Skip to content

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 2 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 3

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 3

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Barry ANDREWS and Manfred WEBER81.1 %3 2664 02581.6 %
Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA26.5 %1 1084 18429.2 %
Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA34.1 %1 3413 93337.1 %

Where they differed, 3 683

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteBarry ANDREWSManfred WEBERJordan BARDELLA
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 28 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 17 to paragraph 28 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 24 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 16 to paragraph 24 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 22 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 19 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 13 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 15 to paragraph 13 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 14 to paragraph 12 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 13 to paragraph 10 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 12 to paragraph 7 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 4 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedForForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 11 to paragraph 4 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)ForForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Proposal to reject the text European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)AgainstAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Decision to maintain the action Decision to maintain the action before the Court of Justice for the annulment of the decision of the Commission on the withdrawal of the Standard essential patents proposalForNo vote recordedAgainst
24 Nov 2025 Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Gaza Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – GazaForAgainstAgainst
24 Nov 2025 Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups — Ukraine (resolution) Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups – Ukraine (resolution)No vote recordedForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital Z Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedAgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital H Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedAgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Recital D — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 87 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedAgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 78 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 74 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 72 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 71 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedAgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 71 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 29 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedAgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAgainst
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 3 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedForAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedAgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 4 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedAgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025No vote recordedAgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Final vote Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)No vote recordedForAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 104 to recital 18 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)No vote recordedAgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 86, adding text after recital 7 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)No vote recordedAgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 103, adding text after recital 3 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)No vote recordedAgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 84 to recital 2 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)No vote recordedAgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 83, adding text after recital 1 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)No vote recordedAgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 82, adding text after recital 1 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)No vote recordedAgainstAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Amendment 102 to Article 72 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)No vote recordedAgainstAbstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 2 Oct 2026, 03:37 UTC (data stamp 343d33dd3e67, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 2 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-02 (retrieved 2 October 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-10-02,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 2 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-02}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-02},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}