Skip to content

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Manfred WEBER and Manon AUBRY52.2 %2 3304 46550.9 %

Where they differed, 2 135

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteManfred WEBERManon AUBRY
1 Apr 2025 Request for urgent procedure Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsForAgainst
31 Mar 2025 Tuesday's agenda — Request by the The Left Group Tuesday's agenda – Request by the The Left GroupAgainstFor
31 Mar 2025 Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Recital H — part 2 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 26 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 25 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Final vote — text as a whole White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainst
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after recital T White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 32, adding text after recital P White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 25, adding text after recital J White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 24, adding text after recital E White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 22, adding text after recital E White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 99 to recital A White paper on the future of European defenceForAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 74 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 74 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 19 to paragraph 74 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 1 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Paragraph 70 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceForAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Paragraph 70 — part 1 White paper on the future of European defenceForAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 69 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 69 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Paragraph 69 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainst
12 Mar 2025 Paragraph 69 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceForAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Paragraph 69 — part 1 White paper on the future of European defenceForAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 68 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 68 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 68 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainst
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 14 to paragraph 68 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 66 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 64 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 1 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 61 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 58 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Paragraph 58 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainst
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 62 to paragraph 58 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 57 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 56 White paper on the future of European defenceAbstainedFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 61 to paragraph 54 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 52 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainst
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 103 to paragraph 46 — part 1 White paper on the future of European defenceForAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Paragraph 44 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainst
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 101 to paragraph 39 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstAbstained
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 11 to paragraph 37 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 100 to paragraph 34 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainst
12 Mar 2025 Paragraph 29 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainst
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 105, adding text after paragraph 22 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainst
12 Mar 2025 Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 22 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstFor

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}