Skip to content

Decision

Discharge 2022: EU general budget – European Council and Council

Effect
Discharge decision adopted
Result
435 for · 92 against · 77 abstained roll call
Date
23 April 2024, 13:12–13:13
Kind
Budget decision
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Counts are for
the proposal for a discharge decision
Source
Committee report by Luke Ming Flanagan
Votes
6 votes · 6 roll calls · 1 amendment
Requested by
S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call) · ID (1 roll call, 1 split vote)
Final vote
168785
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 435 for, 92 against, 77 abstained (roll call).

Discharge decision adopted by a large majority.

Parliament voted on its discharge decision for this budget; whether discharge was granted, refused or postponed is set out in the report.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 adopted) and 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by Patriots and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
GroupForAgainstAbst.Majority lineClear lineBar
The LeftFor 5Against 4Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line Divided
GreensFor 28Against 1Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
S&DFor 58Against 0Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
RenewFor 38Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
EPPFor 78Against 0Abst. 3Majority line ForClear line For
ECRFor 0Against 4Abst. 20Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained
PatriotsFor 0Against 22Abst. 3Majority line AgainstClear line Against
ESNFor 0Against 4Abst. 0Majority line AgainstClear line Against
No groupFor 0Against 4Abst. 1Majority line AgainstClear line Against

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 604 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 6

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Proposal for a decision Roll call539 for, 26 against, 29 abstained Adopted
2Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 16 A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – After § 16 – Am 1 Roll call485 for, 83 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
3Paragraph 24 — part 1 A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 24/1 Part voted on: ‘Notes that the use of the unanimity voting procedure in the Council on certain policy areas can negatively affect the Union’s decision-making process and therefore making it prone to blackmailing by Member States, especially those who fail to respect the rule of law;’Roll call446 for, 143 against, 16 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ID; split: ID
Show the other 5 votesShow the other 3 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 16 A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – After § 16 – Am 1 Roll call485 for, 83 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
3Paragraph 24 — part 1 A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 24/1 Part voted on: ‘Notes that the use of the unanimity voting procedure in the Council on certain policy areas can negatively affect the Union’s decision-making process and therefore making it prone to blackmailing by Member States, especially those who fail to respect the rule of law;’Roll call446 for, 143 against, 16 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ID; split: ID
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 24 — part 2 A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 24/2 Part voted on: “calls on the Council to apply the qualified majority voting procedures whenever provided by the Treaties;”Roll call420 for, 155 against, 20 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ID; split: ID
5Paragraph 24 — part 3 A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 24/3 Part voted on: “notes that a shift to a qualified majority voting procedure in the Council may be one avenue towards more efficient policy-making;”Roll call392 for, 172 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ID; split: ID
6Final vote — text as a whole A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Motion for a resolution Roll call435 for, 92 against, 77 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by S&D, Renew, ID · split votes by ID.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-9-2024-0071

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament postpones its decision on granting discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council for the 2022 budget, citing the Council's continued refusal to cooperate in the discharge procedure.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2023/2131(DEC) · Discharge procedure

2022 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 10 October 2024 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 12 September 2023 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 30 September 2024 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 3 October 2024 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 22 October 2024 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: CONT · Rapporteurs: Jonas SJÖSTEDT (The Left), Luke Ming FLANAGAN (The Left)

Other decisions on this dossier

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Discharge 2022: EU general budget – European Council and Council”. Decision, 23 April 2024. votingId 168785, document A-9-2024-0071, reference 2023/2131(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-23/25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 April 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 April 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-04-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-04-23/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-04-23-25,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Discharge 2022: EU general budget – European Council and Council}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-04-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-23/25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-23/25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 168785, document A-9-2024-0071, reference 2023/2131(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-04-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}