170401
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 510 for, 105 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Passed by a large majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by Patriots and ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 15Against 10Abst. 16No vote 5 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.09
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 169Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 55Against 7Abst. 3No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 25Against 56Abst. 0No vote 5 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.54
ESNFor 0Against 18Abst. 2No vote 5 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
No groupFor 4Against 14Abst. 6No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 37

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria126020.50
Belgium175000.66
Bulgaria103040.65
Cyprus2103—
Czechia163020.76
Germany64201110.63
Denmark141000.90
Estonia5002—
Spain429270.69
Finland140011.00
France3431970.19
Greece113250.53
Croatia100021.00
Hungary181020.92
Ireland90320.63
Italy670270.96
Lithuania90110.85
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia6102—
Malta5001—
Netherlands246100.66
Poland435230.79
Portugal173100.71
Romania1911120.86
Sweden183000.79
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia103200.50

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

No plenary speech is linked to this dossier.

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the draft Council decision A10-0013/2024 – Joachim Streit – Draft Council decision Roll call510 for, 105 against, 27 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2024-0013

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The European Parliament approved the proposal to amend the Statute of the European Investment Bank (EIB), which aims to remove the statutory lending limit and replace the maximum 250% gearing ratio with a unanimous decision by the Board of Governors.

This decision means Parliament supports the change, allowing the EIB's governing bodies full authority over risk and leverage metrics, and it calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it departs from the approved text.

Parliament also asks the Council to consult it again if it intends to substantially amend the text, and it will forward its position to the Council, the Commission, the EIB, and national parliaments.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament approves the draft Council decision amending the EIB Statute, which replaces the statutory lending limit with a unanimous Board of Governors decision.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/0803(CNS) · Consultation procedure

Amendment of the EIB's Statute

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 14 March 2025 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 10 October 2024 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 6 November 2024 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 7 November 2024 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 14 November 2024 (done)
  5. Adopted by the Council · 14 March 2025 (done)

Lead committee: BUDG · Rapporteur: Joachim STREIT (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 10 connections: Running issue: European Investment Bank oversight · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: European Investment Bank oversight

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment of the EIB’s Statute”. Decision, 14 November 2024. votingId 170401, document A-10-2024-0013, reference 2024/0803(CNS). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-11-14/4 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 14 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-14-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 14 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-14-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-14, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-11-14/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-11-14-4,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment of the EIB’s Statute}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-11-14},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-11-14/4}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-11-14/4},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 170401, document A-10-2024-0013, reference 2024/0803(CNS). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-14-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-14-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-14 (CC BY 4.0)}
}