Decision
European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): access to VAT information at Union level
- Effect
- Passed
- Result
- 549 for · 33 against · 84 abstained roll call
- Date
- 17 June 2026, 14:03
- Kind
- New EU law · Consultation
More facts (8)
- Margin
- by an overwhelming majority
- Dossier
- 2025/0348(CNS)
- Source
- Committee report by Michalis Hadjipantela
- Topics
- Economy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
- Votes
- 1 vote · 1 roll call
- Sitting
- Wednesday 17 June 2026
- Final vote
- 193587
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 549 for, 33 against, 84 abstained (roll call).
Passed by an overwhelming majority.
Parliament adopted its position on the law.
Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by ESN; Patriots mostly abstained.
Groups
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Majority line | Clear line | Cohesion | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 43 | Against 0 | Abst. 1 | No vote 1 of 45 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.97 | |
| Greens | For 46 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 7 of 53 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| S&D | For 126 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 9 of 135 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| Renew | For 71 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 7 of 78 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| EPP | For 169 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 16 of 185 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| ECR | For 60 | Against 1 | Abst. 17 | No vote 4 of 82 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.65 | |
| Patriots | For 13 | Against 6 | Abst. 59 | No vote 7 of 85 | Majority line Abstained | Clear line Abstained | Cohesion 0.63 | |
| ESN | For 1 | Against 21 | Abst. 4 | No vote 1 of 27 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.71 | |
| No group | For 20 | Against 5 | Abst. 3 | No vote 1 of 29 | Majority line — | Clear line No line | Cohesion — |
Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.
Voted against their group, 43
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.
The Left line For · 1 abstained of 44 who voted
Abstained (1)
- João OLIVEIRA Portugal
ECR line For · 1 voted against, 17 abstained of 78 who voted
Voted against (1)
- Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA Poland
Abstained (17)
- Anna ZALEWSKA Poland
- Arkadiusz MULARCZYK Poland
- Beata SZYDŁO Poland
- Bogdan RZOŃCA Poland
- Daniel OBAJTEK Poland
- Dominik TARCZYŃSKI Poland
- Emmanouil FRAGKOS Greece
- Jacek OZDOBA Poland
- Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI Poland
- Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI Poland
- Maciej WĄSIK Poland
- Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA Poland
- Mariusz KAMIŃSKI Poland
- Marlena MALĄG Poland
- Patryk JAKI Poland
- Piotr MÜLLER Poland
- Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI Poland
Patriots line Abstained · 19 voted for or against of 78 who voted
Voted for or against (19)
- Afroditi LATINOPOULOU Greece
- Antonín STANĚK Czechia
- António TÂNGER CORRÊA Portugal
- Elisabeth DIERINGER Austria
- Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK Poland
- Georg MAYER Austria
- Gerald HAUSER Austria
- Harald VILIMSKY Austria
- Jana NAGYOVÁ Czechia
- Jaroslav BŽOCH Czechia
- Jaroslav KNOT Czechia
- Jaroslava POKORNÁ JERMANOVÁ Czechia
- Majbritt BIRKHOLM Denmark
- Ondřej KNOTEK Czechia
- Petra STEGER Austria
- Roman HAIDER Austria
- Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ Portugal
- Tomáš KUBÍN Czechia
- Tomasz BUCZEK Poland
ESN line Against · 1 voted for, 4 abstained of 26 who voted
Voted for (1)
- Marcin SYPNIEWSKI Poland
Abstained (4)
- Ivan DAVID Czechia
- Petras GRAŽULIS Lithuania
- Sarah KNAFO France
- Volker SCHNURRBUSCH Germany
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
Votes by country (27 delegations)
| Country | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 12 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0.50 |
| Belgium | 18 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.79 |
| Bulgaria | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0.70 |
| Cyprus | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Czechia | 17 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.78 |
| Germany | 74 | 13 | 1 | 8 | 0.76 |
| Denmark | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
| Estonia | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Spain | 50 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 0.82 |
| Finland | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 |
| France | 47 | 0 | 30 | 4 | 0.42 |
| Greece | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.78 |
| Croatia | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 |
| Hungary | 7 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 0.25 |
| Ireland | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.00 |
| Italy | 64 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 0.85 |
| Lithuania | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Luxembourg | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Latvia | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Malta | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Netherlands | 24 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0.70 |
| Poland | 31 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 0.43 |
| Portugal | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.93 |
| Romania | 27 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0.95 |
| Sweden | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
| Slovenia | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Slovakia | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0.79 |
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.
Debate speakers and how they voted
| Member | Group | Speeches | Spoke | Final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javi LÓPEZ Spain | S&D | Speeches1 | 17 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | No vote recorded |
| Michalis HADJIPANTELA Cyprus | EPP | Speeches1 | 17 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
All votes on this decision, 1
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Final vote A10-0159/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – Commission proposal to the Council | Roll call | 549 for, 33 against, 84 abstained Adopted |
Text
The text voted on.
AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament adopted its position on a proposed Council regulation that would give the European Public Prosecutor's Office and the European Anti-Fraud Office access to value added tax information at Union level.
The regulation aims to strengthen the fight against cross-border VAT fraud by establishing direct communication channels between Eurofisc and these two bodies.
Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended, adding safeguards on data protection, purpose limitation, and data minimisation.
It also calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly and asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text.
AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament's amended version of the proposed Council regulation gives the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) targeted, centralised access to VAT information, with safeguards to prevent untargeted searches and ensure data protection.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2025/0348(CNS) · Consultation procedure
Amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards the access of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) to value added tax information at Union level
Parliament gave its opinion on 17 June 2026. The Council takes the final decision.
Show the 5 steps of the dossier
- Referred to committee · 15 December 2025 (done)
- Committee work · Report adopted 3 June 2026 (done)
- Tabled for plenary · 8 June 2026 (done)
- Plenary vote · Adopted 17 June 2026 (done)
- Adopted by the Council (to come)
Lead committee: ECON · Rapporteur: Michalis HADJIPANTELA (EPP)
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
Show 2 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on ECON dossiers
Other decisions of the part-session on ECON dossiers
- Decision Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) New EU law · report by Tomáš Kubín 17 Jun 2026 Failed
- Decision General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products New EU law · report by Tomáš Kubín 17 Jun 2026 Passed
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): access to VAT information at Union level”. Decision, 17 June 2026. votingId 193587, document A-10-2026-0159, reference 2025/0348(CNS). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/5 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-17-5,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): access to VAT information at Union level}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-06-17},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/5}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/5},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 193587, document A-10-2026-0159, reference 2025/0348(CNS). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}