Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Abstentions Count as a positionIgnore (for and against only) ⓘ

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA34.1 %1 3413 93337.1 %

Where they differed, 2 592

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteManfred WEBERJordan BARDELLA
25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 24 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 16 to paragraph 24 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 22 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 19 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 13 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 15 to paragraph 13 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 14 to paragraph 12 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 13 to paragraph 10 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 12 to paragraph 7 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 4 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 11 to paragraph 4 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)ForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Proposal to reject the text European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)AgainstFor
24 Nov 2025 Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups — Ukraine (resolution) Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups – Ukraine (resolution)ForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital Z Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital H Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Recital D — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 87 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 78 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 74 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 72 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 71 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 71 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 29 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 3 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 4 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Final vote Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)ForAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 104 to recital 18 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 86, adding text after recital 7 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 103, adding text after recital 3 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 84 to recital 2 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 83, adding text after recital 1 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 82, adding text after recital 1 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 102 to Article 72 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 93, adding text after Article 45 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 92 to Article 45 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Agreement on Digital Trade between the European Union and the Republic of SingaporeAgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Final vote Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association ProcessForAgainst

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 30 Sept 2026, 03:27 UTC (data stamp 772c7b2d0380, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30 (retrieved 30 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-30,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}