Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 29 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · FR Remove
The members, 2
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 1
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA | 34.1 % | 1 341 | 3 933 | 37.1 % |
Where they differed, 2 592
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Manfred WEBER | Jordan BARDELLA |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2025 Amendment 482 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Against | For |
| 22 Oct 2025 Amendment 655 — part 2 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against |
| 22 Oct 2025 Amendment 390 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Against | Abstained |
| 21 Oct 2025 Referral back to committee Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group | For | Abstained |
| 21 Oct 2025 Final vote Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group | For | Abstained |
| 21 Oct 2025 Amendment 17 to recital 2 Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group | Against | For |
| 21 Oct 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations | For | Against |
| 21 Oct 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement General Data Protection Regulation: additional procedural rules relating to the enforcement of the Regulation | For | Abstained |
| 21 Oct 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals | For | Against |
| 21 Oct 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals Agency | For | Abstained |
| 21 Oct 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicals | For | Against |
| 21 Oct 2025 10-11 November Parliament’s calendar of part-sessions – 2027 | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Second World Summit for Social Development | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 — part 2 Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 — part 1 Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 3 to recital B Second World Summit for Social Development | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 Second World Summit for Social Development | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 13 Second World Summit for Social Development | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 13 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social Development | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 6 to paragraph 13 Second World Summit for Social Development | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social Development | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 2 to paragraph 9 Second World Summit for Social Development | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 5 to paragraph 5 Second World Summit for Social Development | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 4 — part 2 Second World Summit for Social Development | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 4 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social Development | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 1 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social Development | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 1 Second World Summit for Social Development | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after recital A United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 33 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 1 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 9 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 6 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 6 to recital I Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 5 to recital C Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 10 to paragraph 8 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 8 to paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 15 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024 | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024 | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Establishment and functioning of European Works Councils - effective enforcement | For | Against |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-29
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 29 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 29 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-29 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 29 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-29}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-29},
urldate = {2026-09-29},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}