Skip to content

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 1 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 3

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 3

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Barry ANDREWS and Manfred WEBER81.1 %3 2664 02581.6 %
Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA26.5 %1 1084 18429.2 %
Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA34.1 %1 3413 93337.1 %

Where they differed, 3 683

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteBarry ANDREWSManfred WEBERJordan BARDELLA
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 3 to recital B Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 13 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 13 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedForAbstained
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 6 to paragraph 13 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 2 to paragraph 9 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedForAbstained
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 5 to paragraph 5 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 4 — part 2 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 4 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedForAbstained
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 1 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after recital A United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedAgainstAbstained
9 Oct 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 33 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedForAbstained
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 1 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Paragraph 9 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 6 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedAgainstAbstained
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedAgainstAbstained
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureNo vote recordedAgainstAbstained
9 Oct 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 6 to recital I Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 5 to recital C Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 10 to paragraph 8 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 8 to paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 15 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024No vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024No vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Establishment and functioning of European Works Councils - effective enforcementNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Amendment 81 Establishment and functioning of European Works Councils - effective enforcementNo vote recordedAgainstFor
9 Oct 2025 Recital D — part 2 Humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in CabaretNo vote recordedForAgainst
9 Oct 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionNo vote recordedAgainstAbstained
9 Oct 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionNo vote recordedAgainstFor
6 Oct 2025 Tuesday’s Agenda — Request by The Left Group Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupForAgainstAgainst
6 Oct 2025 Tuesday’s Agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupForAgainstAgainst
11 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionForForAbstained
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 25 to paragraph 30 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstAgainstFor
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 26 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionForAgainstAgainst
11 Sept 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 25 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionForForAgainst
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 24 to paragraph 25 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstAgainstFor
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 17 to paragraph 24 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForFor
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 13 to paragraph 20 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForFor
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForFor
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 10 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionForAgainstAgainst
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 8 to paragraph 9 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForFor

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 1 Oct 2026, 03:37 UTC (data stamp 7669c786bb14, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 1 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-01 (retrieved 1 October 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-10-01,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 1 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-01}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-01},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}