Skip to content

Decision

European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): access to VAT information at Union level

Effect
Passed
Result
549 for · 33 against · 84 abstained roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:03
Kind
New EU law · Consultation
More facts (8)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Michalis Hadjipantela
Topics
Economy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
193587
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 549 for, 33 against, 84 abstained (roll call).

Passed by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by ESN; Patriots mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 1No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 126Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 169Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 60Against 1Abst. 17No vote 4 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
PatriotsFor 13Against 6Abst. 59No vote 7 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.63
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 4No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
No groupFor 20Against 5Abst. 3No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 43

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria126020.50
Belgium180310.79
Bulgaria123020.70
Cyprus6000—
Czechia170310.78
Germany7413180.76
Denmark150001.00
Estonia6001—
Spain501630.82
Finland140011.00
France4703040.42
Greece172110.78
Croatia110011.00
Hungary71850.25
Ireland120021.00
Italy641650.85
Lithuania8012—
Luxembourg5010—
Latvia8010—
Malta5001—
Netherlands240610.70
Poland3131630.43
Portugal190110.93
Romania271050.95
Sweden210001.00
Slovenia7002—
Slovakia122010.79

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Michalis HADJIPANTELA CyprusEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote A10-0159/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – Commission proposal to the Council Roll call549 for, 33 against, 84 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0159

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its position on a proposed Council regulation that would give the European Public Prosecutor's Office and the European Anti-Fraud Office access to value added tax information at Union level.

The regulation aims to strengthen the fight against cross-border VAT fraud by establishing direct communication channels between Eurofisc and these two bodies.

Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended, adding safeguards on data protection, purpose limitation, and data minimisation.

It also calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly and asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's amended version of the proposed Council regulation gives the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) targeted, centralised access to VAT information, with safeguards to prevent untargeted searches and ensure data protection.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0348(CNS) · Consultation procedure

Amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards the access of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) to value added tax information at Union level

Parliament gave its opinion on 17 June 2026. The Council takes the final decision.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 15 December 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 3 June 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 8 June 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 17 June 2026 (done)
  5. Adopted by the Council (to come)

Lead committee: ECON · Rapporteur: Michalis HADJIPANTELA (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 2 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on ECON dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on ECON dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ECON dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): access to VAT information at Union level”. Decision, 17 June 2026. votingId 193587, document A-10-2026-0159, reference 2025/0348(CNS). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/5 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-17-5,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): access to VAT information at Union level}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/5}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-17/5},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 193587, document A-10-2026-0159, reference 2025/0348(CNS). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}