Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 2 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · IE Remove
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · FR Remove
The members, 3
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · Ireland
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 3
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry ANDREWS and Manfred WEBER | 81.1 % | 3 266 | 4 025 | 81.6 % |
| Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA | 26.5 % | 1 108 | 4 184 | 29.2 % |
| Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA | 34.1 % | 1 341 | 3 933 | 37.1 % |
Where they differed, 3 683
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Barry ANDREWS | Manfred WEBER | Jordan BARDELLA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 17 — part 3 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 | For | No vote recorded | Against |
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 17 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 | For | No vote recorded | Against |
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 17 — part 1 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 14 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 | For | No vote recorded | Against |
| 27 Nov 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after recital J Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | Against | No vote recorded | For |
| 27 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 259 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 258 — part 4 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 258 — part 3 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 258 — part 2 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | For | No vote recorded | Against |
| 27 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 254 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | For | No vote recorded | Against |
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 252 — part 6 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | For | No vote recorded | Against |
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 252 — part 5 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 252 — part 3 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Paragraph 252 — part 2 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 244 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | Against | No vote recorded | For |
| 27 Nov 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 125 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | Against | No vote recorded | For |
| 27 Nov 2025 Final vote Harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of third countries interest representation | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Amendment 168 to Article 10, paragraph 2 Harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of third countries interest representation | Against | No vote recorded | For |
| 27 Nov 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani | For | No vote recorded | Against |
| 27 Nov 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 7 Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani | Against | No vote recorded | For |
| 27 Nov 2025 Final vote Amending Regulations on the Internal Market Information System (IMI) and on the single digital gateway as regards certain harmonisation requirements on transparency | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after recital D Escalating repression of the Baha’is in Iran | Against | No vote recorded | For |
| 27 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 2 Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 1 Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani | For | No vote recorded | Abstained |
| 27 Nov 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after recital D Escalating repression of the Baha’is in Iran | Against | No vote recorded | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara | For | For | Against |
| 26 Nov 2025 Recital J — part 2 Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons | For | Against | Against |
| 26 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons | For | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | Abstained |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 15 to paragraph 33 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | Abstained |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 32 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | For | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | For | Against | Against |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | For | Against | Against |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 11 to paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Paragraph 25 — part 2 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | For | For | Against |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 19 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | For | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | For | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 11 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 18 to paragraph 11 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | For | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | Abstained |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | For | Against | Abstained |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Against | Against | Abstained |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | For | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups | Against | For | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 1 Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups | For | Against | Against |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 28 Protection of minors online | Against | Against | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 1 Oct 2026, 03:37 UTC (data stamp 7669c786bb14, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 2 October 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 2 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-02 (retrieved 2 October 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-10-02,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 2 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-02}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-02},
urldate = {2026-10-02},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}