Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 27 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · IE Remove
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · FR Remove
The members, 3
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · Ireland
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 3
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry ANDREWS and Manfred WEBER | 81.1 % | 3 266 | 4 025 | 81.6 % |
| Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA | 26.5 % | 1 108 | 4 184 | 29.2 % |
| Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA | 34.1 % | 1 341 | 3 933 | 37.1 % |
Where they differed, 3 683
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Barry ANDREWS | Manfred WEBER | Jordan BARDELLA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2026 Amendment 92 to recital 15 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | Abstained |
| 17 Jun 2026 Amendment 91, adding text after Recital 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | Abstained |
| 17 Jun 2026 Amendment 90, adding text after Recital 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | Against |
| 17 Jun 2026 Amendment 89 to recital 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | Against |
| 17 Jun 2026 Amendments 67 + 70 (voted as one) to Article 20 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | Against | For | Abstained |
| 17 Jun 2026 Amendments 60 + 61 (voted as one) to Article 16 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | Against | For | For |
| 17 Jun 2026 Amendment 96 to Article 12, after paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | Against |
| 17 Jun 2026 Amendment 95 to Article 12, paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | Against |
| 17 Jun 2026 Amendment 94 to Article 12, after paragraph 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | Against |
| 17 Jun 2026 Final vote on the motion for a resolution EU–Liberia Voluntary Partnership Agreement on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products: termination (Resolution) | For | For | Abstained |
| 17 Jun 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) | Against | For | For |
| 17 Jun 2026 Proposal to vote on amendments Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) | For | Against | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 8 to recital AJ Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Recital AC — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Separate vote on recital U Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 6 to recital Q Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Recital G — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | For | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Paragraph 15 — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Abstained | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Paragraph 11 — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 1 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Role of trade in strengthening the EU’s economic security | For | For | Abstained |
| 16 Jun 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 41 Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values | For | Against | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Final vote — text as a whole European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 2 to recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 22 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Against | Against | Abstained |
| 16 Jun 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 21 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 14 to paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | For | For | Abstained |
| 16 Jun 2026 Proposal to vote on amendments Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | Against | Against | For |
| 16 Jun 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America | For | For | Against |
| 16 Jun 2026 Proposal to vote on amendments Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America | Against | Against | For |
| 15 Jun 2026 Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI | No vote recorded | Against | For |
| 21 May 2026 Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) to recital F The need to reduce work-related fatalities | Against | No vote recorded | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 27 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC (data stamp e994c83b5003, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 27 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 27 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-27 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-27,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 27 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-27}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-27},
urldate = {2026-09-27},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}