Skip to content

Decision

Hague Convention (1980) on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: accession of Cabo Verde

Effect
Passed
Result
659 for · 1 against · 1 abstained roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:03
Kind
New EU law · Consultation
More facts (8)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Ilhan Kyuchyuk
Topics
Foreign affairsJustice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
193543
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 659 for, 1 against, 1 abstained (roll call).

Passed by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 166Against 1Abst. 0No vote 18 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 26Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 1

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

  • EPP line For · 1 voted against of 167 who voted

    Voted against (1)

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria180021.00
Belgium210011.00
Bulgaria150021.00
Cyprus6000—
Czechia200011.00
Germany870091.00
Denmark150001.00
Estonia6001—
Spain560041.00
Finland140011.00
France770041.00
Greece200011.00
Croatia110011.00
Hungary151050.91
Ireland120021.00
Italy710051.00
Lithuania9002—
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia9000—
Malta5001—
Netherlands300011.00
Poland490130.97
Portugal190021.00
Romania260071.00
Sweden210001.00
Slovenia7002—
Slovakia140011.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote A10-0157/2026 – Ilhan Kyuchyuk – Proposal for a Council decision Roll call659 for, 1 against, 1 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0157

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The proposal authorises EU member states to accept, in the Union's interest, Cabo Verde's accession to the 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction.

Parliament approved the authorisation, meaning member states can now accept the accession, making the Convention effective in cases involving the EU and Cabo Verde.

Parliament forwards its position to the Council, the Commission, member states' governments and parliaments, and the Hague Conference's Permanent Bureau.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament approves the authorisation of Member States to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Cabo Verde to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of the International Child Abduction.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/0041(NLE) · Non-legislative procedure

Authorising Member States to accept, in the interests of the European Union, the accession of Cabo Verde to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 21 July 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 27 April 2026 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 3 June 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 8 June 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 17 June 2026 (done)
  5. Adopted by the Council · 21 July 2026 (done)

Lead committee: JURI · Rapporteur: Ilhan KYUCHYUK (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 4 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on JURI dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on JURI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on JURI dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Hague Convention (1980) on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: accession of Cabo Verde”. Decision, 17 June 2026. votingId 193543, document A-10-2026-0157, reference 2026/0041(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-17-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Hague Convention (1980) on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: accession of Cabo Verde}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 193543, document A-10-2026-0157, reference 2026/0041(NLE). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}